Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Home Made TLC plates

Dr.3vil - 11-6-2009 at 08:10

TLC plates are expensive, so, make your own.
giving credit where credit is due, original project by: allanf0


Attachment: Homemade TLC plates.pdf (473kB)
This file has been downloaded 15519 times

Paddywhacker - 12-6-2009 at 02:59

Thanks for that. Spreading looks to be the trickiest part ... getting an even thickness.

A really interesting web site too.

I wonder if silica flour from pottery supplies would work.

Siddy - 12-6-2009 at 06:03

Thats excellent, thanks for posting it.

One thing, it says for spotting "place a small drop", and has a pic of a pasture pipette putting a drop on the plate - that gives you a huge spot and large diameter that wont be accurate. so instead, heat the middle section of an empty pasture pipette in a hot Bunsen flame, as you do so apply stress longitudinally, feeling for when the glass gets soft. When it is sufficiently soft (experiment to find this point, usually very soon after glass is soft and bendy) withdraw from the flame and while each hand is on either end of the pipette separate your arms to there full length in one swift motion. After a little practice you should be making very thin capillaries, about 1m's worth with every pipette, cut them up into about 5-10cm pieces (score the outside of the capillary at 5-10cm intervals and then snap pieces off). They are reusable if you rinse them, which is tricky, but making them is so much fun why bother?

To use, dip the capillary into solution, wait for the solution to raise inside (few seconds, it wont go all the way up, just get a cm or 2), withdraw it and then lightly touch the end of the capillary on the plate to release the solution - be careful not to scrap plate - a very small volume of solution has been spotted onto the plate!

Most analytes do not absorb in visible region, so a UV lamb (with correct eye protection) is good to use, or dip the developed plate in vanillin and heat with a hair drier- some compounds make cool colors.

Dr.3vil - 13-6-2009 at 07:31

hmm, good point on the UV indicator. I have a set of lab quality silica plates with the florescent indicator, I wonder what It would take to incorporate the same function onto homemade plates. (project # 6241..:) there are several texts on TLC at my university library so I'll take a look next time I'm there.

As far as coating is concerned, yes, the uniformity of the layers is going to be an issue. perhaps there is a DIY method that could be developed. with a ball mill one should be able to get a fine enough grind which is key. Instucatables has a few DIY ball mills that can be fashioned from a power drill and HDPE bottle. Maybe take a look at commercial coating system and see if we could copy one...maybe ultrasonic agitation of the sullery?

Sedit - 13-6-2009 at 07:57

Would it be possible to turn this into a slip where the particals are suspended in the water so when the plates are put into it and the particals settle they will be in a perfectly even coating?

DJF90 - 13-6-2009 at 09:57

I was thinking of making a "jig", with a groove the width of a microscope slide, but very slightly deeper (aluminium, made using a milling machine". The "slip" could then be applied and a piece of aluminium or something drawn across the surface to produce replicable uniformity.

watson.fawkes - 13-6-2009 at 14:42

One of my first thoughts upon reading the project was about building a spin coating rig. You wouldn't need all the precision that's used in the semiconductor world, certainly. Likely a small-robot motor should be adequate.

DJF90 - 14-6-2009 at 06:43

That looks very nice. Couple of problems with that kinda rig:

> Hard to get replicable uniformity
>Will work rather badly using a rectangular substrate? In which case a circular disk should be used, meaning waste as you trim it to the proper shape.

But it is a very attractive idea and can't be that hard to set up :P

watson.fawkes - 14-6-2009 at 09:52

Quote: Originally posted by DJF90  
> Hard to get replicable uniformity
>Will work rather badly using a rectangular substrate?
Uniformity comes from consistency of the suspension, consistency of dispensing, and consistency of the rotational motion. Certainly you'd get consistency with a single batch of suspension, shaking the dispenser each time. Put down an excess of suspension in the center each time and it will spread to the edges, even the long ones, just fine. At question with a non-circular shape is how much suspension gets spun off. That matters little, as you can collect it and reuse it. As for consistency of speed, use a small microcontroller (like Arduino) and program in a consistent spinning cycle.

Dr.3vil - 14-6-2009 at 12:06

I think Watson is right on with the physical properties of the suspension. the quality and consistency of the material is 50% of the problem.

With regards to application, I think spin coating should be replaced by screen- print/Masking application. Spin coating is great for fluids of low viscosity, but will it be able to handle the thick slurry?.

A process whereas the substrate (microscope slide) is masked by a material of known thickness (plastic sheet maybe, several layers of tape). There is a hole in the mask according to desired width and height of the chromatogram. Absorbent/binder suspension is applied to the top of the mask and with a strait edge made level. allow to cure, remove mask, activate and use

sound like a plan?

watson.fawkes - 14-6-2009 at 13:24

Quote: Originally posted by Dr.3vil  
Spin coating is great for fluids of low viscosity, but will it be able to handle the thick slurry?
It works better with higher viscosity suspensions. The thickness of the coating depends on a ratio between viscosity (internal cohesive forces) and centrifugal force from the spinning. Higher viscosity liquids can be spun out with more control.

As aside: Centrifugal force is not fictitious, as often labeled. It is, however, frame dependent. When looking at the forces on the suspension, you're in the frame of reference of the liquid, not the spinner. From the point of view of the liquid, it experiences centrifugal force.

Dr.3vil - 14-6-2009 at 16:10

I don't have any experience with spin coating but I accept your reasoning. Looking back DJF90 mentioned a bit about milled aluminum templates, I could see that as being a viable means to build a spin coat rig. round rig with a cut-out for the substrate. It would be conceivable to have several rigs for various sizes of plates. time to build something i guess..:)

watson.fawkes - 14-6-2009 at 16:35

Quote: Originally posted by Dr.3vil  
DJF90 mentioned a bit about milled aluminum templates, I could see that as being a viable means to build a spin coat rig. round rig with a cut-out for the substrate.
Other ways of constructing the holder are bent-up tabs on all four sides (for, say, a microscope slide) or, alternately, four strips of brass silver-soldered to a face plate.

Eclectic - 14-6-2009 at 18:55

http://www.emdchemicals.com/lifescience/literature/061009_Ma...

http://www.sas.org/E-Bulletin/2003-04-18/labNotesAS/

http://books.google.com/books?id=ega5c11VHvkC&pg=PA821&a...

[Edited on 6-15-2009 by Eclectic]

Paddywhacker - 15-6-2009 at 17:07

There is a thread over on The Vespiary:-
http://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php/topic,33.0.html
on making microcrystalline cellulose. That substance might make a good TLC coating.

Eclectic - 15-6-2009 at 23:09

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3607777.html

Cloner - 22-9-2009 at 11:56

An even coating of TiO2 for dye sensitized solar cells has been made using the "doctor blading" technique. The substrate is a microscope slide. On either side, a straight ridge is formed by scotchtape in one or more layers. The gel is brought onto the substrate and then spread with the straight backside of a scalpel blade (but anything straight should do). Due to the tape, the area in the middle receives a very thin layer of suspension.

After heating, the resultant layer is very even in thickness. If it works for TiO2 then it should work for a gypsum/silica mixture just as well. The thickness can be controlled by the thickness of the tape layer.

Sedit - 8-2-2011 at 18:46

Im currently attempting to make some TLC plates out of clay and I wanted to know if there was any reason why I don't really see ceramic TLC plates on the market.

Is it because its simpler to prepair them with Silica and a binder, limitations in constructing them on a large scale or is there some chemical reason for not making them.

Im making mine from a clay slip, I mixed it well with water to make it runny then allowed it to settle a bit before decanting the finest of clay still in suspension. I then placed it on a piece of plaster board and tried a couple different methods. One I just poured onto the board and plan on trimming later on. The surface tension assures that there is an even coat along the entire surface. I also coated a microscope slide but im pretty sure this is going to curl up on drying making it worthless. The others I tried pouring the slip out and letting it set for a variety of times to setup and then placed microscope slides on top to prevent the issue of curling which is a result of shrinkage in the clay. The microscope slide should cause the water to be sucked out evenly instead of allowing evaporate which if uncovered would cause the edges to dry at different rate forcing it to curl and crack as it dries. When its done im going to fire them and hope they do not curl in the kiln as well.

What do you all think? Will they work as I expect or no?

smuv - 8-2-2011 at 22:39

Clay wouldn't be good. It contains mostly the oxides of silica and alumina. What you want is polymers/oligimers of silica which have some free OH groups. If you want a truly OTC way, find some clean sand, dissolve it in sodium hydroxide, filter, and prepare the silica gel from the sodium silicate solution you have made.

But let me say, I thought about making TLC plates for a long time, finally I broke down and just bought them. They are aluminum backed and have a short wave UV inidcator, I spent some money on them, but I don't regret it for a second. If you ration your plates, 20 sheets (standard box size) can give you hundreds of TLCs. Look around on ebay and you can get good deals.

If you are in the US I have a box of 20 glass backed alumina plates with a shortwave fluor (meant for prep TLC, but will be more than adequate for tracking reactions), I would sell them for 30 bucks + shipping (think twice though, aluminum backed plates are sooo much more convenient).


Sedit - 8-2-2011 at 23:44

Well after firing it would be a fine crystal structure of the oxides intermeshed with Mullite but im still not sure if that will make a difference because like you said already would pretty much be a charge zero complex and not have the OH needed.

The reason I want to make my own is to experiment with various imbeddings like you already mentioned such as the UV reactive ones or possibly imbedding things like Ferric chloride for amine detection and things of that nature. I would like the ability to play with various formulas for various projects and buying them just wouldn't have that same appeal all cost aside.

However I am considering your offer and you will recieve a PM from me tommorow. I want to play with the formulas but its always good to have a standard around for comparison.

smuv - 9-2-2011 at 01:07

Take your time. Really, if you want to get a glass cutter and practice on some glass panes before you commit to buying these, go for it.

Let me tall you a little more about these:
I bought them for $30 dollars from a vendor selling surplus lab stuff on ebay over a year ago. It was a box of 25 plates, 5 have been used. The plates are in good shape.The glass is about as thick as a quarter. Their dimensions are 20x20 cm; they are alumina coated, with a 254nm fluor and the stationary phase is 1000 microns thick.

Most standard TLC plates have ~250 micron stationary phase, these plates have a thicker stationary phase, for prep use. They will preform equally well as standard plates, again the only difference is they allow more product to be loaded before they start streaking/giving poor seperations. As an aside, for prep work you could purify of about 1-2g of material per plate (assuming 5mg per sq cm which is about the loading ceiling for a 1000u plate). Pics attached.

Also: I have never heard of adding ferric chloride for amine detection, but in the past in order to determine what spot is an amine, I have taken my TLC sample, and seperated an aliquot. This aliquot I treated with a tiny amount of HCL gas (taken by using a pipet to suck a couple of times some HCl vapor from the head-space of a conc. HCL bottle). Run the HCl treated and stock sample side by side. In the HCl treated sample the HCl salt will stay at baseline except in VERY polar solvent systems (eg neat methanol or water). So whatever spots are missing or have become very faint (from incomplete neutralization of the amine) when comparing the two samples are very likely amines (or compounds that could react with HCl...).


plate-1.png - 721kB plate-2.png - 605kB

[Edited on 2-9-2011 by smuv]

peach - 9-2-2011 at 06:44

This is a great thread!

I was thinking of spin coating as well. I've seen people doing it, not with TLC's but with other thin films, using a computer fan - which is easy to control and smooth running, and cheap, or free. I was also thinking, like Smuv says, that it's not such a bad thing if they're a bit thicker, since they can be useful for preparative. The PDF is very nice. Although yes, spotting with a pasteur, as it is, is likely going to make a mess. You can see in the last picture, the plate on the left is not the eluted plate on the right - which he does mention.

There is a thread going here which discusses spotting tools and gathering results with software.

The only drawback to DIY plates or column packing is the difficulty in comparing them with the Rf results you'll find quoted, which are all on standardised grain sizes, purities, layer thicknesses and uniform.

250 microns though... you can get a rough check of that with a cheapo micrometer.

If you had access to a microscope, you could have a peak at the grains through that. Alternatively, there are quite a few places online selling foot square swatches of micronic weave cloth - including stainless. Attach a big vibrating sex toy, and you've got a screen for the particle size.

I have posted a photo of it before, but I have made a little ball mill using Lego alone. The uses of Lego never end. It was simply a medicine bottle sat on top of some of the rubber wheels and driven by a motor. Marbles inside provided the grinding action. You will certainly want it running from a power supply, because it's going to be on for a looooooooong time to get it that finely divided and homogenised. Maybe go the whole hog and build a Lego spin coater whilst at the forge. You could use the MindStorm controllers to produce repeatable results.

For the price of the TLCs new, if you've got a micrometer and a bit of Lego handy, it's worth doing!

Try new micronic stainless weave bedding! Pressure cleaner friendly. I was going to suggest stockings, or silk, but those will probably deform too much and the stainless is going to have a better rating on it, as it's usually going into a filtration system of some sort to begin with.


[Edited on 9-2-2011 by peach]

Steve_hi - 27-2-2011 at 17:38

Here is a link for a youtube video by the home scintist, Author of
"Illustrated guide to home chemistry experiments" by Robert Bruce Thompson. Making home made TLC plates.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNDQkM3jasA

video # 24

peach - 28-2-2011 at 04:27

I think that's a commercially made TLC.

MIT has some very good videos on their site, free of charge and open to the public!

<iframe sandbox title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/e99nsCAsJrw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe sandbox title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ml58GCq078o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Chordate - 5-3-2011 at 12:30

Would anyone here want to some TLC plates? I know that making your own is cool, but I think I have a sealed box of 500 2x4 sillica on glass plates in a box somewhere. I could go looking for it if someone was interested, as i certainly don't need that many.

EDIT: thats 2 inch by 4inch, 5cmx10cm

[Edited on 5-3-2011 by Chordate]

Paddywhacker - 5-3-2011 at 19:44

What part of the world are you? Overseas shipment is probably not worth the hassle.

Chordate - 5-3-2011 at 23:46

In the states.

HexJam - 6-7-2011 at 15:43

Does anyone know what the UV reactive material is that they mix in? Or some suitably available substitute?

chemrox - 6-7-2011 at 16:18

Really good set of posts.. outstanding. I look for bargains on the commercially made ones but for slide sized I might try again. I didn't add enough binder to the last .. also filter paper has a virtue or two.

peach - 6-7-2011 at 19:16

I'm not sure what precisely is used on the commercial plates to make them glow, only that it's usually a 254nm fluorophor.

There are a number of alternatives to UV glows, alternatives which can be beneficial in that they will show specific functional groups, as opposed to anything that quenches the UV dye.

Have a look at these for some examples.

Here's curly arrow talking about vanillin stain.

And Hanessian's stain.

Very pretty!

HexJam - 6-7-2011 at 23:33

Hey, great links, thanks! I have some of those chemicals so I think I might have a go at doing some staining after I've made my plates.

I take it that a plate isn't reusable once you've used a stain on it though? (I've never done TLC before, excuse my noobness).

I was going to have a go trying to TLC an aspirin / paracetamol (acetaminophen) tablet to see if I could separate the two, a KMnO4 stain aught to do the trick on those right?

One last thing... I notice lots of TLC experiments use hexane as the solvent, which is proving difficult to get a hold of. Is there some common use/source of hexane I'm overlooking? If I use a different set of solvents is there some way/formula to convert the Rf values I'd calculate to the same kind of scale as the reference ones that use hexane/other solvents?


HexJam - 6-7-2011 at 23:45

Ah ha! Apparently the chemical they add to make it UV active is "... usually manganese-activated zinc silicate". This doesn't really help me much, but I thought I'd included it for completeness ;-)

(source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_layer_chromatography#Analy... )

[Edited on 7-7-2011 by HexJam]

peach - 7-7-2011 at 12:07

Funnily enough, manganese activated zinc SULPHIDE is what I've been trying to make for a while. It illuminates when exposed to electric fields. I think UV may make it glow as well, but haven't tried it myself.

Plates aren't really reusable, particularly once they've been stained.

Really, you don't even want your finger prints on the surface. So you should handle them by their sides and most definitely wear some gloves, or you'll end up ruining your kick ass results with contaminants.

If you look at this page on wiki, scroll down to the table of solvents and look in the none polar section for possible alternatives.

Hexane is used as an ideal none polar as it is incredibly simple in terms of functional groups (it has none) and has zero polarity to it. Cyclohexane is even better, since it doesn't even have ends to the molecule. Benzene used to be used, but has double bonds and is of coarse carcinogenic.

In answer to the calculating part, if you were planning to do preparative chromatography, to prepare a sizeable mass, I would recommend you instead give it a test yourself with your solvent mix and plates of choice.

[Edited on 7-7-2011 by peach]

not_important - 7-7-2011 at 12:12

Quote: Originally posted by HexJam  
Ah ha! Apparently the chemical they add to make it UV active is "... usually manganese-activated zinc silicate". This doesn't really help me much, but I thought I'd included it for completeness ;-)


AKA Willemite


smaerd - 15-8-2011 at 17:07

sorry to bump an old thread but I had a go at this and it works like a charm.

My only complaint is drawing on the plates must be done VERY gently. It is too easy to go through the solid-phase. Perhaps one of those chalk line markers(for marking wood) would be more ideal depending on the eluent of course.

edit - the silica I used was Sigma brand for column chromatography(too lazy to read off the size). The CaSO4 I used was from a brew-store(gypsum). Which was dehydrated in an oven for 1 hour at I believe 350*F to form the proper hydrate("plaster of paris").

Here are the results:

TLC.JPG - 40kB

A harmine/harmaline extraction, eluted with HEET(methanol) no other additives. My spotting was done very poorly and it was not fully developed, but this was my very first plate. A 5 and 3/4 inch pasteur pipet has a very small mouth that can be used instead of a thin capillary if one is VERY careful(which I obviously was not).

[Edited on 16-8-2011 by smaerd]

smaerd - 7-12-2012 at 15:23

So I've been trying to read up on making better TLC plates. Trying to think of better ways to get the silica onto microscope slides and I ran into this article saying some people use silicic acid rather then gypsum?

I don't know much about silicic acid or how to use it in this context I was wondering if anyone had any experience?


It also gives some pretty nice tips such as using methanol instead of water so the slurry can be stored rather then having to use it all and use it quick.

It also says that the freshly made plates should be tapped against a table gently to remove air-bubbles, which I didn't know was good practice. As well as air-drying prior to oven heating another mistake I've made in the past.

Another nice hint I've read about was wrapping two ends of a stir bar(kind of like a dumbell the width of a microscope slide) with masking tape or similar to the desired height(above a microscope slide) and rolling over the silica slurry to give an even uniform coating.

It's definitely a bit of an art, I'd like to hear more discussion and or experiences about.

Attachment: 061009_Making_TLC_Plates_from_Bulk_TLC_Silica_Gels.pdf (93kB)
This file has been downloaded 4386 times


Paddywhacker - 27-1-2013 at 02:01

Here is an interesting technique that I came across today, involving depositing the thin layer on the outside of a glass rod or test tube.

The only problem is that powder for making TLC media is pretty well unobtainable.

Attachment: test tube TLC.pdf (128kB)
This file has been downloaded 1319 times


watson.fawkes - 27-1-2013 at 08:58

Quote: Originally posted by Paddywhacker  
The only problem is that powder for making TLC media is pretty well unobtainable.
Unobtainable? Why do you think that?

smaerd - 27-1-2013 at 09:05

I bought a Kg of silica media for column chromatography for I think 40 USD on an auction site. Worked pretty good for TLC plate making and for column chromatography :).

Paddywhacker - 27-1-2013 at 11:28

Silica gel G?

The stuff for plates contains binder and a fluorophor, which shouldn't be in the stuff for columns, and different mesh sizes too.

Sure, silica flour can be had from the pottery suppliers, but it make muster.

watson.fawkes - 27-1-2013 at 13:32

Quote: Originally posted by Paddywhacker  
Silica gel G?

The stuff for plates contains binder and a fluorophor, which shouldn't be in the stuff for columns, and different mesh sizes too.
Silica gel (if you don't want to make it) is readily available as a desiccant. All it needs is crushing. The G is for gypsum (CaSO4), that is, plaster of paris. The F in silica gel GF is the fluorophore. Water tracing dyes are all fluorescent; they're used with portable black light lamps. Fluorescein, originally trade named Uranine (and still sold under that name), remains one of the most common such dyes.

Paddywhacker - 27-1-2013 at 15:54

I believe the best fluorophors are inorganic, but that isn't the problem. The problem is making a mixture that actually works for TLC, with reasonable adherence to the glass. I have tried but was never happy with the result. It was always a pathetic imitation of the real thing.

Column material is also another difficulty. In order to get uniform grain sizes of the right mesh size for reasonable flow rates it is necessary to mix the silica gel with water and a binder, let it set, then grind and sieve it. My formulations, using gypsum as the binder were always too fragile and crumbled to sub 200 mesh ... useless.

Grinding up up kitty litter is a better proposition than grinding up desiccant silica gel. Sure, there is plenty of that available, but I recon it to be too hard.

If anybody has actually cracked the formulation of these products then please post a photo essay in the prepublications forum.

watson.fawkes - 28-1-2013 at 05:17

Quote: Originally posted by Paddywhacker  
The problem is making a mixture that actually works for TLC, with reasonable adherence to the glass. I have tried but was never happy with the result. It was always a pathetic imitation of the real thing.
[...]
Grinding up up kitty litter is a better proposition than grinding up desiccant silica gel. Sure, there is plenty of that available, but I recon it to be too hard.

If anybody has actually cracked the formulation of these products then please post a photo essay in the prepublications forum.
At least we're out of the realm of "unobtainable" into "I didn't make it work".

The photo essay you're looking for is in the very first post of this thread. The author uses desiccant silica gel, although he did grind it with a ball mill.

Mailinmypocket - 12-2-2013 at 15:54

Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes  
Quote: Originally posted by Paddywhacker  
The problem is making a mixture that actually works for TLC, with reasonable adherence to the glass. I have tried but was never happy with the result. It was always a pathetic imitation of the real thing.
[...]
Grinding up up kitty litter is a better proposition than grinding up desiccant silica gel. Sure, there is plenty of that available, but I recon it to be too hard.

If anybody has actually cracked the formulation of these products then please post a photo essay in the prepublications forum.
At least we're out of the realm of "unobtainable" into "I didn't make it work".

The photo essay you're looking for is in the very first post of this thread. The author uses desiccant silica gel, although he did grind it with a ball mill.


I tried making plates today following the original process in the first post of this thread. It was a failure. I used silica gel desiccant beads, crushed to a very fine powder along with the plaster of paris in a 4:1 ratio. The plates were easy enough to coat, dried nicely and then oven dried. They looked great (for a first try anyways) but the layer wiped off with the touch of a finger, almost like a compact layer of talc- shit.

Before scrapping it all, a small dog of methylene blue was applied and the plate placed into some solvent. The solvent started to climb the plate quickly, but stopped because the phase immersed in solvent fell off. I'm thinking the only fix to this would be to try adding more calcium sulfate next time, any ideas? Has anyone tried the above prep with reasonable luck?

Attached photos...


image.jpg - 62kB image.jpg - 67kB

[Edited on 13-2-2013 by Mailinmypocket]

watson.fawkes - 12-2-2013 at 16:21

Quote: Originally posted by Mailinmypocket  
I tried making plates today following the original process in the first post of this thread. It was a failure. I used silica gel desiccant beads, crushed to a very fine powder along with the plaster of paris in a 4:1 ratio. The plates were easy enough to coat, dried nicely and then oven dried. They looked great (for a first try anyways) but the layer wiped off with the touch of a finger
What drying schedule did you use? Plaster of Paris starts to calcine at 100 &deg;C, which is easy to exceed in an oven.

Mailinmypocket - 12-2-2013 at 16:47

Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes  
Quote: Originally posted by Mailinmypocket  
I tried making plates today following the original process in the first post of this thread. It was a failure. I used silica gel desiccant beads, crushed to a very fine powder along with the plaster of paris in a 4:1 ratio. The plates were easy enough to coat, dried nicely and then oven dried. They looked great (for a first try anyways) but the layer wiped off with the touch of a finger
What drying schedule did you use? Plaster of Paris starts to calcine at 100 &deg;C, which is easy to exceed in an oven.


Ah... I think that might be the problem then. Calcining never occurred to me - I let the plates air-dry for an hour, and then oven dried as per the article, at 120c for 45 minutes.

The lowest my makeshift lab oven (toaster oven) goes is 90c, I have to try again and use a digital thermometer to monitor the T as I doubt the thermostat on a 19$ toaster oven is "lab grade", and if I'm going to crush more of those damned stubborn silica beads I want it to work.

[Edited on 13-2-2013 by Mailinmypocket]

Mailinmypocket - 15-8-2013 at 09:42

Has anyone had some reasonable luck in making TLC plates? Again I followed the OP's attached procedure without luck. I think it would be nice to make a visual guide on how to make them so that TLC can be available to more amateurs (Rf values might be hard to determine with the variable grain sizes but that's another issue).

I ground up more silica desiccant beads in a large mortar and pestle, this creates a lot of airborne dust that is dangerous to inhale, use a mask or do it outside. After about 10 minutes it was the consistency of talcum powder. Then the plaster was mixed in and ingredients were ground together for an additional 10 minutes. Then I followed the procedure but once the plates dried I baked them for an hour at only 90c to avoid calcining the plaster, which was a suspected problem in my last attempt.

Again, they came out fragile as hell. Not as much so as last time but the layer can easily be wiped off instead of blown off- I guess that's a small success. A dab of sharpie marker was placed on the plate, which removed some of the coating... Surprise surprise there! An attempt was made to elute with ethyl acetate and it did manage to carry some ink up with it but then the immersed portion of the plate started to disintegrate. Any ideas on how to improve this?

Looks like this...(the top of the plate is bare because I wiped it with a finger :S)


image.jpg - 86kB

watson.fawkes - 15-8-2013 at 10:22

Quote: Originally posted by Mailinmypocket  
Then I followed the procedure but once the plates dried I baked them for an hour at only 90c to avoid calcining the plaster, which was a suspected problem in my last attempt.
[...] Any ideas on how to improve this?
Given that you've got some adhesion now (rather than none), I'd guess you've still got a problem with the temperature of the TLC plate.

Since you're using a toaster oven, if there's a direct optical path to the heating elements, it's likely that the TLC plates surface is sitting at a temperature above 90 &deg;C because of radiative heat transfer. Think of the oven as a steady-state heat flow device, rather than a constant temperature device. The latter is what you want ideally, but the former is what you actually get. The easiest intervention is to make your actual oven more like an ideal oven.

Just putting a couple of layers of metal separated by an air gap will do a lot to even out the radiative inhomogeneities in your rig. (Incidentally, this is the insulation technique that the Webb space telescope uses to reject radiative heat load.) Put these layers between the heating element and your plates.

sonogashira - 15-8-2013 at 12:44

Maybe scratch the glass with sand paper?

smaerd - 15-8-2013 at 13:10

I'll do some experiments this weekend and report back. I did have some success but it wasn't anything too impressive. I could write on the plates if I was very gentle. I have a few ideas now that I've matured in my knowledge base and experimental technique a bit.

Mailinmypocket - 15-8-2013 at 13:26

The idea of shielding the plates from the direct heat might help, that never occurred to me. I will try that out as I still have some silica powder left. As for the sandpaper I'm not sure that is necessary... Etching might be an idea I could try via bifluoride or HF, but I'm not convinced that a rough surface is needed.

BTW, forgot to mention that the slides were cleaned in conc. ammonia, rinsed in dH2O and air dried prior to coating.

smaerd - 15-8-2013 at 13:43

Mailinmypocket. You're plates might be too thick. Ensure your gypsum is dehydrated before using it. An hour at 350*F-400*F should be okay more would probably be better. I've also read that using methanolic solutions of the slurry can allow it to be used/stored indefinitely rather then a one time 5 minute race before preparing more slurry.

I heard an old trick for making uniform thickness TLC plates is to take a glass stirring rod wrap a few layers of tape(uniformly) on both ends. Think a bar-bell. Then roll it over the microscope slide/glass-plate. I believe common thicknesses for stationary phases for TLC plates are 350-450uM? To me that sounds like one layer of tape above the height of the plate.

If you think about it from a surface point of view. If your plate is too thick the adhesion between the weekly bound silica particulates will be strong enough to disrupt and adhesion between the slide and the surface.

I also know that rinsing plates in pirhana solution is used in preparing 'lab on a chip' type applications when bonding PDMS. It works by oxidizing the surface. So an acetone rinse to remove oils, then DI to remove acetone, then hydrogen peroxide instead of ammonia sounds good to me. Or go in for the kill and prepare some dilute pirhana solution. Ammonia will de-protonate the silanols, which I'm not sure if that's advantageous for this. I'm not sure how long the deprotonation would hold up after rinsing in D.I. water anyways. It may take up available spots for hydrogen bonding thus weakening the surface cohesion.

Maybe I'm over thinking it. Either way I'll be joining you on this adventure this weekend, maybe by working together we can some up with something that works really well.

[Edited on 15-8-2013 by smaerd]

smaerd - 18-8-2013 at 12:37

So I kind of blew it with the applicator idea. One height of duct tape is not enough. The glass stir rod happily adhered to the slurry. Should have seen that one coming. Maybe a few layers of tape instead of one would be a lot better. Hard to say but 1 ply was way too thin.

The best plate I made today so far was the one without using any kind of spreader(1 out of 5). I did realize some of the issues however.

Lessons learned:
1) It appears imperative that the silica gel and microscope slides are oven dried thoroughly before application. A detail I likely missed on my last adventure.
2) dehydrating gypsum at 300*F(~150*C) for an hour works fine for dehydration.
3) Use a mortar and pestle and a razor blade to mix the plaster of paris into the silica gel. This is the only way I've found to get a uniform solid mixture.
4) Working fast is annoying. Hardly have time to stir the slurry before it sets. I think using a mixture of ethanol/methanol/isopropanol and water would give us a lot more time to lay the plates.
5) The amount of water in the slurry seems critical. This will be what defines the density of the colloid. Too much and it's too thick, too little and its useless. I shouldn't have deviated so much from the recommended 2x by weight, woops.
6) Air bubbles. Make sure you tap your plate(s) several times before letting them dry.

I'll try another experiment tomorrow using an alcoholic slurry.

[Edited on 18-8-2013 by smaerd]

this little publication has some information about alcohol slurries and making a simple applicator. good information base. Contains information about fluorophores and sorbents etc. -
http://85.238.144.18/lifescience/literature/061009_Making_TLC_Plates_from_Bulk_TLC_Silica_Gels.pdf

apparently polyvinyl alcohol can be used to make stronger plates rather then gypsum. That'd be interesting.

[Edited on 18-8-2013 by smaerd]

Ah-hah! Commercial plates use what is called a 'hard-layer' rather then a soft-layer(gypsum binder). The hard layer is a polymeric binder IE polyvinyl alcohol or similar... These plates will probably always be fragile. To be fair though I have had 'nice' layers. You just can't really write on them.

Reference: Handbook of Thin-Layer Chromatography By Sherma/Fried page 162 (see google books).

I'll give this a shot, polyvinyl alcohol is cheap especially considering it only requires 1-2% of the weight of the stationary phase. Probably has a more reasonable set time as well (heat activation not time).

[Edited on 18-8-2013 by smaerd]

[Edited on 18-8-2013 by smaerd]

IrC - 18-8-2013 at 23:42

This patent contains useful information related to depositing thin films on glass.

METHOD FOR DEPOSITING A THIN LAYER AND PRODUCT THUS OBTAINED

sonogashira - 29-8-2013 at 09:08

I've been experimenting with talc as a stationary phase with very good results. There are some good guides for the preparation of TLC plates using talc. I have never seen it mentioned as a stationary phase for chromatography in any book, but the results from a few trials that I have done using radial chromatography and small column chromatography have been very impressive, as are the reported separations in the papers attached (one of which is too big, and is therefore not attached, but is here: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed044p294). In fact it is the best paper, so I have uploaded it here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/8rha7a
The paper concerning porphyrin chromatography discusses the preparation of the plates (from a slurry with methanol) and the effectiveness of the separation. It's all very straightforward, and the results (in general) are sufficient for solvent selection purposes, at the very least. As mentioned in the papers, more favourable results than silica gel may be obtained for some systems, and it would likely serve as a good alternative to confirm the results from a silica system, in cases where alumina is not suitable (if you bother to do so, anyway!).
Attachment: Talc TLC plates.pdf (644kB)
This file has been downloaded 742 times

Attachment: Talc as a TLC adsorbent.pdf (108kB)
This file has been downloaded 1202 times

Attachment: Porphyrin TLC using talc.pdf (646kB)
This file has been downloaded 536 times



[Edited on 29-8-2013 by sonogashira]

Mailinmypocket - 29-8-2013 at 15:47

That is very interesting! Thanks for sharing!

Up until now (since smaerd's experiment results) I have been messing around with polyvinyl alcohol(PVA) and etched plates hoping for better adhesion. Had to put it on hold due to some pretty nasty burns from saturated ammonium bifluoride.... Just kidding! :P

Haven't had the time to experiment lately... Only had time to etch the plates and prepare the PVA solution. This method with methyl cellulose and talc intrigues me, I have methyl cellulose but no talc yet, have you any experience using unscented baby powder? Or have you only used pure talc powder?

sonogashira - 30-8-2013 at 01:16

I just used what I found in the bathroom. Imperial leather original talc. I mixed it with methanol (2 g talc to 3 ml methanol, stoppered and shaken for 1 minute in a 4 ml volumetric flask), poured onto a glass plate, and left it to dry overnight. The layer adheres to the glass when held vertically (and up side down), but I have been using horizontal development so far, just to test the resolution. To get a consistent thin (250 um) layer, the dipping method described in the porphyrin paper seems suitable, but I will get some pure talc before I try that. Hopefully I can remove commercially prepared plates from my shopping list entirely. The method that I described is amply suitable for solvent selection experiments using radial chromatography, though, and the results translate onto commercially prepared silica plates. It depends on one's intended use. I do more qualitative tests than quantitative. I am going to try to impregnate a piece of chromatography paper with talc, using a methanol suspension. I also bought some cab-o-sil fumed silica for this purpose, but I have a feeling that talc will better-adhere. Another paper on preparing talc TLC plates (using ethanol): http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02330381
I should mention that, in contrast to silica plates, talc does not need to be activated prior to using. It is debatable whether silica plates need activation, I suppose, but that's a different matter. A picture of one of the plates used either for radial chromatography or drop chromatography (10 cm diameter plate). This one was left nearest the window in my shed, so there are a few more minor ripples than on the others, which were almost entirely flat:

Picture.jpg - 36kB

[Edited on 31-8-2013 by sonogashira]

sonogashira - 31-8-2013 at 01:58

I could only find two samples to test. I was a little heavy-handed, but the resuls are good, regardless. There are two samples in the picture: the yellow one to the left is just-about visible, and the orange one was developed with two different solvents (IPA and ethyl acetate respectively, from left to right). I've scraped some of the talc off so that the uniform thickness may be seen, as well as the ease with which one may make clean edges due to the softness of the talc, especially compared with silica.

As mentioned above, this is common bathroom talc (scented!). I used 2 g of talc, 3 ml of methanol (giving 4 ml of talc-slurry), air-dried on a flat plate for only 30 minutes before spotting.

smaerd - 31-8-2013 at 06:35

I actually did find that the thinner the stationary phase on gypsum and silica plates the tougher it was so my hypothesis seems right.

I just got some poly vinyl alcohol in this week so I'll try and make some plates with it if I have time in the next coming days and report back.

sonogashira - 31-8-2013 at 08:46

I tried ascending chromatography on an aluminium-supported talc plate, and the part that was in the solvent (ethyl acetate) fell off. I don't know whether it's the talc or the solvent that was to blame, but a 'concentration zone' of diatomaceous earth would be advisable if using ascending chromatography with talc. The resolution was excellent, however, and the portion falling-off didn't affect the separation in any way. Perhaps the methyl cellulose additive will help. Or just do radial chromatography by dropping solvent into the centre with a capillary tube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9poQ8AVlbgc
Visualizing the spots by spraying a solution of iodine in DCM onto the plate worked as well as for normal silica-plates, but the talc is too soft to write upon with pencil. Hopefully this is of use to someone. I'm going to try mixing cab-o-sil fumed silica with the talc to see how it affects the retention.

[Edited on 31-8-2013 by sonogashira]

sonogashira - 2-9-2013 at 08:00

I take it back. My thin layer was far too thick. By using a thicker suspension than before, and dipping an aluminium plate into it repeatedly, a very very smooth thin layer can be produced just with talc that will not fall off with any solvent that I have tested. The appearance and uniformity is every bit as good as a commercial silica plate. When I have an impure sample to test I will take a picture of it developed side by side with a commercial silica plate.

[Edited on 2-9-2013 by sonogashira]

smaerd - 2-9-2013 at 10:59

Nice sonogashira. In the one .pdf I posted they said for making small quantities of plates you can take two plates back to back and dip them into solution. Remove them and separate and viola two plates ready made. Probably by next-weekend I'll be preparing some plates and working on my other project.

seba - 6-4-2014 at 17:24

What about using PVA (wood glue) as the binder?

smaerd - 26-5-2014 at 07:48

Completely forgot to update my experimental efforts here.

I have tried a few variations with polyvinyl alcohol(PVOH). I have gotten close but nothing quite there.

I experimented with sillica to 5-10% by mass hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol. The basic procedure so far has been as follows:

*Abrade microscope slides with sandpaper(also tested without abrasion without much effect). Clean microscope slides with acetone and oven dry.
*Add PVOH to a small volume of distilled water. Warm water to about 70-80*C until complete dissolution.
*Oven dry silica gel for column chromatography. Let cool, and then weigh appropriate proportion.
*Made slurry with silica gel by adding the PVOH solution and mixing. Think this is where things go wrong...
*Apply slurry too microscope slides so there is no drips over-hanging (Important)
*Let the slides sit, then oven dry gently(have experimented with this a bit).


Now the problem I have been having is a bit unexpected. I appear to get a great TLC plate. Well until I touch it. It seems as though the PVOH forms a 'bubble'. Meaning The outer edge is dry and bonded exactly how I would like. Even a crusty polymeric film layer exists on the face of the plate. When touched with a pencil or similar however, this 'bubble' shatters to reveal dry mobile silica gel underneath.

DSCN0976.JPG - 60kB

It's as if the PVOH concentrates to the outer edges of the TLC plate and does not fully mix with the sillica slurry no matter how much it is mixed. I'm not sure why this may be the case. I'm wondering if it has to do with hydrogen bonding being more favorable to the silica surface from the water, rather then PVOH to the the silica. I think trying isopropanol as a solvent may then prove to be more fruitful? Another alternative would be to do something similar to PCR's thermal phase. Warm the slurry to 80-90*C so the thermal motion over-comes the strength of the hydrogen bonding, then allow the solution to cool. I will try in the future and update if there is success. Acquiring some input would be fantastic.

I think PVOH would be a great layer if it does work. PVA(polyvinyl acetate) would be great as well, but it may pollute the plate with acetates? Probably be preferred to use lab-grade PVA and not the yellow gunky stuff. Might be cross-linkable in an easy way to get a nice firm PVOH/PVA layer.

[Edited on 26-5-2014 by smaerd]

[Edited on 26-5-2014 by smaerd]

smaerd - 28-2-2015 at 06:02

From the book - Thin Layer Chromatography in Chiral Separations and Analysis by Teresa Kowalska, I found another recipe for TLC plates used in chiral analysis. I'd imagine this could be substituted for regular silica gel rather then the chiral one.



Untitled.png - 87kB

Sulaiman - 28-2-2015 at 07:30

don't know if it helps but for plate photography, spreading an even film of emulsion is necessary and here is one applicator that could be modified
http://thelightfarm.com/Map/DryPlate/PlatePrep/DryPlatePart4...