Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Anhydrous AlCl3 attempt

spong - 24-8-2010 at 23:42

After seeing chainhit's thread on AlCl3 with a barbeque I thought I'd give it a try.
I used a Ca(OCl)2/HCl chlorine generator through a CaCl2 drying tube then H2SO4 to suck the last of the moisture out, running through 25mm copper pipe in the BBQ with Al foil in it.
Instead of a condenser I attached another length of copper pipe with a damp rag sitting on it, this way it wouldn't clog up as easily and could easily be disconnected and have a cork rammed through to collect the AlCl3.
Here is the setup:


The inlet for the chlorine:


The 'condenser' and makeshift drying tube:


I thought everything was running smoothly until I realized some fumes leaking out of the BBQ. I noticed the chlorine had been reacting with the copper and had eaten a hole through the pipe, I shut off the heat and turned off the chlorine generator.
The pipe was thin enough to tear apart at the hole, it was full of anhydrous copper chloride and a bit of aluminium chloride.


Copper chloride crystals:


I rammed the rod down to clean the foil from the tube. It looks like the copper chloride had been subliming then traveling down the tube to the unreacted Al and reacting to form AlCl3 and coat the foil in copper.


The CuCl in water:


Here is the only AlCl3 I could collect from the condenser:


Does anyone have any ideas as to how I could stop the copper reacting? Was it just too hot for it?
I'm going to buy some more copper pipe and give this another shot, I've left everything set up still.


[Edited on 25-8-2010 by spong]

Chainhit222 - 25-8-2010 at 03:29

I thought I mentioned in my thread to not use Cl2 gas, as it seems to react with everything.

Stick to HCl made with H2SO4 + NaCl or CaCl2, it leaves the pipe alone.


I gotta say though, when I ran Cl2 through mine, it never looked like it was gonna eat through the pipe!

And are you using a carrier gas? I found it pretty important to push everything through the pipe using argon. Do not pack the Al too tight or you will get jams. The pipe I used was 1 inch ID.
And TBH when you make HCl using a salt/acid generator, it seems pretty unnecessary to dry the gas, I put a little tube of color changing desiccant (cobalt chloride impregnated on some kind of zeolite or some shit, idk what it is) and it barely changed color.

The best procedure is to turn on the carrier gas after the aluminum is hot enough to be in danger of oxidizing (I use 5psi because it seems to be the lowest my regulator can go, it seems a bit excessive), let it get fully hot then turn on the generator and run it all the way. I set it up so the carrier gas inlet was nearly on the bottom of the gas generating vessel, so it was sure to push all the HCl out.

BTW, I tried using a steel fence post for this instead of copper pipe, and it worked very poorly.

Be sure to leave a container over the end of your condenser like this:
http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/5139/jar.png

It really seems to catch alot more AlCl3 if the fumes have to collide with the jar bottom and change direction, or so it seems. I don't know why, but I swear, it collected the AlCl3 so much more efficiently.

I plan on doing more research on this, only problem is that it fumes so bad and my neighbors are pretty close, so I gotta wait for a nice cold moonless cloudy night to do more research, and I have been sidetracked by other things.

I am kinda curious about using a fluorescent light bulb tube instead of a copper pipe. If it could survive the BBQ, one could use chlorine gas (which I must admit seems to react more readily)..... I think I read that UV light emitting flourescent tubes are actually made out of quartz glass, they could prove to be a good OTC resource.

According to Wikipedia, regular fluorescent tubes are made of borosilicate glass... which has a softening point of 800c.... I think I'm gonna crack one of those open today, clean it and throw it on the bbq to see what happens.

And I have a question, is aluminum metal completely resistant to the action of chlorine gas at room temperature? What would happen if one had a flask filled with shredded Al foil and some chlorine gas, would it not eventually react with the chlorine, over the period of several days?

[Edited on 25-8-2010 by Chainhit222]

spong - 25-8-2010 at 05:27

I was a bit worried about the chlorine but I didn't expect that, I was a more afraid of the hydrogen if I'd been using HCl, if I'd had a hole like in that one I probably wouldn't have a barbeque/eyebrows anymore :/
I wasn't using a carrier gas, I should probably get a little bottle of agron or nitrogen, how much do they usually cost? Perhaps I could just use air from my aquarium pump or something provided the Al won't oxidize. If the gas is expensive and air won't work I'll just make a CO2 generator.
Yeah I was thinking about flourescent tubes today but I didn't have any that would reach all the way through the barbecue, it would be much easier to see what's going on, you could probably melt both the ends and make them fit 24/40 fittings as well.
There's definitely some potential to this method, with the big clump of copper chloride I accidentally made, it shouldn't be hard to produce loads of AlCl3 with the correct technique.

You'd think it would have to react a little at room temperature, I've got a thin layer of what I think is hydrated aluminium chloride and bromide all over anything aluminium in the shed along with other salts on different metals that were exposed from the shed being filled with HCl or Br2.

[Edited on 25-8-2010 by spong]

Chainhit222 - 25-8-2010 at 07:24

You don't need to make 24/40 fittings. All you need is container of aluminum foil. Cut a really long strip of Al foil (a few feet at least) and carefully wrap it around the male end of a 24/40 connection to increase its diameter, then you can make a fitting joint. Even if its loose, the bulk of the AlCl3 will flow through the large opening. The aluminum foil joints wont get eaten too much, as they are not directly in the flames. Its kind of a dirty solution but it works well.

I seriously doubt you would get a explosion, even if you were pumping acetylene into the bbq. There is not much oxygen there (the propane is burning there anyway).

btw, don't use a 24/40 liebig condenser, it is too narrow, and it will clog up with alcl3 rather quickly. I had to poke at it with a sharpened steel wire and shit while it was on the bbq because it kept clogging, it was not pleasant (had to wear gas mask). You want the internal condenser diameter to be at least as big if not bigger then the AlCl3 "tube furnace".


Im not really sure what would work well. Perhaps this:
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9705/76070303.png

Same design as yours, but the condenser is removable. You could then take a long steel pipe cleaner (looks like a glassware brush, but it has steel bristles) and push it through the condenser while it is over your container, in order to scrape the walls.

As for the argon/nitrogen tanks, their kinda expensive. But consider that once you buy a one, it will last you a hell of a long time, and refills are not that expensive. A decent bit of reactions need a inert gas. I saw small tanks being sold in the fisher price store for like 50$ i think, I have a big aluminum welding tank that costs like 200-300$.

Btw, you can try purifying your AlCl3 by doing a vacuum sublimation on it. AlCl3 has a sublimes at a lower temp then FeCl3. It is kind of a pain in the ass though.

[Edited on 25-8-2010 by Chainhit222]

bbartlog - 25-8-2010 at 07:33

Cool experiment. You should distinguish between CuCl and CuCl2 when describing and evaluating your results - the brown stuff and the blue solution are presumably CuCl2, but it's entirely possible you also ended up with some CuCl (which BTW is not soluble in water). In particular it would be nice to rule out the possibility that the white stuff you ended up with is CuCl rather than AlCl3.
I don't think you can stop copper pipe from reacting with hot chlorine gas (well maybe a passivating layer of fluoride but realistically no). Seems to me like using glass would be more practical.

Chainhit222 - 25-8-2010 at 07:51

I wonder what would happen if you used a microwave instead of the bbq :o

with a glass tube ofcourse. That would be interesting to look at, just to see the reaction going on (hopefully with sparking).

[Edited on 25-8-2010 by Chainhit222]

Sedit - 25-8-2010 at 16:48

Cool and all but for once can people try to keep things in the thread they belong instead of starting a new thread? This is atlest the third AlCl3 thread in the last month alone.

spong - 26-8-2010 at 01:45

Ohh yeah sorry about that, if someone could merge this thread with chainhit's that'd be great :)
Yeah if you look in the third picture I had a female-female joiner to the condenser piece that I pulled out, stuffed a wad of fiberglass in the open reactor tube and then cleaned. I might try and make a jacket because the wet cloth wasn't doing the best job. I found a fluorescent tube on my old fishtank, it's just bigger than 24mm so ground glass with foil should work well :cool:
I think it was mostly CuCl2, there was however a layer of white crud that wouldn't wash off the inside of the tube, that could be CuCl. It should change to green eventually if it is. I'm pretty sure what I collected was AlCl3 though, it fumes in water and doesn't show any blue or green colour in the solution.

peach - 26-8-2010 at 22:51

I suggest a merge also, as it's a direct follow up from chainhit. [edit: can the merge privilege be given to the authors of the threads? That may alleviate some stress on the moderators]

I'm not sure microwaving it would be a good idea. Microwaves tend to reflect off anything metallic, which is somewhat the opposite of why people are trying them in labs now (with charged organics, like double bonded rings with halogens sticking off, they seem to be absorbed fairly well and cause the charge to shift).

Microwave ovens also use the items inside them to limit their load, and 'light' from the magnetron reflecting back at it may upset it over long durations.

If you have major fuming issues, the product certainly won't be anhydrous. It'll retain some degree of Lewis acid potential but, if a significant amount of water gets in, it's not going to do anything positive. A bigger issue than it loosing some of it's Lewis acid potential is it gaining Brønsted-Lowry potential. The former steal electrons, the latter gives away hydrogens. Having the latter floating around will allow the former to begin behaving in ways that you may not want; side products, tar. As you may have seen in my thread, as blogfast, entropy, watson and I debate the matter, I'm fighting off minute quantities of water, and it's still creating issues.

Watson made an excellent reply with the details for producing a dry(er), clean(er) stream by passing it through activated carbon and then silica. That would probably work even better if you used a separate 98% sulphuric drying stage, then the carbon. If it's not dry, odd acids out the end. If it's not going through carbon, sulphuric in the stream (which may be why your pipe began going funny); the solvent in mine has now gone a deep orange / brown, despite the aluminium being clean, the DCM being redistilled from CaCl2 and the entire thing being borosillicate connected with the very best tubing and grease I can buy (sulphuric is creeping in there)

I've been following these threads, thinking about my own (and working on it bit by bit) and wondering if we're not both going about this in a somewhat over complicated way.

The point of mine was to make it clean, avoid the clogging, the baking and preferably end up with something easily pourable / stirrable; whether the halogen came from HCl(g), Cl2, it went straight on just aluminium or aluminium primed with another halogen or salt. And, and, hopefully discover some more about the temperature dependence and other variables.

Here's some technical details with regards to temperature's effect on chemistry

The maths of that finds that a number of reactions already posses their activation energy, but function at a commercially crippling rate when not heated (as you would expect).

One method that seems to be getting overlooked is to purposefully produce the hydrate with hydrochloric, then simply dry it under a stream of HCl(g). It decomposes at 300C; to the oxide in air, and release HCl(g) under inerts. As with hydrated FeCl3, it would likely need to be under a stream of HCl(g) for drying to function; that's not an issue for people who already used to handling that kind of thing in the first place. My hotplate will easily manage 300C.

If it's the hexahydrate as the starting point, that will be a fair amount of gas to carry the moisture off. Theoretically, the direct to anhydrous methods will be using a 1:3 ratio of aluminium to gas. Then you have to factor in for how well it's being absorbed in the first place, and you're not far off the 1:6 of drying.

Only issue with that, for me, is that I expect some clumping will ensue. For fairly obvious reasons, I don't want to fix those with grinding.

Someone also suggested (sorry, can't remember who), ether is a good solvent from anhydrous AlCl3, and can even carry it over in a distillation. That may offer someway to pick up the lumpy results and then drop them back out in a finer, possibly post distillation, form. I haven't had much luck finding it's solubility in a good number of solvents. DCM is not a great solvent at all. Water is... :D

[Edited on 27-8-2010 by peach]

spong - 28-8-2010 at 02:47

I had another try with a glass reactor tube and a CO2 generator to push the AlCl3 vapour through the tube. Here it is before the Cl2 was started:


You can see the Al glowing and reacting once the Cl2 was started:


There was heaps of AlCl3 in the copper tube I was using as a condenser, the only problem is that is was stained bright orange with a contaminant from the muffler sealing tape I used to attach two bits of glass tube together. One of them was too small for the copper pipe and the other fit it well. This tape eventually ruined the experiment, lesson learned I suppose. Here is what I got from the first scraping of the tube:


Here's that damned muffler tape:


The reactor tube snapped while I was trying to fix the muffler tape, filling the entire shed with Cl2 and HCl.


I quickly scraped what was left from the condenser, here is the finl yield of the two scrapings that will definitely have to be resublimed to clean up:


My lungs hurt :(

peach - 28-8-2010 at 03:04

Quote: Originally posted by spong  

My lungs hurt :(


I know that feeling. Cl2 seems to be even better at producing it, since it seems to go 'smell-less' once I've been breathing it for a while.

Congratulations on the result, get us some picture of the sublimation and end result. ;)

spong - 28-8-2010 at 03:30

Ohh yeah, Cl2 is the worst, you can't tell you're breathing it after a while, at least HCl alerts you. I smelled one of the reducing fittings that had cracked on the last drying tube from the Cl2 exposure and for some reason it really hurt my nose, it was ridiculous, much worse than HCl. Why would that happen? It had been sitting out in the air for days since it last had Cl2 in it.

peach - 28-8-2010 at 09:00

I had my 200g CaCl2 loaded HCl(g) generator sat out in the garden, in the very damp, rainy weather, for three days last week. It was still fuming enough to be a major pain in the ass to when it came to rinsing it out.

You're dead on right about the difference between the two and being alerted. There is no way you'll ever mistake HCl(g) or not notice it, chlorine on the other hand...

At one point I was putting together a mycology laboratory for a company in the US. One of the final things I did to clean it up to something approaching a reasonable standard was to spray and wipe down every single surface in the room, including the ceiling, with 15% industrial bleach (which was greeny / yellow and contained no special additives); wearing my bunny suit, mask, oversocks, gloves and with the flow hood on full. I could easily smell the chlorine.

Two or three hours later, I couldn't smell it. When I left the room, my lungs were a bit sore. A day later, it felt like I'd been whacked in the chest with a baseball bat.

That wouldn't have happened with HCl(g).

I discovered a very handy and cheap method to vastly boost the cleanliness of the room. Buy a big roll of decorators heavy gauge plastic sheeting, glue it to the walls, ceiling and floors, tape up the seams... super smooth, no dust, no leaks, wipe clean.

Chloride ions in the mucus lining of your lungs control the thickness of the mucus. Cystic Fibrosis suffers don't have enough. Breathing chloride donating gases isn't a great idea, and can cause your lungs to flood, encourage pneumonia and so on, but it will also thin out the mucus, for that crisp fresh air feeling the next day. :P

[Edited on 28-8-2010 by peach]

Chainhit222 - 28-8-2010 at 13:14

Smells like victory.


shave your tv and have an adventure

[Edited on 28-8-2010 by Chainhit222]

spong - 29-8-2010 at 07:01

Urgh your poor lungs :/
I tried again today, at first I had a glass condenser set up made from the same sized tubing as the reactor tube but I broke it as I was putting it all together so I used the copper one again. There was no contamination from the muffler tape this time but it was still a similar yellow colour, probably from small amounts of iron in the foil, it's still better than the black commercial stuff though. The contaminant from the tape was the greyish colour to the yellow powder and the red/orange or black coating on the lumps of powder.
I only got a small amount this time, the gas cylinder ran out just as it was getting started :mad:

Yours was off-white wasn't it chainhit? What kind of Al foil did you use?

Chainhit222 - 29-8-2010 at 08:03

I got a slightly yellow offwhite product. That Al foil is like 1% iron, so thats where it comes from. I used some cheap offbrand aluminum foil iirc.

I don't remember if it was more or less yellow then yours, looks about right

[Edited on 29-8-2010 by Chainhit222]

greenimp - 29-8-2010 at 09:57

Very nice. I should have tried this method, but got so fed up with the DCM method I moved on to other things. I will give this a try I think. Some good engineering here could produce a very nice semi continious reactor.

peach - 29-8-2010 at 21:17

Quote:
the gas cylinder ran out just as it was getting started


Again, I've had that happen a couple of times.

"Something's wrong with this picture, [glances at regulator]... fffffffffffffffffffFF-urgh!"

Yellows and greens in AlCl3 can be signs of trace iron and water contamination, as chainhitter is suggesting with regards to the foil being contaminated.

The staining capacity of FeCl3 is gigantic, as anyone who's produced their own PCBs with the etch crystals will know. Even a 1% solution is first piss of the morning yellow. So low contaminations have the potential to produce pretty yellows.

The yellow, if it's not from the muffler tape, also serves as an indicator of moisture content. The anhydrous iron (3) chloride is essentially black. Moisture will then turn it yellow.

I would recommend any repeats of this method include Watson's suggestion of a separate drying and cleaning stage for the gas.

If it's staining yellow with no muffler tape around, there's likely moisture coming through from the generator. Generator -> 98% Sulphuric tube -> Activated carbon tube to remove sulphuric.

[Edited on 30-8-2010 by peach]

spong - 30-8-2010 at 03:39

Yeah it's definitely a viable method, I don't have much DCM to spare, it's impossible to find here so this was the only reasonable way. The main problem with getting it to run continuously(except for cleaning the condenser and replacing the foil) would be the gas generators, particularly the Ca(OCl)2 and HCl generator, once a good amount of liquid above the granules has accumulated the HCl usually just sits near the top, hardly reacting until I swirl it and have it foam like crazy. Bottled gasses or magnetic stirring in the generators would solve this problem. The foil should be able to be replaced relatively easily, the reaction tube is purged of the inert gas, the condenser could be removed and capped or cleaned then the inlet removed and a big log of foil the length of the tube could be quickly slid in, pushing the Al2O3 'ash' out in front of it.
Would it take much moisture to change it to that bright yellow colour? The powder has to be pretty close to anhydrous, it fumes like crazy around moisture, I dumped the AlCl3 and unreacted foil from the last run into a bin and poured in a flask of water, the thick pillar of HCl that erupted from the bin was ridiculous, I should have filmed it.
I'll get some activated carbon at the pet shop and fill another bubbling flask with it as I don't have another tube to use. I'll also get some more gas for the BBQ :P
I might test some in a Friedel-Crafts alkylation of toluene to mesitylene some time soon to see if the hydrate is much of an issue.

peach - 30-8-2010 at 04:56

If you can't get DCM easily, forget the bottled gases. I've been trolling those guys super style and they don't want to hear from the public, it costs a fortune for the gas and you need very expensive, special regulators. Don't try that propane tank rubbish, that's a bad idea.

It's kind of odd your HCl generator foams so much, that suggests there may a surfactant or something like that in the sulphuric, or brick cleaner if your dropping it on that. Redistilling it may be an idea.

I see B&Q have now soaped up their hydrochloric.

I always add some extra to the generators in case it doesn't fully work with the amount I thought I'd need, so I don't have to open it before trying a little more.

I think I'm going to switch over to using plastic bottles for the cake part of the generators. I have all the expensive ground glass, but it's annoying to have to start jamming screwdrivers and things in there to break up the cake afterwards. Or to have the flask burst when it's rinsed.

Provided a suitable plastic is used, there's no way it'll burst and the bottles can go in the bin afterwards if anything does happen to them.

The DCM method, if it works with HCl alone, or primed aluminium, is not as simple as it seems. Moisture appears to be far more of a problem than when the reaction is being run hot.

greenimp - 30-8-2010 at 06:25

Yes, so things to do. Design rock solid gas generator. It must have stirring and probably two reaction vessels, so that one can be taken off line and recharged while the other continues the reaction. As peach said it must also produce bone dry gas. Using a carrier gas to drive things is a great idea and will take some strain off the generator. Pressure spikes and back flow is a pain with them. We need to find the right kind of plastic or use stainless steel maybe. I see a large swage lock purchase in my future.

I would design the tube reactor so that you have the ability to quickly swap out a tube when one is done and load in another. Also having the ability to bring a second condenser online as one clogs will be be helpful. Glass tube is a must. What is the optimum temp for this? I like the muffler tape for the seals but there has to be some kind of high temp stopper material.

Looks like another piece of the puzzle just fell into place. Really nice work guys.

spong - 30-8-2010 at 06:57

I don't think there is any surfactant, I've been using the same stuff for a while, it's usually just when I leave it dripping and get a large layer of HCl on top and then swirl it because it's not doing anything, then suddenly it all reacts and bubbles up with chlorine, once it even made its way over into the drying tube.
Yeah emptying the broth from the generators was also a pain, having to hold my breath and open the chlorine generator and carry it outside to dump and then refill with hypochlorite wasn't the best, the CO2 generator I used for the last attempts made things easier though, I could just flood the chlorine flask with CO2 and then replace it slightly more safely. Flowback shouldn't be much of an issue though, as long as there is a bit of resistance at the condenser end, temperatures are kept relatively constant and the gas generators are air tight then everything should be ok.
Interchangeable reactor tubes would be ideal, if only I could get some ground glass tubes it would be so much easier, the fluorescent tubes are so fragile and hard to work with, I have to melt the ends to get rid of any sharp edges or cracks and then mould a foil seal to the melted end for the condenser or gas inlet, usually breaking the end and having to remelt it and start over :mad: I'm not sure about the optimum temperature, the best estimate I have is 'medium-high' according to the BBQ thermometer, from all 4 burners at full.

peach - 30-8-2010 at 07:47

@Impy

I haven't heard from you in a loooooooong time.

I've never bothered with stirring the generators, since I use salt all the time and the gunk is far too thick to stir even with an overhead. Never had too many problems with pressure spikes either. The only time that's an issue is when something in the wash bottle is solidifying and then clogs the dip tube. Which almost universally happens when I switch the stir bar off in the flask to see what's happening and what's evolving where. I purposefully leave a stopper unclipped around the generator somewhere, which then pops off if the dip tube clogs.

Neither do I really bother with a carrier gas. One goal should be to keep the dead volume in the flasks and tubing short, so the gas doesn't end up sat in those, doing nothing. Purging it with carrier once it's done would be okay. Again, I tend to just add a tablespoon more salt and sulphuric in the first place to save the effort of sorting the cylinders out.

I find using a carrier gas to be precisely the opposite of what I need. I'm usually struggling to get the gas flow as minute as possible, so the reactive gas won't blow out of the exhaust before it has a chance to get to work.

One could easily set this up to have tubes that are continuously swappable by using an oblique (two way) stop tap on the generator's output, to swap it from one path to another as the tubes are swapped. A more 'fun' prospect is handling them whilst they're roasting hot and the gas is going.

I suspect the temperature it's run at industrially is simply so they can push it through as fast as possible. As I said earlier in the thread, an experimental mind could check the temperature with a high heat variable hot air gun, using that to heat the tube. Or a variable blow lamp for plumbing work.

@spong

Ah right! I thought you were talking about HCl and didn't realise you meant the bleach and chlorine thing. Try shaking the ass out of the bottle of bleach for a while and see if there are persistent bubbles. Pure bleaches are noticeably less 'slippery' when wiped on a surface as well. You could also switch to pool shocks for more gas per unit of flask volume.

The gas is a pain, but it's still not annoying enough for me to spend £15 on a half mask. I have far bigger issues picking things up when I've forgotten how hot they are.

I do not envy you trying to do this with fluorescent tubes. They are stupidly easy to smash, indeed! I see ground glass tubes around all the time. I could pick you some up if you want. Only problem, they're usually about 6" long.

Do a yellow pages for sign makers, specifically neon sign makers. They'll have huge racks of very long borosillicate tubing in whatever size you like. That will be a lot easier than the fluorescents.

I like the temperature setting, "Produce the anhydrous acid on a slow roast, turn and cough frequently" ;)

spong - 30-8-2010 at 08:05

Oh I have been using pool chlorine, Ca(OCl)2 granules, If I had to use bleach I'd have given up by now, the strongest stuff we can get around here is about 3.5% with a lemon scent, I'd barely be able to smell the chlorine being produced :P
A 6' reactor tube would work wonders but the shipping wouldn't be too easy. I might have to give the neon sign makers a try though, with slightly thicker glass things would be so much easier, the glass would flare and shrink smoothly instead of getting little dents or lumps in it when I blow or suck from the thin glass heating up too quickly. Plus there's no mercury :D

peach - 30-8-2010 at 08:22

Isn't it 5am in Australia? :P

I'll PM you if I run into any ground tubes.

greenimp - 30-8-2010 at 09:50

i always like the HCL into H2SO4 w/good stirring for gas generation. Something about liquid-liquid mixing makes for a more even gas flow....

Neon Sign place might be the key, but why not a big piece of stainless from swag lock? Then you could just use swag fittings at all the connection points. That would help on the escaping gas problem, and make the whole process safer. Also, keep in mind here the goal is to come up with something the any person can build in their back yard and product 100's of grams of AlCL3. IMO it needs to be bullet proof.

As to the yellow color, all the AlCl3 I used for my experiments was always slightly yellow. Didn't hurt anything as far as I could tell. Al foil should be the target for the substrate. Getting Al powder could be come difficult some day. Foil fill always be out there. I think my not so dry DCM was the bigger problem.

Also why not try some kind of cold finger for the condenser? Seems they were invented for this kind of work. You might need a really mean one, but it would be the best IMO. They are not to hard to build out of a mason jar and copper tubing.





spong - 30-8-2010 at 14:46

Quote: Originally posted by peach  
Isn't it 5am in Australia? :P

I'll PM you if I run into any ground tubes.

Ooh thanks :) It would have been about 2AM, left a maths assignment to the last minute :P
Yeah the powder would probably react too quickly anyway, plus it would want to clump at the bottom of the tube on the glass, foil worked well because it wouldn't be contacting the glass all that much and wouldn't transfer much heat to it as it burnt. Stainless would be good but I don't have the money for it, plus I like being able to see what's going on in there. The cold finger would be better than cramming powder from a tube periodically, you could keep a spare lid so once it's over you just jiggle the finger from outside the lid to shake the last of the powder off, then remove the jar and put a new lid on it. You could probably leave the one jar on for the whole reaction and just disconnect it when it's done and keep filling it the next time you do it. I might try that fir the next run if I can get a nice smooth bend in the glass from the reactor tube, like this:

finger.JPG - 22kB
The only thing I'd be worried about is the reactor tube clogging before it ends in the jar, the stuff sublimes on anything that isn't insanely hot so a lot would probably collect in the tube.

[Edited on 30-8-2010 by spong]

greenimp - 30-8-2010 at 15:23

jacketing the tube as it leaves the BBQ and pumping warm air or hot motor oil through the jacket could work to keep things hot till the condenser. Wide tubeing is probably key also. 1 inch would be a good starting point. Thing is you guys have it working. I cant wait to fire up the grill now, regardless of the setup.


Chainhit222 - 31-8-2010 at 22:13

I have started the era of BBQ chemistry.


If you use a condenser jacket with hot motor oil, how could you heat and recirculate the oil? Would a pump hold up to those temps? Or do you just intend on using the oil to hold temperature?

This is certainly interesting. I would love to see a more complicated setup.

[Edited on 1-9-2010 by Chainhit222]

watson.fawkes - 1-9-2010 at 04:47

Quote: Originally posted by Chainhit222  
If you use a condenser jacket with hot motor oil, how could you heat and recirculate the oil? Would a pump hold up to those temps?
I picked up a little gear pump last year at surplus. I found out after I got it home that it was a pump for recirculating hot frying oil, so it's pretty much exactly what you want for this. (You can't have mine, no no no.) Gear pumps are also used for hydraulic systems. Scavenging one from a repair shop might be possible, say, if its internal seals are failing but not totally failed. A pump that doesn't quite maintain hydraulic pressures would be just fine for recirculating oil.

P.S. Here's an example of a gear pump from Grainger. It's the bottom of series all of which are about $150 new. Discount accordingly for surplus and scavenge.

[Edited on 1-9-2010 by watson.fawkes]

greenimp - 1-9-2010 at 11:12

I have built the set up last night waiting for the weekend to run. Using 1/2 inch stainless, the tubes are 1.5 feet long and have quick disconnects to swap the out. Working on a cold finger tonight. I hope to make 500 grams this weekend. Cross your fingers...if it works ill put the part list up.


Chainhit222 - 1-9-2010 at 19:44

Quote: Originally posted by greenimp  
I have built the set up last night waiting for the weekend to run. Using 1/2 inch stainless, the tubes are 1.5 feet long and have quick disconnects to swap the out. Working on a cold finger tonight. I hope to make 500 grams this weekend. Cross your fingers...if it works ill put the part list up.



fucking outstanding :o
I just hope your stainless does not react... are you using Cl2 or HCl?

[Edited on 2-9-2010 by Chainhit222]

densest - 1-9-2010 at 20:45

Stainless + Cl- + H2O -> no more stainless, unless it's a chloride-resistant alloy!!!

Seriously, chloride/chlorine eats stainless for breakfast and comes back for more. That's why it isn't generally used in marine applications.

If everything is ----perfectly---- dry, it might work.


[Edited on 2-9-2010 by densest]

spong - 2-9-2010 at 01:14

Ohh I can't wait to see the results, are you going to use HCl or Cl2? With the comments above I'd hope HCl, if it doesn't react with copper then it should be fine. Have a blowtorch handy to heat the section of tube between the BBQ and condenser so it doesn't clog, that's another advantage of steel, you could blast it with the torch and not have it shatter.

peach - 2-9-2010 at 03:04

I didn't want to throw too much negative nancy-ism around all the positive vibes, but densest is suggesting something I was worried about as well.

Equipment for handling things like hydrogen chloride is usually made of weird, expensive alloys like Monel. I can get normal regulators for tens of pounds. Reactive gas regulators are £500 or so.

Quote:
Compared to steel, Monel is very difficult to machine as it work-hardens very quickly. It needs to be turned and worked at slow speeds and low feed rates. It is resistant to corrosion and acids, and some alloys can withstand a fire in pure oxygen. It is commonly used in applications with highly corrosive conditions. Small additions of aluminium and titanium form an alloy (K-500) with the same corrosion resistance but with much greater strength due to gamma prime formation on aging. Monel is typically much more expensive than stainless steel.


Quote:
Monel is a trademark of Special Metals Corporation for a series of nickel alloys, primarily composed of nickel (up to 67%) and copper, with some iron and other trace elements.


This isn't just industrial, commercial theory either, it's everyday practical reality unfortunately.

Stainless steel scissors


This sink, despite it being old and retired from the kitchen, was clean prior to me using hydrogen chloride near it


The brand new chromed tap is turning green, it doesn't show up very well here, but you can see the stainless is rotting


The thing for doing the cleaning up needs cleaning up


The shiny new regulator has tarnished and features a new, green, colour scheme, despite being metres away


This is all from one or two minute escapes of the bastard. In todays politically correct atmosphere, hydrogen chloride is a bigoted & intolerant character.

It'll probably work, at least for while. However, I would expect some degree of contamination and for the corrosion to occur a lot quicker when the gas is hot.

You may be able to slow the rate down by ensuring the gas is well cleaned up from the generator. That means getting it bone dry and getting the sulphuric out, which will start ruining your Lewis acid anyway.

[Edited on 2-9-2010 by peach]

greenimp - 2-9-2010 at 06:10

My setup will be hcl/h2so4 for HCL generation w/ nitrogen or He carrier gas. If will also use the carrier gas to purge the system before and after running. As long as i keep everything dry ss should be fine. Even if I only get two or three runs, it is a good place to start. I also have a motor oil pump that I will use to jacket the line from the bbq to the cold finger. If it clogs I will be very surprised. I'm in about 200$ on this but I have all the glassware and most of the fittings already. I am looking on CL for a used grill, don't want to use my new one.... Can't believe I am going to work with hcl gas again I vowed never again after my last round of exps.....

What do you guys think for drying? Bubbleing through a talk column of h2so4 plus a drying tube?


spong - 3-9-2010 at 15:47

Yeah CaCl2 and H2SO4 should work fine, are you going to add a tube of activated carbon too? I'll be getting some glass tubes on Wednesday so next weekend I'll have another shot.

spong - 9-9-2010 at 05:34

I had another shot with tubes from a neon light supplier, 25mm glass. It wasn't a huge advantage to the fluro light tube I was using but at least it's a bit sturdier and I'm not being exposed to mercury cleaning them. I didn't use the activated carbon but it still worked ok.
One thing I noticed with a clear condenser was the AlCl3 seemed to just settle as a powder at the bottom of the condenser, to empty it all I had to do was pull it out and give it a slight tap above the jar, much easier than ramming a cork down there. I added it to the small amount I obtained from the last reaction.
here's the first AlCl3 subliming:

The powder settling in the bottom of the tube:

The jar of AlCl3, one day I may fill it up to the top :D


Magpie - 9-9-2010 at 08:01

Nice work, Spong! Do you have any method for verifying its purity or potency? Does it hiss when placed on water?

peach - 9-9-2010 at 08:16

Do you have activated carbon spong? I can send you out a little scoop to fill a test tube if not, since you're actually doing as opposed to just contemplating. The price tag will be some photos of the setup and result. :P

I'd be careful with the hissing test. I pulled a little plug of white gunk out of my DCM AlCl3 method, threw it in some water and it hissed. But I wouldn't accept that as proof that it was working.

If it doesn't smell of anything, or much, at first, and then stinks of hydrogen chloride whilst hissing, you're onto a winner. Holding a bit of damp acid indicating paper in the fumes will show it up for MOAR evidence.

aonomus - 9-9-2010 at 13:47

I'm left wondering whether aluminum turnings from a lathe or sheet aluminum from the hardware store would fare any better in terms of purity. I don't really have the equipment to do this (or the privacy), but perhaps one of you guys could give this try to avoid iron impurities? Most aluminum alloys are fairly well characterized so you'd be able to know what other impurities may form in HCl given their composition.

spong - 10-9-2010 at 00:36

It definitely fizzes on contact with water :P It really heats up a lot too. The fumes are definitely acidic, I had a big solid lump of it left in a flask after a vacuum sublimation of it today and I was playing around with it by adding water and watching it fizz and pouring the dense HCl 'smoke' into flasks and stuff and then I plugged the flask and shook it around to dissolve the HCl into the water in there and dumped it out on the driveway, it fizzed with some carbonates in the gravel we have and a worm that was on the ground wiggled like crazy. Poor thing, I picked it up and rinsed it off but it was dead :(
I don't have any carbon but I can get some from a pet shop for filters so no need to ship any :) I will get photos when I do it though :D
Anyway, here's the pictures from today:
The setup(I need to buy a cold finger next time I get some glassware):

The dirty AlCl3

Cooling and tipi:

Just starting:

Finished:

The crud that was left behind in the flask (a lot of it was AlCl3 as I discovered when I went to clean it :P)

All I could recover from the receiving flask:

Al turnings would probably be better, I need a good source of them, is there an easy way to make large amounts from a block of Al?

[Edited on 10-9-2010 by spong]

peach - 10-9-2010 at 03:15

That's absolutely great! We need more pictures and videos and people getting hands on.

I like the stopper in that flask, smooth.

A cold finger would likely be better, but that looks quite good already. Try adding ice / gel packs to the beaker in the meantime.

That vivid yellow has got to be iron chloride.

For turnings, open the yellow pages and call all the guys offering machining, even the guys resurfacing engines may be able to help (Ferrari engine blocks are magnesium, if you can find anyone servicing those :D), the scrap dealers will know where to get it as well. The CNC mills and lathes SPEW Al turnings off so quickly they have big augers or conveyors under the table to push all the stuff out into a huge bin on wheels next to the machining centre.

It all goes back to the foundry as comparably high purity precursor to be recast; compared to the ore it's self. But, the machine tools almost always drench the chips and turnings in coolant, which is basically oil in suspension. That lowers it's value a little because the foundry has to then deal with all the smoke and shit burning back off, and clean the alloying up.

Some of the CNC places produce so much of it, they have autobailers that empty the bins into a hydraulic press to squash it into a smaller brick they can stack up as they wait for the scrap guys to turn up, so it's not using up expensive floor space. I've seen some of those bailers with automatic washers on them to rinse the material of coolant prior to squishy the metal into a brick.

I have two billets of aluminium about two foot long each, which I bought from a foundry supplier in Wales (home of very expensive cartons of milk). They'll be pure, but reducing them to shavings, turnings or chips isn't all that easy. Best to go with the scrap I expect.

The most amusing video on youtube of aluminium under pressure

^^^There are also some very funny ones of gigantic 1000 ton hydraulic hammer forges smacking bits of red hot iron into shape

aonomus - 10-9-2010 at 03:43

If you do get your hands on a bucket of Al turnings/chips, probably a few successive extractions with something like acetone will get rid of all the organics that might get turned into the typical black or brown tar on contact with gaseous HCl. Just use solvent grade stuff and redistill the whole lot, its not worth using something *really* nice.

spong - 10-9-2010 at 07:45

Ohh yeah I could have a hunt around machining places, someone would definitely have some to spare. Magnesium would be great :D Copper would be handy as well.
Yeah I'd have to wash the oil and whatnot off, I'd definitely have to distill the acetone back with the prices these days, $10 a litre :/

peach - 10-9-2010 at 10:15

Quote: Originally posted by spong  
I'd definitely have to distill the acetone back with the prices these days, $10 a litre :/


It's those tarts making bombs hoarding all the acetone

MolecularConcept - 18-9-2010 at 16:51

how about using a chromatography column for the reactor tube? its thick pyrex and has correct fittings.

great work guys so is it practical for making 100s of gramms yet ?

spong - 19-9-2010 at 04:33

I think it's bunnings having their fun with the monopoly everything is expensive, they wanted $100 to order in 4l of toluene!
With turnings it should be much easier to make large amounts, I've just bought a big bottle of hypochlorite and a bag of charcoal so once I get some Al turnings I can have a try at making hundreds of grams, I think the oxide 'ash' the foil leaves behind is preventing the centers of the bunches from reacting, turnings should have a much lower oxide to Al ratio and I could cram hundreds of grams of turnings in the tube.
The new reactor tube will just have a small tube for the hose stuck at one end and the open end for the condenser at the other, very similar to a chromatography column without the stopcock so they should be pretty good if you can find a really long one. It won't be possible to reload it easily while it's running because the oxide would have to be washed out from the small end but with the amounts of Al in there something else will surely go wrong before I run out of Al.
Now to ring around and find some turnings :D

MagicJigPipe - 19-9-2010 at 16:38

$10 a liter??! Christ! And I thought it was expensive here (~$5 a quart which is about a liter).

It's also much cheaper to buy it in 5 gallon containers at a solvent supplier but what to do with the unused portion?

Also, toluene is widely available here. $15 or so for a gallon (~4 L) and about $45 for 5 gallons.

What's up with the lack of acetone, toluene and various other petrochemicals in other countries (outside U.S.)?



[Edited on 9-20-2010 by MagicJigPipe]

spong - 19-9-2010 at 23:55

Yeah I've already bought 20l of toluene and methanol because that's the only reasonable way to get them. The shed is a big enough fire hazard without another 20L of flammable liquids :P Getting acetone from a chemical supplier is actually cheaper than from the hardware store *facepalm*
I think it's mainly Australia. Someone at some point has decided the general public has no use for paint thinners.

peach - 21-9-2010 at 17:09

@Spong

"Someone at some point has decided the general public has no use for paint thinners."

That made me laugh. :P

If you can squeeze 100g out in one run, I'd be happy with that. That's a perfectly usable quantity and you may find it more effort to spend weeks / months working out a continuous system than you would to just open it up, pour some more in, purge and rerun it. You don't even need a cylinder of inert gas if you're starting the tube from cold, just displace the atmosphere with HCl(g) and warm the tube up.

Look at the solvent problem this way, if you ever need a BBQ on a rainy day, it's not going to be very hard to get the shed going. :D

20L isn't too bad, just don't drop your cigarettes in the bottles when you're done. And, if the shed is in the sun and it's hot there, those bottles may get fairly warm and fill the shed with vapours, so some ventilation would be an idea.

@Jig pipe

Sell it on eBay. ;)

[Edited on 22-9-2010 by peach]

spong - 23-9-2010 at 00:32

Quote: Originally posted by peach  


Look at the solvent problem this way, if you ever need a BBQ on a rainy day, it's not going to be very hard to get the shed going. :D

Hehe, or if I ever run out of petrol :P
I got some turnings today, I'm a big fan of metal recycling businesses, 300g Al, 650g Mg blocks, 200g Cu and 200g steel for $10 :D

peach - 23-9-2010 at 06:22

That's a great haul of magnesium for $10 compared to what it'd normally cost.

You can find documents online for getting those up to really high purities as well if that's yar thing.

spong - 23-9-2010 at 14:16

Should it be ok for things like gringards or formylations? There's a layer of green backing on each of the pieces I'll have to remove.
I was thinking of making some magnalium too.
The Al turnings aren't as dense as I would have liked, they're almost similar to the foil, they should still work ok provided I wash them and pack the tube pretty tight.

Is it possible to make the hexa hydrate anhy?

noone - 16-10-2010 at 04:46

AlCl3 H2O6 to ALCl3 ? How maybe oven @ 400 for an hr? dessicator w/H2SO4? Dean Stark trap? just wondering why all the trouble you guys are going through to make it when you can buy it very cheap?

DJF90 - 16-10-2010 at 04:49

You think if it was that easy we would have done it by now right... So what does that infer to you?

noone - 16-10-2010 at 06:05

I would think not, but some people cant get things because of restrictions in their country or just like chemistry & also like a challenge or being selfsufficient. That's what I was getting at. Anyway I found sublimation would be the best way actually & I tried to edit my post before anyone saw it ,but was to late. Oh well


btw That infers to me you are quite the smartass DJF90

Thanks for the warm welcom to your board!!!

starman - 16-10-2010 at 07:03

Quote: Originally posted by spong  
Yeah I've already bought 20l of toluene and methanol because that's the only reasonable way to get them. The shed is a big enough fire hazard without another 20L of flammable liquids :P Getting acetone from a chemical supplier is actually cheaper than from the hardware store *facepalm*
I think it's mainly Australia. Someone at some point has decided the general public has no use for paint thinners.

20Lt methanol?Is it of reasonable purity.Care to share your source?

DJF90 - 16-10-2010 at 12:30

noone - I'm almost certain it is not as simple as you suggest - drying at high temperature requires a brisk flow of HCl(g) to carry away the water vapour and ensure the material remains as the trichloride. If you read through the other threads here on AlCl3 production (theres quite a few now!) then you'll be much more informed about the subject.

spirocycle - 16-10-2010 at 13:34

Quote: Originally posted by starman  
Quote: Originally posted by spong  
Yeah I've already bought 20l of toluene and methanol because that's the only reasonable way to get them. The shed is a big enough fire hazard without another 20L of flammable liquids :P Getting acetone from a chemical supplier is actually cheaper than from the hardware store *facepalm*
I think it's mainly Australia. Someone at some point has decided the general public has no use for paint thinners.

20Lt methanol?Is it of reasonable purity.Care to share your source?


i can get it for $35/5gals at VP racing
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/

peach - 16-10-2010 at 14:26

DJF is quite the smartass, but for good reasons, e.g. he's right and you're wrong. He is also quite smart.

You can't dry things like that with heat alone, or any other common drying method. Drying with sulphuric won't work, neither will doing it under vacuum. A Dean-Stark hasn't got a snowballs chance in hell of working. Neither will sublimation, that's for purifying an already dry Lewis acid of other metal halides. AlCl3 decomposes as the water tries to leave.

Lots of the harder Lewis acids do it.

And it's quite likely the form you're looking at is the hexahydrate, which absolutely will not function as anhydrous forms of it will; the water destroys the Lewis acid potential, which is quite important for a lot of work. Added to that, moisture in the solvents (those not dried over sodium) or absorbed from the air (and it will visibly suck it up from the air and emit clouds of hydrogen chloride) will begin rapidly contaminating the Lewis acid with a Bronsted Lowry acid, and the two are quite different. Having the latter around for your Lewis acid work can turn the flask into tar, or at least what's not supposed to be in there. E.g. you'll have halogens adding themselves across bonds and all sorts of nuncing around going on. AlCl3 is particularly good at it, as it is an aggressive Lewis acid. The iodides are less bothered about it. The fluorides are so bothered they need cooling with a dry ice bath to stop them overheating and ripping things to bits.

It's quite ironic that for many BR acids, you want some water around to disassociate them. You don't want any water for most Lewis acid work; although, I'm sure there are some Lewis reactions that do, or will be found to, benefit from being tinted with a little water to catalyze them.

Everyday oxides also function as Lewis acids, but only very weakly. And the strength is important for Lewis acids. A hard acid will attack a hard base site but not be all that interested in a weak site, and vice versa. So a weak base will attack a weak acid site first, even if there's a hard site present. There is also a spectrum within the hard / soft definitions. The definitions are based on the ionization state of the metal, but the finer spectrum is based on the halides, their electro-negativity and so on. E.g. AlI3 is most definitely not as harsh as AlCl3. But they're both in the hard way of looking at things.

You can get softer Lewis acids to react with harder sites, and vice versa, by subjecting the substrate to things like microwaves, to shift the charges around in the molecule. Extra halogens sticking off the opposite end usually help with that.

BR acids add hydrogens. Lewis acids take electrons.

To give you a more usable reply, you'd need to dry it under a stream of sulphuric dried, carbon filtered hydrogen chloride gas, so the water can be swept out but not with the chlorides at the same time. That's a possibility I'm considering. Producing the hydrate with hydrochloRIC acid and then drying under hydrogen chloRIDE, as it works at lower temperatures.

You have to meet hard, anhydrous Lewis acids in person to appreciate the difference with your senses.

I can assure you, the effort is for a reason.

As for a warm welcome, shit... you've just got to get used to that on SM. I got the same response. You WILL get a mouthful back if you're being an idiot. And probably quite a lot if someone disagrees. But... if you want to talk to people who actually know what they're doing, it's about the only place to do it online. Just put up with it for a while. If you're posting rubbish, it'll never end. If you post something novel, it will.

[Edited on 16-10-2010 by peach]

spong - 16-10-2010 at 19:25

Quote: Originally posted by starman  
Quote: Originally posted by spong  
Yeah I've already bought 20l of toluene and methanol because that's the only reasonable way to get them. The shed is a big enough fire hazard without another 20L of flammable liquids :P Getting acetone from a chemical supplier is actually cheaper than from the hardware store *facepalm*
I think it's mainly Australia. Someone at some point has decided the general public has no use for paint thinners.

20Lt methanol?Is it of reasonable purity.Care to share your source?

http://www.oilchem.com.au/products/alcohols
That's just the alcohols page, they have such a great range of chemicals but they're in 20L minimums, it would be great if some Australians could arrange some kind of a group buy for them, with 10 or 20 people in on it we could get a great deal on some awesome solvents and reagents, I've been looking for benzyl alcohol for ages and they have it...in 20L drums :(

DJF90 - 17-10-2010 at 01:59

Thanks peach. You're quite smart too...

Anyway my point was, that I'm fairly certain you've covered all of that in one of the other threads (why can't we just have one thread dedicated to AlCl3, as opposed to having to wade through the current 3-4+?), but it was nice of you to go into detail again here. Other than the dehydration at temperature with HCl(g), the method utilising DMSO and other Lewis bases (R3N, R3P, R3P=O, etc) also looks decent, although you'll need a decent vacuum pump to get it to work I suspect. The patent is provided in one of the other threads, but I can attach it if necessary. Have you tried it? If you're lacking the DMSO I know where you can find that (no, not at toolstation lol).

peach - 17-10-2010 at 10:27

I just was at toolstation. Having sanded the floor from it's previous nicotine amber stain to pristine white, it's now pitch black, momentarily.

I have a litre of DMSO, but have been so busy I haven't had time to do a lot of chemistry fun. I also need to pick up a new receiver bend before any distilling is happening. :P

Sorry for not getting back to your PM. I did read it but, as with the experiments, got carried away with tidying up and kept forgetting.

Yes, the repetition is bad.

I don't mind typing the Lewis acid stuff out once or twice, since they're something people usually don't deal with, don't behave as you might expect and have some quirky traits that aren't discussed all that much in what I've read - so I had to gain it first hand, and experience the defunct results with my pocket money.

AlCl3, the discussions of it here, are a prime candidate for compression. This has already been discussed as well. The BBQ method, we have photos of, I'll have a go at forming it with hydrochloric then drying it, and perhaps the DMSO idea as well. Once that's done, the threads all need a battering down into one in the pre-publications section.

[Edited on 17-10-2010 by peach]

redfox87 - 26-10-2010 at 19:59

I was curious if this method could be used to make anhydrous AlCl3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4IC_B9i4Sg

I thought if the chlorine gas was piped in through some CaCl2 that it would be free of moisture, and if the receiving flask and foil was heated that there would be little moisture to worry about.

Is this a possibility? It seems a lot easier from my perspective then the DMSO method.

spong - 27-10-2010 at 00:44

It would work but recovering the AlCl3 would be a pain, it's going to be coating whatever flask you did it in and mixed with Al2O3 ash left over from the foil. Plus a lot of it would escape, you need quite a bit of cold glass for it to sublime onto, if the entire flask was heated then it's going to go straight out the top and end up as fumes once it hits the moist air.
If it did work you could perhaps vacuum sublime it straight from the flask into a receiver to purify it but it's hard to get a good yield from the sublimation. Another option could be dissolving it in Et2O in which it is supposedly quite soluble in, you could swirl some dry Et2O in the flask and filter it to remove the unreacted Al and Al2O3 then distill it off.
Once my exams are done I'll have more time than I know what to do with so I'll work on getting the process to run more efficiently, I'll also make some ether to see how that works for purifying it.

neptunium - 13-12-2011 at 07:59

has anyone bubbled Cl2 in carbon tetrachloride with aluminum foil in it?
and distilled off the CCl4?
i wanna try that