| Quote: |
.| Quote: |
Quote: Originally posted by smaerd ![]() |
), the numbers in the post one up for the venturi are 133mBar to
53mBar (87 - 95% gone), a water aspirator can manage ~20mbar theoretical (~98% gone), my fridge pump is running at around 15 - 10mbar (99% gone). Quote: Originally posted by smaerd ![]() |
Quote: Originally posted by peach ![]() |
Quote: Originally posted by peach ![]() |
, but I think you conflate the limiting vacuum at zero flow
with vacuum at a useful flow. I believe that a lot of useful work can happen at 100 torr (=130 mBar = -26" Hg) @ 1scfm (~28 litres/minute)Quote: Originally posted by Magpie ![]() |
. | Quote: |
. It really is misleading though that the Ward scientific site says that 7.5psi is
adequate, because I'm sure if I ran 7.5psi through that thing it wouldn't be pulling 28.5"Hg... 
.

I don't, because it takes for fk'ing ever to edit videos, never mind on a 256mb computer, and I absolutely hate doing
it. Video editing is for arts students (you know maths is an art subject? Hmmmmm, odd exception). So it will need to be in sections, until youtube
give me an 'annoy entropy' account.| Quote: |
| Quote: |

| Quote: |
| Quote: |
That's A LOT. Orders of magnitude out of line. The governments
agree with me, as high pressure tools and spraying are now being phased out (yes... high pressure spraying is better for fine finishes
I've spoken to a Sata representative who confirmed that).| Quote: |

| Quote: |
| Quote: |
Quote: Originally posted by peach ![]() |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
Quote: Originally posted by Contrabasso ![]() |