Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Which is your year of birth?

woelen - 27-4-2011 at 01:15

The age poll is revived, but that thread is already 7 years old. Age changes in time, so it does not make sense if people now add their votes to that old poll. For this reason I make a new poll, but now based on year of birth.

I am wondering from which period there are most people. I am from the year 1966 and at the time of writing this post I am 45 years old. I have the feeling that I belong to the group of older members.

[Edited on 27-4-11 by woelen]

Arthur Dent - 27-4-2011 at 04:33

Slowly getting close to the big 5-0... Scary thought that time goes by so fast. I was fascinated by chemistry in my early days after college, where I had cool chemistry teachers that gave us quite a bit of latitude when experimenting (and gathering reagents).

But I put everything away for many decades before my interest in chemistry was revived by interesting "gold salvaging" experiments and home brewing/distilling. So my current interest is tangible and useful, it's not just youthful experimentation, I actually am in the process of accomplishing concrete experiments that have either an interesting monetary purpose, or a very flavorful, hoppy result! :D

Using my limited knowledge just for cool, what-the-heck experiment is also fun too! LOL

Robert

jamit - 27-4-2011 at 06:04

I'm 46. I've resurrected a past hobby.

Hey Woelen and Arthur Dent, it's good to see you're from my generation too...except we're separated by nations. Hey Dent i' m from Canada too... But living in the USA. I love reading up on both your comments. thanks guys!


bahamuth - 27-4-2011 at 07:02

Soon to be 26 and looking forward/hoping to visit this forum for many years to come.


hkparker - 27-4-2011 at 15:16

I'm just turning 18! I feel pretty young for this forum and know I know far less then the senior members here, but I'm pretty sure I'll be here for quite a while :D

bbartlog - 27-4-2011 at 17:33

Early results suggest a bimodal distribution (no one born in the 1970s here? really?). Very interesting.

Ozone - 27-4-2011 at 19:30

Interesting bimodal distribution we are developing here. Am I really the only one from 1970-1979?

O3

[edit] Sh*t, Bbartlog, I just noticed your post :P

[Edited on 28-4-2011 by Ozone]

Bot0nist - 27-4-2011 at 19:49

Great minds think alike...

I'm 25 as of 2011. I guess I'm in the majority. (For now:P)

[Edited on 28-4-2011 by Bot0nist]

Saerynide - 28-4-2011 at 03:09

Wow, almost a text book bimodal distribution. Interesting.... Guess that makes me average - I'm 25.

Neil - 28-4-2011 at 07:52

Coverage is an pretty good reproduction of the age/population graphs for north America, which would suggest that the forum gets about the same percentage of people from each age division.

Add ten years to this graph and see how they match; http://www.censusscope.org/us/chart_age.html

Saerynide - 28-4-2011 at 08:40

Is it just me, or has it not dawned on anyone yet that a 6 year old couldn't possibly use the internet :D

Bot0nist - 28-4-2011 at 11:09

Quote: Originally posted by Saerynide  
Is it just me, or has it not dawned on anyone yet that a 6 year old couldn't possibly use the internet :D


I believe woelen included that category for the same reason that the other 'age' poll was obsolete. Because in a few years this thread may still be active, and the now 6 year olds may then be of posting age.

[Edited on 28-4-2011 by Bot0nist]

mr.crow - 28-4-2011 at 11:25

I don't think asking your year of birth or age makes a difference. You want a snapshot at one point in time instead of a continuous poll. I would expect the average age to remain fairly constant

I am glad to see the majority of people here are my age. I think its a combination of several factors:

1) Maturity. No longer interested in being a kewl or a druggie. Several of our younger members are exceptionally mature though
2) Education. Graduated from or still in college/university
3) Money. So expensive!
4) Independence. Have a lot of free time, not starting a family

The WiZard is In - 29-4-2011 at 06:16

At next birthday — think consensual sodomy.

I wouldn't be this old if — had my mother had said NO.

Phosphor-ing - 29-4-2011 at 06:20

I'm with Ozone. The 1970's must have not produced to many of us interested in chemistry?

Bot0nist - 29-4-2011 at 06:26

Quote: Originally posted by The WiZard is In  
At next birthday — think consensual sodomy.

I wouldn't be this old if — had my mother had said NO.


Fifty nos and a yes still means yes! ;)

woelen - 29-4-2011 at 07:05

The distribution which I now see building up is something which I did not expect, but I can explain it though. I expected a peak around 25 and a slow decline at increasing age, but what is interesting is to see a second peak around around the age of 45 years.

The youngest members are in their teens. They are many of them who are interested in science, some of them in a kewlish way, others more seriously, but few know of sciencemadness. The really interested people among them eventually will find sciencemadness when they persist and move on to their twenties. The largest group are the people in the first half of their twenties. These are the people, who usually have most time and do not yet have a family, a demanding career, and a mortgage with the associated duties which make having time consuming hobbies more difficult. At the same time they have some money to spend, albeit limited due to studies and living out of the parent's house. Their relative freedom however more than compensates the lack of money and the really enthusiasts among them can find money for experimenting anyway (a matter of taking the right priorities :P ).

The number of people, active in home chemistry then quickly declines when people move on to their second half of their twenties. I personally have seen a few people quit at that age, due to the starting of a family, buying their first house, starting a career.
Then there is a dip in the group of people in their thirties. That is the most occupied group, having kids, a demanding career, all kinds of social ties and financial duties.
In the group from 1960 ... 1969 you see that many of them have older children, have less financial duties and larger financial resources and have more time for hobbies. The next two groups are smaller again, but that can be explained because in this group there is a lower involvement in internet affairs like forums, youtube channels etc.

What I see over here, I also see in the church where I am active. Most people who actively contribute to the church (e.g. organizing events, helping out with activities) are young enthusiast people in the age between 20 and 25 and people with more time and resources at an age of 45+. The people in the age of 30 .. 40 simply are too occupied and they hardly contribute and just visit services on Sundays and little else. I have seen many of these 'inactive' people become more active 10 years later while some of the young enthusiasts of 10 years ago now are fully occupied by all their other duties.

Hades_Foundation - 29-4-2011 at 07:28

Some age groups could be less inclined to participate in polls...

psychokinetic - 29-4-2011 at 19:43

24 here. Part of the majority is seems (so far)

redox - 30-4-2011 at 06:48

I guess I am one of the youngest here (14).

Sedit - 30-4-2011 at 08:17

I was assuming that the spike we see in age grouping could be due to youthful enthusiasm for the younger crowd and more people born around the 60's are setup working in the field of chemistry meaning one would expect a spike around this time.

Mr. Wizard - 30-4-2011 at 09:29

I'm 63.

Rogeryermaw - 19-5-2011 at 19:42

Quote: Originally posted by Saerynide  
Is it just me, or has it not dawned on anyone yet that a 6 year old couldn't possibly use the internet :D


it's just you young'n. my six year old daughter uses the internet fairly proficiently (with proper supervision of course). kids are great that way! they are only as limited as the teaching their parents give. at this age they are little sponges that absorb everything they come into contact with. they have an appetite for knowledge like phosphorus pentoxide has for moisture.

it seems as if the 70's are under represented a bit here. well throw my 37 year old ass into the mix!

Sedit - 19-5-2011 at 20:42

My kids been playing on y8.com since he was 2.5-3 years old.... That includes starting the computer... putting in the PW,,, opening IE and imputing y8.com to get to his games...

He has been using the computer before he could speak. We worried he could never speak but with his computer abilitys I was assured there was nothing truely wrong with him.

azo - 20-5-2011 at 00:41

Well woelen i think your perception it spot on.


looks like i am an old barsted around here born 1963


regards azo

m1tanker78 - 26-5-2011 at 17:36

Another mark for the 70s here; born in '78. I vaguely remember that old lime green shaggy carpeting my parents had in the house :D.

I'm 32 years old and at a point in my career where I have more free time. Much of my spare time is dedicated to my family and my other hobbies take up much of my capital. I'm very new to chemistry but I'll be acquiring bits of knowledge here and bits of labware there over the years (if I live to a ripe old age).

I thought there were a lot more thirty-somethings here on SM.

Tank

plante1999 - 26-5-2011 at 17:49

im 15 years old at this day (my year of birth is 1996) but i make chemistry seriously, I think im not a knew but i can make a mistake.... (correct my if I am wrong)
I am one of the Youngest member here. I done (I think) some advanced inorganic chemistry specialy in titanium and zirconium chemistry.

[Edited on 27-5-2011 by plante1999]

mewrox99 - 8-6-2011 at 03:41

I'm from 1995 and 15 1/2

I've had my interest in chemistry since I was 12. Even back then I was doing simple organic

Shag carpet rules!

WannaBeDrD - 8-6-2011 at 05:52

Ok, maybe not, but I do remember our orange shag in the front room.

Another mark for the 70's...just got hit by the big 4-0 this year.

mnick12 - 8-6-2011 at 12:39

17 years old, born in 94.

barley81 - 14-6-2011 at 18:34

I just turned 14 on 5-19 and joined this forum recently. I've loved chemistry for as long as I can remember (got a textbook & encyclopedia when 5). Since I'm very close to having a lab, this will be the absolute best summer of my life :D

I'm one of the old farts...

albqbrian - 14-6-2011 at 20:15

Class of 57. I've been involved in chemistry one way or another my whole life. I started young; my parents got me my 1st chemistry set when I was 6 or 7. Then I got real lucky. When I was 9 a local lab when broke and my dad bought a bunch of their equipment. I was set up. Though having to teach myself I quite naturally drifted into energetcis. But back then it was no problem. The neighbors were all cool with it. After a window rattling boom they'd go: "Oh it's just Brian". And the lab supply places would sell you anything you wanted. What a kinder, gentler time huh?

In between was a chem degree with a lot of lab work in natural products synthesis and protein biochemistry; a few years in the Army blowing up stuff around the world, including 18 months where I tested artillery fired landmines twice a week; work as a quality control engineer in a chemical oriented process plant; a consulting career where I helped a variety of companies utilize statistics to improve their manufacturing; my recent hobby of making all types of ammonium perchlorate composite rocket propellant; and doing some substitute math and science teaching at my daughter's British International School.

The teaching was interesting. I've taught hundreds of adults during my consulting career, but never kids. The day before school started I told the principal that I'd be happy to be a substitute in math or science if they ever needed one. He then said great, can you start tomorrow! Seems one of their math teachers bailed at the last minute and the new guy wouldn't arrive for a week. So the 1st period the 1st day I found myself with the Y13 IB math class. In the US system that would be HS seniors in AP math. Luckily for me the topic was statistics. I also ended up doing a few weeks of science teaching. I was a bit rusty on the labs, but it was fun. Plus being overseas there are no real restrictions on what you can do. Make Nitrogen Triiodide, no problem, blow up some Na, sure; gas out a room with some Br, OK; do fractional distillation of hexane and another flammable, with a bunsen burner and kids crowded around OK (this was not me, I was cowering across the room). It was interesting. They just hired a young British teacher who was having a bit of trouble with his freedom. I guess it was due to the fact that in the UK he couldn't do any of this. When he demo'd the Na; he put in way too big of a piece and managed to scorch the ceiling of the brand new lab. Recently he needed 18 stitches in his fingers because he tried to pull the rubber tubing off a sidearm test tube and ripped the sidearm off instead. He's still gung ho though.

Now I have my kids to motivate my return to chemistry. My 14 yr old daughter really likes chemistry. I have to say the Brit system gives them a lot more science than the US system. Last year and this year (she'd be an 8th grader in the US) science was the topic that got the most time, followed by math, then English. A very sensible scheme if you ask me. And this year she got specialist teachers for each area: biology, chemistry, physics. My 11yr old son is pretty excited to get started on rocket stuff. So I ordered enough chems for us to make a few pounds of propellant when we're at my inlaws 62 acre farm this summer.

Wow, did I ramble on. But being an old fart gives some license for that right :cool:

franklyn - 20-6-2011 at 12:35

How many of these threads do we need ?

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=2120
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=3100
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=16170

.

Steve_hi - 11-9-2011 at 17:43

Quote: Originally posted by franklyn  
How many of these threads do we need ?

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=2120
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=3100
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=16170

.

I vote for all of them

DeathAdder - 29-10-2011 at 13:53

So sad to see that no one my age (13) is interested in anything other than video game mass-virtual-murder so it now looks like i am the youngest member here. How interesting. I'm not a pyromaniac like some people my age. I got into chemistry when I was 11 but I started to want more by 12. Sadly even if I try to explain the simplest chemistry to any one (My science teacher is not a chemist)especially my parents, they say No That will EXPLODE BLAH BLAH I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT BUT BLAH BLAH from my parents. But even if it's a fellow student in the simplest terms possible, they still don't get it like how a glow stick works (i don't discuss pyro with anyone or acid that kind of thing that could give the wrong impression) 2 of them said to make XXX that I would have to put sodium metal in it or put XXX in it to glow, ah so sad to see them talking out of there butt.(I'm not saying i know everything about anything but I hope it doesn't come out that way). Thank you for reading this rant.:D

Adas - 5-11-2011 at 13:01

Quote: Originally posted by DeathAdder  
So sad to see that no one my age (13) is interested in anything other than video game mass-virtual-murder so it now looks like i am the youngest member here. How interesting. I'm not a pyromaniac like some people my age. I got into chemistry when I was 11 but I started to want more by 12. Sadly even if I try to explain the simplest chemistry to any one (My science teacher is not a chemist)especially my parents, they say No That will EXPLODE BLAH BLAH I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT BUT BLAH BLAH from my parents. But even if it's a fellow student in the simplest terms possible, they still don't get it like how a glow stick works (i don't discuss pyro with anyone or acid that kind of thing that could give the wrong impression) 2 of them said to make XXX that I would have to put sodium metal in it or put XXX in it to glow, ah so sad to see them talking out of there butt.(I'm not saying i know everything about anything but I hope it doesn't come out that way). Thank you for reading this rant.:D


Sometimes I have similar feelings, too. :D
btw. I am 16 :)

DeathAdder - 5-11-2011 at 19:48

Nice to see I'm not alone in having been treated that way. I go to a private school and we are a close nit group of roughly 350 students, but everyone (rather intrestingly) knows me by sight or name, i've sadly become known as "that crazy kid","the human encyclopedia" (got that for being the only non-high school student taking the high school SAT this december),"senior nutcase", and my piece de resistance :o"the kid who can kill you with lighting":o(tesla coil).
Little brothers and sisters tell all I'm afraid. I've shut up about chemistry at my school because nobody understands it.
:(

Adas - 6-11-2011 at 00:41

Nice nicknames :D
I talk about chemistry only if someone asks. I brought dry ice into school 2 or 3 times :D So funny, me and my friend put it into our bottles and it made nice dense smoke, we were also making smoke circles by pressing the bottle fast, you know what I mean? :D

Chemistry is fun, but it's a shame that almost nobody is interested in it. And it is also a shame, that when many people hear the word "chemist", they usually imagine some drug makers or terrorists. :(

DeathAdder - 7-11-2011 at 17:22

Ah Adas, so so true. It is very sad that even my parents show no will or desire to even listen to what i have to say (about chemistry). I don't want to sound like I'm moping by saying that, so here are a few-:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D.
But not so nice nicknames, though, I was always "that weird kid no one understands" i have no friends at all (never did, and I learned when you have chemistry that becomes your only friend) sure I talk to people but I don't truly know anyone. If I brought dry ice to school and told them that CO2 was an Asphyxiant gas they would think I was trying to kill them "sigh" i mean there truly is nothing wrong with a tesla coil but they are all so immature about that.(Try saying it really fast and chances are you'll see what I'm getting at) If only people knew what true chemistry looked like and that it does not have only 2 purposes like some people think it does(blowing stuff up and drugs). It is so sadly inevitable that the retarded news media can't grasp the concept of shutting up when your ahead.
EDIT:Read that quote by Einstein "I live in that solitude that is painful in youth but delicious in the years of maturity."
Edgar Allen Poe wrote something that pretty much sums up my situation pretty well ahem
" From childhood's hour I have not been
As others were; I have not seen
As others saw; I could not bring
My passions from a common spring.
From the same source I have not taken
My sorrow; I could not awaken
My heart to joy at the same tone;
And all I loved, I loved alone.
Then- in my childhood, in the dawn
Of a most stormy life- was drawn
From every depth of good and ill
The mystery which binds me still:
From the torrent, or the fountain,
From the red cliff of the mountain,
From the sun that round me rolled
In its autumn tint of gold,
From the lightning in the sky
As it passed me flying by,
From the thunder and the storm,
And the cloud that took the form
(When the rest of Heaven was blue)
Of a demon in my view." words to live by.




[Edited on 8-11-2011 by DeathAdder]

Adas - 8-11-2011 at 11:10

Wow. I think it is sad that you have no friends at all. I am more lucky! I have 2 friends that are interested in chemistry - one of them is my cousin :D He loves chemistry like me. Plus I have very good girl-friend, she changed my life and taught me a lot of things :) So I thank her for this.

But to be honest, I don't have much friends and most of them I know only from internet :(
That quotation from Einstein is a good and faithful one.

I always hated to be like others, I don't understand the others, they don't understand me (just like your case). I was always alone when I was younger. I was searching for bugs in the grass and so xD Old times. Then I switched to chemistry somehow. But I am lucky to have some friends now :)
Thanks God. Friends are very important in my life.

btw. Have you got skype or icq? :D (or facebook)

LHcheM - 11-11-2011 at 23:38

wow I'm young I'm just 16 years old! ^^

DeathAdder - 12-11-2011 at 16:42

Sorry for the late reply Adas, but no I never liked social media at all I do have a facebook but have it only if i need to download something or things like that. I have a you tube channel but there are 0 videos (i wanted to know what a particular song was ). I should have worded that a bit better than I did. But don't feel sad at all I've (perhaps I'm crazy?) grown to like the solitude:) people do talk to me but usually out of boredom.

I hope I don't sound like I'm having a pity party though.

Hexavalent - 2-2-2012 at 14:23

As of January 2012, I am 13 and enjoy mainly macroscalce organics.

AirCowPeaCock - 3-2-2012 at 08:04

Quote: Originally posted by DeathAdder  
So sad to see that no one my age (13) is interested in anything other than video game mass-virtual-murder so it now looks like i am the youngest member here. How interesting. I'm not a pyromaniac like some people my age. I got into chemistry when I was 11 but I started to want more by 12. Sadly even if I try to explain the simplest chemistry to any one (My science teacher is not a chemist)especially my parents, they say No That will EXPLODE BLAH BLAH I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT BUT BLAH BLAH from my parents. But even if it's a fellow student in the simplest terms possible, they still don't get it like how a glow stick works (i don't discuss pyro with anyone or acid that kind of thing that could give the wrong impression) 2 of them said to make XXX that I would have to put sodium metal in it or put XXX in it to glow, ah so sad to see them talking out of there butt.(I'm not saying i know everything about anything but I hope it doesn't come out that way). Thank you for reading this rant.:D


Don't worry, when you're older they will give up and you'll have a fume hood in your basement and be working with cyanides--with enthusiasm! Wanna make a half pound of black powder? You will hear "why so little?"

OctanitroC - 22-4-2012 at 12:48

As of April 2012 I'm 14 and I'm mainly interested in copper chemistry plus a little basic organic.

Quote: Originally posted by DeathAdder  
So sad to see that no one my age (13) is interested in anything other than video game mass-virtual-murder so it now looks like i am the youngest member here. How interesting. I'm not a pyromaniac like some people my age. I got into chemistry when I was 11 but I started to want more by 12. Sadly even if I try to explain the simplest chemistry to any one (My science teacher is not a chemist)especially my parents, they say No That will EXPLODE BLAH BLAH I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT BUT BLAH BLAH from my parents. But even if it's a fellow student in the simplest terms possible, they still don't get it like how a glow stick works (i don't discuss pyro with anyone or acid that kind of thing that could give the wrong impression) 2 of them said to make XXX that I would have to put sodium metal in it or put XXX in it to glow, ah so sad to see them talking out of there butt.(I'm not saying i know everything about anything but I hope it doesn't come out that way). Thank you for reading this rant.:D


DeathAdder- I am SO glad you beat me to that rant. I have had this sentiment ever since I got to middle school and everyone was afraid I'd blow the school up...glad to hear that there are other people my age who feel this way.

-ONC

Teen Chemist - 27-4-2012 at 17:34

Im 13 and have loved chemistry and science in general all my life. I have a small lab but it is constantly growing.

Eddygp - 28-4-2012 at 13:01

I'm 14... not much of a home lab... 4 or 5 products and very scarce glassware. Home chemistry is a difficult hobby when compared to e.g. football. In the latter case, you can purchase balls, sport shoes, etc. everywhere. However, the slight chemophobia and the lack of buyers of these products... makes this more difficult.

[Edited on 28-4-2012 by Eddygp]

ParadoxChem126 - 20-6-2013 at 19:39

I'm 12, born in 2001.

elementcollector1 - 20-6-2013 at 20:17

1996, 16 years old.
Quote:
No That will EXPLODE BLAH BLAH I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT BUT BLAH BLAH from my parents

Welcome to the modern world, where 'chemical' is a bad thing. (I won't go into detail, there are plenty of rage-threads floating around about this topic anyway).

Glucose Oxidase - 21-6-2013 at 11:59

hahaha :)
elementcollector1 ,
Same problem same age the only difference is that i never had fruitful experiment in my life :)

BTW, about parents i always get "are you sure that won't explode?" question when i put my chlorate cell in the kitchen :p

bfesser - 21-6-2013 at 17:36

More young'uns than I had expected. I don't know if I should be dismayed or delighted.

Dismayed, because young chemists will <em>always</em> do stupid things&mdash;I know I did&mdash;and we're encouraging them!
Delighted, because there may be hope for a future generation of chemists, despite their parents' chemophobia.

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]

plante1999 - 21-6-2013 at 17:43

Both, it depend on who you are talking about. For some member, I would be "dismayed" and some "delighted". Depend more on the guy, than the age.

bfesser - 21-6-2013 at 17:53

As for you, <strong>plante1999</strong>, I'm dismayed, and frankly, a little worried. :P

Quote: Originally posted by plante1999  
Depend more on the guy, than the age.

Perhaps you could that it depends more on the <em>individual</em> than on the age of that individual. We need to encourage young women to become interested in chemistry and the hard sciences, not exclude them. (Yes, I know that people casually refer to people of either sex as "guys". In writing, it's poor practice.)

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]

ParadoxChem126 - 21-6-2013 at 17:53

Quote: Originally posted by bfesser  


Dismayed, because young chemists will <em>always</em> do stupid things&mdash;I know I did&mdash;and we're encouraging them!

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]


I do my best not to do anything stupid.:)

plante1999 - 21-6-2013 at 18:00

Quote: Originally posted by bfesser  
As for you, <strong>plante1999</strong>, I'm dismayed, and frankly, a little worried. :P

Quote: Originally posted by plante1999  
Depend more on the guy, than the age.

Perhaps you could that it depends more on the <em>individual</em> than on the age of that individual. We need to encourage young women to become interested in chemistry and the hard sciences, not exclude them. (Yes, I know that people casually refer to people of either sex as "guys". In writing, it's poor practice.)

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]


Sorry, I'm not a pro at writing English yet.

Not sure it is a good thing that you are dismayed about me... But I find that if you are worried, it means I have some value as a chemist ha ha ha ha.

prof_genius - 5-8-2013 at 23:50

Quote: Originally posted by ParadoxChem126  
I'm 12, born in 2001.

You are not the only 12 year old here. (Im 12)

[Edited on 6-8-2013 by prof_genius]

TheChemiKid - 6-8-2013 at 05:08

Quote: Originally posted by hkparker  
I'm just turning 18! I feel pretty young for this forum and know I know far less then the senior members here, but I'm pretty sure I'll be here for quite a while :D


Wow, you feel young! I'm 12.

Oscilllator - 25-8-2013 at 01:47

Quote: Originally posted by bfesser  
We need to encourage young women to become interested in chemistry and the hard sciences, not exclude them. (Yes, I know that people casually refer to people of either sex as "guys". In writing, it's poor practice.)

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]

Just as an interesting fact: I hear that nowadays the gender discrepancy in biology can be greater than that in Phys/chem because so many women end up doing biology. Surprising!

MichiganMadScientist - 26-8-2013 at 09:12

Quote: Originally posted by bfesser  
More young'uns than I had expected. I don't know if I should be dismayed or delighted.

Dismayed, because young chemists will <em>always</em> do stupid things&mdash;I know I did&mdash;and we're encouraging them!
Delighted, because there may be hope for a future generation of chemists, despite their parents' chemophobia.

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]


For the record, I'm somewhere between 25-30 years old..

As has been pointed out, age is not necessarily the big factor here. Certainly, maturity has a lot to do with this (I work in a military environment, and you should see the 18 years olds that I have to deal with. They are like 12 year olds....), but kids can be safe and smart just like adults.

However, I think EDUCATION and UNDERSTANDING has the biggest role here. If you don't actually have a real understanding of the chemicals you're working with, you will not have as great of respect for them safety wise. And, our average teenage-chemist is simply not likely to possess much in the way of formal chemistry lab education.

Still, I would NEVER trust any SMART teen under 16 year olds to work with concentrated acids/etc. without proper supervision. I mean, they may be smarter than the average teen, but they are still KIDS! Just my 2 cents... :) And for your average typical kid, no serious chemicals without supervision until at least 18...

We have all given ourselves Nitric Acid tattoos in our freshmen-level university labs, but hopefully, most of us older people have moved on from this stage... :)


[Edited on 26-8-2013 by MichiganMadScientist]

plante1999 - 26-8-2013 at 09:33

Quote: Originally posted by MichiganMadScientist  

Still, I would NEVER trust any SMART teen under 16 year olds to work with concentrated acids/etc. without proper supervision. I mean, they may be smarter than the average teen, but they are still KIDS! Just my 2 cents... :) And for your average typical kid, no serious chemicals without supervision until at least 18...
[Edited on 26-8-2013 by MichiganMadScientist]


Since a very early age I worked with concentrated acid, halogen, oxidizing agent etc.. I'm also reputed to be a bit mad. I never feared chemistry at all. And I have almost nothing of all theses year then some permanent face burns from a small mistake, especially that I was without ANY supervision for all these years.

Some of my more "mad" experiments are not repertoried on the web too, but be assured I am safe in my experiments, more so then most graduating chemists.

Look 50-70s chemistry video, and how chemist worked back then. Its mostly like that that I work.

I don't believe in restriction of uses in lab of dangerous chem, nor fear of them, and especially not from people that never worked like real chemists.

Just my 2 cent ha ha.

[Edited on 26-8-2013 by plante1999]

MichiganMadScientist - 26-8-2013 at 11:04

Quote:
[quote=296857&tid=16170&author=plante1999]I'm also reputed to be a bit mad. I never feared chemistry at all.


We are all a bit mad, :P:P. Chemicals are nothing to be feared, but they must always be respected

Quote:
And I have almost nothing of all theses year then some permanent face burns from a small mistake, especially that I was without ANY supervision for all these years. Some of my more "mad" experiments are not repertoried on the web too, but be assured I am safe in my experiments, more so then most graduating chemists.


Quote:
Look 50-70s chemistry video, and how chemist worked back then. Its mostly like that that I work.


Hmmm....How do you mean? If anything, people were less safe with chemicals in the past. Today, we now know that a lot of the heavily used chemicals of yesteryear are carcinogenic. I often joke that all usefull chemicals (e.g. benzene, etc.) are eventually found to be somehow cancerous.

This is also a good reason to practice caution when dealing with even seemingly harmless chemicals like acetone. Limit skin exposure, wear gloves, etc. Who knows? We may discover acetone to be harmfull 50 years from now...

Quote:
I don't believe in restriction of uses in lab of dangerous chem, nor fear of them, and especially not from people that never worked like real chemists.


Again, I feel its more of a respect thing than a fear thing. From your posts, it pretty much sounds like we are on the same page here regarding this. :) "Real" chemists can get careless, too. Safety practices are super enforced in undergrad teaching labs, but I happen to know that in the research labs, safety goggles aren't always worn as much as they should be. Having said this, people who work in these labs have already developed a very thorough set of safe chemistry lab practices... :)

A Good Example:

Don't get me wrong, I'm ALL for letting teens experiment with chemistry. It just needs to happen in a proper enviroment. In the US, we often take young children deer hunting. We teach them how to shoot a firearm even at a young age. But we start them out by first heavily emphasizing safety issues. Guns are not cool toys. They are machines designed to do little more than Kill. A 12 year old simply hasn't lived long enough to appreciate fully the meaning of dangerous. An older child (a teen) has a better grasp on the seriousness of a firearm, but still cannot be universally expected to have the ability and maturity to ALWAYS make safe decisions. And with guns and chemicals, there is NO ROOM for even ONE TIME mistakes. That one mistake could mean acid in one's eyes or shooting oneself in the head. That's why we have adults. Adults may never need to intervene because the child is responsible enough, but the Adult should still be there in most cases, just in case.

[Edited on 26-8-2013 by MichiganMadScientist]

plante1999 - 26-8-2013 at 11:08

70s chemist were less careful, but much better, and didn't had that much more harmed then modern ones. Everything is toxic anyway, its simple logic of how an organism work. As such I use general care with everything, not caring there toxicity, unless it is extreme, like hydrogen cyanide. I feel it is the way to go.

Pyro - 26-8-2013 at 11:38

Im 17, from '96
My mother is always worried about me blowing up stuff and my dad encourages me!

I come home very happy one day with the bottle of P4 (Late for dinner) and at the dining table I show them my nice white P4 and explain what it is and how I made it.
My mother says: ''are you sure its safe? you need to be careful not to drop it! you'll burn the boat down one day!''
and my dad says:''Cool, you going to make a grenade and use it in the sleepstraat (a street here where all the non-whites live)?''

and my chemistry teacher doesn't even think I should be experimenting with I2 or HCl!


MichiganMadScientist - 26-8-2013 at 14:18

Quote:
you'll burn the boat down one day!''


Lolwut? :o:D Does your family live on a boat or something???

Quote:
and my dad says:''Cool, you going to make a grenade and use it in the sleepstraat (a street here where all the non-whites live)?''


...Lolwuuuuuuuuut???:o:o

Seriously. Europeans crack me up.... Over here in the U.S., we tend to think of Canadians as being a cutesy, gentle people with a slightly-odd accent. Canadians just seem so harmless. But you Europeans are like, "Elemental Iodine?, Jolly Good Fun!!":cool::P

I wish I could play with Iodine crystals and not get arrested over here...:mad:

[Edited on 26-8-2013 by MichiganMadScientist]

neptunium - 26-8-2013 at 15:08

78...

Pyro - 31-8-2013 at 05:40

Sure we do, there is already a GL45 sized I2 stain on the ash floor :( been there almost a year, so I guess she might be right. (I thought the cap was clean and put it on the floor in front of the heater to dry.

Lol, you know how many people who first hear about my interest in chemistry ask if I can make a bomb for the allochtonen (basically non whites and Romanians and such)

What exactly would you like to do with I2 crystals? stain you fingers? stain other things?

PeeWee2000 - 31-8-2013 at 13:18

19 here, born in 94'.
@Michigan Pssh playing with iodine isnt a big deal you can even buy it on ebay (just dont mix it with sulfuric acid :P) but coming across some elemental phosphorus like pyro over there now that would really be something! Guess were stuck in the mud until meth becomes legal :\

Texium - 22-3-2014 at 22:22

This poll is pretty interesting. I would have never expected that my age group (I'm currently 16, born in '97) would be the largest group on the forum, at least as of now anyway.

numos - 22-3-2014 at 22:54

Quote: Originally posted by Oscilllator  
Quote: Originally posted by bfesser  
We need to encourage young women to become interested in chemistry and the hard sciences, not exclude them. (Yes, I know that people casually refer to people of either sex as "guys". In writing, it's poor practice.)

[Edited on 6/22/13 by bfesser]

Just as an interesting fact: I hear that nowadays the gender discrepancy in biology can be greater than that in Phys/chem because so many women end up doing biology. Surprising!


Yes!! I agree here, not just biology, medicine especially too, our school has an entire academy dedicated to working in the medical field.

bismuthate - 23-3-2014 at 03:40

Quote: Originally posted by zts16  
This poll is pretty interesting. I would have never expected that my age group (I'm currently 16, born in '97) would be the largest group on the forum, at least as of now anyway.

Me niether although now I'm guessing in five or six years my group (2000-2004 I'm 13 with only 4 people in my age group as of now judging by the poll) will be the dominant group. What do you all think this poll will look like in a few years?

Texium - 13-9-2014 at 19:43

Interesting, it appears that although there haven't been any more replies to this thread in a long time, the 1995-1999 age group has continued to pull ahead by a wider margin, unless I'm misremembering the number of votes that were placed last time I looked at this thread.

Amos - 14-9-2014 at 06:06

'95 here(19 at the time of posting). I'm actually surprised there are so many older participants here. You pull up a chemistry youtube channel and the majority of the time you're being taught syntheses by a 15 year-old, it seems.

BromicAcid - 14-9-2014 at 08:46

I started doing chemistry experiments in my back yard in 1995, I was 12 at the time. Aside from a few posts to sci.chem on the Usenet I was working completely solo. I didn't have anyone to brag to or ask questions from so I read and read and read. The internet was considerably less useful at the time, at least for me.

Within 2 years I had a supply of nitric acid I had distilled. Copious quantities of solvents, bases, halogens (I was stockpiling bromine) and quite a bit more. By the time I joined the forum in 2003 I was making phosphorus, alkali metals, and plenty more. Again, to that point I had been working in a vacuum. I wish I had taken better notes on everything I did, for nearly a year I was making and decomposing acetates to see what I would get. Nothing from that time is recorded here.

The point of all of this is, just as mentioned above, maybe there are some 12 year olds that do not have the maturity for this, and I was likely one of them. Consider the scars on my hands and arms from strong acids / bases or my bad eyesight from my sodium hydroxide electrolysis cell. But then again I am much better for it, I was able to breeze through chemistry in high school and most of college. I feel as long as you are actually learning what you do, taking the time to read up on the reactions and the hazards and understand them then age should hardly factor in at all. But if you are just copying something from youtube you get significantly less out of it and might not fully appreciate the true hazards of the reaction.

cpman - 5-10-2014 at 15:35

Wow! I'm surprised that my age group ('95-'99) is the biggest! (I'm 17, born in '97.)
I'd expected the biggest group to be slightly older.
I'm glad that this is the largest group. Even this poll is only a small percentage of the total members of the forum, it is good to see that there is still a good number of younger people interested in science.

Brain&Force - 5-10-2014 at 16:27

Yeah - I've always kinda felt that there's a few groups at Sciencemadness that we all fall into, and the teen chemist group seems to be the biggest.

Jylliana - 5-10-2014 at 21:54

I'm currently 21 years old, born in 1992 :)

subsecret - 6-10-2014 at 17:36

As of January 30, I'm 16 years old.

Hopefully we will see a decrease in legal troubles due to increased interest in home chemistry...

Texium - 6-10-2014 at 18:07

Quote: Originally posted by Awesomeness  

Hopefully we will see a decrease in legal troubles due to increased interest in home chemistry...
Yes, that would be great. We need to try and get the word out about amateur chemistry. The more people who get interested in it, especially younger people, the better chance it has of becoming more accepted and respected in society.
Hopefully projects like Rador Labs will help with that. It will probably be a generation or two at the least, but I think it will happen.

Zombie - 18-2-2015 at 20:00

Where do all these young whipper snappers come from?

violet sin - 18-2-2015 at 21:33

no clue, but I am starting to feel a bit old, the largest segment of members was born right about when I graduated high school. now I realize thats not much in the grand scheme of things, but its probably the first time I have noticed my self in a situation like that. I'm sure it won't be the last time.

only 17 members in my age group, and its a whole decade, there are 90 in the 90's!!! if you add both 90-94 and 95-99

Zombie - 18-2-2015 at 22:00

If I bring my 15, you bring your 17... We still get our butts whooped. Damn Kids!

Bert - 18-2-2015 at 23:10

Quote: Originally posted by Zombie  
Where do all these young whipper snappers come from?


"The mommy and the daddy love each other very much..."


---------------

Wow. I can use my AARP discounts in less than 3 months. Ain't retiring. Might go out like Grandpa Chiarella...

Brain&Force - 18-2-2015 at 23:35

Here's one of your resident '90s kids...I guess we all want to grow up, get jobs, and have our own mad laboratories!

Happy 1000 posts Bert!

[edit] just realized I wasn't even in kindergarten when SM started in 2002...

[Edited on 19.2.2015 by Brain&Force]

Zombie - 19-2-2015 at 00:06

My mommy loved my uncles...

Happy 1000!

http://media2.giphy.com/media/YlLD7GP21x6dW/200.gif

Crowfjord - 19-2-2015 at 18:56

Currently 27, born 1987. Surprised to see that my age group is the second largest. I wonder how many are actually still active, though.

Zombie - 19-2-2015 at 19:56

Most forums seem to have an active group, and those that come, and go like the tides.

I prefer the active group forums. There is always something new to learn.

You're a year younger than my daughter Crowfjord. I still call her Baby Girl. Man life is strange.

Eddygp - 8-3-2015 at 06:11

Just to make sure... will someone change the categories in the poll, in a few years' time? Some users might have become inactive by then.

Bedlasky - 9-10-2020 at 20:34

I am currently 22, born in 1998.

teodor - 10-10-2020 at 02:32

I am surprised that in my range 1970-1979 there are less people than in 1960 - 1969 and 1980-1989 groups. Is it something with demography?

B(a)P - 10-10-2020 at 03:01

Quote: Originally posted by teodor  
I am surprised that in my range 1970-1979 there are less people than in 1960 - 1969 and 1980-1989 groups. Is it something with demography?

Weird isn't it, I also sit in that bracket.

Syn the Sizer - 10-10-2020 at 06:05

I am in the 1980-1984 demographic.

Chemorg42 - 10-10-2020 at 10:54

For me, its 2004. I predict that in the next few years, the numbers from my demographic will increase significantly.

symboom - 10-10-2020 at 15:28

Mine is 1990 that's goo it shows a trend in more younger people getting interested in chemistry I think mature chemistry is slowly becoming more popular

arkoma - 10-10-2020 at 18:17

This oldie has gained new traction I see.

I was somewhat of a kewl during my first iteration, as a teenager in the '70's. Could buy everything for black powder at the Rexall Drug. And they KNEW we were gonna fool around with it.

Second iteration, I was 50, kids grown wife four states away (usually its far enough) and I kept running into search results from this forum. Signed up, got a few pieces of gear and while I'm not super serious I haven't gotten bored yet either. Well, serious enough to have a hotplate/stirrer, vacuum pump etc and I've collected up some "exotic" reagents along the way. I've got some TEMPO, TBAB, borohydride and a few others squirreled away. A good majority of which I got/bought/swapped with members here. I can proudly say I have NEVER had a "bad" deal from a member of this forum.

You youngsters WILL, a lot of you, rotate out. Thats natural. Spouses, kids, bills, etc.

Us old folks will be here when the bug bites again!!

Oh, and the year of my birth is 1963.

solo - 10-10-2020 at 19:07

........still here after a start in 1945....solo

mackolol - 11-10-2020 at 06:17

I'm just as old as SM
2002