Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Explosive chambers

uber luminal - 9-11-2004 at 13:38

Erm, I suppose this goes here, since its a piece of lab equipment.

I need to make a SAFE way of delivering molten cast iron (and a variety of other lower MP metals), into a 5 gallon bucket full of water.

Some sort of cover would be needed to shield one from flying spatter, but also in consideration would be the force of the steam generated... in an explosive manor.
anywhere from 5-100 grams of the metal would be deposited each time.

the water bucket needs to be tall, as metals with lower Tconductivity will go further than metals with less TC.

The metal needs to be dropped from at least 30 cm, into the water.

I am pretty stumped becuase everything I devise has some danger or some flaw that I worry will kill me.

Possible materials I have available... Hole in ground, Mild Steel (i can weld),cement.

I thought maybe some of you have devised ways to set off explosives in confined spaces, and you might be able to help out.

Dodoman - 9-11-2004 at 14:19

I think you could place a wire net over the bucket. The net should have small openings. The wholes should vent the vapor so it won't explode. And you don't have to worry about it melting cause it won't. I was told that jewelry manufactures in some 3rd world contries place such nets over silver as they dry it after molding cause sometimes water gets trapped inside the pieces.

Twospoons - 9-11-2004 at 15:07

The risk of a steam explosion is probably not as great as you might think. I have poured 1/2 kg molten lead into a bucket with only a litre or two of water, with no great steam eruptions. What tends to happen is non-contact boiling at first, which is fairly slow, then rapid boiling as the metal cools sufficiently. This happens about the time the metal reaches the bottom of the bucket. The steam generated condenses again as it rises into the cooler water above, and very little escapes the surface.
I'm assuming you're trying to make small metal beads, so will be pouring a thin, slow stream of metal in to the water.


This is not to say one shouldn't be careful, but with a large enough bucket, and a small quantity of metal I think you wont have any trouble.

Just don't stand with your face over the bucket ;)

[Edited on 9-11-2004 by Twospoons]

chemoleo - 9-11-2004 at 15:11

Well if the metal is hot enough, isn't the heat sufficient to split water into H2 and O2, which recombines upon cooling, making this dangerous? Lead is obviously not a problem - but 1300 deg C molten iron maybe.
Face mask, and other gear is obviously a must! And a ladle with an extremely long handle.

uber luminal - 9-11-2004 at 16:19

Quote:
Originally posted by Dodoman
I think you could place a wire net over the bucket. -- And you don't have to worry about it melting cause it won't.


Dodo, what do you propose I make a net out of, that is going to withstand molten iron? and I need to pour directly into the water, not through a net. Although this does sound partialy like a good idea for around some areas where I dont want random spatter.

Quote:
Originally posted by Twospoons
The risk of a steam explosion is probably not as great as you might think. I have poured 1/2 kg molten lead into a bucket with only a litre or two of water, with no great steam eruptions


The type of steam generation will depend greatly on what metal I pour. I think it depends mostly on Thermal conductivity of the material, the ammount, and what the temp is.
If it has a high TC(thermal conduct), it will transfer heat quickly, and thus Dump it much faster. If it has a lower TC, it will take longer to transfer the heat from the entire volume of the metal to the water. So your lead that you poured, was both low temp (not a lot of heat stored)(since leads MP is pretty low as well) and its TC is also very low for a metal. (almost half that of iron a nearly a 7th of what Al is. So obviously you can put Pb into water, and it will take some time before the water is heated enough that it will boil and eject steam.

Fe doesnt concern me as much as Al. While the Fe will be considerably hotter, the Al's TC is 3-4 times greater than Fe. Al will dump its heat and dump it fast. I have had fresh welded steel fall on my arm, and the damage was just on the surface of my skin. I had molten Al fly off and hit my other arm and transfer enough heat through the leathers into my arm and leave deep tissue damage. The contact time of both were about the same. The TC makes all the difference.
when I do the Al there will be flying spatter, and a huge explosion. I am not sure if the explosion is just caused by the ejecting steam, or if theres actualy enough energy in the system to break apart the water molecules for something much worse. I hope this helps any conciderations.

I will be wearing a face shield, and full body leathers. But this still wont protect me from flying cement or metal that didnt pass the stress . I thought about pouring the metal into a seperate crucible that could then be activated remotly to pour, but I would have get the metal, run over to the bucket of water, pour it into the other crucible, run back, activate the mechanical function, and do it all before the metal (specificaly Al) starts to cool enough that the experiment wont work.

axehandle - 9-11-2004 at 17:16

This can probably be improved upon, but here goes: Make metal container as in picture, fill with water. Take hold of crucible with molten metal with long tongs. Get behind container, lower tong handles into slot in container. Say quick prayer and turn tongs, thus emptying the crucible into the water.

Back of container will act as blast shield, hopefully deflecting water and/or steam and/or molten metal away from operator.

Additional protection using metal nets as well as adjusting the angle of the blast shield etc could be helpful I guess...

[Edited on 2004-11-10 by axehandle]

dumper.jpg - 25kB

Twospoons - 9-11-2004 at 18:25

With Al you also have the issue of Al reacting with the water.

You could also try an oil quench - with a high BP oil. This would be good for reactive metals like Al. Though you will need a lid to kill the fire afterwards :P

Taaie-Neuskoek - 10-11-2004 at 08:16

Dumping Al in water is risky, the water splits into 2H2 and O2, and with a little heat a rather exothermic, explosive reaction will happen.

This is why you never should try to extinguish burning Mg with water.

For oil, I don't know. It will burn at the end for sure. I don't like the idea of putting an oxidiser of 660 - 2467*C in a FEUL. Although it looks the best option, be carefull!

Dodoman - 10-11-2004 at 09:01

The net i was refering to doesn't have to stand the temp. The metal that would hit the net must have come from the water so it should have a hard surface.

Small balls of hot iron with molten core hitting the net should bounce off it back to the bucket.

As for how to place the net this is simple. Fill the bucket to about 2/3 leave a littel space to allow the metal balls to cool a littel as it hitts the water before hitting the net. The net should have a whole in the middle to allow pouring the iron.

As for how to pour the iron this could be tricky. I think you could gide its way in by placing a ceramic pot with a whole in the middle (the kind they put plants in). Just make sure that it won't crack or get too hot and melt the net and fall into the water. I think you could do this by building supports for the ceramic pot.

uber luminal - 10-11-2004 at 21:57

Erm... So why would adding that much heat make water break apart? then explode? I mean really, metal industries quenche metals that get even hotter right into brine (which is mostly water anyway) and they dont have explosions?
It just doesnt make sense to me that H2O would undergo a reaction of 2H20 -> 2H + O2 then O2 + H2 --> H20

darkflame89 - 11-11-2004 at 00:08

hmm.. at high enough temperatures, Mg and Al can react with water, just like sodium react with water. This action liberates hydrogen. In large enough qunatities, the exothermic reaction between metal and water, will cause this hydrogen to react with oxygen in air, and cause and almighty explosion.

Ium - 11-11-2004 at 00:17

An O2/H2 explosion danger is most certainly present when considering reactive metals as Mg and Al. I would not even consider water for quenching when using these materials. Even if an explosion does not occur the metal will oxidize to a considerable extent. Something to consider if purity is an issue.

Also remember that latent heat values differ from material to material and there are reasons why water has found widespread use as an effective coolant other than the financial benefits.

I can agree that thermal conductivity of some metals can be an issue. The higher the conductivity the shorter the timeframe for the heat transfer to occur. The shorter the timeframe the more intense the reaction with the coolant will be. If the heat has no time to dissipate then you may get localized hot-spots in the coolant which could present a fire or explosion hazard with water or oil.

However I have little experience in such areas as metal casting and such so I can really only offer my personal opinion.

unionised - 12-11-2004 at 07:50

"I need to make a SAFE way of delivering molten cast iron (and a variety of other lower MP metals), into a 5 gallon bucket full of water. "

Why?

uber luminal - 12-11-2004 at 08:40

Quote:
Originally posted by unionised
"I need to make a SAFE way of delivering molten cast iron (and a variety of other lower MP metals), into a 5 gallon bucket full of water. "

Why?

why not?

er rather, I need it for a MatE report. I need to provide several hard evidence/observations for a said report. By quenching the different molten metals, they do a variety of different things. I can provide evidence for thermal conductivity etc. by the way the metals freeze in the water. Its an oddball experiment but it has worked thus far for Os-Pewter, zinc, tin and lead.