
Quote: Originally posted by ChemistryAddictive ![]() |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
But as i
said i think it needs more Zn... As in this procedure they use less Zn than they use Pd/C in this article ( General procedure for selective mono
debenzylation of dibenbenzylamines: The substrate dibenzyl compounds (1 mmol), ammonium formate (3 mmol), 10% Pd/C (100 mg) and methanol (20 mL) were
charged in to a 50 ml reactor. Reaction was stirred for 15- 20 min at room temperature under nitrogen. After completion of the reaction (monitored by
TLC) catalyst was removed by filtration, catalyst was washed with 5ml of methanol. The combined filtrate was concentrated to dryness.... )
But it looks so attractive... No pressure, cheap Zn
instead of expensive Pd/C... Quote: Originally posted by ChemistryAddictive ![]() |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
As for "try-and-optimize", this why i will try to do it with
ballon, to check the conversation on such pressure.
Only the problem
that i don't have a TLC plates to check the conversation.
But by the all characteristics (physical properties, appearance, smell, MP) it's really deprotected amine HCl.
And if i add to
much Rpm it start to "fly" in a flask
I had to add some H2 from time to time. Also i wanted to ask, in
theory this reaction must use 1 mol H2 to 1 mol substrate to deprotect it? Quote: Originally posted by ChemistryAddictive ![]() |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
(no starting intermediate recovered). I used 5% by weight Pd/C (50% wet) to starting substrate. So next time i will try to use double of Pd/C and
more vigorious stirring. And try 24 hours...
But you answered to my question. For such cheap solvent i don't going
to do any additional steps to recycle it. 