Sciencemadness Discussion Board

KCLO3 by way of H2O + KCL

 Pages:  1  2  

12AX7 - 29-6-2007 at 17:36

Oh, same old graphite bar seen above.

dann2 - 30-6-2007 at 15:51

Hello,
That is a high temperature for Graphite.
Would it be possible to weigh anode every half day to get an idea of wear.
Some nosey git would like to know:)

Dann2

12AX7 - 30-6-2007 at 17:27

I doubt weighing it directly would be an effective plan, given the possible difference in absorbed and surface moisture, salt and, if time is taken to try to clean it out, soaking time, rinsing, drying, etc.

I would estimate I was getting about 10 grams of graphite muck every week, at 20A. Tomorrow I will process this electrolyte to see what's happened. (That counts to four days, but current was running intermittently due to faulty connections.)

Tim

12AX7 - 3-7-2007 at 13:31

Curious! Today when going to change the liquor, I noticed the PVC pipe spacers were floating!

I don't know if this is due to a chemical change (hydrogen bubbles reducing or chlorine and oxides oxidizing?), liquid density, or mere hydrogen bubbles adhering to them. A stir, knocking them around, failed to permanently submerge them, so my liquor must be unusually strong or something. It should be just as saturated with NaCl and NaClO3 as usual...I haven't changed my process except in temperature (which should reduce density!) and current flow.

Tim

12AX7 - 22-7-2007 at 12:47



3.5 kilos, minus what water is still present (no more than 0.5 kg I would guess).

This is the result of a week's run (about half of those days running, due to a shortage of brine), which produced 3 kg of NaClO3. This was dissolved in 1.6 kg boiling H2O and mixed with 2.1 kg KCl dissolved in 4.2 kg boiling water to precipitate the KClO3. Another 0.5 kg or so should be dissolved in the leftover liquid, giving yield around 85%.

And no, I don't really have a use for all this chlorate... Right now my interest is to tweak my process in terms of efficiency, time spent, etc.

Tim

Eclectic - 22-7-2007 at 13:05

You can use some of it to try making a flux for brazing cast iron.

1 part borax
1 part boric acid
1 part sodium or potassium chlorate

The idea is to have it be oxidizing at low temp to burn off oils and carbon in the cast iron and be neutral at brazing temps.

Something like this used to be available as a two part mix, but it's no longer made.

hashashan - 23-7-2007 at 03:09

12AX7
holy cow ...... one week? what was the current through the cell?

12AX7 - 23-7-2007 at 14:38

Around 60A.

Tim

chloric1 - 24-7-2007 at 02:13

Tim
I thought your PC power supply burned up. Did you get a new one? Hey one thing you can do it get some oxalic acid (Meijers has 2 pound jars near drain openers) and mix with your potassium chlorate to get a uniform crystal mix and then add enough battery acid to submerge. These 3 ingredients do not react intitially at room temperature at least not at perseptable measure anyways. Immerse a test tube of the mix in water above 60 Celcius and you get on-demand chlorine dioxide. Great for water treatment while camping etc.
Don't store ingredients mixed. Make ony what you need. It smells like chlorine AND nitric acid :D:D:D SEXY STUFF

[Edited on 7/24/2007 by chloric1]

[Edited on 7/24/2007 by chloric1]

hashashan - 24-7-2007 at 14:23

60A ..... very nice that you could controll such currents .... when i push more then 10 amps i have a real trouble to keep the cell cool.

Do you use some stirrer or anything else? what is your power supply? what were the electrodes, the distance between them ... can you specify all the small details? I am very interested in such high yields.

Rhodium - 27-7-2007 at 02:36

I was directed to disscuss my electrode questions at this thread (I hope it's the reigth one^^)

(here is the old thread http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=8879 )

@garage chemist: It is hard to believe that coated anodes corrode, because they are used in industrie.

I don't want to use graphite (because of his negative attributes) and chromate (because of its high toxitiy) for my cell.


(di-)chromate will create a layer of hydratet oxides of chromium around the cathode. (So the catalitic effect will not take place in solution or directly by the chromate). And metallic chromium is always coated by an passive chromium oxide layer, right?
(In fact I've seen twice sites which told that under some circumstates chromium will get as chromate in solution.

gnitseretni - 26-8-2007 at 08:44

would a 1/8" dia tungsten rod make a good anode material?

Xenoid - 26-8-2007 at 12:40

Quote:
Originally posted by gnitseretni
would a 1/8" dia tungsten rod make a good anode material?


No! Check out Dann2's website for a discussion of suitable anodes;

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/5361/chlorate/...

If you are making your first chlorate cell, graphite or carbon "gouging rods" (remove the copper) are the best choice!

Regards, Xenoid

gnitseretni - 26-8-2007 at 14:49

Ok, thanks. Carbon it is :)

chloric1 - 27-8-2007 at 05:43

Well I completed my first 14 day chlorate run about a week ago. My observation conclude that graphite is the best choice. Take note the quality of the carbon you choose is important. I started with a mediocre grade graphite rod and it was destroyed in 6 or 7 days. I now have two shorter pieces of this rod. I switched to a "denser" stronger graphite and the anode only suffered minor pitting. So may recommend EDM grade graphite. It is reasonalbly priced on ebay but expensive everywhere else.

I don't have indigo testing solution so I tested for chlorate by trying to ignite the dried filter paper I used to clarify my electrolyte. WOOSH! Burned so hot that some NaCl vaporized and condensed salt on a near by rod of metal!:D:D:o

I wanted to crystallize sodium chlorate but I ony have 300 grams per Liter more or less. So I will boil down and add more saltwater and rerun for another week to 10 days. This stuff is soluble!!

[Edited on 8/27/2007 by chloric1]

Xenoid - 27-8-2007 at 06:55

@ Chloric

Congratulations!

Sounds just like my experiences, although I moved to gouging rods (they were so cheap) and I just run them to destruction.

If your cell is not too big, say less than about 2.5 litres, magnetic stirring improves efficiency, it also allows you to add say 5g, 10g or even 15g per 100mls extra solid NaCl to the saturated solution you are already using. If you note the time when all the solid NaCl dissolves during the operation of your cell, you can work out the exact "true" efficiency of your cell, eg. 40,50,60%. Obviously, it also results in higher final concentrations of NaClO3.

When concentrating your solution, note the type of crystalisation occurring at the saturation point;
Flashes of large, sheet-like rafts on the surface indicate NaClO3 saturation, so remove and cool etc.
Tiny, crystals forming on the surface and clumping together indicate NaCl saturation, at about the same time you should see a fine white "sludgey" deposit of NaCl forming on the bottom of your evaporating container. Continue to concentrate a little further and then hot filter this NaCl out of the solution. You can then cool, and "harvest" a crop of NaClO3 from the remaining solution. You can repeat this several times, although the law of diminishing returns sets in and starts to make it not worthwhile. I would normally do two or three cycles.

Regards, Xenoid

[Edited on 27-8-2007 by Xenoid]

DerAlte - 27-8-2007 at 09:00

Xenoid said

Quote:
If you are making your first chlorate cell, graphite or carbon "gouging rods" (remove the copper) are the best choice!

......

I moved to gouging rods (they were so cheap) and I just run them to destruction.


Agree 100%! No amateaur should bother about a few cheap rods or power efficiency. I haven't done a chlorate or perchlorate manufacture for a few years, but my best results were gotten using the inverted trough arrangement, where the mixing with the chlorine produced seems best.

It's difficult to be truly scientific with this electrolytic Oxidation. There's a lot of lore in it - the pyrotechnics boys are stiff with ideas. To hell with carbon erosion! I run the cells at high current density and about 60C (self heating). And I maintain you can get perchlorate with carbon anodes - I have done it. All the perchlorate I have comes from the last attempt.

I always used NaCl as the starting material. It seems to convert easier than the KCl, although I also add about 10% KCl. Why I'm not sure. If you add KCl and attempt the perchlorate step ( by upping the voltage and current density when most of the chlorate has formed) KClO4 will precipitate to the bottom of the cell, along with carbon rod detritus.. Likewise KClO3 if the solution is concentrated. The pH needs to be near neutral (6-8) - I believe this is the most critical factor.

The high temp encourages the disproportionation of the hypochlorite (and the erosion of rods). Many say dichromate is necessary for efficiency. It does work without. I add a little KMnO4 (enough to color red) -- more an act of faith than science!

To crystallize the sodium salt(s) is difficult. I always convert them to the far less soluble potassium salts. Purifing sufficiently to give a product suitable for some pyrotechnic needs (getting rid of the sodium yellow) is quite difficult, but in the perchlorate case not so difficult - one or two re-crystallizations with careful washing with ice water does it. Even with chlorate, there is a large difference of solubility between the Na and K salts.

Finally, I think the prize has to go to 12AX7 for his innovative and massive cell, huge power supply and prodigous yield. Positively industrial! The dirty mess he shows in the beaker is absolutely typical of what you get with graphite anodes. Not for those who don't like getting their hands dirty, and not for Kitchen labs! Well suited to a ventilated garage or outhouse (well, shed).

Regards,

Der Alte

12AX7 - 27-8-2007 at 09:25

Which reminds me, I have another five pounds on KClO3 the shelf (I've sold a total of 6 pounds so far), plus my personal stock, plus some 6 pounds of NaClO3. I've got the bottom half of a milk jug worth of KClO3 to hot filter and recrystallize.

My anode has also shrunk dramatically over the last few months. It's nicely rounded and about half its original dimension (1.5" square down to about 3/4", rounded). Oddly, I'm still running about the same current (typical current is 30A with room temperature liquor, up to 45A when hot), which means current density is roughly quadrupled. At least the copper plated connection isn't corroding further -- there was a vein of excessive porosity in this bar which piped chlorine-rich goo straight up to the connection, but now, solution can't even reach it because the rest of the vein has worn away.

I should let the cell run for an extra couple of days some time and see if perchlorate is formed. Hmm, if I'm going to do that, I'll want to get the potassium out of the liquor and prepare the next anode...

Tim

DerAlte - 27-8-2007 at 13:39

@12AX7
My god, man! You have gone commercial! (watch out for Big Brother if he lurks around your area.)

Don’t forget to tell us if you get any perchlorate. I don’t think anyone believes me when I say this can be done with carbon anodes.

Possible reactions for ClO4- production are

(1)Anodic oxidation: ClO3- + H2O -- > ClO4- + 2H+ +2e- ( -1.2V SEP at standard conditions)

(2)Disproportionation: 4ClO3- -- > 3ClO4- + Cl- (You can show this one by boiling a strong solution of KClO3 for a fair time. It is a slow process. Ultimately some less soluble perchlorate will precipitate)

(3)Oxidation in solution at large by ClO- ions; ClO3- + ClO- -- > ClO4- + Cl-

Who knows if and which happens? One thing is sure – it’s not a healthy environment for the poor carbon anode!

Regards,

Der Alte

[Edited on 27-8-2007 by DerAlte]

Progess

chloric1 - 8-9-2007 at 07:34

Well, I was not able to identify any chlorate looking crystals from my first run even though the filter papers burned like slow gun powder. I might have only had 300 grams or 350 grams NaClO3 per liter so I reran at 5.97 AMPS for just under 168 hours and the last 48 hours where without the lid. As Tim says the salt spray is atrociuos but I concentrated the solution down from 2 liters to 1 liter! :o I think I flipped over the balance and I have NaCLO3 as major constituant and NaCl as a minor one. I have maybe 100 or 150 grams of clear cubic crystals that fell out during filtering. They look like bust glass they are so clear. Unfortunately, they taste much like NaCl. The chlorate is a cooling saline taste simular to the nitrate. I know I am looking for tablet type crystals and I am boiling down to try to affect this. Maybe most of my chloride is out so this should'nt be too hard. I will return the cubes to solution and blend with more saturated NaCl for the next run. I might not crystalize all of the chlorate and put some of the mother liquor back in the cell to give the electrolyte a head start. I will let you know maybe with photos as things progess.

@ Deralt- You know maybe Perchlorate may form at graphite anodes but would anybody want to try? The yields would be poor and after destroying the significant chlorate amount I feel most would be disappointed. Don't worry I have a couple ideas for composite anodes. That is if I ever have free time to make them.;)

[Edited on 9/8/2007 by chloric1]

DerAlte - 8-9-2007 at 09:37

@ chloric1

Quote:
Deralt- You know maybe Perchlorate may form at graphite anodes but would anybody want to try? The yields would be poor and after destroying the significant chlorate amount I feel most would be disappointed.


Yes, an old fool like Der Alte would! It's the only way I've ever made perchlorate. and then only about 75g. It's the sacrificial anode process. Since I have always used battery rods, and a few gouging rods, the cost is not that great. Sure the efficiency is poor. It's the pricipcle of the thing. As for chlorate, well, that's no real problem with graphite in my opinion.

Mind you, Der Alte would not say no to a nice piece of Pt foil, or a well formed PbO2 anode, if anyone ever achieves the latter. I watch the dfforts of Dann2 et al. with great interest.

Der Alte.

12AX7 - 8-9-2007 at 10:18

NaClO3 forms nearly cubic crystals (they may actually be tetragonal) in certain conditions. In particular, I find them often when cooling slowly near room temperature in a saline solution.

Tim

chloric1 - 9-9-2007 at 18:21

Well I have noticed that there is a pattern. You boil processed electrolyte until cloudy. A powdery deposit forms. THis is the NaCl. I pour off supernatant fluid to be cooled. ONce cooled the electrolyte deposits crystals that are clear and glassy. These may have cubic speicimens but alsosome have tetragonal characteristics. I feel it is a learning curve.

@Tim- do you use chromates? If so how do you remove yellow color?

12AX7 - 9-9-2007 at 18:49

Washing and recrystallization. Or I suppose NaOH (covert to CrO4(2-)), H2O2 (peroxychromate complex) and acidify (decomposes to Cr(III)) to neutral (precipitates Cr(OH)3) would be an acceptable alternative.

Fine precipitates (of KClO3) are hard to clean by mere washing and recrystallization; the last batch I handled was just barely perceptibly green when dried. Oh well, it's only a few ppb of the stuff!

Tim

12AX7 - 13-9-2007 at 22:40

After about a week of down time, I replaced the crispy wires to the rectifier (I used wire apparently just a bit too thin for the current) and am now running on a new anode, a full 1.5" square cross section. As a result, current is higher (60A or so, maybe a smidge more?), which caused those wires to fail. The rectifier is in a hard-to-reach spot in the cabinet, so I had been putting it off.

Tim

chloric1 - 14-9-2007 at 15:32

Quote:
Originally posted by 12AX7
Washing and recrystallization. Or I suppose NaOH (covert to CrO4(2-)), H2O2 (peroxychromate complex) and acidify (decomposes to Cr(III)) to neutral (precipitates Cr(OH)3) would be an acceptable alternative.

Fine precipitates (of KClO3) are hard to clean by mere washing and recrystallization; the last batch I handled was just barely perceptibly green when dried. Oh well, it's only a few ppb of the stuff!

Tim


I know its not alot but the yellow color is REALLY annoying! Here is my electrolytic urine :D

[Edited on 9/14/2007 by chloric1]

Chromated filtrate.JPG - 113kB

Precipitation

chloric1 - 14-9-2007 at 15:41

Barium chloride

I don't know why I did not think of this sooner! :mad:
Barium chloride forms very insoluble barium chromate which precipitates and leaves a clear fluid on top. Some barium goes into solution but the remainder seems to drop out during boiling and concentrating. Just be sure to separate this before the solutions cools. Here is the resulting solution after barium treatment. I am waiting for crystallization right now in the freezer.

Clear Chlorate.JPG - 120kB

12AX7 - 14-9-2007 at 17:23

Since I do this continuously, I remove the material and leave the chrome in place. I have a whole bucket (about 5 gallons) approximately that color. :P

...That would be a lot of urine...

Tim

chloric1 - 15-9-2007 at 05:04

Continuous Process

Tim,

Actually that was about a fourth of what I had but still not close to the level that your running. Plus my final chlorate yeilding solution has been crystalized and redissolved about twice now. There should be very little sodium chloride now. I am nowhere near production on a continous basis but I have a working knowledge of solubility and crystal behaviour. The real key here is there is very change in sodium chloride solubility at various temperatures.

chloric1 - 15-9-2007 at 05:16

Chlorate crystal

OK this my final result. After spending the night in the freezer at 20 below zero Celcius, I got these crystals with peculiar cubic characteristics different than sodium chloride cubes. The cluster in my hand has a notably large cube face so I tried to capture the suns reflection with it for photo drama :P.

@Tim,
Even with HUGE volumes of crude product like you have, the actual quantity of barium choride would be small in comparison. You may only want to do a few smal batches if you wanted purified chlorate for a specific use or crystal study. Great thing to do next time you have downtime.

[Edited on 9/15/2007 by chloric1]

Big cube face.JPG - 109kB

12AX7 - 15-9-2007 at 10:06

Nice sample. :)

I have some crystals like that. None of them as large, but I do have a few which formed over several days which are very clear, and clearly cubic in shape. Remarkably, most of these sorts of crystals are formed in raw yellow solution, yet they are hardly colored.

When rapidly cooling from a boiling, saturated solution, I get a hard bed of stepped, rounded (not quite polygonal) crystals that's hard to break up. (It seems to me a lot of very soluble substances do this.) The difference is probably the temperature of spontaneous seeding and, especially in regards to clear crystals, the cooling rate.

Tim

Xenoid - 15-9-2007 at 13:06

Quote:
Originally posted by chloric1

OK this my final result. After spending the night in the freezer at 20 below zero Celcius, I got these crystals with peculiar cubic characteristics different than sodium chloride cubes. The cluster in my hand has a notably large cube face so I tried to capture the suns reflection with it for photo drama :P.

[Edited on 9/15/2007 by chloric1]


This is a bit off topic, but sodium chlorate was a popular choice for crystal growing recipes in more enlightened times. It is very easy (like alum) to grow large perfectly formed crystals. Now, if only I could find my crystal growing book (damn kids!) there is a lovely photo showing this!

Edit: Ah! Finally found it! It was in a kitchen cupboard with the crystal growing chemicals! Interestingly they mention that if the growing solution has 6g borax for every 100g chlorate, you can entirely suppress the growth of the cubic faces and the crystal will take on the tetrahedral shape! So perhaps the more cubic shaped your crystals are is an indication of purity.

Regards, Xenoid

[Edited on 15-9-2007 by Xenoid]

Xtal.jpg - 25kB

chloric1 - 15-9-2007 at 15:40

Chlorate purity

Well, That what I think and hope. I am going to bottle what little I have now. Whatever did not crystallize is mixed back with brine and I started the cell again at 7pm EDT. If it is not 99% pure it is damn close! I put some in a test tube and added drops of conc. HCl and it turned BRIGHT yellow and gave copious noxious fumes. I am certain it was chlorine dioxide mixed with free chlorine. Elemental chlorine when in any solution is dumped into large water is almost immediately dispersed. This yellow color stayed persistant for a while and had to be agitated to disperse indicating it's density amongst other qualities.

[Edited on 9/15/2007 by chloric1]

The_Davster - 22-9-2007 at 17:48

I was curious about how much current Pt could handle.

So...anode and cathode both 0.3cmx0.8cm Pt foil. Assuming only the area of the electrodes that are closest together have the majority of current flowing through them, that gives an effective surface area of 0.24cm<sup>2</sup>. 4.5A was run through these electrodes for 6h, the cell stabilized at 85C. Current density=18.75A/cm<sup>2</sup>.:P

Funny thing is, the electrode that was badly dissolved was the - cathode:o Which is very odd, it should have been protected from dissolving, any dissolution should have taken place at the anode, which is still perfect. I have looked for all sources of me making an error and confusing the two electrodes, but I took pictures at the beginning, and it was hooked up the way I think, and a voltmeter was attached indicating that my - and + leads were the ones that I thought they were.

How strange.

Now the challenge..cleaning PtO2 off glassware...Hopefully peroxide/HCl works.

[Edited on 22-9-2007 by The_Davster]

too much power.JPG - 13kB

Xenoid - 22-9-2007 at 18:41

According to Dann2's site, 600 mA/cm^2 is considered high by industrial standards for Pt electrodes in a perchlorate cell, that's 6000 A/m^2. Now 18.75 A/ cm^2 that's 187500 Amps/m^2. I'm surprised you had anything left at all!... :o

Regards, Xenoid

The_Davster - 22-9-2007 at 23:07

Yes, I was expecting heavy wear!...of the anode...
The anode was perfect after doing this. The cathode should have been protected by the (verystrong)negative charge on it, but yet it wore down as opposed to the anode.

I am wondering if the black junk is platinum dioxide or some sort of very very fine platinum particles which were somehow ejected from the electrode.

Xenoid - 23-9-2007 at 00:28

What was your electrolyte, NaCl solution or acidified water?
If you have black material, I would suggest it is "platinum black", ie. finely divided platinum with interesting occluding properties, etc.

Regards, Xenoid

The_Davster - 23-9-2007 at 09:36

Yes, it was saturated NaCl, I was doing this experiment to see how well Pt electrodes under high current density in a chlorate cell would hold up.

Pt black would be more expected from the cathode than platinum dioxide.

Eclectic - 23-9-2007 at 10:14

Maybe the current density was so high you got spark erosion or bubble cavitation? (ultrasonic erosion)

High hydrogen loading of the Pt with surface spalling?

[Edited on 9-23-2007 by Eclectic]

Crystal growing

ciscosdad - 23-9-2007 at 18:03

@ Xenoid
This crystal pics you posted look great.
What was the name of the book? I was fascinated by the reference ro Borax in NaClO3 to give tetrahedrons. It makes me wonder what other delightful little insights are there.

Xenoid - 23-9-2007 at 18:57

@ Ciscosdad

It's an oldie! But I've seen some of the "recipes" published on various crystal growing websites.

Crystals and Crystal Growing by Alan Holden & Phylis Singer.
Published by Heinemann, 1st Published Great Britain 1961.

I bought my paperback copy in the mid 60's from Verity Hewitt in Canberra for 13 shillings and 3 pence! :o

I'm not sure if there are anymore interesting titbits in it, I only noticed the borax reference when I was looking up the NaClO3. It is interesting though, to experiment with growing crystals and deliberately introduce various amounts of ions with the same charge but differing ionic radii so they are incorporated into the lattice but cause distortion and change the growing habit.

There is an appendix with about 10 amateur "research" topics.

EDIT: I just googled it, it is still available. Looks like Phylis got married and is now Phylis Morrison!

Regards, Xenoid

[Edited on 23-9-2007 by Xenoid]

The book!

ciscosdad - 8-10-2007 at 16:54

Thanks Xenoid.
I now have the book, thanks to you and Amazon, and it looks amazingly interesting.
Ref P2P's
I note the changes in crystal shape due to copper/alkali doping. I just gotta try that.

Power supplies

ciscosdad - 18-10-2007 at 18:17

I have read with envy of Tim's run at 60A. Unhappily most of us do not have access to these sorts of currents.

Is it possible to parallell 3 PC PSU's at (say) 20A to get the same result?
I know that there is a potential problem balancing them, but could the differences be swamped (if you like) if there were a separate electrode assembly for each PSU all in the same bucket of electrolyte? I would assume that the small solution resistances between the arrays would damp the potential problems but my electronics theory is not that good.

12AX7 - 18-10-2007 at 19:00

No.

Just build three cells ;)

Tim

dann2 - 19-10-2007 at 16:33

Hello,

Building three cells or using three sets of electrodes needs three anodes. If using Graphite that's not too much of a problem but if using something more exotic, three anodes may not be to hand.

(Assuming three ATX supplies): If you were to use one (available) anode and three different cathodes. All the positives connected to anode. Each of the three neg's to each cathode.
Perhaps that would be a good compromise if you do not have three Anodes. A diode in each power supply would be essential IMHO. The diode would also help to balance current as the voltage will rise accross it (a small amount) as current increases helping setup to have the current more evenly distributed between supplies. You could also have a low value resistor in each supply for to measure current coming from each supply (volt drop accross resistor) and adjust the cathodes to give sensible (~one third) currents from each supply.

Would it work though??
I obtained 6 computer power supplies to experiment with, in parallel, some time ago but never got around to doing anything yet.

Dann2

12AX7 - 19-10-2007 at 17:18

Ah, that should work. As long as the cathodes are widely seperated, they won't be prone to corroding each other.

I prefer using the steel housing as cathode, which obviously wouldn't be very amenable to such a solution :)

A diode will prevent current backflow (which would otherwise cause the internal regulator to throttle down or cut off, as it does when lightly loaded), but it will not encourage current sharing. A diode has a steep rate of current vs. voltage, little better than the power supplies themselves. To share current, you need each supply to be a constant current source, of which a series resistor is a rough, wasteful approximation. (You need to drop voltage anyway (typical cell operating around 3-4V), so it's not all that bad.)

Tim

3 Supplies

ciscosdad - 21-10-2007 at 16:13

When I visualised this I had 3 totally independent electrode sets (gouging carbons and Stainless steel) in mind. The only connection between the 3 is the resistance of the solution.
Current measurement is a 0.01 ohm resistor in series with each supply and a cheapo Digitial multimeter that will read the voltage across the resistor to give an indication of current.
Looks like that will help the current matching.
Thanks for your input guys.

BTW. This last few posts may be better in the PSU's thread if any of the moderators prefer to switch it. My fault; I should have posted there in the first place.

dann2 - 21-10-2007 at 16:29

Hello,

Don't forget to come back and tell us how it went....or didd'nt.
You could always put a loose plastic baffle between the sets of electrodes to isolate them some more from each other. Nearly three different cells but not quite.

Dann2

NaClO3 crystals

JohnWW - 23-10-2007 at 13:35

Quote:
Originally posted by Xenoid
Chloric:
OK this my final result. After spending the night in the freezer at 20 below zero Celcius, I got these crystals with peculiar cubic characteristics different than sodium chloride cubes. The cluster in my hand has a notably large cube face so I tried to capture the suns reflection with it for photo drama :P. (Chloric)

This is a bit off topic, but sodium chlorate was a popular choice for crystal growing recipes in more enlightened times. It is very easy (like alum) to grow large perfectly formed crystals. Now, if only I could find my crystal growing book (damn kids!) there is a lovely photo showing this!
Edit: Ah! Finally found it! It was in a kitchen cupboard with the crystal growing chemicals! Interestingly they mention that if the growing solution has 6g borax for every 100g chlorate, you can entirely suppress the growth of the cubic faces and the crystal will take on the tetrahedral shape! So perhaps the more cubic shaped your crystals are is an indication of purity.
Regards, Xenoid

As I remember, in crystallographic notation, the cubic cleavage planes of isometric- or cubic-system (and also tetragonal and orthorhombic) crystals are (100) (as in NaCl), the octahedral and tetrahedral cleavage planes are (111), the rhombic dodecahedral planes (as seen in garnet) are (110), and the pyritohedral planes (as seen in the irregular-pentagonal dodecahedral form of cubic FeS2) are (210), to name the most commonly-seen crystal forms. There are five different cubic symmetry class - there is holosymmetric or spherically symmetric or hexoctahedral (like NaCl, CaF2, diamond, Cu, Ag, Au, AgCl, spinel) with identical symmetry in all 3 dimensions, the diploidal or pyritohedral (like FeS2), the hextetrahedral (like spalerite), the gyroidal (like Cu2O), and tetartoidal which is the least symmetric.

The symmetry class has a strong effect on the crystal form, i.e. macromorphology, of a compound that is most commonly seen; see
http://www.galleries.com/minerals/symmetry/isometri.htm . and http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/symmetry/xlforms.htm
There are a total of 7 crystal systems, 32 symmetry classes, and 48 special crystal forms.
See this ebook on crystal systems: http://homepage.mac.com/whitby/.Public/CrystalBook.pdf

In the case of NaClO3 and NaBrO3, they belong to the cubic tetartohedral class, and exhibit optical activity which is characteristic of that least-symmetrical cubic symmetry class. By contrast, NaCl belongs to the most symmetrical cubic class.
See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X57002327
- if anyone can download it, please.
This property has led to its use as a new crystal in Raman-spectrum lasers, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApPhB..67..157K

Here is a reference on growing NaClO3 crystals from aqueous solution: http://www.crystalresearch.com/crt/ab34/661_a.pdf

The_Davster - 7-11-2007 at 22:30

Thinking of trying out a design for a chlorate cell...
Alfa Aesar sells a 20 mesh titanium gauze(made from0.003in wire).
Thinking of one of those wrapped in a cylinder form around a graphite anode.

Is the wire used in this mesh(their cheapest Ti mesh;)) too thin at all? It should not dissolve at all, but I usually prefer something beefier.

12AX7 - 7-11-2007 at 23:09

It's probably too resistive.

I don't know that there's any advantage to titanium, it just sounds cooler. :)

On the other hand, something like that could be very awesome for, like, filtering molten aluminum metal.

Tim

Chlorate using divided cell?

Xenoid - 10-11-2007 at 05:55

I was cruising the information superhighway looking for information on Li perchlorate (as one does) when I came across this procedure in Google Books for making Na chlorate. The procedure seems to contradict just about everything I've learnt about chlorate making over the years. The book is entitled:

The Preparatory Manual of Black Powder and Pyrotechnics By Jared Ledgard

and it can be found here:

http://www.google.co.nz/books?id=370UwG8CuNwC&pg=PA113&a...

The procedure can be found on pages 105-106 (note you need to read all of column 1 over the two pages, then column 2 otherwise it makes even less sense.

The method is based on a divided cell concept and the author seems happy to use just about anything for an anode. The porous membrane (a plant pot) is first "charged" - made conductive using magnesium sulphate electrolyte. It is then used in a divided cell to make chlorate. I can see that the anode compartment would be kept at a low pH and chlorate would be formed by diffusion through the plant pot. But what's the point of this method, what about anode erosion, the author does not even discuss it.

Regards, Xenoid

Book.jpg - 20kB

dann2 - 10-11-2007 at 12:47

Hello,

Reading the opening lines it says, Sodium Chlorate is widely used in pyrotechnics also used to make Ammonium Chlorate and Perchlorate which are used in powerful solid rocket propellents.... Does not sound too good.


The battery charger only works when plugged in...

The entry on Lead Dioxide has been snipped :(

Have not seen anything like it before.

Dann2

chloric1 - 10-11-2007 at 13:00

I had one of his other books and throughout his methods are questionable. Two items from memory, a solvay type synthesis with potassium salts, making silver perchlorate from boiling bleach with silver nitrate. I purchased one book on ebay and emailed him asking him if he had success with any of the synthesises and he stated tey ALL worked but never elaborated. He list a Bachelors degree as one credential but I hardly believe it.

12AX7 - 10-11-2007 at 13:01

It would appear, the author never attempted this method. Else, he made it intentionally useless for some reason. Obviously it would not work: the anolyte will become increasingly acidic, producing only chlorine gas. Meanwhile, the sodium ions migrate into the catholyte, making it more basic.

Why titanium, chromium and lead are suggested is beyond me. Graphite will certainly withstand chlorine gas. Titanium will not conduct at all. Chromium will dissolve quantitatively, forming chromium chloride solution. Lead will oxidize to a flaky layer of PbO2 and PbCl2, giving poor efficiency and even poorer conductivity.

Note also that most of the molecular structures are wrong. Wow, a three-membered ring for sodium azide! A four-membered "red phosphorous " ring, with two double bonds! Covalent bonds on ionic substances! An iron (2+) center with four potassium (+) ions and six randomly-arranged neutral cyanide groups bound to it!

Tim

Rosco Bodine - 10-11-2007 at 14:55

Another circular filable crap book from a conartist / pyro expert pretender
and chemist wannabee .

Put the authors collected works on CD and call it a coaster :P

[Edited on 10-11-2007 by Rosco Bodine]

chloric1 - 10-11-2007 at 15:29

Aside from the questionable methods I also suspected his research as he even states that most of the literature comes from various patents but never references to specific ones! Very unprofessional. Also, in his chemical guide, he introduces reaction equations and states only the desired product be wrote as the result! Further more he states that balancing equations and listing all products is not done in the professional world:o That seems hard to believe considering that even non active by products can affect how the desired product is separated, identified, and made ready for purification.


Oh yea, using aluminum anodes in salt water and creating aluminum hydroxide.:D:P This would work for about 45 seconds

Xenoid - 10-11-2007 at 16:02

Quote:
Originally posted by dann2
Reading the opening lines it says, Sodium Chlorate is widely used in pyrotechnics also used to make Ammonium Chlorate and Perchlorate which are used in powerful solid rocket propellents.... Does not sound too good.

The battery charger only works when plugged in...
Dann2


Check out the Ammonium Chlorate on page 463.....

... well, my battery charger only works when plugged in also!

Yes, now that I have perused some of the other "content" I can see there are quite a few "howlers"! Some good information, mixed with a lot of bad. Who knows whats what!

Perhaps it's fortunate that the lead dioxide section is missing:D

Regards, Xenoid

12AX7 - 15-11-2007 at 20:56

http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms/Chem_Chlorate3....

Update time! Pictures, and a tally of what I've produced this year. Conclusion: efficiency is lower than a snake's belly. Read all about it.

Tim

How to use PC PSU in a chlorate cell

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 8-12-2007 at 06:13

Recently I'm starting the eletro-chlorate synthesis and still trying a very small batch with a 1A AC/DC adaptor. Seems very bad to massive production of chlorate..

But yesterday I acquired a old used ATX PC PSU and above it comes a small chart with the (resumed,quick & dirty) following info:

http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff176/tnitrato/ps-psu.jpg

Just to see the 'power' developed by this new power source, I plugged it in the wall (110V ac) and adapted the 12v yellow wire with the anode wire of my mini cell and the black with the cathode wire ..when turned on ,instanstaneosly, a fast and violent development of gas on both electrodes was reported and the thin wire on cathode released smoke..then I quickly turned off the PC PSU..all this happened in less than 5 seconds !!!

So, I'm full of doubts :D

how I may know the real current of the out-put using the above chart?
And how thick should be the wire used in the connections of the electrodes?

(sorry, I'm still a begginer in electrolysis , and also my knowledge on eletronic/related stuffs is very limited..also the search engine this time wasn't very helpful for me in this specific, although I know there are some threads on ATX PSU ..)

Chlorates are very pleasant to have lying around, not only because of their usefulness in amateur pyrotechnics (although very dangerous when compared to ClO4- salts) and also in other chemicals..
Thank you guys very much!

Xenoid - 8-12-2007 at 07:27

Quote:
Originally posted by Aqua_Fortis_100%
Just to see the 'power' developed by this new power source, I plugged it in the wall (110V ac) and adapted the 12v yellow wire with the anode wire of my mini cell and the black with the cathode wire ..when turned on ,instanstaneosly, a fast and violent development of gas on both electrodes was reported and the thin wire on cathode released smoke..then I quickly turned off the PC PSU..all this happened in less than 5 seconds !!!

So, I'm full of doubts :D

how I may know the real current of the out-put using the above chart?
And how thick should be the wire used in the connections of the electrodes?



Oh Dear! Where do I start! I'm sure this has been talked about elsewhere many times, I know I have mentioned it once or twice!

A small chlorate cell only requires about 3 - 3.5 volts to operate at a suitable current, which may be 1 to 4 amps or so in your case.

The table you refer to is not really relevent and refers only to the maximum and average ratings that the power supply is capable of running at. Firstly, you should be using the +5V supply (probably the red and black) any red as they all go to the same place! The +5V is the most desireable as it is closest to the 3 - 3.5V you require. It is also capable of supplying the most current (Amps).

You really need a couple of cheap multimeters, or at least one to measure the current through your cell. And a large (physically) resistor to limit the current to acceptable levels, (a few amps). The resistance will have to be determined using Ohms Law, (Voltage = Current x Resistance). If you want 1 Amp to flow through your cell, you rearrange the equation like so Resistance (Ohms) = (5 volts - cell voltage) / current (Amps).

thus R=(5-3.5) / 1

R = 1.5/ 1 or R = 1.5 ohms

Every cell is different and in practise you will have to experiment with different values of resistance ( say .5 to 2 ohms) until you get what is right for your cell. Nichrome wire is a suitable starting point, remember it will get hot because it is getting rid of all that excess power which would otherwise be heating up your cell.

Power (watts) = volts x current, in this case the resistor power will need to be;

watts = 1.5 x 1 = 1.5W

If you are wanting higher currents your resistor will need to be lower and its wattage will need to be higher, try substituting 2, 3, and 4 amps into the equations above!

Please look on the internet for tutorials on the use and application of ohm's law!

To operate a chlorate cell you need to understand ohm's law and you really need to be able to measure the current (amps) flowing through it!

[Edited on 8-12-2007 by Xenoid]

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 8-12-2007 at 13:03

Xenoid, thank you. You actually was very helpful.

About Ohms Law,and earlier posts talking about the same, please, sorry. As I did said before, I have very poor knowledges in eletronic stuff, but you solved many of my own doubts.

I've got more interested in ATX PSU after looking the 3rd page of this thread and looking the Tim's pic:

http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff176/tnitrato/ClO3_by_Ti...

Looking happy in the first, I thinked that he plugged directly the red and the black wires from the ATX PSU to the cell.. After some posts he said:
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim:
Ah, that's just an AT power supply with load resistors on the +5 and +12V rails. Should be running around 30A and done in a week's run time or so.


So these 'load resistors' seems to be the same thing you are talking to use in ohms law.. And I will use after I get sure in what I'm doing...But for now, I still doing the procedure using the 1 amp power source @ 4.5V ..

The only improvement made today was to cut the plastic sides from this AC/DC adaptor and putting a cooler (which I get along with the ATX PSU in a eletronic store as 'souvenir') in one side and plugging this to another AC/DC adaptor (9.3V @ 850mA)..this all to cool the first adaptor (since using it in electrolysis make it getting very hot in some hours..) .. This is appearing to work fine to solve the heat problem..

It could be great if I could associate these two sources and running the resulting current in the cell (and after putting more graphite anodes ), but ... I dont know ! (Looking the battery example were associating in parallel could give more current and same voltage I didn't know what will happen if I will try the same with my power sources, because of the different voltages (one at 4.5 @ 1 A and the other at 9.3 V @ 850mA, as said before) :(

[Edited on 8-12-2007 by Aqua_Fortis_100%]

Xenoid - 8-12-2007 at 13:33

I would not recommend connecting the supplies in parallel!

Have you got a multimeter, something to measure the current, voltage and resistances!

How big is this chlorate cell, what is it constructed of?

12AX7 - 8-12-2007 at 14:50

The load resistors I used were to protect the power supply from overvoltage. Switching supplies usually need a certain minimum load to work correctly.

A better example would be the series ballast resistor on my current cell (well it would be current if I had anodes, right Fleaker?), which is a piece of steel wire coming to about 30 miliohms resistance (60A * 0.03 ohm = 1.8V. My power supply is good for about 5V at 60A, which is far too much for a chlorate cell. The 1.8V drop gives 3.2V for the cell, much better.

Of that particular experiment, two things are of note:
1. The power supplies (note the plural!) failed quickly. This was partly due to corrosive salt fume, which negligiently, I was not containing at the time. The other part was, when the cell was in good shape, it drew too much current at 5V, which it ought to. Cells should run in the range of 3V.
2. Electrode wear wasn't great. The graphite anode strips became grooved and much more porous. Probably, the main factor limiting current was how I attached the anodes to the buss bar, which was rather loose and prone to corrosion.

Tim

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 9-12-2007 at 06:10

@Xenoid, is a very small cell.. a 250mL PETE bottle (not pop bottle) with aprox. 200-225mL brine... 4 pieces of gouging rods and a espiraled iron wire as cathode. all in the place through the lid with hot melt glue on it. there are also a aquarium tubing (I don't know what kind of plastic is that made out) attached to the lid and going to another bottle to a improvised inverted funnel on a Na2CO3 solution and another aquarium tubing going from it to the outdoor through the window.

So, according to you, to get best results I will really need of a multimeter for every cell I make? And also to see the real current going to the cell (and also to make the running times eh?).
So I will browse the hardware store aisles to see any..

@12AX7 , thank you, really.. I dont want to ruin my ATX PSU. So need I to lower the voltage from +5V to +3-3.5V with the load resistors and also with the use of these is to avoid the overvoltage, right?
But where come from your PSU "5V at 60A"(I never had see a atx(?) psu with this current)?

How long I may let a ATX PSU turned on? There is a risk of it overheating and .. burning or ruining?

Xenoid - 9-12-2007 at 08:50

Quote:
Originally posted by Aqua_Fortis_100%
@Xenoid, is a very small cell.. a 250mL PETE bottle (not pop bottle) with aprox. 200-225mL brine... 4 pieces of gouging rods and a espiraled iron wire as cathode. all in the place through the lid with hot melt glue on it. there are also a aquarium tubing (I don't know what kind of plastic is that made out) attached to the lid and going to another bottle to a improvised inverted funnel on a Na2CO3 solution and another aquarium tubing going from it to the outdoor through the window.

So, according to you, to get best results I will really need of a multimeter for every cell I make? And also to see the real current going to the cell (and also to make the running times eh?).
So I will browse the hardware store aisles to see any..

@12AX7 , thank you, really.. I dont want to ruin my ATX PSU. So need I to lower the voltage from +5V to +3-3.5V with the load resistors and also with the use of these is to avoid the overvoltage, right?
But where come from your PSU "5V at 60A"(I never had see a atx(?) psu with this current)?

How long I may let a ATX PSU turned on? There is a risk of it overheating and .. burning or ruining?


I wouldn't put anymore than about 4 Amps through that cell. Instead of spiral wire use a sheet of steel or preferably stainless steel for your cathode.

Not necessarily a multimeter, an ammeter say from a car or old instrument. If you have several small cells, just insert the multimeter in each one, say once or twice a day to check the current! If you find the current has dropped you will know something is wrong....:( check the anode connections for corrosion....:o Make a note of the current in a logbook to spot any trends!

Most computer supplies automatically shut down when over loaded. Only "modern" ones have +5V output greater than about 20 -25 Amps. The more modern supplies also have an output of +3.3 Volts at upto 10 -15 Amps.

The use of a resistor in the circuit is to lower the current (Amps) through the cell, this will at the same time lower the voltage across the cell. The sum of the voltage across the cell and the voltage across the resistor will equal the supply voltage! The voltage from a computer supply is constant (they are constant or fixed voltage supplies). Ideally you want a constant current supply, but that's another story...:D

12AX7 - 9-12-2007 at 09:31

Simple: my present PSU is not an ATX. I haven't used one for some time, opting instead for what amounts to a homemade battery charger.

ATX supplies are fan cooled and are good so long as the load current is within ratings.

For your cell, you might use a (5V - 3V) / 4A = 2/4 = 0.5 ohm series resistor, rated for more than (5 - 3) * 4 = 8 watts. 10, 12, 15 and 20W power resistors are cheaply available in this value.

To load the unused outputs (mainly the +12V (yellow to black), and if you disconnect +5V from the cell, you might want an additional load on that line as well), about 5W is fine: from the 5V output, a 5 ohm, 5-10W resistor will suffice, while from 12V, a 20-30 ohm resistor will suffice.

Tim

hashashan - 11-12-2007 at 10:08

Hi
Constructing a new electrolizer, well actually just wanted to brag, check it out
5.5 liter, 8 anodes and 8 cathotes, all graphite


[Edited on 11-12-2007 by hashashan]

Xenoid - 11-12-2007 at 11:25

Hashashan - I see you are still using "old fashioned" graphite (gouging rods), haven't you switched over to the "new - fangled" Co oxide (spinel) anodes yet..... :D

What is it built from - looks like plumbing fittings, I've thought about that, but I usually use bottling and pickle jars. At least you can see whats going on inside. How much current are you going to put through it!
That looks like a good EFFICIENT design, unlike a 10 litre, 12 rod cell I put together a few weeks back. My cell really needs some stirring. I really put it together, just to produce some bulk chlorate, as I am starting to run out. It can bubble away in the background. I wrote up the following item, but never got around to posting it:

--------------------------------------

........ Well, contrary to my comments about "filthy gouging rods" and wanting to try out MMO pool chlorinator electrodes, I have decided to first have a go at a relatively large sized chlorate cell. This is because I still have a couple of boxes of cheap gouging rods left and I also have several containers of chloride/chlorate "liquor" left over from recrystallising etc. that needs to be recycled.

My previous largest cell was about 4 litres, so I have decided to have a go at a "Tim (12AX7)-sized" 10 litre cell, based on an old plastic paint tub. This should be capable of processing at least 3.5Kg of NaCl as well as the old solutions.

The cell is sealed and the lid has 12 (9.5mm) gouging rods mounted through it. The rods are held in place using waterproof cable glands and "o" rings. One advantage of this design is that the used gouging rods can easily be removed and replaced, by unscrewing the gland. The "o" ring seals in gasses and fumes and prevents corrosion of the electrode electrical connections

The stainless steel (SS) cathode is constructed from an old cooking pot which I had bought some time ago for processing chlorate solutions, etc. But being made in India it only lasted for about a week before holes appeared and it started leaking. The handles were drilled off, and the base was cut off using a jig-saw with a metal cutting blade fitted. It conveniently fits nicely inside the paint pail witha bout a 10mm gap around it.

The vent tube is 6mm ID PVC tubing fitted similarly to the gouging rods, but using the next size down cable gland.

Image 1: Main components, SS cathode, plastic pail, lid with gouging rod anode assembly.
Image 2: Details of anode electrode connections and mountings.
Image 3: Close up, showing cable gland, gouging rod and "o" ring.
Image 4: SS cathode, in position and wired up.

[Edited on 11-12-2007 by Xenoid]

BigChlorate.jpg - 39kB

hashashan - 11-12-2007 at 11:46

I like your cable gland idea, Ill need to find some of those. I just use hotmelt glue :)
and no need for the electric connection, I just soldered my wires to the copper.
Didnt want to use SS because of possibility of chrome ions running loose, and I do want to use that chlorate later in a perchlorate cell with the PbO2 anode.
The tube really is a simple 6 inch PVC pipe
And I still dont know how to make a good lid to it, this one is just going to sit over it, not really a lid .... more like a cover.

about stirring, I was planning to however my magnetic stirrer went in flames :D while making my PbO2 anode I had a little fire so still need to fix it, or maybe to make a new one

12AX7 - 11-12-2007 at 11:52

Nice and large. What kind of power supply do you have lined up for that?

Tim

Xenoid - 11-12-2007 at 12:20

@ Tim - if you are referring to my cell, I'm using that 48 amp halogen lighting transformer power supply I put together, it's in the "PSU" thread. I'll probably run it at 24 amps, ie 2 amps per rod.

@ Hashashan - unfortunately those cable glands are quite expensive, to save money, I bought the next size SMALLER. I cut off the internal sealing bits, drilled them out to 9.5 mm and fitted "O" rings. This also means they don't take up so much room! Although expensive, they should last a lifetime.

I've thought long and hard about the stirring, it will really make a difference with a bulky cell like this. I did some experiments with a rare earth magnet attached to an old microwave fan motor, spinning a conventional lab stirrer bar. It worked, sort of, but then it meant I had to make a stand. I've also looked at various other magnetic stirring designs. I have even considered using the fan motor with a long rod coming down from the top. This is partly why the project is "on hold".

That grey plastic sewer pipe, you can get screw on lid fittings, with "O" ring seals and also simple endcaps, I have considered this as a design from time to time. A bit like the combustion chamber of a "spud gun".

Looking at your design again! Doesn't that lid or cover actually fit INSIDE the pipe - in other words, shouldn't the rods be going through it the other way!
Hot glue sealing should be fine, I've used epoxy in the past, it holds up quite well.

[Edited on 11-12-2007 by Xenoid]

hashashan - 11-12-2007 at 14:31

Ill use a modified PC PSU(just making it Voltage controlled)
I couldnt find a lid. This lid wont fit in Its the same diameter .. so It was meant to be exactly in this direction.

dann2 - 11-12-2007 at 21:00

Hello Hashashan,

Do you intend to treat the rods with Linseed oil or some other stuff.

Dann2

hashashan - 12-12-2007 at 04:56

nope, I dont have the patience for that.
Ill electrolyze till the anodes erode

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 12-12-2007 at 08:36

@ Tim and Xenoid, thank you guys.. I'm away from my house this week, so when I return I will visit the eletronics supply store and report my own adventures ;)

Xenoid , this cell you've did really seems to be a very good cell to massive prodution of chlorates..with very high currents.. sure, this is the good and mad science in pure form :D

@hashashan, also thanks to present us with the good job you've did.. what is your spected yield of chlorate ? Did you notice fast rates of corrosion on graphites used as cathodes?

A little doubt ocurred now , all peoples says that is much better using linseed oil treated gouging rods , but I never had heard about the quantitative comparation on using treated gouging rods and no treated ones.. So How fast is the erosion of these two types operating at same conditions (temperature, current density, chloride conc. , etc)?

In the first cell I did (described above) , I tried to treat the pieces of gouging rods with a weird kind of brownish 'linseed oil' ("óleo de linhaça") .. I tried to mix this with acetone (60% the only OTC here) , but these compounds didn't have mixed ! It separated in two layers.. But anyway I put this in a glass pickle jar with the gouging rods and let some time(without vacuum).. after I have removed the gouging rods ., I let the rods 'curing' at about 4 weeks, but when I've used it in electrolysis, in short space of time (less than a minute) they had set free a weird mini immiscible bubbles which stay at the surface of the brine.. back to drawing board :(

12AX7 - 12-12-2007 at 09:21

Linseed oil (or any other varnish) has to be baked to really cure it in porous materials.

Tim

Xenoid - 12-12-2007 at 10:00

Quote:
Originally posted by Aqua_Fortis_100%

A little doubt ocurred now , all peoples says that is much better using linseed oil treated gouging rods , but I never had heard about the quantitative comparation on using treated gouging rods and no treated ones.. So How fast is the erosion of these two types operating at same conditions (temperature, current density, chloride conc. , etc)?


There is a short thread here, you may already have seen it;

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=9184

I used "boiled linseed oil" which is brown, rather than "raw linseed oil" which is pale yellow. From my point of view, I think the main benefit of the linseed oil (or any waxy impregnation) is preventing the salt solution and chlorine, etc. migrating up the rods and corroding the electrical connections.

@ Tim - I wasn't aware of the baking, I've just left mine in a warm place for a week or so, they get a plastic like coat. Does the baking at what - 100 - 150 oC. produce a hard coat?

Something I thought about trying is shellac (varnish - golden flakes), dissolve in alcohol and let rods soak in it! As I said in the other thread - plenty of scope for simple experiments here.

12AX7 - 12-12-2007 at 10:22

It's my understanding that varnishes cure best in the 150C range. Stick it in the oven at cookie-baking temperatures while the S.O. is out with a wad of money at the mall.

I wonder if the common polyurethane stuff would hold up very well.

For that matter, I wonder why linseed oil would work well. It's heavily crosslinked (well, supposed to be anyway), but those bonds might be vulnerable to attack. Certainly, any remaining -enes will be chlorinated rapidly. Urethane might survive better for its aromatic content, but worse for its functional content (O's and N's). I'm not sure what lacquer usually is these days, but I would think if it dissolves in alcohol, it wouldn't seem to be a very robust material.

Really serious processing here, I wonder what graphite vacuum-impregnated with glass would do.

Tim

hashashan - 12-12-2007 at 10:41

Well its a 5+ liter tank .. I think that 2 Kg will be there for sure. And I still didnt start running it. However from previous runs I can tell you that the cathodes hardly erode at all.

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 13-12-2007 at 04:01

Quote:
Originally posted by Xenoid:

I used "boiled linseed oil" which is brown, rather than "raw linseed oil" which is pale yellow. From my point of view, I think the main benefit of the linseed oil (or any waxy impregnation) is preventing the salt solution and chlorine, etc. migrating up the rods and corroding the electrical connections.



Wow, that's seems the same stuff I've used..but was strange the fact that this linseed oil haven't mixed with my acetone..(that's maybe because of the acetone concentration - 60%, being the rest ethanol and some water), but anyway it touched and, I think, penetrated in some extent the rod pieces. Can I replace the acetone by ethanol ? (Because I have about 2 L of absolute ethanol and some more of common 95% grade)


Quote:
Originally posted by Xenoid Here :
I think I've mentioned it at least twice in other threads, to get a good connection to a gouging rod, leave about 2-3 cm of the copper on the end of the rod that you are going to make the electrical connection. You can then solder your wires onto the copper, or make small stainless steel clips to clamp onto the copper.


Yes, in your cell (some posts above) this is show also.. that's seems to be good in a eletrical connection..But I'm worried: what happens if , in some way, the green mess of copper get a way into the electrolyte ? I need to descart the whole batch because of Cu contamination ?

Quote:
Originally posted by Xenoid:

I used "boiled linseed oil" which is brown, rather than "raw linseed oil" which is pale yellow. From my point of view, I think the main benefit of the linseed oil (or any waxy impregnation) is preventing the salt solution and chlorine, etc. migrating up the rods and corroding the electrical connections.


Any waxy substance ? Why I can't just rub on the gouging rods some paraffin ? (that's because of the poorer adering (or any other) properties and/or because of the waxy making electric isolation ?)

Also, why the formed chlorine does not appear to react with the hardened linseed oil at grapithe and making more mess (any substance formed ?) in the cell?

@ Tim, I still don't understand : You say that is best to put the linseed oil at 150*C , but , you say to baking the oil alone or baking it when on the gouging rods ?
(if in latter case, is present some risk of damaging the gouging rods? )

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim:
Really serious processing here, I wonder what graphite vacuum-impregnated with glass would do.


Wow, I like your idea of glass on gouging rods.. But , is there risk of some sort of electric isolating the graphite?

Also what about using a sodium silicate solution instead of the linseed oil and then passing in a HCl solution ?

@hashashan, my gouging rods are somewhat expensive ... So I will hardly use it as cathode..but seems to be good in using a chlorate cell in which the product will be used in a perchlorate cell as you have said before..

(recently I acquired also some Ni electrodes..Can anyone tell me if this can be a useful cathode?)

thanks





[Edited on 13-12-2007 by Aqua_Fortis_100%]

12AX7 - 13-12-2007 at 07:06

Quote:
Originally posted by Aqua_Fortis_100%
But I'm worried: what happens if , in some way, the green mess of copper get a way into the electrolyte ? I need to descart the whole batch because of Cu contamination ?


Copper is insoluble and unreactive in chlorate solution.

Quote:
Any waxy substance ? Why I can't just rub on the gouging rods some paraffin ? (that's because of the poorer adering (or any other) properties and/or because of the waxy making electric isolation ?)


I doubt that would be very effective. Certainly, just rubbing it on isn't going to do a damn thing.

Quote:

@ Tim, I still don't understand : You say that is best to put the linseed oil at 150*C , but , you say to baking the oil alone or baking it when on the gouging rods ?


You tell me. What good is it to cure a block of solidified linseed oil? Sounds pretty stupid eh? Baking the rods to cure the oil inside them sounds like a much better idea.

(if in latter case, is present some risk of damaging the gouging rods? )

Quote:
Also what about using a sodium silicate solution instead of the linseed oil and then passing in a HCl solution ?


Hmm, a possibility.

Quote:
(recently I acquired also some Ni electrodes..Can anyone tell me if this can be a useful cathode?)


As good as any other metal for cathode.

Tim

Xenoid - 13-12-2007 at 08:05

@ Aqua_Fortis_100%

As I stated elsewhere, there is plenty of scope for amateur experimentation in treating gouging rods, I use a siloxane concrete treatment with about 10% linseed oil, it works OK but it's not perfect, it penetrates very well! I played around with candle wax dissolved in PURE acetone and in hexane camping fuel, and some others, I don't remember!

Sodium silicate? - Go for it, it's used as a concrete sealant after all, like the siloxane, and could work well in this application. Experiment, that's what this forum is about, after all... :D

Copper contamination? - I've never observed it, sure there is some green corrosion, but movement is always OUT of the cell, not into it!

chloric1 - 13-12-2007 at 17:08

Quote:
Originally posted by Xenoid
Hashashan - I see you are still using "old fashioned" graphite (gouging rods), haven't you switched over to the "new - fangled" Co oxide (spinel) anodes yet..... :D

The cell is sealed and the lid has 12 (9.5mm) gouging rods mounted through it. The rods are held in place using waterproof cable glands and "o" rings. One advantage of this design is that the used gouging rods can easily be removed and replaced, by unscrewing the gland. The "o" ring seals in gasses and fumes and prevents corrosion of the electrode electrical connections

The vent tube is 6mm ID PVC tubing fitted similarly to the gouging rods, but using the next size down cable gland.

Image 1: Main components, SS cathode, plastic pail, lid with gouging rod anode assembly.
Image 2: Details of anode electrode connections and mountings.
Image 3: Close up, showing cable gland, gouging rod and "o" ring.
Image 4: SS cathode, in position and wired up.

[Edited on 11-12-2007 by Xenoid]


I have notice simular anode hookups in the cobalt spinel section. I really need to go to the hardware store soon and look around. The water proof cable thingies are in the electrical dept?? Also, what are those metal tabs that you circle around your rods? I have been looking for those becuase my old cell was ugly and I need to connect several anodes so I can lower the current density on each one to get maximum life out of them.

I am not too far from messing around with cobalt spinel but I need a heat gun and cash is modest. Maybe this weekend. I need to try to contribute especially since I am going to try selling anodes so I can financially support my hobby with a net gain to boot!

dann2 - 13-12-2007 at 23:01

Hello,

Have used Nickle in a Perchlorate cell myself. They corroded. The cell had a LD anode that was let run and run. There was a black mess due to Ni corrosion.
Indusry used Ni. It needs Chromate to protect if from the cell invironment. (Not good/possible with LD).

Dann2

Xenoid - 13-12-2007 at 23:58

Quote:
Originally posted by chloric1

I have notice simular anode hookups in the cobalt spinel section. I really need to go to the hardware store soon and look around. The water proof cable thingies are in the electrical dept?? Also, what are those metal tabs that you circle around your rods? I have been looking for those becuase my old cell was ugly and I need to connect several anodes so I can lower the current density on each one to get maximum life out of them.



Chloric - sorry to take so long in replying, I kept forgetting about your post, with all the anode excitement... :D

I bought the cable glands from a specialist electronics company called Jaycar, here in NZ and Australia. They have an IP68 rating which is the highest possible for dust and water sealing. They have a built in rubber and plastic sealing mechanism, however I bought the next size smaller than would normally be used, because it was cheaper and also they took up less room (this was when I was trying to fit 10 of them on top of a pickle jar). Size was not so important in my latest "bucket" cell. You can use the correct size glands "as is". If you use the smaller, cheaper ones, you have to cut off the sealing part and drill them out to 9.5 mm. Just get a small "O" ring that fits tightly around the rod, and put a bit of silicone grease on the assembly!

The clips are made from stainless steel. I picked up a whole lot of scrap at a recycling centre. I cut strips 6 cm long and about 1, 1.5 or 2 cm wide, (I made a range of sizes). The rods are 9.5 mm or 3/8" so you have to preform the clips around drill bits which are a bit smaller than the rods.

Here's where it becomes a bit hazy, as I made a large batch several months ago and haven't made any since!

I used an 8 or 8.5 mm drill and bent the strips into a "U" shape around it, then squeeze the ends in a vice as tightly up to the drill as possible. You'll end up with something roughly the right shape. Next force this around a drill (9.0 mm) and do the same thing, you may have to do a bit of hammering at this stage. You should get nice tight bends where the tag starts to go around the rod. Don't try to form them around something the same size as the rods, otherwise they will never be tight or look nice. I'm sorry I can't be more specific, it's a bit of trial and error. I got quite good at it and even threw away my first few attempts, because they were not "up to standard" Drill 3.5 mm holes ( say 1/8") in the tags, after you make them. All I used were two drill bits, the vice, a hammer and some metal snips.

[Edited on 14-12-2007 by Xenoid]

Rosco Bodine - 14-12-2007 at 11:54

That old iron tin nitrate hydrogel , or the chromium or aluminum analogues , might make for an interesting
baked on coating and sealer for even lowly gouging rods .

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?action=att...

A mixture of zinc and cobalt nitrates , perhaps with
manganese and lead and bismuth nitrates baked on top ,
might even yield a perchlorate anode .

[Edited on 14-12-2007 by Rosco Bodine]

Reply

chloric1 - 14-12-2007 at 17:14

I know your seriously multitasking, so I was not expecting a rapid reply anyway. You explained enough to me, I understand that the drill form must be smaller than the rod I will use, its like drilling holes smaller than your tap bit before you tap otherwise the bit won't remove material and make your wonderfull threads.

Copper may be easier to fab, I might want to nickel plate copper strips. If solution does not "wick" up your anode then copper connection would be fine IMHO. Especially if your doiong O-ring seals and want not. Just don't repeat the 1986 Challenger errors and use the wrong size O-rings. :o

12AX7 - 14-12-2007 at 20:46

I copper plated the anodes I used in my eight month run. Having stripped the copper from the graphite nubs left, I have two chunks of graphite, about 6" long, good and solid, if impregnated with what have you.

The main obstacle is height and porosity. The first bar I used had a vein of low density that wicked chlorine right up to the copper, continuously corroding that side much faster than anywhere else. I stripped, cleaned and replated it halfway through. The second lasted its whole lifetime with one plating, showing no tendency to devour the copper.

The copper surface was always mildly tarnished of course, due to chlorine in the area. Most of the gas, steam and salt fume stayed in the cell due to the packing I placed on top. The height above the liquid level was the other major factor keeping the copper metallic.

Tim

Chlorinator Electrode Chlorate Cell

Xenoid - 20-12-2007 at 22:26

I've finally got around to putting together a chlorate cell based on the chlorinator cell electrodes I rescued from a skip (see "Cobalt Oxide Anodes" thread, pp 2,4,6,7).

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=9572&a...

The cell is based around a tall fruit bottling jar I got from a recycling place for 50 cents. The cell is only about 1.1 litres but it fits the chlorinator anodes very well. The cell uses the two outer electrodes of the original chlorinator because thes were the least worn. It has a central SS cathode, with the 2 multi metal oxide (RuO2/TiO2) coated Ti mesh anodes on either side. Electrode spacing is 10mm. The cell was filled with saturated NaCl, about 350g.

The cell is running of a 5 volt computer supply, and at the moment is operating at 2.75 volts and 4.19 amps. A pair of 0.8 ohm 20 watt resistors in parallel are used to control the current. The ~4 amp current is quite conservative as I want to see how they behave, I may increase it later. The cell voltage is an amazing 2.75 volts, I've never had a cell running at a voltage of less than about 3.2 volts before! I guess it's due to the large surface area flat sheet electrodes, the close spacing, and the efficient MMO coating.

Needless to say the cell electrolyte is clear (Yay!!!) although a little orangey-brown scum formed initially, it has mostly faded!

ChlorinatorChlorate.jpg - 55kB

dann2 - 21-12-2007 at 13:08

Hello,

Cell looks very tidy. Your bench is respectible too, would not show mine in a photo, I can tell ya!!!!!!!!!!!

The MMO in industrial Chlorate production are not run at low Chloride conc. as it erodes/damages them. Perhaps the type of MMO on the pool chlorination andodes are different than the industrial anodes for Chlorate as the pool anode will ALWAYS be sitting in water with little Chloride present. The pool andoes suit the home maker better than the 'real macoy' of industry. Hope the presence of Chlorate does not do any damage though.


2c later,
Dann2

Xenoid - 21-12-2007 at 16:03

@ Dann2

Yes, a tidy cell but as it turns out, a flawed design. BTW you should see the rest of the garage - an utter pig sty! What do you think about the low operating voltage (2.75 volts), I was quite surprised!

The orangey - brown scum actually got worse, much worse! When I came down to check it this morning (after 16 hours operation) it was full of brown and orange particles and so cloudy I couldn't see the electrodes. Fearing that the anodes had disintegrated, I switched the mutimeters on, and was relieved to see the electrical parameters were essentially unchanged.

I dismantled the cell, and immediately saw the problem. I had used two SS screws to attach the 2 Ti anodes to the PVC lid and also act as electrical terminals. I have always used this procedure in the past for SS cathodes, so used it for the anodes without thinking! I should have known better, SS is useless in anodic saline conditions.

The screw heads had about 5 - 10% corroded away...:o
In doing so they had contaminated the cell with Cr and copious amounts of reddish-brown colloidal iron hydroxide - just what I was trying to avoid, as this is a major problem with gouging rods!

After careful cleaning I have now coated the screw heads with hot glue. Epoxy would have been better, but I think the hot glue should hold up. I've filtered the solution, lucky I have a pressure filter.... ;)

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=9630

and put the cell back together, albeit with an orangey coloured electrolyte!

My Chlorate Cell

jpsmith123 - 21-12-2007 at 18:21

Your cell looks pretty good there, Xenoid.

Attached is a picture of mine.

The container is a 4L PET jar from Wal-Mart. The lid is PP. (I would have preferred PVC but it's kind of hard to find).

The studs that connect the electrode assembly to the lid are titanium, with titanium washers and viton o-rings.

The electrode assembly is a solid plate type, rated at 20 amps.

ChlorateCell.jpg - 34kB

Xenoid - 21-12-2007 at 19:17

@ jpsmith123
We've been waiting a long time!

When are you going to fire up that baby... :o .. it looks really good! It will be sooo.. nice to have a clear solution to work with.

Did you have much trouble adapting the original chlorinator cell lid to your jar. As you would have seen in the other thread my chlorinator had an epoxy sealed top and no terminals. I think they are starting to make them all like that now!

That's a long exhaust pipe, are you planning on feeding it over to the neighbours place... ;)

With that large capacity, it would probably benefit from a bit of magnetic stirring.

Be sure to let us know how you get on. I'm impressed with these electrodes so far, but its only early days. These chlorinators are supposed to last 5 -6 years in pool use, I wonder how long in a chlorate cell...!!!!

Xenoid - 23-12-2007 at 19:04

Goddammit!!!... :(

I just can't get this chlorinator electrode chlorate cell right.

This morning I noticed more orange-brown gunk floating around in the cell. Thinking the hot glue had lifted off the anode screws, I was already to replace it with epoxy. But, no, this time its the SS cathode that's starting to corrode badly along the edges. I haven't really had this problem before, just some minor cathode corrosion. Must be the relatively small cathode to anode surface area ratio, usually I have big cathode surfaces compared to gouging rods.

Moral of story, if you want a nice clean running cell use TITANIUM cathodes.

12AX7 - 23-12-2007 at 20:49

Funny, with all the graphite shit I had, I didn't give a rat's ass about the rusting "stainless" steel cathode I've been using. Methinks you should point your nose down away from the clouds! :P

Tim

Xenoid - 23-12-2007 at 21:08

Quote:
Originally posted by 12AX7
Methinks you should point your nose down away from the clouds! :P

Tim


Well, I'd just like to get away from filtering and defloccing etc. all together. Ti sheet is now pretty cheap, no reason not to use it for cathodes. Theoretically a chlorate cell should be perfectly clean, just boil and crystallise, or if you use KCl just dig out the crystals!

A chlorate cell can be as "low tech" as you want, I prefer to head the other way!

Developments in my cell

Aqua_Fortis_100% - 3-1-2008 at 12:11

I invested some money to get my PC PSU to do a good job in chlorate cell and I'm think to be probably close to achieve that..

In a prior attempt I tried to connect a 0,22ohm/5W resistor between the +5V lines.. But was too simple and the resistor heated like hell in a few seconds !

Yesterday I constructed and tested a circuit that my friend did , tested and did the upload here to control and to stabilize current (the photo was his test , using a lamp and the schematic is in portuguese (also)) :

http://www.4shared.com/file/32991572/7dcdf563/Regulador_0_a_...

It gives a max. and smooth 4,4 - 4,5 A running in my cell .. He said that with this I can control the current to even 8 A , but the connections and the cell design (anode -cathode distance , cell materials connections,etc) will afect it at all..And so the low current I got...

What I can do to improve the connections? Can I solder the wires direct to the rest of copper plating on anodes (as Xenoid advised to let some of the copper unpeeled)?

Thanks!

[Edited on 3-1-2008 by Aqua_Fortis_100%]

[Edited on 3-1-2008 by Aqua_Fortis_100%]

Xenoid - 3-1-2008 at 12:49

Quote:
Originally posted by Aqua_Fortis_100%
In a prior attempt I tried to connect a 0,22ohm/5W resistor between the +5V lines.. But was too simple and the resistor heated like hell in a few seconds !

What I can do to improve the connections? Can I solder the wires direct to the rest of copper plating on anodes (as Xenoid advised to let some of the copper unpeeled)?


What do you mean, you "connected the .22 ohm resistor BETWEEN the +5V lines" The resistor goes in series with your cell to drop the voltage and limit the current. Wattage for that resistor at 4 amps should be W=I^2xR, W= 16 x .22, W= 3.52, 5W should be adequate. At 4 amps that resistor will drop the voltage by E=IR, E=4 x .22, E= .88 volts.

If you connect that .22 resistor BETWEEN +5v and 0V (earth) you will get I=E/R, I=5/.22, I=22.7 amps - that's probably at the PSU limit! That would be 113.4 watts that poor old 5W resistor would be trying to dissipate!

Mind you, even in series it will get warm, or even hot when running at 3.52W

That circuit should be OK, I've used something similar for constant current charging of NiCad cells in battery packs for caving lights. It's effectively using the power transistor as a variable resistor.

Yes, for you, the best thing is to solder directly to the remaining copper! You'll need a fairly heavy duty soldering iron. A lightweight electronic iron doesn't develop enough heat, well mine doesn't anyway. Put silicone grease on your connections, make sure no electrolyte gets on them... :(

[Edited on 3-1-2008 by Xenoid]

Xenoid - 3-1-2008 at 14:43

Quote:
Originally posted by Xenoid
Well, I'd just like to get away from filtering and defloccing etc. all together. Ti sheet is now pretty cheap, no reason not to use it for cathodes. Theoretically a chlorate cell should be perfectly clean, just boil and crystallise, or if you use KCl just dig out the crystals!


After various experiments and disasters over the last few weeks, I now realise that the SS cathode corrosion occurs almost wholly in the headspace area of a cell, and is particularly pronounced at metal junctions (needless to say). Any SS within the electrolyte and even metal juctions within the electrolyte are little corroded.

Colloidal Fe hydroxide and Cr contamination from the headspace area can be avoided. I have found glue lined heatshrink tubing or even a silicone grease coating, overlain with ordinary heatshrink will protect the SS in the headspace area. Screw connections to the outside world can be covered in hot glue.

The 10L, 12 rod cell I described in an earlier post, now has 5mm threaded rod cathode connections. These are covered in heatshrink and rise directly up through small waterproof cable glands on the lid. The entire electrode assembly is now mounted directly to the lid, and is completely gas and odour free.

So if protected correctly SS makes perfectly good, contamination free, cathodes. Ti cathode(s) for a large cell would work out to be quite expensive and I now realise it is not justified. Perhaps Tim is right, and I should get my head down out of the clouds, it's just that making these cells is such damn fun!... :D

 Pages:  1  2