Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Could Antarctica provide renewable energy?

SupFanat - 10-5-2015 at 03:02

It's said to be very windy.

Tdep - 10-5-2015 at 03:05

Well yes, but you gonna provide the cabling?

SupFanat - 10-5-2015 at 04:27

If it's impossible to build submarine power cable between Antartica and any other continent maybe the electricity should be used there for electrolysis?

Amos - 10-5-2015 at 04:43

Generally ventures like this are only done if they're profitable. We're talking constructing wind turbines that have to be adapted for the brutal climate of Antarctica, shipping them down there, moving the parts inland, assembling them, and then building necessary facilities to make use of the energy. If we're assuming that the underwater power cable thing is not feasible, and instead the energy is going to be used for something like electrolysis, or any other industry that requires large amounts of electricity, then you're also going to have to ship cargo between the facilities and their intended destinations, which might require a cargo port being built. All of this in one of the most hellish and unforgiving landscapes on earth. I'm not exactly picturing heaps of money at the idea.

Also, this has nothing to do with energetic materials.

SupFanat - 10-5-2015 at 05:32

What is "energetic material" here?
If magnesium is made from seawater by some automated machine in Antarctica (the problem is disposal of chlorine - ideally reaction with water which would theoretically give +0.12 Volt DC) isn't it "energetic material"?

aga - 10-5-2015 at 07:46

Quote: Originally posted by SupFanat  
It's said to be very windy.

Yes.

So could everywhere else.

Why Antarctica in particular ?

Hawkguy - 10-5-2015 at 14:12

Quote: Originally posted by aga  
Quote: Originally posted by SupFanat  
It's said to be very windy.

Yes.

So could everywhere else.

Why Antarctica in particular ?


Katabatic Winds maybe? Don't get those everywhere

aga - 10-5-2015 at 14:24

Seem to get Sunlight everywhere.

Seem to get water everywhere.

Seem to get Life everywhere.

Nothing Antarctic-specific about Katabatic winds.

Yes Sir, i can Google, Google Google, all night loooong.

[Edited on 10-5-2015 by aga]

Amos - 10-5-2015 at 14:35

Quote: Originally posted by SupFanat  
What is "energetic material" here?
If magnesium is made from seawater by some automated machine in Antarctica (the problem is disposal of chlorine - ideally reaction with water which would theoretically give +0.12 Volt DC) isn't it "energetic material"?


Okay, well by your definition, EVERYTHING is an energetic material, so there'd be no point having a subforum for it.

On the site, energetic materials generally refers to explosives, combustibles, and pyrotechnics. Essentially reactions whose defining characteristic is the release of a huge amount of energy.

SupFanat - 10-5-2015 at 14:38

Imagine hypothetical Antarctic Space Center which relies on local rocket fuel produced from wind power.

blogfast25 - 10-5-2015 at 16:15

Quote: Originally posted by SupFanat  
Imagine hypothetical Antarctic Space Center which relies on local rocket fuel produced from wind power.


With you everything is wind.

Mesa - 10-5-2015 at 16:47

I've got dibs on fire then! We're half way to captain planet :D

IrC - 10-5-2015 at 22:17

Aga is spending far too much time in that shed.

Wind power? At 100 below or colder? Using what to lubricate all those bearings? Have you considered how much power heating the bearings would waste? I take it you have never lived in climates 40 below or colder but I have for years. Every morning (at a typical 36 below) I would unplug my block, tank, and battery warming plate heaters. Fire up the pickemup and after suitable time (measured by the interior being warm enough you just started regaining feeling in your nuts) hit I-94 to Billings. For the first 3 miles no matter how hard you hit the gas about 38 MPH was your top speed with 18 wheelers blowing by frighteningly recklessly. Suddenly as if some giant hand let go of your rear bumper presto, the speedo said 75. You let off slightly it was still 55 MPH back in those days. It was the 90 weight in the rear end combined with the Li based wheel bearing grease heating up just enough to let go. No not exaggerating here there was that much resistance to the bearings spinning free. Now you can believe this story or not but I lived through 7 winters there and I am not kidding.

Just imagine those bearings in giant turbine blades and generators at 100 below or more. No Babbitt bushings fare no better at extreme low temperatures unless you keep them at a minimum temperature for free operation just as you need to for lubricated bearings. Not saying it is impossibly wasteful to operate heaters in all those critical areas but next we must consider the tremendous loss bringing that power thousands of miles where it could be used. It would take minimum half a million volt undersea transmission lines covering vast distances and still incur great loss over those distances. The engineering aspects and sheer cost are mind boggling.

Make fuel there? Out of what water? Here we go again with the Goldberg engineering.

aga - 11-5-2015 at 01:23

Quote: Originally posted by IrC  
Aga is spending far too much time in that shed.

... lived in climates 40 below or colder but I have for years.

I think i prefer the shed !

pneumatician - 11-5-2015 at 15:06

Quote: Originally posted by SupFanat  
It's said to be very windy.


is this for some bizarre study? or for more human delirium tremens?:cool:

exist others zones of the planet with a lot of wind like the cape horns and agulhas: sud america and africa.

but read this, here in front of your nose is possible 100% rew. energy.

Suppressed French report says 100% renewables is possible – German Energy Transition

http://energytransition.de/2015/04/suppressed-french-report-...

are you talking about economics/profit? if no, ALL (or 99%) humans problems are gone reducing the population, not with demented wars, not with genocides, no, no no!!!! only with birth control!
(of course this is sci-fiction with the actual low human neocortex and too much use of the reptilian brain) :cool:

this idiots from the seven sisters are saying this again and again and again...

https://www.change.org/p/weltweite-geburtenregelungen-verbin...

420MLGnOhEADsCOPEpro - 18-5-2015 at 22:57

antarctic wind power is actually feasible because there lots of ice particles in the high velocity wind
that ice makes the air much denser and thus much higher in kinetic energy
lets suppose that the air has 24 kilograms of ice per cubic meter and thus weighs 25 kilograms per cubic meter
lets also suppose that you chose a good spot where there's 36 km/h winds frequently
finally suppose you can half the velocity of air passing though your turbine
Pm = p*A*1/2*(vi^3-vo^3)
where Pm is mechanical power, vi is the wind velocity, vo is the output velocity (we suppose 1/2 here), p is the density of the air, A is the area, the units are meters kilograms and watts
Pm = 25*A*1/2*(10^3-5^3) = 10,937.5 watts per square meter of turbine
assuming a good electrolysis plant producing NaOH and HCl that should produce ~$1 per square meter of turbine per hour
100 turbines by 20 square meters per turbine is $2,000 per hour of wind

furthermore if a massive storm hits bringing wind speeds of 300 km/h and more ice thus 75 kg per cubic meter
Pm= 18,988,715.3 watts per square meter
$3,472,222 per hour assuming your equipment can handle it (it probably can't though considering that's just short of 380 MW per turbine which is equivalent to burning 19 kg of coal per second at 50% efficiency)

IrC - 19-5-2015 at 01:30

Theory needs to be balanced with reality. In many locations at certain times of the year ice buildup could cause catastrophic unbalance of blades. In areas much colder year round to avoid this trouble katabatic winds will force the blades to be idled or be destroyed. The sheer physical forces of hurricane velocity winds would end your little project rapidly and this is the norm year round if one wishes to locate the turbines in areas so cold ice buildup would not be likely to occur. I think many locations exist without such extreme conditions and should be considered in light of the technological problems in such an extreme location.

j_sum1 - 19-5-2015 at 02:59

Quote: Originally posted by 420MLGnOhEADsCOPEpro  
antarctic wind power is actually feasible because there lots of ice particles in the high velocity wind
that ice makes the air much denser and thus much higher in kinetic energy
lets suppose that the air has 24 kilograms of ice per cubic meter and thus weighs 25 kilograms per cubic meter
lets also suppose that you chose a good spot where there's 36 km/h winds frequently
finally suppose you can half the velocity of air passing though your turbine
Pm = p*A*1/2*(vi^3-vo^3)
where Pm is mechanical power, vi is the wind velocity, vo is the output velocity (we suppose 1/2 here), p is the density of the air, A is the area, the units are meters kilograms and watts
Pm = 25*A*1/2*(10^3-5^3) = 10,937.5 watts per square meter of turbine
assuming a good electrolysis plant producing NaOH and HCl that should produce ~$1 per square meter of turbine per hour
100 turbines by 20 square meters per turbine is $2,000 per hour of wind

furthermore if a massive storm hits bringing wind speeds of 300 km/h and more ice thus 75 kg per cubic meter
Pm= 18,988,715.3 watts per square meter
$3,472,222 per hour assuming your equipment can handle it (it probably can't though considering that's just short of 380 MW per turbine which is equivalent to burning 19 kg of coal per second at 50% efficiency)
There are some problems with your proposal and your analysis. More than a few.

And that is before we get to the numerous problems associated with electrolysis of (I presume) seawater. It turns kind of solid. And it is only available under the pack ice. The pack ice front is continually changing (by hundreds of km.) It is just not accessible.
Cold bearings has already been mentioned. Difficulty of cable laying has already been mentioned. However both of these pale compared to the logistics of carting or pumping solid or liquid materials across the continent.
I am not saying that wind harvesting on Antarctica is completely impossible. Obviously it is. But it is not going to be nearly as productive as you make out. It could really only provide power locally -- unless some very significant engineering was done. And there is not the joint political will to make it happen anyway -- Antarctic Treaty and all that.