Sciencemadness Discussion Board

Salt containing pentazolate ion isolated

Metacelsus - 31-1-2017 at 15:10

I thought some people here might be interested to know. It's pretty stable, and the formula is (N5)6(H3O)3(NH4)4Cl

Source:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6323/374


[Edited on 1-31-2017 by Metacelsus]

Tdep - 31-1-2017 at 21:43

Ok I love this. The pentazole ring has been formed before, it is stabilized by being attached to a benzene ring. In fact, now that I look into it, a somewhat stable pentazole compound can be made from paracetamol in three steps, which I would be doing now if it didn't require the use of trifluoroacetic acid. But still, that's not a very obscure reagent and most professional labs will have that, but it's not a thing amateur labs have.

This new paper manages for the first time to cleave the benzene ring - pentazole bond. This is amazing, especially considering m-CPBA is not that crazy of a reagent (once again, no home lab will have it but for what i've seen it's a well known lab chemical.) So the thing that makes the C-N bond cleavage, according to the new paper is "formation of cyclo-N5ˉ from arylpentazoles proceeded more efficiently upon increasing the number of electron-donating groups at the meta/para-position of the aryl groups". So the reaction probably doesn't work with the top pentazole, which is a shame. Because that would be paracetamol to free pentazole in a handful of steps.

Still, this is the new forefront of energetic materials research, and I really don't think it's out of reach for us at home.

Reference one: http://sci-hub.bz/10.1021/jo0110754

Reference two (new paper): http://sci-hub.bz/10.1126/science.aah3840



16425243_1419353188076808_697588948_n.jpg - 53kB

Microtek - 1-2-2017 at 05:05

It would be interesting to know what the density of the salt is. It looks like it might be a decent energetic on its own (81% nitrogen), though it is unfortunate that the chloride ion cannot be replaced with nitrate (but maybe perchlorate was worth a try?). Of course, slow decomposition at ambient temperature precludes its practical use, but very promising news nonetheless.

Texium - 1-2-2017 at 07:19

I highly doubt an oxidizing anion would be able to be anywhere near a pentazole ring without causing it to blow.

The_Davster - 1-2-2017 at 19:40

This is so fucking sexy.


Quote: Originally posted by zts16  
I highly doubt an oxidizing anion would be able to be anywhere near a pentazole ring without causing it to blow.


Under non-hot conditions nitrate and perchlorate can barely be counted as oxidizers. Other highly-oxidizable species can easily form those salts like TAG or hydrazine. The lack of the stability in their attempts to prepare those salts likely lies in crystal structure H-bonding being removed compared to the ammonium/hydronium mixed salt.

PHILOU Zrealone - 2-2-2017 at 08:42

Maybe that iron or other metals (Co, Cr, Ni, Mn, V, U, ...) may form ferrocene (or metallocene) like structures
--> pentaz(a)-ocenes Me(N5)2 :cool:

Wich prove to be stabler :) ?
Or an explosive disaster :D (owing to metallic core catalytic effect) ?

FeCl2 + N5(-) -THF-> (N5)Fe(N5) + 2 Cl(-)

Yeah FeN10 --> Fe + 5 N2(g) + a lot of energy and heat.

Microtek - 3-2-2017 at 14:35

While we are on the subject of esoteric energetics, did anyone see this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/27/us-scientists-...

There is still some doubt as to whether it actually was metallic hydrogen that they made, and if it was, if it will be metastable at STP. But if it was, and if it is, the predicted performance is quite extraordinary.

DubaiAmateurRocketry - 3-2-2017 at 16:00

Quote: Originally posted by Microtek  
While we are on the subject of esoteric energetics, did anyone see this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/27/us-scientists-...

There is still some doubt as to whether it actually was metallic hydrogen that they made, and if it was, if it will be metastable at STP. But if it was, and if it is, the predicted performance is quite extraordinary.


That is definately interesting stuff,

I really want to believe it true, however Nature dosnt think so.

http://www.nature.com/news/physicists-doubt-bold-report-of-m...