Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: hyperchem geometry optimization
g3ovn
Harmless
*




Posts: 12
Registered: 8-11-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

sad.gif posted on 25-8-2011 at 04:10
hyperchem geometry optimization


Im trying to optimize ochratoxine a, but when tell hyperchem to show hydrogens, and put any semi-empirical method , and leave the semi-empirical options>Charge and Spin>total charge: 0, spin multiplicity 2, and click in geometry optimization and ok it says:

Quote:

Warning message received from node=0:
The optimized geometry may not correspond to the geometry with the minimum energy because of the half electron approximation.



So the molecule isn't in a singlet state, then i should change the total charge from 0 to something, then the spin multiplicity has to be 1, 3 or 5. BUT, any of those numbers give me a geometry with some bonds too big, like 4.6Å, 2.17Å,etc.
Is there a way to make it show me the right calc?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
arsphenamine
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 236
Registered: 12-8-2010
Location: I smell horses, Maryland, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-1-2012 at 12:34


Use neutral charge and singlet state.

The optimization step can be very sensitive to the initial structure.

Try generating your hyperchem input file from Avogadro after pre-optimizing the structure with MMFF94.
Check the initial bond lengths by exporting to a z-matrix file format first with Avogadro or openBabel.

With a poor starting point, ab initio methods like B3LYP/6-311G** may not converge in reasonable time or, if allowed to run long enough, can rearrange your molecule undesirably. They take long enough even when correct and convergent.

Semi-Empirical PM6 optimization under MOPAC is very rapid, but yields very similar results.

Compared to the PM6 method, ab initio optimization of Ochratoxin had a slightly (and visibly) different handling of the geometry about the peptide linkage and the nearby intramolecular hydrogen bond. Published structures do NOT show the lower energy hydrogen-bonded conformer.

Ab initio methods put more ring pucker in the lactone moiety, too.

[Edited on 7-1-2012 by arsphenamine]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
galvanize
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 2-5-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-2-2012 at 14:48
mm+


maybe you have to run first mm+ task
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top