toxin
Harmless
Posts: 27
Registered: 12-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
law of multiple proportions
Sulfur forms two compounds with fluorine. In one of them it is observed that 0.447 g of sulfur is combined with 1.06 g of fluorine while in the other,
0.438 g of sulfur is combined with 1.56 g of fluorine.
How would I show that these data illustrate the law of multiple proportions ?
would (0.447/1.06)/(0.438/1.56) work, why or why not ?
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
Your fraction = 1.502 which is very nearly equal to 3/2. If I remember the law right it says atoms combine in ratios of whole numbers. Your fraction
does show this.
Looking at the moles:
compound 1)
moles S = 0.447g/32.064 = 0.0139
moles F = 1.06/19.00 = 0.056
atomic ratio F/S = 0.056/0.0139 = 4.01 = very nearly 4/1.
compound 2)
moles S = 0.438/32.064 = 0.0137
moles F = 1.56/19.00 = 0.0821
atomic ratio F/S = 0.0821/0.0137 = 5.99 = very nearly 6/1.
The ratio of these ratios is 6/4 = 3/2 which is, of course, the same as your original fraction.
So I think your fraction does show this law. Converting to moles just shows the atomic ratio for each compound.
Does this make any sense? 
[Edited on 13-8-2005 by Magpie]
2nd Edit:
When I got off my ass and actually looked up the Law of Multiple Proportions it says that when 2 elements combine in more than one compound the ratio
of the weights of one element to a fixed weight of the other will be that of small whole numbers. So I think your original fraction shows this to be
true. Just presenting the complex fraction as the answer may be a little obsure to the teacher, however. 
[Edited on 13-8-2005 by Magpie]
[Edited on 13-8-2005 by Magpie]
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
Toxin,
I answered "yes" to your question but did not explain "why," at least not very directly.
Working directly with the Law:
Compound 1): weight ratio of S/F = 0.447g/1.06g
Compound 2): weight ratio of S/F =
0.438g/1.56g
Weight of S in compound 2 for 1.06 g F =
(1.06)[0.438g/1.56g]
Ratio of weights of S (cmpd 1/cmpd 2) to same amount of F =
0.447g/{1.06g[0.438g/1.56g]}
Rearranging this = (0.447g/ 1.06g)/(0.438/1.56), which is what you have. And in agreement with the law this is equal to 3/2, a ratio of 2 small
numbers.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
toxin
Harmless
Posts: 27
Registered: 12-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Magpie, what do you mean by weight here, aren't weight and mass two different things ?
"
Compound 1): weight ratio of S/F = 0.447g/1.06g
Compound 2): weight ratio of S/F =
0.438g/1.56g
Weight of S in compound 2 for 1.06 g F =
(1.06)[0.438g/1.56g]
Ratio of weights of S (cmpd 1/cmpd 2) to same amount of F =
0.447g/{1.06g[0.438g/1.56g]}
"
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Weight is mass on Earth. 
Tim
|
|
|
toxin
Harmless
Posts: 27
Registered: 12-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Isn't the gram a measure of mass ?
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Strictly the weight is the gravitational attraction of the earth and is measured in Newtons. Mass is the amount of stuff and is measured in grams or
kilograms.
The distinction is totally irrelevant here. On the moon tha weights would be different, but the ratios would still be the same.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
