Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Teenager in UK arrested for allegedly making explosives.
I am a fish
undersea enforcer
****




Posts: 600
Registered: 16-1-2003
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Member Is Offline

Mood: Ichthyoidal

[*] posted on 22-12-2005 at 10:26
Teenager in UK arrested for allegedly making explosives.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/12...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1953024,00.html
http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,5500,1672602...

A teenager in Lanacashire has been arrested for possessing "a cache of bomb-making chemicals". The third article quotes a neighbour as saying "when you don't know the facts, you don't know what to think", which seems pretty apt given the quality of the journalism surrounding this incident.

No information is given on the crucial issue of what chemicals the teenager possessed and the quantities involved. Whilst it is probable that the police have not released this information, no article mentions any attempt by the writer to probe beyond the press statements. It seems that mention of the dreaded "C" word is enough for a story.

None of the articles draw the slightest distinction between merely making a small quantity of an explosive compound and constructing a weapon. Whilst the word "device" is mentioned in the second and third articles, it is not at all clear what this means.

Four controlled explosions are referred to, but the results are completely ignored. There is no mention of whether or not the charges placed by the bomb-squad caused the substances in question to detonate.

Can anyone find any better information on this incident?




1f `/0u (4|\\| |234d 7|-|15, `/0u |234||`/ |\\|33d 70 937 0u7 /\\/\\0|23.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
The_Davster
A pnictogen
*******




Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline

Mood: .

[*] posted on 22-12-2005 at 13:24


That is interesting, but we will likely no know all the facts surrounding this. At least they have ruled out terrorist. The first article definatly portrays this guy in the best light, it focuses more on the 'eccentric chem student' unlike the third, they use so many words there that encite the public.
:(




View user's profile View All Posts By User
quicksilver
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1820
Registered: 7-9-2005
Location: Inches from the keyboard....
Member Is Offline

Mood: ~-=SWINGS=-~

[*] posted on 25-12-2005 at 11:57


It's painful in a certain manner. If the chemicals were acetone, hair bleach, and swimming-pool acid. If the chemicals were drain cleaner, stump-remover, & Beauty-shop glycerine. - All manner of crap....you would have a different item altogether. But because they were clearly marked lab grade chemicals it's high drama.
The public would be better served if facts were reported but the damn media has to sell air-time and ad space so every event is pumped to get any "journalistic blood" available. That thing shouldn't have even been a story. The authorities should have kept it quite until they knew what they had.....but there you have civil servants looking for publicity as well.
The only thing I could possably think that the police would need to destroy in place would be an explosive peroxide. But yet it seems that a chemistry student wouldn't waste his time with such a thing. You're right....there are too many missing pieces.




View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top