bigdaddymac
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 13-12-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
typo in Vogel?
Hello. This is the first time I have posted a question to the forum, even though I am a long time reader. This is mainly because I like to try to
search and solve problems for myself before posting a question, but this one has me stumped:
In Vogel's "Practical Organic Chemistry", 5th Ed, pp. 1035-1036, it states:
3,4-Methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene
In a 250-ml round-bottomed flask mix 30g (0.20 mol) of 3,4-methylenedioxybenzaldehyde (piperonal), 13.4 g (0.22 mol) of nitromethane,
7.8 g (0.1 mol) of ammonium acetate and 50 ml of glacial acid. Attach a reflux condenser, and boil the mixture under gentle reflux for 1 hour. Pour
the reaction mixture with stirring into a large excess of ice-water (about 1 litre). When all the ice has melted, filter off the crude product under
suction and recrystallise from a mixture of absolute ethanol and acetone (about 2:1 v/v). Almost pure yellow crystals of the nitrostyrene, mp 161°C,
are obtained. The yield is 23.3 g (60%). Further recrystallisation from the same solvent yields the pure compound, mp 162°C.
Shouldn't this be 'nitroethane'?
I understand that this topic of enquiry could be construed as 'drug chemistry', however I have no interest in that domain whatsoever. I'm just
wondering if it is a typo.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The mass and number of moles
13.4 g (0.22 mol)
don't tally for nitroethane, but they do for nitroMethane.
And the number of carbons in that bit of the molecule (hanging off the ring) works with one from nitromethane and one from the aldehyde group giving
two in the styrene derivative.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3555
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
bigdaddymac, anyone who spotted/encountered such a mistake should not be just 'lurking'
there are plenty of less experienced members like myself who need all the help/guidance/support that we can get,
stop lurking and help us please, pretty please ?
|
|
|
UC235
National Hazard
Posts: 565
Registered: 28-12-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's not a typo, because Vogel isn't giving you a recipe for 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine precursor. If you'd bother to draw the reactants and
products, you'll find that nitromethane will indeed produce the β-nitrostyrene as advertised.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Even after 20 cans i'd have looked at this very hard indeed before questioning Vogel.
|
|
|
bigdaddymac
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 13-12-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
ahh ok thank you for your responses. So to clarify, nitroethane and nitromethane produce different nitrostyrenes.
According to UC235, the use of nitroethane produces an amphetamine precursor; and the use of nitromethane produces something different entirely (I'm
curious as to what, actually). This makes sense because I'm sure that Vogel, like myself, was not a drug chemist aficionado.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Work it out for yourself.
Post your results and workings out and folks like UC235 could check it for errors.
I could check it for mistakes with the colouring-in, smudges etc.
|
|
|
CouchHatter
Hazard to Others
Posts: 146
Registered: 28-10-2017
Location: yes
Member Is Offline
|
|
I found an error on page 892, preparation of aniline, and on page 562 of the 3e the error is not present. Didn't think it would be worth having an
older version! Before cross-referencing the 3e, I searched for 'Vogel typo' and found this post. Thanks for the great laugh.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
