Scalebar
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 6-5-2016
Location: Europe!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Looking for a way out
|
|
2,4-DNPH in schools - overreaction
There have been a couple of news reports about this - and couple of places calling the bomb squad over the stuff, it just adds to stupid mentality in
the press of 'chemicals are dangerous'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-37835432
Looks to me like the info sent out to schools was just plain alarmist and the controlled explosion solution a total waste of public money.
I've had to deal with the stuff before when it's dried out - and picric acid, we just immerse the whole container in warm water and ask our chemical
waste company to come and pick it up when they're next in the area.
|
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
Nothing like having something to justify spending all that money turning the police into a paramilitary outfit. The Yanks have turned this
transformation into high art while Australia seems almost comic with the police force changing the uniform to dark blue (read black) and turn every
domestic situation into a exercise of 'show of force'.
Several years ago a guy in a little town called Castlemaine had a few fireworks ingredients; net quantity 4kg. (reported in the media via the cops as
4kg of "explosives" ie KNO3 plus others. He had let the odd bang go off and that required bomb squad, helicopters with black clad numpties dropping
down ropes, and what seemed like a brigade of cop cars.
Not to mention the media the cops called.
http://www.news.com.au/national/heavily-armed-police-arrest-...
Overreact much??
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
That Castlemaine story is all kinds of disturbing. Really, it makes as much sense to arrest someone for having 20L of lawnmower fuel. I hope his
lawyer made that point. That media story was so full of hyperbole it was ridiculous. I could excuse the police reaction if they were misinformed
about the scale of the situation. But for the media to deliberately misrepresent details and inflame the situation is reprehensible.
As for the UK situation, I understand it from the schools' perspective. They have this chemical. It is no longer in the curriculum. It presents
certain hazards if dry and the longer it is left there the greater is the risk of someone who knows nothing doing something foolish with it. They
decide to get rid of it. Some administrator box-checker type up the chain of command has deemed that the best method for disposal of 2, 4 DNPH is
detonation. So the school follows protocol and informs the police. Then the police follow standard policy when faced with an explosive material of
indeterminate destructive potential.
What is an over-reaction is the public response to a little bang and window rattling. And the allocation of newspaper inches to people with nothing
more significant going on in their lives.
|
|
|
CuReUS
National Hazard
Posts: 928
Registered: 9-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
But why did the castlemaine guy have anti-personnel mines if he was just making firecrackers ?
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
Ok. I somehow missed that item. That is a bit odd. It would be a concern if they were operational. But he strikes me as just a
fairly ordinary guy with some quirky interests -- much like most of us here. Just because he has an interest in railway does not make him a
candidate for a terrorist attack on a commuter train. Likewise if he had a WWII relic mine from a French farm, I would not assume he was up to
something nefarious. There is not enough detail to know, but my bet is that he is pretty harmless.
The reporter was reckless with inferences and very light on the details that actually matter. There is a world of difference between someone with an
interest in pyrotechnics and someone with a TAPT vest.
|
|
|
Scalebar
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 6-5-2016
Location: Europe!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Looking for a way out
|
|
Actually, is detonation really going to destroy the stuff or if it's still wet in the container, is it just spreading it around?
|
|
|
wg48
National Hazard
Posts: 821
Registered: 21-11-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Wow the BBC news gave a detailed explanation of the DNPH in the UK school incident with a picture of its structure.
That’s much better than the usual so simplified its ridiculous technical sound bites they frequently give, like oxygen burning or volatile
explosives.
|
|
|
nezza
Hazard to Others
Posts: 324
Registered: 17-4-2011
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: phosphorescent
|
|
"They have this chemical. It is no longer in the curriculum.". Are "A" level chemistry students these days allowed to do ANY chemistry. It strikes me
that they are only allowed near a lab in full NBC suits to watch a teacher adding sodium chloride to water from a safe distance. It's no wonder kids
these days are sciencephobic and of course the media and the police farce encourage that.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
What I am concerned about is the way this seems the beginning of a new dark ages, where information is politicised and possession of it tantamount to
witchcraft. I've stopped myself searching for something on the web because of the Big Brother factor; ooh this wouldn't look good if it came up. There
is a paranoid new reality where any risk is too much risk. I was talking with a lab manager about how they have to remove so many chemicals from the
teaching curriculum because of the risks. A small amount of dilute hydrazine was deemed too toxic for first year chem students. 'Really?' I say 'burn
a nitrile glove, you are so fond of handing out, in a classroom and then tell me what toxic is?'
I know the difference in terms of risk management between the two situations, but the point to be made is risk is everywhere, and the distinction
between removing one risk and overlooking another equal or greater by ignorance or necessity, makes the whole exercise seem arbitrary and overstated.
You breed a generation who has never had to deal with risk and with very little practical experience with anything other than installing an app on
their phone, they are incredibly pliable in the hands of an authority who tell them they are having their freedoms removed because of THE DANGER! They
have no way of knowing whether the risk is genuine or complete bullshit.
This has drifted off topic, but in terms of spending $250,000 on an operation to have heavily armed SOGs yell 'GET ON THE GROUND' to a harmless yokel,
then jam an automatic weapon in his face, handcuffing him with a knee on his neck then telling the media they found 'explosives' is bullshit
overreaction. They could have sent the amiable local sergeant over to say 'Bill, if you're going to let off a few bangs you might want to go somewhere
a bit out of the way, it's scaring the neighbours... and by the way are those real mines?' And Bill says ' Yeah, I get your point, a couple were a bit
louder than I expected and those are training mines used for disposal practice. Kinda cool.'
'Look Bill I'd better take them, they could end up god knows where one day'
Risks managed, no bullshit.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Chemetix  | | Nothing like having something to justify spending all that money turning the police into a paramilitary outfit. |
Ironically, it's the other way round in this case.
The police called in the "bomb squad".
It's entirely possible that they are civilians
http://www.1stlinedefence.co.uk/?gclid=CI-Wwer7itACFdXNGwodO...
How much you should worry about a few grams of DNPH is another matter but blowing it to kingdom come isn't a bad solution.
OK most of it just gets redistributed across the sports field but who cares?
30 years ago they were spraying that field with DNOC as a pesticide.
It avoids any potential risks of transport.
And it gives the press something to shout about.
The only real problem I see is the damage done to the reputation of chemistry; promoting the "all chemicals are bad" we should ban dihydrogen monoxide
sort of thing.
Waiting until the fifth of November and chucking it into the bonfire would have been sensible.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
A common reagent in use for decades in the organic teaching labs to identify carbonyls is now a horrible, scary chemical that must be blown up under
cover of darkness. What's next, sodium, phosphorus? Where will it end?
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just a thought... will all the excitement of blowing stuff up on school fields get kids interested in science?
|
|
|
macckone
International Hazard
Posts: 2159
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
The next scare after dihydrogen monoxide will be that sodium and chlorine compounds are found contaminating food in school cafeterias. It must be
alqeda as chlorine is a known war gas and sodium is in drain cleaner! Quick save the children. It is assault!
|
|
|
Scalebar
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 6-5-2016
Location: Europe!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Looking for a way out
|
|
Don't! Our campus banned salt from the tables of every eating establishment in the place in favour of compulsory lo-salt on the grounds of 'public
health' - despite the fact that they still use tonnes of salt in the kitchen and serve fat laden sugar doped crap.
Handy for when you need to precipitate out a bit of K perchlorate though...
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
Relevant (good) article on the situation.
http://www.compoundchem.com/2016/11/07/24-dnp/
In particular it explains why it is being exploded on site at schools rather than just wetted down.
| Quote: | | CLEAPSS’ advice is that if 2,4-DNPH has not been stored according to their instructions, or if it has but the water in the outer container has dried
out, it must be assumed that the 2,4-DNPH has dried out and poses an increased risk. They advise that in either of these cases, the bottle should not
be opened, and the school should contact CLEAPSS for further advice. This is because of the small risk of the friction caused by opening the bottle
triggering a small explosion. |
So the hyperbole comes essentially from the media. No surprise there.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
