solo
International Hazard
Posts: 3967
Registered: 9-12-2002
Location: Estados Unidos de La Republica Mexicana
Member Is Online
Mood: ....getting old and drowning in a sea of knowledge
|
|
Buss Loop Reactors
Currently considering the purchase of a reactor.....however I had planned to do some hydrogenations on it because of the high psi availability and the
volume...I since have read that there are specific type of reactors for hydrogenation called Buss Loop reactors...this are designed with hydrogenation
in mind however I wonder if regular use as a reactor is also possible , making it a dual purpose unit.
Most of the units I've looked at are for the 5 gallon volume and they vary from 7-22k ...used they are all glass lined and are with an overhead
stirring mechanism and some with a reflux column.
There are a couple of reactions I'm interested in but require cooling around -20 C and hence a reactor with both heating cooling coils and the design
of a buss loop unit with make it a trifold purpose unit.
Has anyone had any experience with such reactor and are there any preferences over a Pfoudler glass lined unit vs a stainless steel unit.
I'm just looking around for something as mentioned to be a very useful tool in my lab....there are some out of patent phermaceuticals that demand a
very good price /kg that get my interest..............solo
It's better to die on your feet, than live on your knees....Emiliano Zapata.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
Solo I had never heard of a BUSS loop reactor, but had heard of BUSS AG, the Swiss company who makes them. I looked on their website to see what it
looked like. It has a very clever mixing device that utilizes an entrained/dissolved gas.
My career never took me to the use of these small pilot plant scale reactors, with one exception: a one-gallon stirred tank reactor with a steam
jacket. It was used for the conversion of corn starch to complex sugars using alpha-amylase enzyme.
Edit: I have also used a similar pilot scale reactor to digest wood chips to pulp using the Kraft process (NaOH/Na2S).
BUSS took over the US company LCI. One plant I worked at had a large steam jacketed vertical dryer made by LCI, now BUSS. We used it to dry waste
water salts such as ammonium sulfate.
[Edited on 31-7-2008 by Magpie]
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
A loop reactor by definition is one in which the reaction mixture is recirculated by pump (often peristaltic pump or diaphragm pump) and usually this
involves a main reservoir, and a catalyst bed tube. For examplee a CSLR is a Constantly Stirred Loop Reactor. This is all CE terminology so I suspect
the chem engineers around here like JohnWW will be more familiar with it than I am.
A word of caution:
Many hydrogenation catalysts are very sensitive to certain catalytic "poisons" so when considering using a hydrogenation apparatus for other
reactions, weigh carefully the potential for ruining the apparatus for further hydrogenation work.
Also, pressure reactors that give long service for hydrogenations may have their service life shortened by the effects of corrosion from certain kinds
of reagents even if they are not poison to catalysts. Study carefully the choice of reactor material, as there are reasons why all those expensive
exotic alloy reactors exist, plain old 316SS just won't do the job for everything. Glass or PTFE liners do not completely protect the metal reactor
components from vapor and liquid reactants.
Never heard of BUSS AG but will look them up, I shudder to think of Swiss prices, however. Parr is bad enough!
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Sauron
A loop reactor by definition is one in which the reaction mixture is recirculated by pump (often peristaltic pump or diaphragm pump) and usually this
involves a main reservoir, and a catalyst bed tube. |
I may be wrong but to the best of my knowledge, the pump in the BLR is always a CENTRIFUGAL PUMP. It replaces the gas inducing stirrer of the normal
hydrogenation (stirred tank) reactors. The perstaltic or Diphragm are essentially transfer pumps with very little mixing characteristics. They aid /
help to maintain the "Plug Flow" of fluids in the system. Whereas centrifugal pump is as excellent mixing device as well. Which is what is required in
BLS for intimate contact between 3 phases.
gsd
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
You are right. But I wasn't referring to BUSS BLRs, but rather loop reactors generically. Peristaltic pumps have the advantage of no contact with the
reaction mix (except inside the tubing) and all-PTFE diaphragm pumps also are available. But of course centifugal pumps provide better mixing, it's
just problematic when the reactants are very aggressive.
For example a CSLR running SO2Cl2 through a bed of GAC while admitting Cl2 and SO2 at controlled rates using MFCs. Even Viton tubing has a short
service life when handling sulfuryl chloride, I recall it is something like 6-12 hours. Replacing tubing is cheap, replacing the wetted parts of a
centrifugal pump, rather costly and laborious.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"Loop reactors" can be either of two components of process units:
(a) A liquid- or gas-phase reaction proceeds inside a pipe into which the reagents are continuously introduced, mixed, and through which the reaction
mixture moves in turbulent-flow mode during the reaction (which is complete when the mixture exits the pipe into a tank); while concentrically outside
this pipe is another pipe through which flows (either countercurrently or cocurrently depnding on the reaction) a cooling or a heating fluid in a
continuous closed loop, with this fluid being either recooled (e.g. water in a cooling tower) or reheated to the required temperature before
reentering the cooling or heating pipe; or
(b) Some sort of continuous liquid- or gas-phase reaction in which one of the reagents (e.g. an homogenous catalyst) emerges unchanged after the
reaction and is somehow continuously recovered and recycled in a loop, eg. by its forming an immiscible liquid which can be pumped off and reused in
the reaction.
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@ Sauron
We are discussing the same subject on different wavelengths  . You have lab scale
on your mind where peristaltic / diaphragm pumps definately have an edge. However on industrial scale the good old CP beats them hands down.
Also now-a-days Material of Construction for pumps is not an issue at all. From glass and exotic polymers to esoteric metals or even Cement Concrete
(!), every imaginable material is successfully used as a MOC for Centrifual pumps.
gsd
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
OK but then the question becomes:
What does industrial scale process equipment have to do with amateur home chemistry?
I own some pilot scale stuff like 72L RB flasks and a 20L Buchi but have never actually USED them. In fact my bench scale kit stops at 5 liters.
Rarely do I feel the need for 12-22 L glass and too rarely to have ever purchased any. (The big stuff I do have was bought for liquor making.)
I think process equipment is fascinating, but just a little OT for this forum, isn't it?
[Edited on 3-8-2008 by Sauron]
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
| Quote: |
What does industrial scale process equipment have to do with amateur home chemistry?
|
Sauron, I agree with you that process equipment is fascinating in it's own right. Since it has to do with chemistry I think discussions of it are fun
and worthwhile.
Besides, who says we might not be able to scale down some clever feature we find on industrial scale equipment to a lab or at least a pilot scale. I
would say that the gas mixing jet on the BUSS loop reactor might even be a posibility for scale down. Chemists perhaps have a mindset that they can
only run batch reactions. When you use a tube furnace with continuous feed aren't you just using a small continuous flow plug reactor?
[Edited on 2-8-2008 by Magpie]
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
I was not proposing that we rule the thread out of bounds, merely arching an eyebrow, so to speak about the delineation between industrial scale and
bench scale. I have a lot of kit that is not "typical" home lab stuff, e.g. pressure reactors. However they are definitely bench scale (like, 1 liter)
and not something enormous that is fed by process pipe.
Scaling down is fine where feasible.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
dapper
Hazard to Self
Posts: 66
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I personally would love to hear more about pilot scale reactors and gear because its interesting and not-often discussed. You're certainly lucky to
have the larger stuff, I'm sure it wasn't cheap.
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
Cheap? Nope. Two 72 liter GlasCol TM's purchased new from their agent here. Two Kontes 72 L single neck 45/50 flasks, same, new from local agent.
That's about $6000 US right there.
Two used 72 L four neck flasks purchased second hand in USA and shipped to Thailand, these were $750 each not including the ocean freight and import
fees. These are 100 mm center necks with Schott flanges, side necks are 45/50 on one and 55/50 on the other. I sleeves those to 45/50 and set up one
with a stirrer and water cooled bearing and the other for distillation or reflux. So far have never used any of this stuff and have near $10K in it.
The 20 L Buchi is a R-152 with E-type glassware (descending condenser, foam trap etc.) I paid $6500 for this in Alabama and shipped it to Thailand.
20 L flask and 10 L receiving flask came with it. Also have not had use for it yet.
All this was purchased for liquor making (absinthe) which project I pulled out of for complex reasons.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Isn't all this discussion completely off-topic?
I think PM is a great tool available on this forum but unfortunately it seems it is grossly under utilized.
gsd
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
Ah, the volunteer auxiliary post police are active, I see.
I was responding to post above. My response is no more off topic than any other discussion of process equipment on a forum dedicated to AMATEUR HOME
chemistry.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Since when merely pointing out something-which is not only completely off-topic but is hijacking a good thread from scientific discussion (albeit
about process equipments but scientific never-the-less) into a personal life monologue of a member-has become policing?
I don't know how can anyone see BLR as anything other than a process equipment.
And if you can discuss finer points of Parr Bomb in this AMATURE HOME chemistry forum then so can others discuss construction features of plant scale
BLR which could give some input to scaling it down to HOME scale to some enterprising member.
gsd
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@ Solo
Here is a process description of an INDUSTRIAL SCALE BLR
(This description is mailed to me by a friend who is in this business)
"Process Description of BLR
The reaction mixture is fed into the reaction autoclave and then circulated through the reaction heat exchanger
and then back into the autoclave through a unique reaction mixer which also introduces the reaction gas (H2,
EO, NH3, etc). Mixing is intensive, constant, and with high sheer forces that produces high diffusion rates
across the catalyst boundary layer.
The intensive mixing provides optimal reaction contact. Any undissolved, dispersed gas is disengaged in the
autoclave and returns to the head space. As the reaction gas is consumed, fresh gas is introduced to maintain
a constant reaction pressure. The temperature of the reaction mixture is controlled by the reaction heat
exchanger. Catalyst is added in a suspension of raw material or solvent. The centrifugal pump used to circulate
the reaction mixture is specifically designed to handle suspended catalysts. It has a special seal system that is
protected by a pressurized flushing system."
I think this gives clear picture of the system. Given the inclination and of course resources, Any good AMATURE HOME chemist will be able to assemble
a working HOME BLR based on this description.
Also I must admit that I was wrong when I presumed in my previous post that the centrifual pump does the job of mixing as well as circulation in the
BLR. This description says that it is meant for circulation. A separate (static) mixer does the mixing job.
gsd
[Edited on 7-8-2008 by gsd]
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
@solo, my Parr is 1 L nominal with a working capacity of 650 ml.
I am not the only member with this sort of equipment, and mine is not the largest owned by a member.
Pray, what is un-amateur about that?
When you factor in the mantle, and stirrer, and thermostat, and controller, the cost is of same order of magnitude as glassware setup - which is to
say it is more but less than 10X more. And the ability to work at >1800 psi @ a few hundred C is something glass will never deliver.
Of course I did not buy it new.
On the other hand, I have never seen anything from BUSS AG come up for sale on used market.
You have not mentioned the size of the BLR you are contemplating to buy.
Benchtop? Or does it require a containment dome?
In any case I never intended to raise any serious objection to this thread, and I already said so upthread.
Nor was it my intention in any way to hijack or derail the discussion. A member asked or at least implied a question, I replied. End of story.
[Edited on 8-8-2008 by Sauron]
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Here is a schematic diagram of BLR, which when read along with the process description given previously gives perfect details of BLR.
It seems it is a good candidate for scallling down to lab / small scale depending on the pressure at which you wish to operate.
You only need to find out correct centrifgual pump compatible with your reaction media, temperature and PRESSURE.
The big advantage as I see it, BLR has over Autoclave is there is no stirrer. It ofcourse has a centrifugal pump but it is available - depending on
your operating conditions - in vide variety / types and prices. In an high pressure hydrogenation autoclave the mechanical seal of a stirrer is a
major cost component. I remember for a 30 lit gas-inducing type hydrogenation reactor operating at 35 bar and 150 Deg C., the cost of BERGMANN double
mechanical seal complete with pressure equilizing device was more than the cost of the vessel .
gsd
[Edited on 8-8-2008 by gsd]
Attachment: BLR.pdf (53kB)
This file has been downloaded 1057 times
|
|
|
Sauron
International Hazard
Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline
Mood: metastable
|
|
Lots of bench scale autoclaves, say 1 to 5 L, have either packed gland or magnetically coupled stirrers and operate to about 250 C and >100 bar.
Optionally, higher, with a different vessel. The standard ones are rated for 1900 psi at the max service temp. (316SS vessel).
But you are right, the components for these things, purchased new, are absolutely outrageous in price.
Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
|
|
|
Fleaker
International Hazard
Posts: 1252
Registered: 19-6-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: nucleophilic
|
|
Solo,
The only Pfaulder I've experienced is their glass-lined unit with the bottom tap and it wasn't meant for pressure. I know they make pressure vessels,
but as you said yourself--they're extremely expensive. Convenience lies in that you have little worries about permeability of the stainless and that
there are less things that react with glass than SS316--granted you won't have the same pressure capabilities. Weigh your options--spend more on
higher pressure using cheaper catalysts, or spend less on lower pressure with expensive catalysts.
Neither flask nor beaker.
"Kid, you don't even know just what you don't know. "
--The Dark Lord Sauron
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 819
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
Recirculating Hydrogenation Apparatus
Has anybody seen or heard of this?
Some guy on another forum claims that his "company uses this type of device on a wide variety of hydrogenations since it is easy to use and does not
require high pressures of hydrogen".
I have no clue as to how this device could be made up. Enlighten me!
Edit: Yes, i googled. The patents that came up are useless.
[Edited on 18-10-2013 by stoichiometric_steve]
|
|
|
gsd
National Hazard
Posts: 847
Registered: 18-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
By any chance is it Bus Loop Reactor?
Gsd
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 819
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
thanks man, that looks exactly like what the guy was talking about! there's even
a thread about it here. gotta know what to search for.
|
|
|
bfesser
|
Threads Merged
18-10-2013 at 07:43 |
Texium
|
Thread Moved
21-11-2023 at 13:39 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
