Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  ..  7    9
Author: Subject: Synthesis of L-Phenylacetylcarbinol(L-PAC)
hector2000
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 127
Registered: 22-8-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: Cool

[*] posted on 17-5-2009 at 14:17


i made L-pac from mandelamide method one time but mandelamide method is expensive and has several step(making memgi,resolution mandelic acid,making mandelamide,...)
1,1 dichloroacetone method has one step and easy and cheap but make racemic PAC




Chemistry=Chem+ is+ Try
View user's profile View All Posts By User
turd
National Hazard
****




Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-5-2009 at 14:26


Quote: Originally posted by Cyrex  
[Edited on 17-5-2009 by Cyrex]

ROTFL. Who really believed that stuff about the "pharm company"?
Just a few minutes ago there was typical Hector drivel stating that he supposedly made L-PAC via mandelonitrile. So either Hector and Cyrex are the same person or they use the same computer. I wonder if moderators/administrators can see old versions?
Hector/Cyrex, you crazy people: you can make nor-ephedrine, ephedrine, amphetamine and methamphetamine _much_ easier than via L-PAC. These are four absolutely trivial compounds whith a myriad of possible syntheses.


[Edited on 17-5-2009 by turd]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
hector2000
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 127
Registered: 22-8-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: Cool

[*] posted on 17-5-2009 at 14:42


yes cyrex is another my id.
why now you are angry?is problem somebody has two id?
i afraid to ask about ephedrine because then all member said me cooker
as you said there is no reason for making meth,amphetamine from l-pac because there is better way. here i can buy ephedrine without limitation because here isnt forbidden then i dont want to make meth.i just has question before that why amination of l-pac make l-ephedrine not d-pac and i afraid to ask this question then i ask it with another id.
i believe god allow human to do every work bad or good work but if you do good work you will go to paradise(after die) and if you do bad work (killing,..)you will go hell
god allow human be free to choose his way
you sure i amnt bad person or cooker

[Edited on 17-5-2009 by hector2000]




Chemistry=Chem+ is+ Try
View user's profile View All Posts By User
turd
National Hazard
****




Posts: 800
Registered: 5-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-5-2009 at 21:45


Quote: Originally posted by hector2000  
why now you are angry?

Not angry, but very amused about your clumsiness. I couldn't(sic!) care less if you cook a 1kg batch of methamphetamine, so no point in getting defensive.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 17-5-2009 at 22:23


Hector, clumsy attempts at deceiving this forum do you no credit.

I am afraid you have mplaced yourself beyond my help.

You owe the members of SM an abject apology.




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
hector2000
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 127
Registered: 22-8-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: Cool

[*] posted on 18-5-2009 at 00:28


Sauron,
I am really sorry but i am not cooker
I apology of all member and moderator
really i like you and i wish my credit dont lose in your mind
thank you




Chemistry=Chem+ is+ Try
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
*****




Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-5-2009 at 09:33


Having two logins means you either need another member to backup your absurd claims (sockpuppeting) or you need to avoid raising suspicion about some unkosher activities. Hence, it does your credibility no good.

Anyway, that point is moot because user Cyrex is now terminated. May that be a lesson learned.

Oh, and would we please refrain from speculation about intent? This thread is about L-PAC and it's already confusing enough.

[Edited on 18-5-2009 by vulture]




One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  ..  7    9

  Go To Top