Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Preventing light from screwing with an electrophilic addition reaction
Edward Elric
Hazard to Self

Posts: 86
Registered: 2-5-2005
Location: : Cloud 9
Member Is Offline

Mood: seraphic

[*] posted on 17-10-2009 at 18:40
Preventing light from screwing with an electrophilic addition reaction

Light is all around us.

So, when someone says that a reaction can take place because light is there, then I can't help but think that the reaction is inevitable even if a person wants a particular reaction.

Ok, so let's take a basic rxn. This thread is mostly about Markovnikov reactions.

So, let's say I take this: 1-Butene

And I mix it with this: HBr

Let's say I want the the reactants to go through a Markovnikov reaction path. Ideally, I would get 2-Bromobutane.

Free-radical addition (Anti-Mark.) is going to occur regardless, right, because there is light? Thus, I'm going to get 1-Bromobutane?

Therefore, despite my best efforts to remove light from the environment, I'm going to have 1-Bromobutane and 2-Bromobutane as products?

How do scientists go about forcing Bromide into one path? Is there a way to block out light?

This anti-mark. thing only happens with bromide, right?

[Edited on 18-10-2009 by Edward Elric]

☣ - Full Metal Alchemist - ☣
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
ammonium isocyanate
Hazard to Others

Posts: 124
Registered: 13-7-2009
Location: USA - Midwest
Member Is Offline

Mood: sick :(

[*] posted on 17-10-2009 at 19:01

Free radical addition, IIRC, would require alot of light, specifically of higher wavelengths, or better yet a radical initiator. Normal light in the laboratory would probably not cause anti-markovnikov addition to an appreciable extent.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
International Hazard

Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-10-2009 at 03:17

When a chemist wants antimarkovnikov addition, they use a source of UV and a radical initiator. Without a radical initiator, you almost certainly need UV, and this can be eliminated by working under red or yellow coloured lamps (these colours are very low in energy with respect to UV), much like a dark room in a photographic lab.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
International Hazard

Posts: 1454
Registered: 9-12-2006
Location: Mars
Member Is Offline

Mood: Nucleophilic

[*] posted on 18-10-2009 at 06:25

The addition of HBr should have few to no issues with light. That's just bromine, chlorine, etc. You may simply wrap the flask in aluminum foil to keep out light.

Furthermore, Markovnikov/antimarkovnikov addition isn't a hard rule. Since the selection is only based on stability of the product and steric issues, you will get a significant amount of the anti-markovnikov product along with the expected markovnikov product.

This is why fractionating columns exist, why preparative chromatography is used, and sometimes very expensive reagents are used where it might appear that simpler ones would work. No reaction is without side products.

[Edited on 10-18-09 by UnintentionalChaos]

Department of Redundancy Department - Now with paperwork!

'In organic synthesis, we call decomposition products "crap", however this is not a IUPAC approved nomenclature.' -Nicodem
View user's profile View All Posts By User
International Hazard

Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: Manic Expressive

[*] posted on 18-10-2009 at 09:20

How do scientists go about forcing Bromide into one path?

Radical scavengers and antioxidants have been used to force Markovnikov addition in this reaction IIRC. You seem to suggest that removal of light from a reaction is a hard thing to do???

Knowledge is useless to useless people...

"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story before."~Maynard James Keenan
View user's profile View All Posts By User
National Hazard

Posts: 459
Registered: 11-1-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: paranoid distrustful apprehensive

[*] posted on 9-11-2009 at 15:39

it's not that touchy keep it on the freeze sealed up it's dark in the freezer.
the cooler the better.- c i mean
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top