Ormarion
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 19-12-2017
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: Alkylating her DNA
|
|
Radioactive lightning rods
Hi, i hope everybody is doing ok. Today i wanted to share something i learnt about some years ago that i believe to be pretty interesting.
I believe when we ear about americium we all think about those smoke detector ion chamber but from what i saw at this time they also made some
lightnings rod holding quite significant sources on them (sometime they also used radium).
Have any of you ever handle or saw such things ? And how much did you measured out of it ?
Finally is the ionisation created by the rod really enough to potentially attract lightnings to it ?
PS: I am not especially planning to get one, first because no one would ever sell such thing for the purpose of it being radioactive, second because i
already have big enough sources of those isotopes.
Anyway have a great day then 
|
|
|
Jenks
Hazard to Others
Posts: 130
Registered: 1-12-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Americium is an alpha emitter. The Wikipedia page on the alpha particle says that although this ionized, and ionizing, helium nucleus is typically
emitted at around 4% the speed of light (5 MeV), it can only penetrate a few centimeters of air. Since ionizing air makes it relatively conducting,
this should make sparks attempting to reach it only a few cm longer. Maybe a neat demo with a high voltage generator, but in the case of the lightning
rod it seems like the same result could be obtained by making the rod a few cm longer.
|
|
|
Ormarion
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 19-12-2017
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: Alkylating her DNA
|
|
Ok interesting, in this case as radium is a alpha and gamma emitter i believe it would be a bit more efficient even if i am not sure if it worth it in
both cases. I wouldn't test myself to just strike a radioactive sources like this with a HV electrical spark lol.
|
|
|
Jenks
Hazard to Others
Posts: 130
Registered: 1-12-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Now that you mention it, I suppose vaporizing spots of an americium surface with sparks isn't such a good idea. As far as radium being more efficient
(as a lightning attractor?), if this is to be due to the gamma radiation - while gamma rays go much further through air, I think they do this by
having much less interaction. So unlike leaving a conductive, unbroken ionized trail as visualized in a cloud chamber, a gamma ray would leave a trail
of isolated gas atoms too far apart to leave a conductive path. But it is all a matter of amount, right? And this reminds me of a thread I once saw on
the topic of summoning lightning either by launching a small rocket with conductive smoke into a cloud (which can work) or by firing a laser beam of
ionizing radiation into it. The problem with the lightning rod, with radiation going in all directions, is that the intensity of that radiation is
proportional to the cube root of the distance from the rod. Unlike alpha particles, gamma ray photons diverge.
[Edited on 6-5-2021 by Jenks]
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6221
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
Cube root? Why not squate root?
|
|
|
Jenks
Hazard to Others
Posts: 130
Registered: 1-12-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
You're right - square root of the distance.
|
|
|
Ormarion
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 19-12-2017
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: Alkylating her DNA
|
|
Jenks, interesting for the conductive smoke in rockets, i was thinking it would be some kind of thin wire instead but it seem more logical. If any of
you find one of those rods a day please share it under this post !
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
