tjosephrhodes
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 17-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
zinc sulfur
I am trying to burn some sulfur and zinc for a demonstration and it does not flash and burn, but just sputters and burns blue. Youtube videos and
other people say it should burn bright green and very energetically spark and flash. I have tried 2:1 and 6:1 ratio, and I blend them very well with
mortar and pestle first. What am I doing wrong?
|
|
|
UKnowNotWatUDo
Hazard to Self
Posts: 96
Registered: 30-6-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What are you using as your source for sulfur? Is it relatively pure or is it something like gardening sulfur?
|
|
|
tjosephrhodes
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 17-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Its roll sulfur from fisher chemical.
|
|
|
argyrium
Hazard to Others
Posts: 123
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Pacific
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
tjosephrhodes,
Do not be lulled into disrespect for this mixture - it can and has bitten many... and it certainly can behave with a "flash" and not just
"sputtering".
|
|
|
simply RED
Hazard to Others
Posts: 206
Registered: 18-8-2005
Location: noitacoL
Member Is Offline
Mood: booM
|
|
You have to ignite it with something like KNO3/Al/S mix! Not with a match!
When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead...
|
|
|
Blasty
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 25-7-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That's not necessary, it will ignite without help from an oxidizer.
|
|
|
tjosephrhodes
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 17-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Most of the people I have seen say they light it with a propane or methane fed bunsen burner, which is exactly what I am using. My mixture just seems
to melt and darken and then kind of burn slowly and go out. I can even get it to red hot for minutes without anything dramatic happening. I am doing
it in a fume hood with protective gear and nothing flammable around. Not sure what I could be doing wrong.
|
|
|
Blasty
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 25-7-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by tjosephrhodes  | | I am trying to burn some sulfur and zinc for a demonstration and it does not flash and burn, but just sputters and burns blue. Youtube videos and
other people say it should burn bright green and very energetically spark and flash. I have tried 2:1 and 6:1 ratio, and I blend them very well with
mortar and pestle first. What am I doing wrong? |
In a proportion of 6 to 1 it burns pretty fast, but don't get your hopes up if what you are expecting is for it to be some sort of substitute for
black powder or flash powder. I have never been able to make it explosively burst a strongly closed container (like kraft paper tubes with both ends
tightly shut), like you can with black powder or nitrate/sulfate-based flash powders (chlorate/perchlorate-based flash powders do not need very strong
containment to explode.) It always breaks through just some part of the container (usually the area where the hole for the fuse is), giving a rather
lame "pop", and propelling it.
|
|
|
Blasty
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 25-7-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by tjosephrhodes | | Most of the people I have seen say they light it with a propane or methane fed bunsen burner, which is exactly what I am using. My mixture just seems
to melt and darken and then kind of burn slowly and go out. I can even get it to red hot for minutes without anything dramatic happening. I am doing
it in a fume hood with protective gear and nothing flammable around. Not sure what I could be doing wrong. |
Your zinc and sulfur powder also need to be very fine. When I used to tinker with this mix I used a very fine zinc dust and flowers of sulfur.
|
|
|
The WiZard is In
International Hazard
Posts: 1617
Registered: 3-4-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by tjosephrhodes | | Most of the people I have seen say they light it with a propane or methane fed bunsen burner, which is exactly what I am using. My mixture just seems
to melt and darken and then kind of burn slowly and go out. I can even get it to red hot for minutes without anything dramatic happening. I am doing
it in a fume hood with protective gear and nothing flammable around. Not sure what I could be doing wrong. |
What ratio of Zink - Sulphur dobe you using?
6 Zn - 1 S by weight seems be de régle.
This is hard to completely mix ... diapering would seem the
best method. Pour on paper and lift ends ad lib to mix.
Byda Shakhashiri's Chemical Demonstrations : A Handbook for
Teachers of Chemistry recommends using a mad hot wire. I
haven't done-did this for 55+ years ---- seems to me I used
a match or a fuse back then. Always worked ... made a heck of a
mess ... but it always worked.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | This is hard to completely mix ... diapering would seem the
best method. Pour on paper and lift ends ad lib to mix. |
Roll the mixture in a ballmill or just put it in a sealed can and roll it around on the ground!
Or better - down a good-sized hill . . .
|
|
|
The WiZard is In
International Hazard
Posts: 1617
Registered: 3-4-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by hissingnoise | | Quote: | This is hard to completely mix ... diapering would seem the
best method. Pour on paper and lift ends ad lib to mix. |
Roll the mixture in a ballmill or just put it in a sealed can and roll it around on the ground!
Or better - down a good-sized hill . . .
|
Reminds upon me .... some years ago I bought a bunch of
pyro chemicals from a going out of business (hobby) pyro.
(He got remarried and was pussy whipped.) Said
he ñ when I mixed barium chlorate/shellac for green stars
I put it in a barrel and roll it down el hill.
Twas also told years ago of the professional fwks company
that put la mixture in a barrel and then "Hey Jose ... roll this
barrel around to mix it... were going to town." They drove off
a few ... stopped - read the days paper... then drove back.
djh
----
"Here, where everything is done in a hurry and as cheaply as possible, it
was preferred to transport NG in liquid form, although it was more
dangerous, Many accidents occurred and many live were lost in connection
with NG and as long as most of the workmen were foreigners, especially
Chinese, the industrialists, who care only for profits, did not introduce
any safety regulation until the were forced by the Government after
establishing in 1910 the Bureau of Mines, at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania."
PATR 2700
|
|
|
The WiZard is In
International Hazard
Posts: 1617
Registered: 3-4-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by The WiZard is In | | Quote: Originally posted by tjosephrhodes | | Most of the people I have seen say they light it with a propane or methane fed bunsen burner, which is exactly what I am using. My mixture just seems
to melt and darken and then kind of burn slowly and go out. I can even get it to red hot for minutes without anything dramatic happening. I am doing
it in a fume hood with protective gear and nothing flammable around. Not sure what I could be doing wrong. |
Byda Shakhashiri's Chemical Demonstrations : A Handbook for
Teachers of Chemistry recommends using a mad hot wire. I
haven't done-did this for 55+ years ---- seems to me I used
a match or a fuse back then. Always worked ... made a heck of a
mess ... but it always worked.
|
Hot metal rod - too.
http://tinyurl.com/6hstmt9
This from Popular Science September 1932, home chemist.
a time before Chemistry became a pejorative and DuPont
was Better things for better living through chemistry.
|
|
|
albqbrian
Hazard to Self
Posts: 73
Registered: 26-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: Alternatingly paranoid or pi**ed
|
|
A classic...
I still have Cpt Brinley's book that was published in the mid 1960's using Zn/S as a nice rocket propellant. It was definitely a different time. The
book was made to help stop the rash of serious injuries from young men inspired by the early Space Race to make their own. A common, really dangerous
"motor" was the heads from wooden matches stuffed into an empty CO2 cylinder. That claimed many a body part.
Brinley had the full support of the Army and came up with a very detailed amateur rocket operation. He was big into making sandbagged structures for
protection, remote loading, etc. It covered everything. Except recovery systems! I guess in the 1960s they were too difficult to make. Or they went on
the probability path. That a falling rocket and a standing person were unlikely to occupy the same place at the same time. And, of course, you had the
sandbags. The book contained detailed descriptions fro two rockets that could attain altitudes of 10K and 20K feet! Steel tubes, no parachute  Man I miss those days.
OK, back to your question. When used for rocket fuel the recommended ratio is 2 pts Zn to 1 S; by weight. When I did demos I just mixed roughly
(eyeballed) equal amounts of each. I then wrapped it in toilet paper and lit the paper. I used this demo to show how to very distinct, different
elements transformed into a totally new thing. With lots of flame and smoke. It doesn't flash, but the energetic burning always was a crowd pleaser.
[Edited on 18-6-2011 by albqbrian]
|
|
|
IndependentBoffin
Hazard to Others
Posts: 150
Registered: 15-4-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Blasty | | Quote: Originally posted by tjosephrhodes | | I am trying to burn some sulfur and zinc for a demonstration and it does not flash and burn, but just sputters and burns blue. Youtube videos and
other people say it should burn bright green and very energetically spark and flash. I have tried 2:1 and 6:1 ratio, and I blend them very well with
mortar and pestle first. What am I doing wrong? |
In a proportion of 6 to 1 it burns pretty fast, but don't get your hopes up if what you are expecting is for it to be some sort of substitute for
black powder or flash powder. I have never been able to make it explosively burst a strongly closed container (like kraft paper tubes with both ends
tightly shut), like you can with black powder or nitrate/sulfate-based flash powders (chlorate/perchlorate-based flash powders do not need very strong
containment to explode.) It always breaks through just some part of the container (usually the area where the hole for the fuse is), giving a rather
lame "pop", and propelling it. |
The reason why it doesn't explode is because the reaction (in theory) produces no gaseous products.
Zn(s) + S(s) -> ZnS(s)
Therefore gaseous pressure against a casing to explode it or thrust to propel a rocket can only come from two sources:
1) Vaporisation of the solids
2) Pressure rise from heating of any existing gas
Sulphur has a relatively low vaporisation energy of about 1.75kJ/g. Zinc is a bit higher at 2.34kJ/g. By contrast aluminum has a vaporisation energy
of 13.5kJ/g. Therefore sulphur rich compositions are more likely to come close to something resembling a weak "explosion".
Comments: This does not preclude the usage of Zn + S in propellant or explosive applications. To use Zn + S as a propellant you can try to vent high
pressure gas into burning Zn + S in the combustion chamber. Best gas for performance to use is one with a high specific heat ratio
C<sub>p</sub>/C<sub>v</sub>, e.g. He (expensive) or H<sub>2</sub> (better). For convenience though,
CO<sub>2</sub> can be used even though it is a poorer gas as a propellant because of the ease of acquisition in compact containers used in
the airgun and soft drink industries.
BTW for those who don't understand the relevance of C<sub>p</sub>/C<sub>v</sub> as a propellant, the explanation is simple:
thrust is only provided by linear translational momentum of the exhaust gas. As the degrees of freedom of excitation increase (e.g. polyatomic
molecules) then thermal energy of the gas becomes vibrational/rotational energies as well. These energies are wasted from a perspective of rocket
thrust. Incidentally this is why all the noble gases (monoatomic particles) have very similar C<sub>p</sub>/C<sub>v</sub> of
1.66 (within 2%)
Conclusion: Zn + S makes a poor propellant and explosive. It is best used for pyrotechnic purposes. Under these circumstances it is relatively safe
because it is does not generate copious amounts of gas.
I can sell the following:
1) Various high purity non-ferrous metals - Ni, Co, Ta, Zr, Mo, Ti, Nb.
2) Alkex para-aramid Korean Kevlar analogue fabric (about 50% Du Pont's prices)
3) NdFeB magnets
4) High purity technical ceramics
|
|
|
quicksilver
International Hazard
Posts: 1820
Registered: 7-9-2005
Location: Inches from the keyboard....
Member Is Offline
Mood: ~-=SWINGS=-~
|
|
LDRS has a "Study of CATO's" that makes for very interesting reading. With more & more serious rocket competition, bodies naturally moved to
aluminum & altimeters got much less expensive. The plethora of graphite nozzles made for further strides in the hobby as did inexpensive
multi-minutes video cameras (pointed downward through the entire launch: 2-6 minutes would fit on a USB drive).
unfortunately I forgot the name but there is a lot of material dealing with that subject from David Sleeter's huge work "Amateur Rocket Motor
Construction" (1st printing '04 - ISBM 0-930387-04-x, it's the "classic" rocket text & IMO should be studied as closely as Davis).
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
