Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Zinc sulfide thin films on glass
Freddybaby
Harmless
*




Posts: 4
Registered: 8-3-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-3-2011 at 16:35
Zinc sulfide thin films on glass


Trying to deposit very thin films of ZnS on glass for gamma detector. This stuff does not mix well with much on my shelf.

Thought about combining with Sylgard silicone elastomere, similar to Sol gel but it's expensive and my needs are small.

Anyone have any ideas ??

Also, I wonder how much the microscope slide will attenuate the light level ? Perhaps a glass coverslip instead

[Edited on 19-3-2011 by Freddybaby]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
redox
National Hazard
****




Posts: 268
Registered: 22-2-2011
Location: The Land of Milk and Honey
Member Is Offline

Mood: Chalcogenetic

[*] posted on 18-3-2011 at 16:52


Does the zinc sulfide have to be strongly adhered to the glass surface? Or can it be loose?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Freddybaby
Harmless
*




Posts: 4
Registered: 8-3-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-3-2011 at 19:15


It should be bonded to the glass but even simple adhesion would be fine. A photo sensor will be on the opposite side and the entire assem bonded together.

The ZnS should be fairly protected I guess, it will be exposed to the atmosphere but the coating over the sulfide must be thin for sensitivity.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ozone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1267
Registered: 28-7-2005
Location: Good Olde USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Integrated

[*] posted on 19-3-2011 at 07:01


"..must be thin for sensitivity."

Not so for gammas! A glass slide over the one with the ZnS secured with rubber bands would be fine, and would demonstrate little to no decrease in counting efficiency (aside from the fact the ZnS is a pretty crummy scintillator). You want the material to be even, but not so thick that your detector (photodiode, PMT, etc.) cannot see the pulses from the active side. Also, look up ZnS(Ag) (doped with Ag) which is a much more efficient material.

Cheers,

O3




-Anyone who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
--Albert Einstein
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 4008
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-3-2011 at 02:43


Would something like this help?
http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=q3655543...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-8-2011 at 07:36


Do you have a furnace?
Zinc sulphide sublimes at ~1100C, you could deposit it onto a glass surface by heating some zinc sulphide under a piece of glass. The added bonus to this method is that any impurities are left behind or evaporated away under the intense heat. Alternatively, if you already have high purity zinc sulphide, you could melt some glass and mix some of it in, stir, extrude into a sheet and let cool.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Wizzard
National Hazard
****




Posts: 337
Registered: 22-3-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2011 at 12:11


Ungh, I don't know what happen to my last post... Apparently it was never sent.

I second the ZnS sublimation idea.

Encase a Ta/Moly boat in a small brick box, sealed with some clay. Fill with argon (recommended?), loosely seal the top with some material. Short some volts across the with some carbon terminals. Heat to red hot, replace the atmosphere (getting rid of zinc and sulfur), place your glass close above the boat, forming a loose seal over the top, and then heat the boat as hot as it will go.

ZnS melts at 1830*C, I think.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
redox
National Hazard
****




Posts: 268
Registered: 22-2-2011
Location: The Land of Milk and Honey
Member Is Offline

Mood: Chalcogenetic

[*] posted on 4-8-2011 at 14:07


How about sandwiching the powder in between two planes of glass, like microscope slides? I'm not very learned in nuclear chemistry (I prefer to stick to organic), but would the extra sheet of glass interfere with readings?

Just a thought.




My quite small but growing Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/RealChemLabs

Newest video: Synthesis of Chloroform

The difference between chemists and chemical engineers: Chemists use test tubes, chemical engineers use buckets.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-8-2011 at 15:23


Redox:

Yes it would. Beta rays don't make it though a millimetre of aluminium and alpha rays are even easier to stop. The only way to get readings is to have a thin film of scintillator attached to a glass substrate, or to somehow embed the scintillator inside a very thin piece of glass.

Good thinking though.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
redox
National Hazard
****




Posts: 268
Registered: 22-2-2011
Location: The Land of Milk and Honey
Member Is Offline

Mood: Chalcogenetic

[*] posted on 4-8-2011 at 16:20


Oh. For some reason I thought this was a scintillator for gamma rays, which, of course, could penetrate.
Whoops!




My quite small but growing Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/RealChemLabs

Newest video: Synthesis of Chloroform

The difference between chemists and chemical engineers: Chemists use test tubes, chemical engineers use buckets.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-8-2011 at 17:34


Gamma rays would penetrate, but they wouldn't interact much with the zinc sulfide. Zinc sulfide, from what I understand, scintillates in the presence of alpha, beta and X radiation, not gamma. Freddybaby is probably trying to build a scintillation counter, but in order to detect gamma rays (specifically), different scintillator materials must be used. Besides, the decay of common radioisotopes results in the emission of alpha and beta particles (gamma radiation is negligible).

So the OP must have misunderstood something. Detecting gamma radiation is not a reliable way to measure radioactivity in rocks/ radium dials/ medical isotopes etc... Zinc sulfide only allows you to detect alpha and beta particles.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top