Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: I just had a weird thought
Acetic Acid
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 95
Registered: 14-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

cool.gif posted on 4-9-2011 at 05:54
I just had a weird thought


There should be a machine that generates heat based on the addition of sulfuric acid to water. :P
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Arthur Dent
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 546
Registered: 22-10-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: entropic

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:09


Interesting idea, but the byproduct of this reaction would be massive quantities of diluted sulphuric acid... not the friendliest of emission! ;)

Robert




--- Art is making something out of nothing and selling it. - Frank Zappa ---
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Acetic Acid
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 95
Registered: 14-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:11


Hmm... Maybe it could be subsequently neutralized in Na-OH to generate even more heat?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
drago57
Harmless
*




Posts: 16
Registered: 13-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:22


Making one from adding water to anhydrous CuSO4 would be better, you could easily regenerate your heat source
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Acetic Acid
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 95
Registered: 14-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:27


Oh I get it, because hydrating that is an exothermic process, the heat produced might boil the water if you use enough. However, I always wondered what happens if you don't follow safety rules and add water to acid.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
drago57
Harmless
*




Posts: 16
Registered: 13-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:47


Plenty of heat from the hydration of CuSO4, I think that's how some of those instant self heating food packs work (though not completely sure on that one)

From experience rinsing out flasks that've had conc. acid in them, I wouldn't fancy trying it on more than a few mL
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bot0nist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline

Mood: Streching my cotyledons.

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:48


@Acetic Acid
The drop of water you add will instantly boil and splash acid all over. Not fun.

[Edited on 4-9-2011 by Bot0nist]




U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!


Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Megamarko94
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 68
Registered: 31-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:51


how about adding CaO to water



View user's profile View All Posts By User
drago57
Harmless
*




Posts: 16
Registered: 13-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 06:58


CaO would work, I've seen several gallons of water be boiled almost instantly by adding relatively small amounts of CaO. You'd have a load of Ca(OH)2 to get rid of afterwards though
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 07:58


How about aluminium burned in the presence of sulphur? This reaction gives off tremendous amounts of heat. Once it cools down, you can add it to water and it will give off H2S, which is flammable. Burn the H2S and use the heat to heat some vanadium pentoxide catalyst and pass the sulfur dioxide mixed with oxygen over it then pass the sulphur trioxide into some water and this will generate even more heat and so on...

Kind of like a rube goldberg machine:)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
plante1999
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1937
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Mad as a hatter

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 08:02


Aluminium cannot be used asa fuel , It require an extrem amount of electricity to extract it. I think Ammonnia is the best fuel we can have at this time.



I never asked for this.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 08:59


Ammonia also uses a lot of energy during production. Ammonia synthesis uses up about 1% of the all the energy generated worldwide. I never said that aluminium should be used as fuel. It's foolish to use aluminium, ammonia and sulfuric acid to generate heat.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
plante1999
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1937
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Mad as a hatter

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 09:40


Ammonia could be produced from waste animal matter (piss) , urine contain urea , chloride and sulfate one can evaporate water from urine and get urea and the other constituan of urine , When heated urea decompose to cyanuric acid and ammonia , cyanuric acid could be transformed in melamine , witch can be converted to melamin resin (A polymer).

So ammonia could be produced ''not cheaply''.

[Edited on 4-9-2011 by plante1999]




I never asked for this.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 10:19


That last word ruined it all. Collecting cow piss is definately not cheaper than making ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen in an ammonia plant. Think of logistics involved in collecting, transporting and purifying urea from piss. Besides, I thought I heard you say:

Quote: Originally posted by plante1999  
...When heated urea decompose to cyanuric acid and ammonia....


What's the point of using ammonia for heating if you need to heat urea in order to make it? That's a pointless thing to do, even if the energy expended is lower than the energy released by the burning of ammonia.

For heating on a large scale, I would rather use a good old nuclear reactor. Nothing beats fission power, except nuclear fusion.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
plante1999
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1937
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Mad as a hatter

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 10:25


We could use bactery to change the conssentred piss in ammonia in place of heating.



I never asked for this.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 10:57


Or just get a small nuclear reactor and heat an entire city with it.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Acetic Acid
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 95
Registered: 14-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 11:07


When we can harness antimatter that will be even more effective than fusion. :P
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Arthur Dent
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 546
Registered: 22-10-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: entropic

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 12:25


Oh we can... we can...



Robert




--- Art is making something out of nothing and selling it. - Frank Zappa ---
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Acetic Acid
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 95
Registered: 14-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 13:54


:-O
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Acetic Acid
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 95
Registered: 14-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 13:55


:-O
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 4-9-2011 at 16:55


You would have to manage the high energy gamma rays that are involved with anihilation. Stepping down the energy to infrared levels is easier said than done....
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ScienceHideout
National Hazard
****




Posts: 391
Registered: 12-3-2011
Location: In the Source
Member Is Offline

Mood: High Spin

[*] posted on 5-9-2011 at 16:50


Seems a little expensive for just a small amount of heat...



hey, if you are reading this, I can't U2U, but you are always welcome to send me an email!


View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
White Yeti
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 6-9-2011 at 05:17


That's why I like fission better than particle- antiparticle anihilation :)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
IrC
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline

Mood: Discovering

[*] posted on 7-9-2011 at 21:21


Interesting until you get a ticket for going 88 miles an hour. And then they bring in H.S. for your Mr Fusion.





"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
*****




Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-9-2011 at 22:12


Finely powdered CaO with SO3 would generate a tremendous quantity of heat.

Think about it; each of the two constituents alone with water can generate enough heat to start a fire. Even after both reactants have been hydrated, forming Ca(OH)2 and H2SO4, respectively, mixing the two would still result in an extremely violent reaction, instantanously boiling out the water as it forms.

[Edited on 8-9-2011 by AndersHoveland]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top