watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Shop-made supercritical CO2 chamber
Ben Krasnow built his own chamber to hold supercritical CO2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gCTKteN5Y4
Here's what happens when you don't put a release valve on it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4CTkicgKtE
The builder had access to machine tools, but there's nothing at all fancy about the machining. This kind of project is well within the bounds of a
typical community college machine shop.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
That's the first time I have ever seen liquid CO2 or a supercritical fluid. Thanks for sharing.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5103
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It seems that doing something plainly stupid is within the bounds of a community college.
Why would you want to do that?
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
very nice, thanks for sharing!
although it would be extremely dangerous, one wonders about the possibility of dissolving N2O5 in the liquid CO2 for performing extreme nitrations. http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=17304
[Edited on 12-9-2011 by AndersHoveland]
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by unionised  | It seems that doing something plainly stupid is within the bounds of a community college.
Why would you want to do that? |
In the US, many community colleges have shop classes whose equipment may be
used for the cost of the generally very cheap tuition. For many people, it's an ideal way to do some occasional projects.
|
|
|
drago57
Harmless
Posts: 16
Registered: 13-8-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I've been using supercritical/liquid CO2 most days for the last 4 years for my PhD project. I wouldn't be so rash as to suggest I'm an expert, but if
anyone has any questions about system design or whatever I'd be happy to have a go answering them.
|
|
|
bahamuth
Hazard to Others
Posts: 384
Registered: 3-11-2009
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Under stimulated
|
|
Extracting limonene using liquid/supercritical carbon dioxide
If this really exhibits supercritical levels I'm not sure, but it works.
Done this for fun at the lab in cheap VWR 50ml centrifuge tubes, and only one of three-four trials ruptured the cap, possibly due to reuse of the cap.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
|
|
|
bbartlog
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by unionised | It seems that doing something plainly stupid is within the bounds of a community college.
Why would you want to do that? |
Because it looks cool, and with a little more work could be used to do some interesting extractions or even just reactions with the CO2 itself?
Seriously, the guy did the appropriate calculations and for his first run pressurised the thing remotely (viewing via TV). Still risky, but do you
just want to write off any possible amateur experiments with supercritical CO2?
Granted the lack of a release valve was a nice piece of foolishness...
|
|
|
peach
Bon Vivant
Posts: 1428
Registered: 14-11-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
These are from 'periodicvideos' on youtube, who produce educational science videos at Nottingham University to engage the public.
The videos are always interesting and feature the whacky professor's hair. The professor studies supercritical fluids and has a demonstration model in
his office, and new videos are put up regularly so you can subscribe and click for email updates.
If you scroll down on the channel page to "Brady's other channels", you'll see there's a channel for physics (sixty symbols) and other related topics.
<iframe sandbox width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/trhXiCxvzu4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe sandbox width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/0dSMzg0UPPo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ben Krasnow has a new video up on his chamber. Effect of long-term high pressure CO2 on acrylic. Teaser: foamy acrylic.
There's a reason they use sapphire windows on the professional versions. For him, the easiest thing to do would be to use an off-the-shelf sight
glass, an optical disk of glass, available in borosilicate, that's used to see into boilers and tanks and the like. Use the acrylic for mechanical
stability. Mount the sight glass in a recess therein.
|
|
|
White Yeti
National Hazard
Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline
Mood: delocalized
|
|
Strange...
I read that you need some kind of synthetic sapphire window in order to be able to see the supercritical CO2. This goes without saying that such a
window would be outrageously expensive. So, I would not look at this in terms of feasibility, but I would instead consider the financial limitations
associated with making such a chamber. It better be a chamber you'd use often, or else you're throwing one and a dozen grant out the window.
You technically don't need a window, you could substitute it with a thermocouple, a pressure gauge and a phase diagram.
I know this is a hypothetical thread, so I will present you with a hypothetical question; what would you use this chamber for? Extracting caffeine?
Extracting essential oils? Extracting smells from flowers? Looks like an awesome project, but not something that a single person can undertake.
"Ja, Kalzium, das ist alles!" -Otto Loewi
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by White Yeti | So, I would not look at this in terms of feasibility, but I would instead consider the financial limitations associated with making such a chamber. It
better be a chamber you'd use often, or else you're throwing one and a dozen grant out the window.
You technically don't need a window, you could substitute it with a thermocouple, a pressure gauge and a phase diagram. |
Using an opaque chamber is just fine once you've debugged the apparatus, but being able to see inside is very useful before that
point. It's worth the expense.
And that expense isn't even all that much. Search for "borosilicate sight glass". A 4" diameter disk of 1/4" thickness (~ 100 mm x 6 mm) is only about
$26. It needs reinforcement for strength, but the chamber in the original post shows that's eminently feasible. The gasket material can seal against
the glass, so the acrylic is then used only for strength and optical clarity, not chemical resistance. | Quote: | | Looks like an awesome project, but not something that a single person can undertake. |
I will answer this
defeatist attitude. This is easily a single-person project.
Admittedly you need access to the right tools to do this, but even this isn't particularly difficult. There are many routes to access. As I've said
before, your typical community college machine shop has all the equipment. You can gain the skill to do this with one or two semesters of night
classes.
A serious person of modest means can just go purchase the equipment these days. Tormach sells a line of inexpensive CNC gear. They are not designed
for continuous production manufacturing but rather for prototyping and serious hobbyists. If you could afford a second car payment, you can readily
finance a complete shop.
If you're in a city with a TechShop, join that. They've priced their membership to be comparable to a gym membership. Indeed the economics are rather
similar. A well equipment shop has about the same capital cost as a well-equipped gym.
If you're enrolled at a major university, there's always at least one student-available shop on campus. It's usually in the physics department. Talk
your way in; it's a good skill to practice for later life.
Edit: Fixed the price. the 3" one is $21.
[Edited on 10-10-2011 by watson.fawkes]
|
|
|
peach
Bon Vivant
Posts: 1428
Registered: 14-11-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I like the borosilicate backed window idea.
That just leaves the seal. Suggestions on material?
Also, if you haven't already, suggest it to Ben.
| Quote: | | I know this is a hypothetical thread, so I will present you with a hypothetical question; what would you use this chamber for? |
That's like asking what you'd use a bottle of solvent, soxhlet or still head for. 
Rather than trying to think of really specific applications (like caffeine) think of what it fundamentally is and how it compares to other things.
The supercritical CO2 is an organic solvent, with the dissolving capacity of a liquid but the flow properties of a gas. So, instead of sitting on the
surface of things, stuck in place by it's surface tension (like a liquid solvent), it will flow through them.
This has major potential for performing reactions in solvent systems that are very different to normal liquids and gases.
It is also an under explored area of science, as creating such supercritical systems, in a highly controlled manner, is something that requires a fair
bit of materials and engineering technology.
For instance, until society had easy, cost effective access to high vacuums and pure inert gas in cylinders, the whole area of studying
atmospherically sensitive materials and reactions was out of bounds. That was not very long ago at all.
|
|
|
White Yeti
National Hazard
Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline
Mood: delocalized
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by peach |
The supercritical CO2 is an organic solvent, with the dissolving capacity of a liquid but the flow properties of a gas. So, instead of sitting on the
surface of things, stuck in place by it's surface tension (like a liquid solvent), it will flow through them.
|
Right, but considering the size of the chamber shown in the video, you can't extract much of anything. There's probably enough room for the CO2 and a
dozen coffee beans. You'll get a yield of a fraction of a gram if you get lucky. What I'm saying is that this chamber would be great for
demonstrations of supercriticality, but putting such a small chamber to use is a different story.
Of course you can scale this up, but as soon as you scale this up, the walls will need to get thicker, the window will get thicker and more expensive
and things start to get dangerous. There's a reason why sapphire windows are used in large chambers.
I think the most profitable use for such a small chamber would be extracting essential oils from flowers to make perfumes. That's why I asked what the
OP was going to do with this chamber. No one mentioned it and everyone kept talking about extracting caffeine from coffee beans instead. I don't know
why everyone has an obsession with extracting caffeine. What about extracting essential oils instead? For once you could extract something that is
actually pretty valuable, oils are sold for quite high prices.
"Ja, Kalzium, das ist alles!" -Otto Loewi
|
|
|
peach
Bon Vivant
Posts: 1428
Registered: 14-11-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think Watson was posting it merely to show something interesting and that it's possible at home.
Why is extracting flowers more advanced than extracting caffeine?
We'd get an equally poor mass of essential oil out of those as well. And neither process needs a windows, it's only there so us fickle humans can get
excited by what the windows to our soul tell us.
The big deal with supercritical solvents now is not just extracting things but doing reactions and forming novel products in that supercritical
solvent.
| Quote: | | putting such a small chamber to use is a different story |
It's only a problem if you plan to run your own commercial caffeine extraction plant from that chamber.
The vast majority of experimental work starts in the micro-scale first, even processes for plants producing millions of tons of product per year.
Really special products are still made on a comparatively micro-scale compared to things like sulphuric acid, which is made by the megaton. The guys
who make sulphuric acid will look at the pharmaceutical companies as if they're playing with that CO2 chamber.
We could equally well say the same thing about CERN. That is one big and expensive chamber, yet all it does is fire a tiny quantity of atoms into each
other and produce nothing that is of any immediate, tangible worth. It can technically turn lead into gold, if you want a few atoms of gold for the
few billion it cost to build and run that accelerator.
Imagine you're trying to make an anticancer or HIV drug that is as powerful as adrenaline is stimulating, or LSD psychoactive. But that happens to be
best made in supercritical solvents. That chamber could contain enough to treat thousands and thousands of people. So it certainly has it's use.
[Edited on 10-10-2011 by peach]
|
|
|
White Yeti
National Hazard
Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline
Mood: delocalized
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by peach |
...Really special products are still made on a comparatively micro-scale compared to things like sulphuric acid, which is made by the megaton...
[Edited on 10-10-2011 by peach] |
That's my point. Flower extracts (perfumes) are still made on a relatively small scale, while caffeine extraction is done on a really, REALLY large
scale. Caffeine extracted from tea and coffee then goes into "energy drinks", which is a huge multimillion market.
Whether experimentation starts out on a small scale or not, you'll have to scale it up eventually and that's when you will hit financial obstacles.
This method for making CO2 chambers is great for a small scale if you don't want to do anything except look at supercritical CO2.
"Ja, Kalzium, das ist alles!" -Otto Loewi
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'd guess lots of fluoropolymers might be appropriate,
but I certainly can't say definitively. It's not like material compatibility tables regularly have a column for liquid CO2. Viton is the most readily
available of these for this applications, as you can get off-the-shelf O-rings. McMaster-Carr carries a huge variety. You could also machine hard
gaskets from PTFE or PVDF. Assuming a 4" glass disk for a somewhat smaller window, they'd be somewhere between $10-$20 each in materials.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by White Yeti | Whether experimentation starts out on a small scale or not, you'll have to scale it up eventually and that's when you will hit financial obstacles.
This method for making CO2 chambers is great for a small scale if you don't want to do anything except look at supercritical CO2. If a cubic inch of
homemade aerogel isn't proof enough of your kewlness, you're trying to impress the wrong people. |
What you're
doing is complaining that you have to invest in capital equipment in order to start a business. Duh.
I can't think of a reason for scaling up that's not production or research for production. If you're doing science, the modest size of this chamber is
just fine. If your cubic inch of homemade aerogel doesn't adequately show off your kewlness, you're trying to impress the wrong people. | Quote: Originally posted by White Yeti | | Of course you can scale this up, but as soon as you scale this up, the walls will need to get thicker, the window will get thicker and more expensive
and things start to get dangerous. |
This is just mechanical nonsense. When you scale up such a reactor, you
don't just scale up the dimensions of a test reactor. The Krasnow test chamber is essentially just a pair of sight glasses opposite each other,
without a separate tank structure. A larger reactor would be a pressure tank of typical design, a cylinder with a pair of spherical or ovoid end caps.
If you want sight glasses in your reaction, weld on bits of pipe for sight glasses. You shouldn't have to change the design of the sight glass
mounting and sealing from what's used in the test chamber. You don't even have to change the dimensions.
|
|
|
Wizzard
Hazard to Others
Posts: 337
Registered: 22-3-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Indium or lead may make a very good, hard seal. You could always use aluminum but that may not work really well with glass, but should work well with
the plastics.
|
|
|
White Yeti
National Hazard
Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline
Mood: delocalized
|
|
What kind of "science" are you planning on doing with such a chamber? Just out of curiosity.
I have a feeling that you would start by extracting caffeine from coffee (and the like) before using it for anything else. Anders suggested dissolving
N2O5 in the liquid CO2 to perform nitrations, but other than that, I don't see what use such a chamber would have, besides extractions of chemicals
from raw materials.
Be careful when using the word "science". Call me whatever you want, I don't care, but I take the words "science" and "experiment" very seriously.
Extracting chemicals is not "science" per say, it's just an industrial process.
"Ja, Kalzium, das ist alles!" -Otto Loewi
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by White Yeti | What kind of "science" are you planning on doing with such a chamber? Just out of curiosity.
I have a feeling that you would start by extracting caffeine from coffee (and the like) before using it for anything else. Anders suggested dissolving
N2O5 in the liquid CO2 to perform nitrations, but other than that, I don't see what use such a chamber would have, besides extractions of chemicals
from raw materials.
Be careful when using the word "science". Call me whatever you want, I don't care, but I take the words "science" and "experiment" very seriously.
Extracting chemicals is not "science" per say, it's just an industrial process. |
Failing to have anything
further to say about construction of such apparatus, you proceed to attack the messenger of your small experience with building things. Then you pose
a straw man about what I myself might want, wholly out of your small imagination. Your small actions speak louder than any names I might call you.
|
|
|
UnclearReactor
Harmless
Posts: 9
Registered: 11-1-2008
Location: Eastern US
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Eminently doable. Sapphire windows. Prices start under $200 U.S. http://www.mpfpi.com/sapphire.html
Attachment: Viewports 1.1.pdf (2MB)
This file has been downloaded 1113 times
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5103
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"Indium or lead may make a very good, hard seal. "
Possibly the only time you will ever see indium and lead described as hard.
|
|
|
Retrical
Harmless
Posts: 1
Registered: 1-10-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
He Blew an O-Ring in the Second Video... XD
He Blew an O-ring taking the thing apart, LOL.
|
|
|
Master Triangle
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 24-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The first thing about supercritical CO2 is that the pressures and temperatures are not as high as most people think, look up a table for it. As you
see in one of Ben Krasnow's videos where he makes aerogels you can just make a chamber out of steel pipes and that is well more than you need, I have
a calorimetry bomb that I was considering using for this sort of thing but am selling now. If you can get some short lengths of bolt-flange pipe like
this would be perfect as you really want a large chamber. You could just start with straight tube or a sawn-up nitrogen tank and weld bolt flanges
to that, most welding shops would be happy to do that, just make sure they understand it needs to be gas-tight and very secure.
If you do not mind minor gas leakage then any sealing material that does not completely fall apart under intense solvents will do, even "liquid
gasket" will probably work. For the viewing window you can use thin glass on the inside with thick perspex supporting it (careful with big windows
>15cm, the perspex may flex too much to support the glass adequately), then only the glass is exposed and needs a seal, have a steel flange with
bolts holding the sandwich to the surface or just put the bolts straight through the perspex like Krasnow did. For a small pipe vessel something like
this would provide a good flat surface that can be bolted to.
You really do not need a viewing window as it increases complexity a lot and you only need to know the temperature and pressure, but who doesn't like
to see their experiment bubbling away?  Heating would be best done with a
electric heating band like Krasnow did, have a look around Aliexpress for a good one.
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
21-11-2023 at 13:44 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
