| Pages:
1
2
3 |
Ramblesthegoat
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 18-2-2012
Location: Upstate NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sand baths
Hey guys, I have noticed that almost everybody (on Youtube at least) uses mineral oil baths for heating flasks and other things more evenly, but why
do I never see sand baths? They are very cheap, reusable, can get to much higher temperatures, and in most cases less messy. Are they more dangerous
or significantly less efficient? This might be a really dumb question and the answer is right in front of my face but this has been bugging me for a
while.
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Ramblesthegoat  | | Hey guys, I have noticed that almost everybody (on Youtube at least) uses mineral oil baths for heating flasks and other things more evenly, but why
do I never see sand baths? They are very cheap, reusable, can get to much higher temperatures, and in most cases less messy. Are they more dangerous
or significantly less efficient? This might be a really dumb question and the answer is right in front of my face but this has been bugging me for a
while. |
Click on the "Search" icon in the upper left hand corner. Enter "sand bath" in the search box.
Select "Subject only" and "All forums". You will get several hits.
You can also search for subjects such as "heating" or "baths" and so on and find other hits.
If you are really diligent, you can even download several of the practical chemistry lab manuals in the forum library where heating methods and other
techniques of the fine art of chemistry are discussed at length.
Wasn't that easy?
|
|
|
Ramblesthegoat
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 18-2-2012
Location: Upstate NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well I guess I was more looking for advantages and disadvantages of sand and oil baths. I understand how to set one up and stuff, but I haven't found
why exactly sand baths seem to be so unpopular. Is it because they can scratch the flask?
|
|
|
Funkerman23
Hazard to Others
Posts: 416
Registered: 4-1-2012
Location: Dixie
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Ramblesthegoat | | Well I guess I was more looking for advantages and disadvantages of sand and oil baths. I understand how to set one up and stuff, but I haven't found
why exactly sand baths seem to be so unpopular. Is it because they can scratch the flask? |
That( although
hat is a minor concern) and simply because it is messy. At least that is why I don't use sand baths often. Frankly I prefer my Heating mantle but
barring that a hotplate , crystallizing dish and the right oil are a good second best. But there are a lot more learned than I here.
|
|
|
Bot0nist
International Hazard
Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Streching my cotyledons.
|
|
I use brine water baths, oil baths, and sand baths. Each in different heating temperatures and situations. I have even used small copper coated shot
(BBs) lately a lot, as they have good thermal conductivity and they don't scratch. The method of heating should be tailor fitted to the reaction and
apparatus.
U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!
Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
|
|
|
zoombafu
Hazard to Others
Posts: 255
Registered: 21-11-2011
Location: U.S.
Member Is Offline
Mood: sciencey
|
|
One disadvantage of a sand bath is that it takes much longer to heat up than a mineral oil bath. However if you put the container with the sand in
the oven, this will heat it up faster than using a hot plate.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sand baths suck. They're messy, <strong>they're <em>very</em> slow to heat and cool</strong>, and they're opaque. It's also
not possible to just lower a clamped setup into a sand bath. You have to dig, shake, or aerate. There are so many better alternatives;
<strong>heating mantles</strong>, water baths, metal shot baths, and baths of various oils. You can even use an ionic liquid or eutectic
alloy if you're adventurous and reactivity isn't an issue.
[edit]
Sorry, forgot some classics: naked flame & heat gun
[Edited on 3/4/12 by bfesser]
|
|
|
MyNameIsUnnecessarilyLong
Hazard to Self
Posts: 71
Registered: 12-7-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I once heard of people even using molten potassium nitrate for achieving high temps higher than 300C. That always sounded a bit dangerous and wasteful
to me. But supposedly after the nitrate cools it will simply crack and flake off the flask so you don't need to wipe any messy oils off.
|
|
|
paulr1234
Hazard to Self
Posts: 51
Registered: 30-8-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sand baths can be useful in some situations: http://curlyarrow.blogspot.com/2011/03/sand-bath-alternative...
|
|
|
ldanielrosa
Hazard to Others
Posts: 124
Registered: 25-4-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: transparent
|
|
I use a dedicated crock pot filled with sand to heat evaporating dishes (okay, mason jars)
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
Nakes flames are not a classic and never were. They should never be used for heating borosilicate flasks... unless doing some
flameworking.
Heat gun is ok, if the temperature is not too high.
Anyway, there aren't methods that fit all the needs...
|
|
|
Ramblesthegoat
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 18-2-2012
Location: Upstate NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
So it seems to me like sand baths are better for higher temperatures, but bad with heat transfer and spills are a pain. I will try some metal bb's
because they seem to be the way to go, but different baths are good for different situations and temperatures. Thanks for all the advice guys!
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
I've said it in other threads and I'll say it again. If you ever read the instructions for your hotplate it will usually have a warning about sand
baths. Sand is a very good insulator and hence the instructions will warn you not to use sand baths for high temperatures as the insulating effect
can burn out the coils. Since most people only want to use sand for higher temperatures this means that the utility of a sand bath becomes next to
nothing.
This information is not just in the manuals, my hotplate has the same warning written on the tag on the cord not to go above 3 / 10 when using a sand
bath and it was mentioned a few times during my college years.
Edit: Of course all of this assumes you want to use a sand bath on a hotplate. They work well to diffuse the heat of an open flame.
[Edited on 3/4/2012 by BromicAcid]
|
|
|
Bot0nist
International Hazard
Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Streching my cotyledons.
|
|
I think peach, or somebody here, melted there hotplate by covering it tightly with foil. The heat built up inside the plate and destroyed it.
[Edited on 4-3-2012 by Bot0nist]
U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!
Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Endimion17 | | [Naked] flames are not a classic and never were. They should never be used for heating borosilicate flasks... unless doing some
flameworking. |
I disagree. Although, perhaps, I shouldn't have said <em>naked</em> flames. If
you're heating a florence flask with a non-flammable liquid, for example, you'd typically want to put a ceramic coated wire mesh between the flame and
the flask. But it's not always necessary. Especially if the flame is low, and you're heating gently.
<hr width="300" />
I have a personal hatred of sand baths. The ceramic top of my favorite hot plate cracked cleanly in half because I was slowly heating a small
sandbath. Even if you're careful, which I was, they're a pain. If you do choose to use a sand bath, as some procedures implicitly call for, be very
careful. And don't use a ceramic top hot plate!
I forgot to mention a good one: steam baths/cones.
|
|
|
Bot0nist
International Hazard
Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Streching my cotyledons.
|
|
I also use "air" baths to good success. All that's needed is a foil skirt around the RBF. lower it until in is just a few cm from touching the
hotplate. Works fine for many lower boiling point refluxes and distillations.
U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!
Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
|
|
|
Hexavalent
International Hazard
Posts: 1564
Registered: 29-12-2011
Location: Wales, UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pericyclic
|
|
I also hate sand baths. Many of my expensive flasks have been severely scratched using them - personally, these days I use liquid paraffin/paraffin
oil or sunflower/corn oil bath, the former which I buy in glass bottles from the pharmacy for treating diarrhoea(!) and the second, of course, from
the supermarket, both very cheaply.
I have never tried mini copper BB pellets, although I may give them a go in the future. I am however, a big fan of air baths using aluminium foil (the
Baco-foil thick stuff is the best).
My two cents, for all its worth
"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Endimion17 | | Nakes flames are not a classic and never were. They should never be used for heating borosilicate flasks... unless doing some
flameworking. |
Well that is news to all of us who learned organic back in the 1960's when Bunsen burners were
the only heat sources used in the undergrad labs, including organic chem. Not to mention to guys like Liebig, Wohler, Hoffman,
Perkin, Gatterman, Fischer and so on.
Flame free labs are a relatively new phenomenon.
So I think the Bunsen flame is indeed classic, if sometimes a little risky.
I have about 8 mantles, 2 stirring hotplates and several oil baths but I still sometimes use a Bunsen flame if I want to be able to immediately remove
the heat at the first sign of trouble. (But I do always feel a little naughty when the solvent is flammable,)
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
I don't think I've ever used a sand bath. Setting up a mantle seems so much easier. If I think I need an even heating high temperature bath I use
silicone oil. If I need it even and kept below 100° I use a steam bath (especially good for low boiling flammable solvents like ether). I also use a
Bunsen burner if I need heating with a quick response, and always use a screen with the ceramic center, unless just spot heating the glassware. My
wife recently gave me a hot air gun for Christmas, and I'm finding I use that more than expected. It is the only heater I would use for certain
applications.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by bfesser | | I disagree. Although, perhaps, I shouldn't have said <em>naked</em> flames. If you're heating a florence flask with a non-flammable
liquid, for example, you'd typically want to put a ceramic coated wire mesh between the flame and the flask. But it's not always necessary.
Especially if the flame is low, and you're heating gently. |
I was referring to the process of heating a flask with visible flame (the hotter it is, the greater the danger), i.e. immersing it into the flame.
That is something that should never be done. It doesn't have to crack at all. It just introduces stress inside the glass, and if you do it again, and
again, and again, the stress builds up and one day CRACK, or if ether is inside, WHOOSH/BANG!.
It is a rule. Period.
| Quote: Originally posted by Bot0nist | | I also use "air" baths to good success. All that's needed is a foil skirt around the RBF. lower it until in is just a few cm from touching the
hotplate. Works fine for many lower boiling point refluxes and distillations. |
Yeah, that's a convenient way, too, though it isn't recommended it for things like ether. Non-flammable halogenated hydrocarbons, that's ok.
If the flask cracks, and they do occasionally, ether will fall on the hotplate and catch fire. Such fires are quite spectacular. 
It's always better to use a water bath for ether, as it boils at around 36 °C.
Foil skirt or not, it's always bad to lower the flask to the metal of the heating pad, but if the setup is heavy, and you don't want to clutch it too
hard with clamps, you can put a small cushion of asbestos mat (2x2 cm) between. Asbestos is soft, so this works great.
Sometimes I do it with 4 cushions, placed at four corners, like here.
| Quote: Originally posted by Hexavalent | I also hate sand baths. Many of my expensive flasks have been severely scratched using them - personally, these days I use liquid paraffin/paraffin
oil or sunflower/corn oil bath, the former which I buy in glass bottles from the pharmacy for treating diarrhoea(!) and the second, of course, from
the supermarket, both very cheaply.
I have never tried mini copper BB pellets, although I may give them a go in the future. I am however, a big fan of air baths using aluminium foil (the
Baco-foil thick stuff is the best).
My two cents, for all its worth |
Sunflower oil fan right here!
I heated it to 280 °C. No smoking occured. Great stuff.
Paraffin tends to smoke and catches fire rather easy if you go that high.
| Quote: Originally posted by entropy51 | Well that is news to all of us who learned organic back in the 1960's when Bunsen burners were the only heat sources used in the
undergrad labs, including organic chem. Not to mention to guys like Liebig, Wohler, Hoffman, Perkin, Gatterman, Fischer and so on.
Flame free labs are a relatively new phenomenon.
So I think the Bunsen flame is indeed classic, if sometimes a little risky.
I have about 8 mantles, 2 stirring hotplates and several oil baths but I still sometimes use a Bunsen flame if I want to be able to immediately remove
the heat at the first sign of trouble. (But I do always feel a little naughty when the solvent is flammable,) |
I doubt the mentioned guys were stressing their equipment like that.
The heat of the naked flame was always used together with an asbestos mat, or a bath of some kind.
One of the rare things that can be immersed into a naked, blue flame are thin porcelain crucibles, after they were preheated above the sooty yellow
safety flame for a few minutes.
And of course, quartz vessels can be immediately heated in the blue flame.
You're playing with the devil. Keep building stress in the glass and one day an accident will happen...
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Seeing as the original post's questions have been thoroughly answered, discussed, and elaborated upon at this point; I see no harm in taking this
thread a little more off topic.
Says the man who experiments with large volumes of liquid mercury, causes white phosphorus to luminesce, images mercury vapour with ultraviolet lamps,
dips his fingers in molten lead, intentionally starts mock laboratory fires, microwaves assorted metallic and glass objects, surfs on elevators . . .
need I go on?
I don't think your <em>opinion</em> has much value. The <em>fact</em> is that naked flame is a <em>classic</em>
heating method, even for borosilicate glassware. Flame heating has been associated with chemical (or material, elemental, phlogistical, whatever)
manipulations since pre-Lavoisier chymistry and even alchemy. Besides, I never said that flame heating was superior, simply that it's a classic.
I'd like to add that, from my personal experience (which I'm sure mirrors that of others here), vintage borosilicate glassware, although it is
typically thinner-walled and of lighter construction, will take more abuse than it's modern day equivalents. I've dropped old 'green stamp' 500 ml
Erlenmeyer flasks from shoulder height to a rough concrete floor and watched them bounce at least a meter into the air and continuing until at rest
with no damage observed whatsoever. These flasks were heavily used before they ever came into my posession--with FLAME! Try doing that with your
'unstressed' glassware. Your arrogance does not lend support to your opinion, nor does it cause reality to reflect your opinion.
<a href="http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/video/linstead/" target="_blank">[video featuring classic organic chemistry utilizing flame heating]</a>
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by bfesser | | I'd like to add that, from my personal experience (which I'm sure mirrors that of others here), vintage borosilicate glassware, although it is
typically thinner-walled and of lighter construction, will take more abuse than it's modern day equivalents. I've dropped old 'green stamp' 500 ml
Erlenmeyer flasks from shoulder height to a rough concrete floor and watched them bounce at least a meter into the air and continuing until at rest
with no damage observed whatsoever. |
I can second that. Some of my Pyrex is older than I am and has seen
many a flame applied.
I think it is the rate of temperature change and not the heat source that causes glassware to fail.
I have to shake my head when I read about some of the "unexpected" catastrophic glassware failures that people report on the forum.
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by bfesser | Seeing as the original post's questions have been thoroughly answered, discussed, and elaborated upon at this point; I see no harm in taking this
thread a little more off topic.
Says the man who experiments with large volumes of liquid mercury, causes white phosphorus to luminesce, images mercury vapour with ultraviolet lamps,
dips his fingers in molten lead, intentionally starts mock laboratory fires, microwaves assorted metallic and glass objects, surfs on elevators . . .
need I go on? |
I see no problems with those experiments. They were done with a great deal of ventilation, and sometimes mask was used. Mock fire was made in an
almost completely empty room made of concrete, with one wooden shelf and a water main exactly behind the camera. Molten lead is a trick, and so is the
elevator surfing. Microwaving a CFL immersed in a glass of water is one of the safest tricks you can do with such oven.
| Quote: | I don't think your <em>opinion</em> has much value. The <em>fact</em> is that naked flame is a <em>classic</em>
heating method, even for borosilicate glassware. Flame heating has been associated with chemical (or material, elemental, phlogistical, whatever)
manipulations since pre-Lavoisier chymistry and even alchemy. Besides, I never said that flame heating was superior, simply that it's a classic.
I'd like to add that, from my personal experience (which I'm sure mirrors that of others here), vintage borosilicate glassware, although it is
typically thinner-walled and of lighter construction, will take more abuse than it's modern day equivalents. I've dropped old 'green stamp' 500 ml
Erlenmeyer flasks from shoulder height to a rough concrete floor and watched them bounce at least a meter into the air and continuing until at rest
with no damage observed whatsoever. These flasks were heavily used before they ever came into my posession--with FLAME! Try doing that with your
'unstressed' glassware. Your arrogance does not lend support to your opinion, nor does it cause reality to reflect your opinion.
<a href="http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/video/linstead/" target="_blank">[video featuring classic organic chemistry utilizing flame heating]</a>
|
On the other hand, heating a glass vessel with a naked blue flame will introduce stress buildup. That's a fact mentioned in pretty much every lab
manual I've read, and it's something glassblowers/flameworkers always talk about when asked about the chemists' worst habits (that, and stucked glass
joints). They usually do an assortment of facepalms while discussing it.
Thinner glass or thicker glass? It depends. For new glass (boro 3.3) thicker is the option. Old Jena glass (boro 3.1 I believe) prefers thinner.
Nobody works with 3.1 anymore, and if you have a broken part, repairing it is a nightmare.
You think your flask that fell on the floor is safe as ever? Sorry, but you really don't know much about glass. I don't, but you know way less.
Flasks that fell on the floor and managed to survive have either microfractures or local stress. They're prone to bursting more than a brand new.
If I'm arrogant, then my flameworker is arrogant, too. I'm just repeating his words.
@entropy51: It's not just the temperature change rate, but the geometry of heating. There's a reason why mantles and baths exist.
[Edited on 6-3-2012 by Endimion17]
|
|
|
Mumbles
Hazard to Others
Posts: 436
Registered: 12-3-2003
Location: US
Member Is Offline
Mood: Procrastinating
|
|
I use sand baths on occasion. Back with my homelab, I'd use them to do some moderately high temperature reactions. I didn't have access to good
silicone oil at the time. I wish I had known about sunflower oil back then. In the academic lab I currently work in we use sand baths to activate
things like silica and alumina. The temperature we activate them at (250C) is on the upper end of the useable range of even the high temp silicone
oil and much cheaper.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by bfesser | | <a href="http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/video/linstead/" target="_blank">[video featuring classic organic chemistry utilizing flame heating]</a>
|
Sorry, I noticed that this video doesn't seem to load from the original site. I've uploaded the film segment to YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PcrVsYxAYs
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2
3 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
