disulfideprotein
Harmless
Posts: 32
Registered: 14-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fractionating
|
|
Isolating Sodium With Lithium
Well... I believe that there is a very simple way to isolate sodium. Lithium is available in some batteries and after extracting the lithium you can
take sodium chloride and wrap the lithium around the sodium chloride. After placing in a suitable container the heat is turned on and after an hour or
something in that time range you would be left with sodium and lithium chloride. Am I correct?
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
Yes, and you get few tiny, expensive pieces of sodium. If you're rich enough to buy that much lithium batteries, you might as well order few kilograms
of sodium.
|
|
|
Ephoton
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 21-7-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: trying to figure out why I need a dark room retreat when I live in a forest of wattle.
|
|
I dont think this idea would be a waist if one was only wanting hobby amounts of the metal.
the question is though does it work. I dont see it happening my self.
If I remember correctly lithiums tight molecular structure stops this from happening
it does not react like other alkali metals or nobody would care for sodium methoxide they
would just dump lithium into methanol instead.
e3500 console login: root
bash-2.05#
|
|
|
AirCowPeaCock
Hazard to Others
Posts: 311
Registered: 9-1-2012
Location: In your nation!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Hazardous
|
|
I believe sodium is significantly cheaper than lithium, or at-least, that used to be the case.
Thus it may just be cheaper to use sodium.
[Edited on 3-5-2012 by AirCowPeaCock]
BOLD
|
|
|
ThatchemistKid
Hazard to Others
Posts: 132
Registered: 2-6-2010
Member Is Offline
|
|
actually there was an entire argument in which I was shown that this method does not work for sodium production. I recalled it working from a few
years back what I had neglected to recall is that instead of using just NaCl in some experiments I used the hydroxide as well, which was partly
responsible for my confusion...sigh those early KEWL days of mine.
refer to this thread.
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=15061&...
|
|
|
TheChemINC
Hazard to Self
Posts: 61
Registered: 22-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: fuming
|
|
i have dont this before.... but i used potassium chloride instead and wound up with potassium metal. although it
was an extremely small amount, it still looked cool when it was thrown into water... 
|
|
|
MrTechGuy1995
Harmless
Posts: 27
Registered: 21-9-2011
Location: Chatham, New Jersey
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lab Envy
|
|
Wait wut.....
Li + NaCl --> LiCl + Na
It should be the other way around.....
LiCl + Na ---> Li + NaCl
Lithium would rather keep it's only valance electron compared to sodium which is lower in electronegativity.
Lithium being .98 and Sodium being .93.
Or am I mistaken?
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
^^you are mistaken. Lithium is a stronger reducer.
|
|
|
MrTechGuy1995
Harmless
Posts: 27
Registered: 21-9-2011
Location: Chatham, New Jersey
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lab Envy
|
|
Thought as much. Now would that work with KCl and Na?
Or is Lithium an exception?
|
|
|
disulfideprotein
Harmless
Posts: 32
Registered: 14-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fractionating
|
|
I dont know weather that would work but im guessing not.
You can't arrest me, it was for science!
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
