Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  ..  12    14
Author: Subject: New Energetic Materials - Current Research
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2879
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic

[*] posted on 22-10-2017 at 07:15


Quote: Originally posted by Mr.Greeenix  
-Ammonium-dinitroguanidine (ADNQ)
-1,7-diamino-1,7-dinitrimino-2,4,6-trinitro-2,4,6-triazaheptane (APX)


Both Materials possess very good detonation parameters:

APX (Vdet = 9540 m·s–1, pC–J = 395kbar, Qv = –5935 kJ·kg–1)
ADNQ (Vdet = 9066 m·s–1, pC–J = 332 kbar, Qv = –5193 kJ·kg–1),


with moderate safety parameters:

APX: IS ≥ 3 J, FS ≥ 80 N and ESD ≥ 0.1 J
ADNQ: IS ≥ 10 J, FS ≥ 252 N and ESD ≥ 0.4 J,


Two very interesting compounds, however preparing dinitroguanidine seems to be a problem i think.




Nice information thanks...

Strange that they only think to allow monopotassium salt to enter into reaction and not the dipotassium salt... that way you may get other interesting goodies... like imino-RDX if cyclisation or n-poly-ITNTAH (linear poly-imino-trinitro-triazahexane)
See annexed drawing... :);):P
Based onto the density increase effect observed for polymers... one should expect poly-ITNTAH to be denser than APX...but also to display a lower or equal sensitivity to shock...

APX is named by them as 1,7-diamino-1,7-dinitrimino-2,4,6-trinitro-2,4,6-triazaheptane but this could be aswel be named 2,8-diimino-1,3,5,7,9-pentanitro-1,3,5,7,9-pentaazanonane (following me more appropriate) (DIPNPAN)

ClCH2-NNO2-CH2Cl + 2 O2N-NK-C(=NH2(+))-N(+)-NO2 -->
O2N-N(-)-C(=NH2(+))-NNO2-CH2-NNO2-CH2-NNO2-C(=NH2(+))-N(-)-NO2

APX, imino-RDX and n-poly-ITNTAH.jpg - 129kB




PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)

"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 691
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 1-3-2018 at 01:37
new EM on Cu - KClO3 base


Some message from research a new energetic material from 16.2.2018
http://sci-hub.tw/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jacs....

pic 1.jpg - 342kB




Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 341
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-3-2018 at 20:48


LoL, What does this mean, have you produced it? my chemistry is not well enough...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 691
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 5-3-2018 at 03:15


Haha....not. All news energetics matrials in not from my lab. Preparation is difficult. Only info for someone, for everybody.



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kratomiter
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 100
Registered: 30-9-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-3-2018 at 23:24


Recently I tried to make a methanolic solution of hydrazine mixing hydrazine sulfate and calcium hydroxide in methanol, then filtering. But this way it's difficult to get a concentrated solution due to low methanol volume required. My goal is to sensitized NM.

Could dissolving hydrazine sulfate in sodium methoxide solution and the filtering the sodium sulfate work?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 691
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 21-3-2018 at 00:26


Your goal is some nitromethane gel...reliable sensitive on No.8 ? Or liquide NM as solution ? On No.8 cap sensitive ?



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kratomiter
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 100
Registered: 30-9-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-3-2018 at 12:48


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Your goal is some nitromethane gel...reliable sensitive on No.8 ? Or liquide NM as solution ? On No.8 cap sensitive ?


My goal is a PLX-type liquid exposive, capable of detonation by 0.5 grams MHN. I hope something like 90% NM/10% hydrazine solution in methanol works.
For sensitizing NM, there are cheaper amines like hexamine, I tried but it requires a big booster. I even tried sensitizing NM with sodium nitrite, just for fun, and also failed.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 691
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 22-3-2018 at 00:40


You can try this gel. Nitrocellulose (12,4N+) 10%, ( 8 -15) microballoons 2% (1 -
3) aluminium bright type for colors 5%. (5 -10). + NM 80 %. Were tested again and again without fails. From 0,3g ETN.




Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kratomiter
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 100
Registered: 30-9-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-3-2018 at 12:33


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
You can try this gel. Nitrocellulose (12,4N+) 10%, ( 8 -15) microballoons 2% (1 -
3) aluminium bright type for colors 5%. (5 -10). + NM 80 %. Were tested again and again without fails. From 0,3g ETN.


Thank you, very useful!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 691
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 31-1-2019 at 09:50
CHC77


New energy material based on tetraamine copper chlorate was discovered. His working name is CHC77. It contains the main propellant, namely [Cu (NH3) 4] (ClO3) 2 + Hexamine + NH4ClO3. The detonation pressure of CHC77 is comparable to CHP, , which is a working mark for copper hexamine perchlorate [Cu (NH3) 4] (ClO4) 2 + hexamine + NH4ClO4. Stability and other CHC77 parameters will be further investigated. CHC77 has a detonation pressure of 25 GPa. If it turns out to be safe to handle, prepare, its advantage lies in the availability of the base precursors, which are NH4NO3 + NaClO3......:cool:....LL



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 341
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-2-2019 at 11:29


http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Discovery_could_lead_to_mu...


https://web.stanford.edu/group/zheng/pages/research-combusti...

Article does not give much details. Another reference listed the graphene oxide in amounts of 3-20percent, which for a catalyst seems far far too much. Who cares if the AL burns better at 20 percent GO.... because you now have 20 percent less oxidizer.

Does anyone here have GO? Maybe give this a try add 10 percent in standard flash and see what happens? If this makes micron Al act like nano... then it’s huge!!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Herr Haber
National Hazard
****




Posts: 387
Registered: 29-1-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-2-2019 at 04:54


Onyx Met is preparing an order for me. They have GO.

The only thing I am unsure of is the particle size. The density announced (0,15 to 0,25) doesnt convince me it'll be usable.
Truth is I fear the particles will be bigger than the AL and wont coat anything.

If you have suggestions I can ask them to add 1 gram of GO to my order and give it a try.
I was going to try Zr flash already :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 341
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-2-2019 at 00:25


Why Zr flash, you know Zr compositions are herendously sensitive?

Well. Go for it... although my understanding is micron Al already burns completely before 6 expansions. So GO is probably not needed. It makes me confused.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Herr Haber
National Hazard
****




Posts: 387
Registered: 29-1-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-2-2019 at 15:28


I understand Zr compositions are mostly sensitive to static.

Anyway, no answer so far about the GO particle size and I really doubt I could know if the metal was properly coated or coated at all.
Not much incentive to get a reagent as expensive as gold :o
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 341
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-2-2019 at 00:04


Well. You could grind it between two plates and reduce to nano size....

In the article they hail this as cheaper than Al nano.... huhuh. Far from it! There MUST be SOME catylist out there that can make micron sized fuels (1-5um) act like nano fuels (100nm). PTFE certainly works with boron because the metal fluoride becomes gaseous.

In fact they are starting to coat metal powders in Teflon, which is both obvious plus genius.

I would think a small percentage of nano graphene would make pyrotechnic and explosive compositions less sensitive, as it is a very good conductor and might be able to conduct heat from friction and impact away fast enough?

Anyone with nano graphene want to try adding it to a notoriously sensitive composition??
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  ..  12    14

  Go To Top