Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Copper Acetate
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 01:53
Copper Acetate


When producing copper (II) acetate electrochemically with a copper cathode/acetic acid solution, are there any anode materials that will not reduce the copper acetate back into copper and acid? If not, how could I layout the cell to prevent this from happening? I have so far used a copper, and a graphite anode.

Also, if no material will prevent this from happening, I would like a question answered. If the cathode has a greater surface area than the anode, will the net concentration of copper (II) acetate increase, or remain equal?

[Edited on 2-7-2012 by liquidlightning]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Diablo
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 113
Registered: 17-9-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: Autodidactic

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 13:16


Copper anode dissolves in acid to form copper acetate



In a cell built this way little copper acetate will plate back out.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 14:38


But wouldn't most of the acid not be converted in a cell layout like that?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
99chemicals
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 174
Registered: 24-3-2012
Location: In the Octet
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 15:22


If you want full conversion and a pure product
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieAvEXuneCw

Just dissolve the crystals and done. Pure copper acetate sol.




Do you have mole problems? If so, call Avogadro at 602-1023

My Youtube Channel
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 16:14


I know about the hydrogen peroxide route, however that uses a lot of peroxide, is fairly expensive, and takes much longer to boil down/evaporate due to the extra volume of the peroxide. Unless of course you use higher concentration peroxide, which is both more expensive, and not currently available to me.

Thus, as electricity is cheap, I have opted for the electrochemical method.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 16:16


Oh, and I have assembled a cell as per Diablo's extraordinately detailed diagram, and am awaiting completion.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Diablo
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 113
Registered: 17-9-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: Autodidactic

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 18:17


I forgot to label the tube on the diagram. The cell works because the + wire is in a tube until it reaches the bottom of the cell where the copper dissolves and the copper ions stay at the bottom of the solution allowing a lot of acetate to be formed before any copper ions reack the cathode.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 18:28


I realized that, although I used tape, not a tube. I have been pushing 65 watts through it with 200 ml of 10% acid for a few hours now, and a fair amount of the acetate has gotten to the top electrode. I have been getting growths of copper crystals, but not nearly as large or fast as my previous attempts with side by side electrodes. The water has gotten pretty warm so far. Just to be clear, the reaction is mostly finished when the positive electrode starts to bubble hydrogen, correct?

Also, when I tried to make a salt bridge earlier, with a paper towel rolled up and draped into two beakers of the acid, for some reason it would not work. It just wouldn't conduct electricity. Anyone know why?

[Edited on 3-7-2012 by liquidlightning]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Diablo
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 113
Registered: 17-9-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: Autodidactic

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 19:49


The + electrode will bubble if the acids used up, but its making oxygen not hydrogen. The paper salt bridges drastically reduce the current flow through the cell, however if no current was flowing maybe it wasn't saturated with acid.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 2-7-2012 at 20:11


Well, the copper acetate has diffused too much to the top, so I will distill off excess acid and concentrate the copper acetate, and run it again with the distillate. Oh and yeah, my mistake, oxygen on the cathode.

[Edited on 3-7-2012 by liquidlightning]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
roupt
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 1-12-2007
Location: Lithuania
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-7-2012 at 00:56


Acetic acid route won't be efficient in electrolysis... try to make copper hydroxide and then neutralize. 12AX7 has covered this procedure on his site ;)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
liquidlightning
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 66
Registered: 10-5-2012
Location: Washington
Member Is Offline

Mood: Witty

[*] posted on 3-7-2012 at 15:45


Why won't it be efficient?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
roupt
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 1-12-2007
Location: Lithuania
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-7-2012 at 02:05


Due to low acetic acid Ka value
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top