Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: lead metal and sodium nitrate
jock88
National Hazard
****




Posts: 505
Registered: 13-12-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-12-2012 at 05:49
lead metal and sodium nitrate



Once upon a time I read in a publication that a 'very powerful' mix could be make by mixing finely divided lead metal + Sodium Nitrate.
I presume it needed a detonator.
Is that correct.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Adas
National Hazard
****




Posts: 711
Registered: 21-9-2011
Location: Slovakia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Sensitive to shock and friction

[*] posted on 28-12-2012 at 06:37


Quote: Originally posted by jock88  

Once upon a time I read in a publication that a 'very powerful' mix could be make by mixing finely divided lead metal + Sodium Nitrate.
I presume it needed a detonator.
Is that correct.


Probably not. Plus, you don't want to poison the air and everything with lead, I suppose. Don't work with heavy metals.




Rest In Pieces!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
barley81
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 481
Registered: 9-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-12-2012 at 09:29


Molten lead can be used to reduce sodium nitrate to nitrite. Some members have produced nitrites in this way (search for the thread)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-12-2012 at 10:30


Lead cant be powerful reducer, or give high vods and I haven't heard of the idea of mixing lead azide with oxidizers, I'd more likely mix it with boron. I've heard lead is pyrophoric, can there be uses for powdered lead like exotic fuses or something?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Swede
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 491
Registered: 4-9-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 31-12-2012 at 09:19


I'm just not getting why so many people recently want to be putting huge quantities of lead/Pb compounds and vapor into the air.

They outlawed leaded automobile gasoline for a reason, and the tetra-ethyl lead in petrol was a tiny fraction. Now we are talking about grams, tens of grams, kilograms of Pb going up in smoke, to be inhaled and to land on (and contaminate) surfaces, the environment, hands, etc.

There are so many other interesting energetics that don't come with the dangers of large amounts of lead.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Metacelsus
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble

[*] posted on 1-1-2013 at 16:14


Tin is a good replacement for lead in many chemical applications. It shares most of lead's properties, and is significantly less toxic.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
*****




Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 1-1-2013 at 23:51


Quote: Originally posted by Cheddite Cheese  
Tin is a good replacement for lead in many chemical applications.

While it might be a satisfactory replacement in some reactions, there are also quite a few significant differences:
Tin dissolves in hydrochloric acid, whereas lead is not attacked. Lead dissolves in nitric acid, whereas tin is only dissolved with great difficulty (due to protective coating of meta-stannic acid that forms on surface hindering further reaction). Stannous salts are reducing agents, and under alkaline conditions can reduce Bi+3 salts to bismuth metal. An alcoholic solution of Tin(II) chloride can spontaneously ignite after prolonged exposure to air. Solutions of stannous nitrate are unstable, and such solutions can be hazardous in concentrated form. Plumbic oxide, PbO2, is an oxidizer, it reacts with hydrochloric acid to release chlorine.

[Edited on 2-1-2013 by AndersHoveland]




I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying lets remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
jock88
National Hazard
****




Posts: 505
Registered: 13-12-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-1-2013 at 11:07



It appears that lead is still used in aviation fuel.
lead makes for paranoia . If you 'made your own' leaded fuel by adding 2.5 grams of the lead compound to pure gasoline most people watching you make it would then refuse to handle the (leaded) fuel or go near an aeroplane that was burning the stuff.

You should of course avoid lead as much as possible. If lead is a bad as people make out ALL YOUR PARENTS (if not yourselves, depending on how old you are) ARE semi-brain-dead zombies.

wiki

TEL remains an ingredient of 100 octane avgas for piston-engine aircraft. The United States Environmental Protection Agency and others are working on an economically feasible replacement for leaded avgas. The current formulation of 100LL (low lead) aviation gasoline contains 2.12 grams of TEL per gallon, half the amount of the previous 100 octane avgas (at 4.24 grams per gallon),[16] but far more than the 0.1 gram per gallon permitted in automotive leaded gasoline or the 0.001 grams per gallon in automotive unleaded gasoline sold in the United States.[17]



[Edited on 2-1-2013 by jock88]
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top