elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Ampouling Gases
I recently noticed that every ampoule I've ever made... sucks. They all leak. These are all the glass pipettes (as per NurdRage) sealed together on
both ends, and the only one I've ever gotten right was for bromine. So, what's the best way to ampoule gases?
Also, an additional note on elemental gases: Are they miscible with air? That is, if one had a sealed tube filled with air, and they bubbled hydrogen
into it from underwater, would the tube be slowly filled top-down with hydrogen (because hydrogen is the lightest gas, and insoluble in water) or
would the glass tube now contain a mix of hydrogen and air? If so, what would be a way around this for most gases, if not all?
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Gases are miscible, always! If you want to ampoule gases, then you have to accept some impurity of the gas. I succesfully ampouled Cl2 and NO2 years
ago and these ampoules still are filled with the gas.
First of all, you need to use real ampoules, with a flat bottom and a narrow top. Fill the ampoule with the gas. Do this copiously, use a lot of
excess gas to drive out all air. Then quickly heat the narrow top of the ampoule and seal it. I heat the ampoule until it is red hot and molten and
then take a metal clamp with which I quickly seal the top and then I keep on heating for a while to make the seal smooth. In this way I could make
samples of probably better than 90% purity. See the wiki page on chlorine, it shows my sample of chlorine gas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine
You also have to make the gas sample really dry, otherwise you will have condensed water on the inside of the ampoule when it cools down a little bit
and that looks really ugly. I use a mix of 90% CaCl2 and 10% P4O10 for drying the gas.
I only ampouled the visible gases Cl2 and NO2. I see no reason why I should ampoule H2, O2 or any other colorless gas. These samples are not
interesting at all and then I also could ampoule air. If you want a nice sample of invisible gases, then try to find discharge tubes containign the
gas and show the light of the gas discharge when a high voltage is applied across the discharge tube.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1376
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Do you use a cold or hot metal clamp to seal the top?
I find that if I use a hot clamp, it sticks to the glass, but if I use a cold clamp, the glass is not well sealed.
This does improve if I heat the seal for a bit, as you describe, but when the ampule contains a volatile liquid I am always worried that the heating
may cause excessive overpressure.
Do you ever cool the bottom part with the content while heating the seal?
[Edited on 22-1-2013 by phlogiston]
[Edited on 22-1-2013 by phlogiston]
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I use a somewhat hot clamp. I heat the clamp in the flame for a few seconds before I clamp the glass, but it is not red hot. Use of two flames can be
convenient, one flame for the ampoule and the other for the clamp.
When the ampoule contains a volatile liquid, then you do not need to worry about strong overpressure. You just heat the top and if all is well, then
you fill the ampoule, such that the liquid does not extend into the neck of the ampoule. For display purposes I only fill the ampoule with a small
amount of liquid (e.g. sample of Br2 contains 1 to 2 ml of liquid bromine in a 10 ml ampoule), for storage purposes I fill the ampoule 75% to 80%
(thionyl chloride, 17 or so ml of thionyl chloride in a 20 ml ampoule).
It is important, that after the seal is made with the clamp, that only the upper rim is heated and not the rest of the neck of the ampoule! I just let
the roaring flame touch on the rim, such that it melts. The only place where it can leak is at the rim, so there is no need to heat other places.
I never cool the bottom of the ampoule while sealing it. I keep it in my hand and that would not be possible if I had to cool it. I never had a
cracking ampoule, due to heating. Of course I also have failures, but these always are near the neck (e.g. cracking of the sealed part when it cools
down). The failure rate is appr. 20% for me.
[Edited on 22-1-13 by woelen]
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There's a wide variety of graphite manipulation tools for working glass, including different kinds of tongs or tweezers. Also, there are formulated
coatings (some containing graphite, as I recall) for metal tools that contact hot glass that prevent or minimize sticking.
The main contaminant from bubbling hydrogen through water is going to be water vapor. It's common enough to have acquired its own name, "wet
hydrogen", as opposed to dry hydrogen, which has been dessicated (and usually also deoxygenated).
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Woelen,
Have you ever tried ampouling cryogenic gases? Specifically, I want to liquify some chlorine and ampoule a bit of the liquid, so that when it warms up
and evaporates I get a nice concentrated sample of the gas. That will make it easily visible for display purposes. Do you think that's possible, given
the large temperature difference between the top and bottom of the ampoule? I'm worried about the glass shattering. I don't need to store the liquid
itself (though that would be really cool, if the ampoule can take the pressure), I just want a sample for my element collection that is easy to see.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Would "Dry-Z-Air" (basically calcium chloride) work for drying hydrogen?
So, could I clamp the pipette-ampoules closed, then?
Unfortunately, I don't have a blowtorch that stays lit, I have to constantly press the button. So, I'm thinking of using one hand to hold the torch,
the other to hold the clamp (twist to seal, right?), and clamping the bottom (or top, in the case of hydrogen) to a lab stand.
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
Lambda-Eyde
National Hazard
Posts: 857
Registered: 20-11-2008
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cleaved
|
|
How do you plan on flame-sealing the ampoule without igniting the hydrogen?
This just in: 95,5 % of the world population lives outside the USA
You should really listen to ABBAPlease drop by our IRC channel: #sciencemadness @ irc.efnet.org
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
MrHomeScientist , don't even try that. It's way too dangerous. It requires above average ampuling skills and tiny ampoules with heavy walls. Probably an oxyacetylene torch, too, because ordinary torches are not only too cool, but don't give enough heat. Quartz tubes
are a better choice, but their softening range is very high.
Finishing pressurized ampoules (and the pressures we're talking about are substantially higher than 1 atm) have to be flawless. Pinching with cold
metallic tweezers introduces stress, fucks up the geometry of the seal and you basically end up with a poisonous bomb in your hand that can detonate
any time and release a great deal of poison.
The seal must be spherical and cooled slowly.
Chlorine, sulphur hexafluoride and xenon are good candidates. I doubt CO2 is. The pressures involved are too high.
It's best to encase such ampoule in a block of transparent resin, for extra protection.
[Edited on 22-1-2013 by Endimion17]
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Endimion17:
There was some discussion about this a while back in <a href="http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=22473#pid267286">this
thread</a>.
My plan, which I am apparently no good at describing, was to make a small amount of liquid Cl2, add that to an ampoule, let nearly all of it
evaporate, then seal the ampoule. In this way, there is no actual liquid remaining in the ampoule when it warms up to room temperature, but the slight
pressure it produces after it boils would (I hope) be enough to make a clearly visible sample of the gas.
I don't use clamps to seal my ampoule; rather, I melt the neck closed while pulling the top and bottom apart slowly. It usually takes a few minutes
with a propane torch. Certainly not a spherical seal, but not quite as stressed as using (relatively) cold clamps.
|
|
|
Endimion17
International Hazard
Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline
Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by MrHomeScientist  | Endimion17:
There was some discussion about this a while back in <a href="http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=22473#pid267286">this
thread</a>.
My plan, which I am apparently no good at describing, was to make a small amount of liquid Cl2, add that to an ampoule, let nearly all of it
evaporate, then seal the ampoule. In this way, there is no actual liquid remaining in the ampoule when it warms up to room temperature, but the slight
pressure it produces after it boils would (I hope) be enough to make a clearly visible sample of the gas.
I don't use clamps to seal my ampoule; rather, I melt the neck closed while pulling the top and bottom apart slowly. It usually takes a few minutes
with a propane torch. Certainly not a spherical seal, but not quite as stressed as using (relatively) cold clamps. |
Oh, that's a different thing. 
However it's not neccessary and it can easily lead to acute poisoning. Have you ever tried to ampoule chlorine using a gas generator spewing out
chlorine ~0.5 ml/s? Holy crap, it has to be done outside while standing upwind. It's horrible.
First prepare your ampoule by narrowing its neck just to let a tiny tube inside. That way you won't waste time when the sealing starts.
Then flood the ampoule with chlorine. Slowly pull out the tube, so that the air doesn't rush inside. Chlorine should be constantly pouring out while
you pull out the tube i.e. there has to be a positive chlorine pressure inside.
After you pull it out, seal it immediately with neck pointed upwards. Only traces of air remain inside.
It would be more interesting (and a lot more difficult) to fill it with pure chlorine and then evacuate it, so that low pressure chlorine remains
inside.
Why? To use it in this manner.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by elementcollector1 | Would "Dry-Z-Air" (basically calcium chloride) work for drying hydrogen?
[...]
Unfortunately, I don't have a blowtorch that stays lit, I have to constantly press the button. So, I'm thinking of using one hand to hold the torch,
the other to hold the clamp (twist to seal, right?), and clamping the bottom (or top, in the case of hydrogen) to a lab stand. |
A desiccant will make the air more dry. Just how dry do you need it? You haven't said what you want the gas for. Without knowing the
application, I can't offer appropriate advice.
Having stated that, if what you want is something for an element collection, then all you really need is for the dew point of the water inside the
ampoule to be low enough that you won't ever see condensation. A desiccant should accomplish that much.
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by MrHomeScientist | | My plan, which I am apparently no good at describing, was to make a small amount of liquid Cl2, add that to an ampoule, let nearly all of it
evaporate, then seal the ampoule. In this way, there is no actual liquid remaining in the ampoule when it warms up to room temperature, but the slight
pressure it produces after it boils would (I hope) be enough to make a clearly visible sample of the gas. |
If
you can make a T-joint in glass, you can make your own ampoule rig. The trick is to fill the ampoule from a mostly sealed system, and to fill it
upside down with vapor from inside the system. Consider a long tube, sealed on both ends, mounted vertically so that the bottom acts as a reservoir,
with a T-joint above the reservoir. Fill the reservoir with liquid chlorine (chilled, obviously), seal off the port, turn it upside down, open the
port and let some of the chlorine evaporate to purge the vessel (you could also use vacuum technique, if you want higher purity). After purging,
there's only the target gas within the system. Close the port and turn it all right-side up again.
Now create an ampoule by parting off the top end of the vessel. Clamp the vessel at the reservoir end in a stand. Clamp the top end with a hand clamp
(bend up some wire if you need to). Apply heat to the top tube section at a height right for however large you want your ampoule to be. As the glass
softens, twist the top end, pull out a bit and seal the glass to itself. You'll end up with two ampoules, one in your hand and one in the stand. You
can reuse the reservoir section by cutting off the top end and sealing on a new ampoule section.
Practice first without chlorine, obviously. This is a level of glassblowing manipulation that used to be common in undergraduate labs. It's nothing
like making a ring seal, for example.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I never have ampouled cryogenic gases and I would never do that. You need ampoules with thick walls for that, the ordinary thin walled ampoules most
likely easily break due to the inside pressure. Another issue with pressurized thin walled ampoules is that when the seal is still liquid, the glass
expands like a balloon and this balloon then pops and you again have a little hole in the ampoule. I think that ampouling pressurized gases is
extremely difficult without the proper equipment and the proper ampoules. I accept that this is beyond my abilities.
Btw, a chlorine ampoule can be nicely made, even without pressurizing the gas. The ampoule I show on wikipedia is at normal atmospheric pressure and
it nicely shows the color of the chlorine. Use a 20 ml ampoule for this gas, this makes it easy to show the green color.
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you want to practice, you can try ampouling nitric oxide. Keep checking on it periodically. If it develops a brown color, you know there is an air
leak.
I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying lets remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Amouling nitric oxide (NO) without getting any brown color from the start is nearly impossible. During the ampouling process you always get some
mixing of gas and air and if e.g. 10% of the gas is replaced by air, then you already have a fairly deep brown color in the ampoule.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1376
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Woelen, I've experimented a bit over the past two days with your method of sealing, using pasteur pipets which I first sealed on the other end for
practice, and in my hands the flattened piece of glass obtained by clamping with a moderately hot pair of tweezers nearly always (>90%) developed a
crack upon cooling. The crack is always in the flat part, but very near the tubular section and it often results in leaking.
After clamping, I heat the end, including the flat bit of glass for another 5 seconds or so, turning it as I heat it, and then place it upright in a
rack to cool.
I did have some success with another method, which is (1) heat the end of the tube untill soft, (2) grap the very end with a pair of warm tweezers (3)
remove from the flame and pull the tweezers about 10 cms away while twisting, thereby closing the tube and drawing a wire. (4) heat the wire in the
middle, thus separating the glob of glass in the tweezers and (5) keep heating the end of the wire, so that it eventually melts completely and forms a
little ball of glass at the end of the pipet/ampoule.
It's still not perfect though, with about 30% of the seals failing, especially if I fill the improvised ampoule to a large fraction (say to 2 cms of
the end) with a moderately volatile liquid (ethanol).
[Edited on 24-1-2013 by phlogiston]
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Could it be that the pasteur pipettes are made of another type of glass? I use real ampoules (see the wiki page for chlorine) and these do not break
on cooling down. I also do not turn the ampoule around, I simply firmly press the molten neck of the ampoule between the clamp, such that the glass is
pushed flat. I then keep the flat part of the glass in a flame to make a nice rounded rim, otherwise it becomes ragged.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
What if you heated the glass, sealed it, put a clamp on the top and flattened it out, and while still molten, twisted the glass around to form an even
(but rather pointy!) neck, then applying a bit more flame to the end to round it out?
Not sure if I described it right, but that's what I see in my head.
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
In the light bulb industry they use an inert atmosphere (argon and nitrogen) and use a plasma torch, for sealing the fused quartz capsules in halogen
bulbs.
|
|
|
Lambda-Eyde
National Hazard
Posts: 857
Registered: 20-11-2008
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cleaved
|
|
I'm willing to bet that these are made from soda glass and that that is the source of the problem. I use borosilicate test tubes for my "ampoules",
and they work great with some practice.
This just in: 95,5 % of the world population lives outside the USA
You should really listen to ABBAPlease drop by our IRC channel: #sciencemadness @ irc.efnet.org
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Lambda-Eyde | | I'm willing to bet that these are made from soda glass and that that is the source of the problem. I use borosilicate test tubes for my "ampoules",
and they work great with some practice. |
I would concur. The thermal coefficient of soda-lime glass is
approximately three times that of borosilicate. It's well-known that soda-lime glass is more fragile when used (see all the stories of USA-brand
Pyrex), but it's even more important when fabricating glassware. The thermal gradients are even more severe.
I'm guessing that the technique absent from the folks who are having trouble here is flame annealing. The goal is to cool hot glass slowly. Somewhat
counter-intuitively, that means continuing to heat the glass after working it. Yes, more heat, but with a cooler flame. The flame you want is not the
neutral flame for working the glass, but a reducing (sooty) flame with less oxygen. Some of the fancier torches and gas setups I've seen have a valve
to mix oxygen with regular air. This cools the flame in two ways. Most obviously, there's less oxygen, so the fuel burns over a wider area. Less
obviously, it takes energy to heat up the inert nitrogen component, directly cooling the flame. Play the heated area in and out of the flame, leaving
it out longer each time.
Edit: typos, clarification.
[Edited on 2013-1-25 by watson.fawkes]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
