Mastro
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 17-8-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ethanol production from anything other than yeast
Can you turn sugar to ethanol with any thing other than yeast?
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That is the oldest method of producing ethanol; fermentation of either sugars (e.g. in fruit juices), starch, cellulose, or whey from milk. It
accounts for practically all the ethanol produced for human consumption.
However, now only 5% of the ethanol for industrial use comes from fermentation. Most is now obtained from the acid-catalysed hydration of ethylene,
which is reversible depending on the conditions e.g. temperature, pressure, and acid concentration:
acid catalyst
H2C=CH2 + H2O -> CH3CH2OH
<-
John W.
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Another silly method (silly because of the losses) is via the cannizzaro reaction, you'd start with acetaldehyde and (in the presence of NaOH)
this will disproportionate to ethanol and acetic acid (sodium acetate).
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
ziqquratu
Hazard to Others
Posts: 385
Registered: 15-11-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I alwas thought the Cannizzaro was only for carbonyl compounds with no alpha-hydrogens? Shouldnt acetaldehyde undergo an aldol condensation under
basic conditions?
|
|
|
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: crystalline
|
|
Yes you are right, I just checked. Exactly for that reason it doesnt work. Ah well - it wasn't a realistic method anyway 
Edit: Misread question.
Sure there are different types of yeast (other than bakers yeast, S. cerevisiae) that produce ethanol, and also bacteria. I guess S. cerevisiae was
chosen becuase it it ubiquitous and easily cultured.
[Edited on 19-8-2004 by chemoleo]
Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
|
|
|
Geomancer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 228
Registered: 21-12-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The original question seemed interested in going from sugar. Eschewing biomimetic routes (what's life ever done for me, anyway?), strategy will
revolve around breaking up the carbohydrates, and reducing the bits. Supercritical water will break cellulose into HOCH<sub>2</sub>CHO
fragments. Hydrazine might then give ethanol, or you could try something more subtle.
Interpreting the question narrowly, I don't think you need yeast. Sure, yeasties are cute, but some bacteria can ferment to alcohol too.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes
http://www.ejpau.media.pl/series/volume3/issue2/food/art-04....
|
|
|
MadHatter
International Hazard
Posts: 1332
Registered: 9-7-2004
Location: Maine
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enjoying retirement
|
|
Ethanol
Mastro, I'll assume that you're looking for a direct synthesis of sugar
to ethanol. I don't know if that's possible. I suggest you go the yeast
route and distill. For more information on distillation, I suggest you
UTFSE ! Ramiel, chime in PLEASE !
From opening of NCIS New Orleans - It goes a BOOM ! BOOM ! BOOM ! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Is it just me or is madhatter's post less that totally unhelpful?
"Mastro, I'll assume that you're looking for a direct synthesis of sugar
to ethanol"
Seems a fair assumption, that's what he asked for.
"I don't know if that's possible"
That's OK, I did so I posted some stuff about it.
"I suggest you go the yeast
route and distill. "
Why, isn't that a bit dull? It hardly seems like mad science.
"For more information on distillation, I suggest you
UTFSE !"
I'm not aware of him having asked about distilling (unless he's been crossposting and I haven't seen it yet). Perhaps he knows enough
about it. Maybe he used a (fantastic?) search engine.
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Pyrolysis in the absence of air of wood, which is mainly cellulose, produces as its main products methanol (not ethanol) and wood tar (wood creosote,
consisting mainly of phenols such as cresol, phenol, xylol, mesitylol, and polynuclear aromatic species which impart a dark color, probably with small
amounts of pyran, furan, and furfural). I think the wood creosote sold commercially is probably a solution of the wood tar in methanol.
I wonder if there are any natural carbohydrate materials which would yield ethanol instead of methanol on pyrolysis in the absence of air?
John W.
|
|
|
Marvin
National Hazard
Posts: 995
Registered: 13-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
John, your post quality seems to have dropped significantly in the last 2 weeks. I suspect you are trying to bolster your post count of various
forums for some reason. You are posting a great deal we allready know, aparently without reading much older posts, and everything else seems to be
only extrapolations from your own understanding of chemistry. Please stop this.
"of wood, which is mainly cellulose" there is a great deal of celulose in wood, so I'll let you have that one. The pyrolysis of
cellulose though produces charcoal and water. To all intents and purposes nothing else.
"produces as its main products methanol (not ethanol) and wood tar "
This starts off as more of a gotcha, and just gets worse. Main product obviously charcoal (and water but we can ignore this). The distillate
produced is mostly a dilute solution of acetic acid called with good reason 'pyroligneous acid'. This contains small amounts of methanol,
acetone, methyl acetate etc. The methanol content in the distillate only amounts to about 1%. Compaired to the mass of wood needed, this is a truly
minor product.
"wood creosote, consisting mainly of phenols such as cresol, phenol, xylol, mesitylol, and polynuclear aromatic species which impart a dark
color"
Wood cresote typically contains very little in the way of aromatic compounds, you are confusing this with coal tar.
For a typical analysis of the wood tar from a softwood kiln distillation, look here.
http://www.natmus.dk/cons/lab/tjaere/tjaere.pdf
The actual composition is an unsurprising terpine mixture. Some aromatic compounds are to be expected as a result of the decomposition of lignin but
the majority tar products occur from pyrolysis/distillation of the tree resin.
Carbohydrates are essentially polymers of CH2O, getting CH3CH2OH from them by pyrolysis is not going happen in any useful shape or form.
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Marvin, you are "the pot calling the kettle black"! In view of your number of posts, I suppose the cynics would call you a hypocrite.
John W.
|
|
|
Ramiel
Vicious like a ferret
Posts: 484
Registered: 19-8-2002
Location: Room at the Back, Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-demented
|
|
Stop this please, you three. Marvin - your response <html><i>is</i></html> actually usefull, so don't take this too hard.
U2U is the proper forum for personal attacks, assaults or miscelaneous vilification.
Don't go at each others throats when someone interprets an admittedly broad and poorly framed question differently to you.
I do hope we understand each other.
- D
Caveat Orator
|
|
|
Mastro
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 17-8-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
First off I never mentioned methanol or cellulose so if you want to talk about it, do it in another thread. Second I have already used a search
engine. And last but not least quit fucking arguing.
|
|
|
Geomancer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 228
Registered: 21-12-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Cellulose is where to look, the assumption being that what works with it will work with monosaccharides. Sugar (which one, BTW?) is simply not a very
attractive feedstack for bulk chemical manufacture. Moreover, there already exists a relatively good route from glucose to ethanol.
|
|
|
MadHatter
International Hazard
Posts: 1332
Registered: 9-7-2004
Location: Maine
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enjoying retirement
|
|
Sugar to ethanol
Admittedly, I could've been less hostile in my last post but I can't
find anything on the net or in the local library about a synthetic
route for sugar to ethanol. The ethanol production industry would
go hog wild if such a process were available and it could be done
cheaply. Of greater importance would be the speed of such a process
if it was significantly faster than yeast. For right now, it looks like we're
stuck with Nature's little chemists ! I asked Ramiel to chime in
because of his experience in producing ethanol which I have found
to be far greater than mine. As for getting flamed, I don't mind if I've
been a wanker and deserve it. There's no shame in admitting
you're wrong.
From opening of NCIS New Orleans - It goes a BOOM ! BOOM ! BOOM ! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
|
|
|
bobo451
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 23-6-2004
Location: Wyoming USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Another route, albeit very inefficient, would be to gasify the sugar. If injected into a partial combustion chamber with water, it should form a fair
amount of syngas (CO, H2). The syngas could then be passed over a catalyst (MoS2, etc.) to form the ethanol. It would provide an impure product, but
could be done. At the efficiencies that could be achieved, it would be a mad science sort of venture.
|
|
|
Marvin
National Hazard
Posts: 995
Registered: 13-10-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I was under the impression synthesis gas, with extra hydrogen produced methanol. I havnt heard of any ethanol method this way, or are you expecting
trace amounts of ethanol in the methanol?
|
|
|
bobo451
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 23-6-2004
Location: Wyoming USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Depends on the catalyst, MoS2 has the tendency to produce higher alcohols, and favors ethanol. There will be methanol in the product, but the
percentage of ethanol will be much higher depending on the residence time and reactor conditions. It is, of course, an addition reaction very similar
to the Fischer-Tropsch reactions. The reaction will produce methanol before ethanol, but there is a much lower energy barrier to go to ethanol from
methanol than to go from syngas to methanol. The reaction to ethanol occurs very quickly after the methanol is produced.
|
|
|
If_6_was_9
Unregistered
Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline
|
|
US5000000
[Edited on 8-27-2004 by Polverone]
|
|
|
janger
Harmless
Posts: 40
Registered: 20-8-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Mastro
First off I never mentioned methanol or cellulose so if you want to talk about it, do it in another thread. Second I have already used a search
engine. And last but not least quit fucking arguing. |
First, sugar is a general term. Not all sugars are
fermentable by usual methods (eg lactose). Second, cellulose is made up of sugar. A lot of the research in ethanol production methods focuses on
converting ploysaccharides to fermentable products.
For an overview of the bacteria route, look here: http://www.uyseg.org/greener_industry/pages/ethanol/ethanol8...
Also check out us patent no. 6,130,076
For a list of patents associated with ethanol production, http://motorheaven.bizland.com/Technology_Reviews_2/Ethanol_...
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Unlike humans, ruminating animals such as cattle, sheep, goats, etc., have bacteria in their extra stomachs which can hydrolyse long-chain
polysaccharides like cellulose, comprising the fibrous material of plants, to monosaccharides like glucose and fructose. The stomach acid in humans
can hydrolyse starches (low-molecular-weight polysaccharides). however. I would think that the bacterial approaches are likely to involve these or
related species for the initial hydrolysis (followed by fermentation).
John W.
|
|
|
jimwig
Hazard to Others
Posts: 215
Registered: 17-5-2003
Location: the sunny south
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just slip a non-threating something in here-----
I have distilled the cheap-o mouth washes when a little anhydrous was not available otherwise. they are easily available and contain around 24%
alcohol
they cost around a dollar or so US.
also they are copies of Listerine. but they are not Listerine.
after the initial distillation dry with any number of methods on-line.
just an idea and hope I didn't offend anyone.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
