| Pages:
1
2
3
..
38 |
aonomus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 361
Registered: 18-10-2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
Bad days in the lab or with glassware?
So I'm sure that while accidents aren't funny, I'm sure we have some minor things that aren't major accidents, or involve breakage of glassware. I
thought I'd share my bad day in the hopes that others have had similar experiences. Perhaps there is something to learn?
So today started out fine enough, and I was in the process of recovering a nice CuSO4 crystal that I slowly grew over a few days in a desiccator. Once
I had it out, I managed to drop it from about 4ft off the ground, having it shatter. I was dejected, but kept on working and recovered the bits of the
crystal.
Later on, a housemate drops a can of pepsi from about waist height onto my big toe while I was taking a short break from cleaning glassware.
Limping over to the lab I finish rinsing my glassware, and set down a 29/42 to 24/40 adapter on a plastic tray to dry. It rolled about 1 inch and hit
another piece of glassware, taking a big chip out of the adapter....
Notice how the adapter instantly makes a sad face 
So instead, I decided to make fun of the broken adapter, and personified it.
[Edited on 4-1-2010 by aonomus]
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Aww, Mr. Adapter is sad. He should rub himself against his wrists in angst.
Tim
|
|
|
psychokinetic
National Hazard
Posts: 558
Registered: 30-8-2009
Location: Nouveau Sheepelande.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Constantly missing equilibrium
|
|
I once knocked a cheap 250ml beaker off my desk, had it bounce and roll. No problems. Wiped forehead and continued.
Half an hour later I was washing a much more expensive, durable boiling tube with a soft cloth and had it shatter in my hands. That was fun, picking
out the pieces from my hand! Typical.
“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found
the object of his search.
I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor.”
-Tesla
|
|
|
anotheronebitesthedust
Hazard to Others
Posts: 189
Registered: 24-6-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How about getting excited about a new shipment of glassware that you spent $500 on only to find that 2 of the flasks have air bubbles in them, and the
other flask and the condensers are shattered.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7976
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I once made some bromine (distilling from NaBr+KBrO3+H2SO4 all in water). I had 10 ml of bromine in a little flask. I decided to dry this with 10 ml
of H2SO4 which works great. Next I went outside and wanted to separate the H2SO4 and bromine. I went outside because of the bromine vapors. I poured
the mix of Br2 and H2SO4 in a separating funnel, only to discover that the liquids simply run through  . I had forgotten to close the funnel at the bottom and all liquid (and a lot of work and time) was gone. Fortunately
no personal accident happened and the mess was outside. I cleaned the mess with dilute ammonia (giving dense white smoke of NH4Br).
|
|
|
Panache
International Hazard
Posts: 1290
Registered: 18-10-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: Instead of being my deliverance, she had a resemblance to a Kat named Frankenstein
|
|
the first time i made a sodium solution in ammonia the rb flask cracked in the alcohol bath without my knowing allowing very wet alcohol to seep in, i
discovered it a few minutes later when i went to photograph the glorious blue to find it had all gone white. I calmly removed the flask and placed it
with a bucket within a bucket. there was only ~1g of sodium in it so i guess not really that much could have happened.
Undeterred i managed several lovely attempts crystallizing the sodium out of the evaporating ammonia solution, forming intricate sodium dendrites up
the walls of the flask, glistening with sodiums metallic luster. So fragile both mechanically and chemically it is special to witness.
|
|
|
User
Hazard to Others
Posts: 339
Registered: 7-11-2008
Location: Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: Passionate
|
|
Ow yes i remember a couple of bad days.
This one is not my fault and could have been fatal.
In my second year of education (chemistry) I was in the lab with a girl next to me.
She was doing a filtration using a ceramic filter and a thick walled erlenmeyer.
It was almost time for a coffee break and i went to the other side of the lab to get my coat and cigarettes.
The girl that was next to me left the lab right before me.
Suddenly a very loud explosion occurred.
Pieces of glass smacked against the wall just inches away from where i stood.
Well what had happened...
The girl had left the vacuum open, the filter clotted and the vacuum got so deep that the flask was not capable of holding it.
It imploded and if course exploded directly afterwards.
Would it been a minute earlier i could have been perforated with thick pieces of glass.
I was lucky, very lucky.
guess one could call this a bad day 
What a fine day for chemistry this is.
|
|
|
aonomus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 361
Registered: 18-10-2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by User  | Well what had happened...
The girl had left the vacuum open, the filter clotted and the vacuum got so deep that the flask was not capable of holding it.
It imploded and if course exploded directly afterwards.
|
Wow, the house vac at your undergrad lab was that good? Usually during the lab hours, the vacuum pressure drops significantly, to the point where
water aspirators do a better job. I suppose its all a matter of scale, but when you have 100+ students vacuum filtering with the same vacuum system in
the building, plus a bunch of rotovaps humming away, things get to the point where even if you left the vac open, you wouldn't get too strong a
vacuum.
Good to see that no one has hurt themselves here, but it goes to show how Murphy shows his face from time to time with all of us...
|
|
|
User
Hazard to Others
Posts: 339
Registered: 7-11-2008
Location: Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: Passionate
|
|
It was at the end of the day.
Could well be that she was the only one using the system.
She wasnt really one of the smartest persons in the class 
Working with some people made me feel more insecure than the most dangerous and maybe even irresponsible experiments that I performed.
I also remember some dude that wiped a complete distillation set-up filled with hot solvent off the table.
Ouch..
I barely broke glass in the last couple of years.
A short while ago i did something stupid.
I had a 2 litre erlemeyer with a ground joint.
An adapter had frozen in the joint :S
I applied some force , not that much.
I broke the whole damn top off the flask.
Guess it was already weak.
Still those damn things are expensive.
[Edited on 4-1-2010 by User]
What a fine day for chemistry this is.
|
|
|
mr.crow
National Hazard
Posts: 884
Registered: 9-9-2009
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: 0xFF
|
|
I guess glass breaks when it wants to
Does anyone think the adapter is still usable or is it filled with internal stress and could shatter at any moment?
woelen: Holy cow thats the worst time to have an open sep funnel
|
|
|
bbartlog
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Wandering a little offtopic, but... should the strength of the vacuum even be all that relevant? I would think that a flask designed for vacuum would
have some safety margin, and the difference between a hard vacuum and a relatively poor one wouldn't be all that much in terms of forces exerted on
the flask.
Kind of curious since I have a heavy-walled 2l Erlenmeyer which is supposedly designed for vacuum, and I would prefer not to have to be overcautious
in terms of how hard a vacuum I subject it to... I'd hope that an implosion would be a result of cracked or flawed glassware.
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
In some instances, where a breakage is not in a critical part of a piece of glassware, and it is not likely to be subjected to high temperatures or
mechanical stresses, e.g. a piece broken from the foot of a measuring cylinder, it may be possible to glue it back together with a two-pack epoxy glue
(Araldite etc.).
|
|
|
medchem
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 12-12-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
ya I remember (may be 1 year back), I had a bad experience with methylene chloride filled glass jar. I kept methylene chloride in normal glass vessel
without any space (full). It was summer and after few hours there was big sound BuMMMM. To my surprise, there was methylene chloride all over the
floor and I saw the glass vessel was broken (due to pressure exerted by methylene chloride vapor). Since then, I started leaving some space for
solvent vapors to play freely...GOOD LESSON
|
|
|
aonomus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 361
Registered: 18-10-2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
Yikes, DCM is one of those solvents I'd rather not have spill all over a lab floor....
|
|
|
Jor
National Hazard
Posts: 950
Registered: 21-11-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Some DCM on the floor is no problem at all. DCM is alo in paint stripper, and i guess many people use it in great quantities without high quality
ventilation. It quickly evaporates, leaving no residue. What is much worse is spilling non-volatile toxins. I have twice kicked over a beaker by
accident. One time it contained a conc. copper sulfate solution and once it contained a Cr(III)-solution. These are quite nasty experiences, having to
clean it all up. When I spill solvents I just let it evaporate.
Also I once had a wet precitipate of PbI2, wich i was heating with my burner, as i was impatient to use the hotplate, wich i normally use (at bout
90C). I heated to fast, and some water boiled splattering small amounts of PbI2 crystals all in the hood, staining the bench. it was a total of 200mg
i think. This is also very annoying to clean up.
My most nasty spill ever, was about 200mg of HgO (long time ago) on the bench. It also stained my bench, so i had to pour acid on the bench to
dissolve the stains, and absorb into paper. Now I always work over containment when working with things like Hg, Pb and Cr(VI), unless test-tube
scale.
|
|
|
medchem
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 12-12-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Jor | Some DCM on the floor is no problem at all. DCM is alo in paint stripper, and i guess many people use it in great quantities without high quality
ventilation. It quickly evaporates, leaving no residue. What is much worse is spilling non-volatile toxins. I have twice kicked over a beaker by
accident. One time it contained a conc. copper sulfate solution and once it contained a Cr(III)-solution. These are quite nasty experiences, having to
clean it all up. When I spill solvents I just let it evaporate.
Also I once had a wet precitipate of PbI2, wich i was heating with my burner, as i was impatient to use the hotplate, wich i normally use (at bout
90C). I heated to fast, and some water boiled splattering small amounts of PbI2 crystals all in the hood, staining the bench. it was a total of 200mg
i think. This is also very annoying to clean up.
My most nasty spill ever, was about 200mg of HgO (long time ago) on the bench. It also stained my bench, so i had to pour acid on the bench to
dissolve the stains, and absorb into paper. Now I always work over containment when working with things like Hg, Pb and Cr(VI), unless test-tube
scale. |
Ya its volatile and easily evaporates. Even then we can't risk to its exposure as it has been classified as carcinogen (though many compounds fall in
this category). Yes, you are rite it is used in paint but due to its toxicity (though mild) people are trying to ban or lessen the concentration. Pls
check out the link below.
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/064...
There was no problem cleaning methylene chloride but it was quite boring to collect glass pieces. It might be dangerous if someone was present there
during the breakage. 
|
|
|
aonomus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 361
Registered: 18-10-2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
I fear for the undergraduate chem labs at my uni who have a lab of 24 students work with DCM at the bench for the first time ever, packing and running
microscale columns.
I remember walking by and nearly keeling over from the fumes in the hall, I don't know how they survive in that lab. One spark and the whole place
would go off.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
For practical purposes DCM is non-flammable in the typical undergraduate laboratory setting. I believe that is why it has replaced ether as a solvent
whenever possible. For a truly hazardous situation go back to the 1960's when the lab could be filled with the smell of ether.
24 students in one organic lab seems like too many. But then maybe I've been spoiled.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Jor
National Hazard
Posts: 950
Registered: 21-11-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well, at our uni laboratory, we use ether in organic synthesis instead of dichloromethane.
I don't understand it, as I consider dichloromethane one of the safest solvents, due to its non-flammability, relatively low toxicity (if you handle
it in a well ventilated area at least).
But they say it's dangerous as it's a carcinogen... I mean, common, if you use this stuff in a fume hood it is EXTREMELY safe, outside a hood but with
good ventilation it is still one of the safest solvents as long as you don't use it daily.
But they are pretty paranoid here. Chloroform and toluene may not even be used by 1st year undergraduates (although in second year it is used as a
starting point for synthesis). Well finally I convinced them I could use some toluene after a lot of arguing. Also for one synthesis I needed 400mg of
sodium, but this was not allowed... I just needed to dissolve it in benzyl alcohol, I mean what is dangerous about that, you even need to heat to
dissolve it.
Mercury compounds are completely banned AFAIK on our uni... (that's just insane, banning an element from a research institute).
But it's ironic that they let us weight out p-toluidine and p-nitrotoluene just in the open, no hood. Especially the former is quite nasty, especially
compared to toluene....
Well not really a problem for me I have most things at hand at home anyways, so
I can use these materials when I want
It's remarkable how safely you learn to work at home, if you experiment a lot. At home you are responsible, and you experiment a lot more (at least I
do) than do students, and you work very carefully. My supervisors (3rd or 4th years students) were quite stupid on safety point of view, I saw them
doing things wich I would never do. And they don't even know what's gonna happen. For example, for analytic project, we had to dissolve brass in
nitric. Well the supervisor (a woman), thought it was too dangerous using the conc. acid (as she thought the reaction might be somewhat explosive ), so she thought let's dilute the acid to 2M. The dissolving took a LONG time.
Also they stress us here to add acid to water instead of reverse. I was diluting 4M HCl in the reverse order and they freaked out . I mean an experienced chemists should know that on a small scale this rule only
applies (of the standard acids) to conc. H2SO4, and to some extent to 37% HCl. All these people only get to learn safety theory, but no practise.
[Edited on 7-1-2010 by Jor]
|
|
|
DJF90
International Hazard
Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Whilst diluting 4M HCl your way may indeed be fine, I beleive its more about the principle. They don't know you wouldnt change the order if it was
conc. sulfuric, and its good lab practice to ALWAYS add acid to water, regardless of the concentration.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7976
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I agree with Jor. You have to know what you are mixing, otherwise you should not be mixing anything at all. With conc. H2SO4 I always pour acid in
water, but with 4M (appr. 12% HCl) I just do what is most practical and convenient and do not care about the order of adding. The same is true for 30%
HCl or 65% HNO3. Adding water to 90% HNO3 is stupid, but mixing such a concentrated form of HNO3 with water is stupid anyway, for that purpose we have
the much easier to obtain 65% or 53% grades of HNO3.
|
|
|
bbartlog
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The more conservative rules and heuristics are designed to protect those who don't know as much about the properties of the chemicals they're dealing
with. For example, standard safety procedures for chemical spills at my company are fairly agnostic about *what* medical/therapeutic agent is spilled,
so that in theory at least a broken beaker that results in a puddle of potassium chloride solution is going to be treated much the same way as a spill
of some quite toxic chemotherapy agent. Whether the lab techs actually use their knowledge of chemistry to downgrade the level of protection when it's
not needed, I don't know - but they aren't supposed to.
As that pertains to home chemistry though I would quote William Blake: 'One law for lion and ox is oppression'.
|
|
|
crazyboy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 436
Registered: 31-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Marginally insane
|
|
I have broken a number of pieces of glassware but the most frustrating is breaking beakers or Erlenmeyer flasks because I purchsed them as a set from
50ml to 1L and I can't get individual beakers or flasks of the same make without purchasing the whole set again. 
|
|
|
Panache
International Hazard
Posts: 1290
Registered: 18-10-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: Instead of being my deliverance, she had a resemblance to a Kat named Frankenstein
|
|
Rules, laws, guidelines etc are written so the stupidiest person covered by them will not hurt themselves/get into trouble. Try pointing this out to a
policemen when you are explaining to him that because you know why the law was written and that this 'spirit of the law' was not intended to be
applied in such a circumstance. Policemen do not enjoy being asked questions they cannot answer.
Jor i feel your pain, throughout undergrad i had constant disagreements with the demonstration staff (usually 3rd or 4th years) regarding
'modifications' to the procedures i employed to expedite the tedium of our prac lessons. When asked why the procedure was written as such they usually
had no idea, they were just dogmatically following some code they didn't understand.
That said it gets very dangerous when you start being so arrogant as to believe you understand the motivations ffor all such guidelines and i have
made many mistakes thus.
|
|
|
aonomus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 361
Registered: 18-10-2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
To provide counterpoint, in one of the 3rd/4th year teaching lab courses, the professor does use current syntheses from the literature alongside older
syntheses, however sometimes modifications are made, possibly to the students detriment. Additionally, it seems short notice is always given, so the
lab tech and I are always scrambling to make up new solutions and switch things around.
Fortunately though, in the teaching labs there is quite a bit of sanity regarding spills and glassware breakage - ie: if you know what was in the
glassware, you can grade the threat/hazard accordingly. No worries for clean empty beakers, minor slip hazard for water baths, NaCl sol'ns, etc. like
mentioned above.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2
3
..
38 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
