Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: AP vs TNP (grab some popcorn)
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 09:12
AP vs TNP (grab some popcorn)


I was curious, we all know some R.E. figures from wikipedia or other sources, but what happens in practice.
Please bet for something and watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5AUT48E7w4
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pyro
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1305
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Gent, Belgium
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 09:24


you looked awfully close to that last explosion, were you viewing from inside a bunker or something?




all above information is intellectual property of Pyro. :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 09:30


With thick safety glasses, behind the camera screen I didn't feel too intimidated by this energy deprived firecracker :/
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dany
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 482
Registered: 3-8-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 09:35


What is missing in this test is the loading density of each explosive which is very important since detonation performance depend on crystalline density. at least you should compare the 2 explosive @ theoretical maximum density (TMD). We know that picric acid has better performance than triacetone peroxide so why wasting time in comparing the two explosive?

second, to be able to compare between the 2 you should use the same witness plate (in your case the metal tube). If the tube were from different source the results (depth of dent) may change.

Dany.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 09:53


Both hammered in the tube with a risk of accident. Both at reasonable for hobbyist density. The tubes are the same kind and look same thickness. The experiment is more like an illustration, nothing too solid. If we seek serious comparison, there are very nice books.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
simply RED
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 206
Registered: 18-8-2005
Location: noitacoL
Member Is Offline

Mood: booM

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 10:18


Epic introduction of the AP test with the "taliban" soundtrack from "Generals". Very predictable results indeed.
p.s.
Dany, relax a bit :)




When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead...
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Dany
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 482
Registered: 3-8-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 10:23


well Ral123,

this test serve as a beautiful illustration for the power of picric acid compared to acetone peroxide but no meaningful conclusion can be drawn.

Dany.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
hyfalcon
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1003
Registered: 29-3-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 11:01


Never hammer a sensitive energetic. Press them behind a blast shield.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-10-2013 at 11:17


Thanks, entertainment is first with my channel.
Quote: Originally posted by hyfalcon  
Never hammer a sensitive energetic. Press them behind a blast shield.

I take measures not to get hurt in case the thing blows up. The only way an amateur can really press is if he has a vice with large length of movement.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top