D4RR3N
Hazard to Others
Posts: 271
Registered: 9-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
spherical magnet falling in Aluminium tube
Hoping someone might know this or have some ideas how I could find the answer I seek.
So most of you will have seen an experiment in which you drop a magnet through a copper or aluminum tube and if falls very slowly due to eddy currents
induced in the tube.
Lets say I have a 12mm dia spherical magnet, several aluminum tubes with an internal diameter of 14mm,300mm long but varying wall thickness from 0.5mm
to 12mm thick.
We drop the magnet through the 0.5mm tube and time how long it takes to come out the end and then move onto the next tube with 1mm wall thickness. As
the wall thickness increases the rate of fall will decrease but I assume at some point increasing wall thickness will have no effect on the speed of
the falling magnet....that's what I want to find out, but I don't want to pay someone to machine 50 aluminum tubes. Can it be calculated?
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1376
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
yes
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
D4RR3N
Hazard to Others
Posts: 271
Registered: 9-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
you know how to calculate optimal wall thickness ?
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
Is this something where you are looking for an exact answer, or a "rule of thumb"?
I don't have the time to figure out how to calculate it precisely, but I would think that after you pass a 1:1 ratio (wall thickness
to internal diameter) that you pass the point of diminishing returns. Technically no matter how thick the tube already is,
making it thicker will always help, even if it has a miniscule effect.
There are more than just eddy currents that you're dealing with. The tube itself acts like a shorted turn. If you cut a slit
all along the length of the pipe, the magnet will fall much faster.
|
|
|
quantumchromodynamics
Hazard to Self
Posts: 67
Registered: 25-9-2013
Location: with much determination, nowhere in particluar
Member Is Offline
Mood: tired but still trying
|
|
other variables
orientation of spherical magnet
rotation of the magnet
flux density of the magnet
and others...
|
|
|
D4RR3N
Hazard to Others
Posts: 271
Registered: 9-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by WGTR  | Is this something where you are looking for an exact answer, or a "rule of thumb"?
I don't have the time to figure out how to calculate it precisely, but I would think that after you pass a 1:1 ratio (wall thickness
to internal diameter) that you pass the point of diminishing returns. Technically no matter how thick the tube already is,
making it thicker will always help, even if it has a miniscule effect.
There are more than just eddy currents that you're dealing with. The tube itself acts like a shorted turn. If you cut a slit
all along the length of the pipe, the magnet will fall much faster.
|
I want a rough idea so I don't waste material, basically this device I am making must be light weight and any wall thickness over what is required is
extra weight that is doing nothing.
"I would think that after you pass a 1:1 ratio (wall thickness
to internal diameter) that you pass the point of diminishing returns"
I had actually thought this too but its simply a guess on my part and don't know if it is correct or not. Whats your logic behind this 1:1 ratio?
Actually correction my guess was that 1:1 for radius not diameter, so for a 12mm dia sphere that would be a wall thickness of 6mm. Its a pure guess
and don't know if it is correct or not.
[Edited on 15-12-2013 by D4RR3N]
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
Edited: stupid math mistake.
Looking at a cross-section of the tube, if the tube were divided up into a number that approaches
infinity of insulated concentric rings of a thickness that approaches zero:
A tube with an internal diameter of 10mm and an outer diameter of 30mm would have a
DC resistance around the outer surface that approaches three times that of the inner surface.
That would mean that additional increases in thickness would not decrease the overall resistance
much. This is rather subjective, though.
The assumption that there is an infinite number of insulated concentric rings, however, is not
accurate, since the tube is a solid piece of metal. Therefore, the above estimate doesn't account
for eddy currents and skin effect, which among other things, depend on the speed of the magnet
travelling past the metal. This is pretty much where my ability to help falls flat.
[Edited on 16-12-2013 by WGTR]
|
|
|
D4RR3N
Hazard to Others
Posts: 271
Registered: 9-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by WGTR | Looking at a cross-section of the tube, if the tube were divided up into a number that approaches
infinity of insulated concentric rings of a thickness that approaches zero:
A tube with an internal diameter of 10mm and an outer diameter of 20mm would have a
DC resistance around the outer surface that approaches three times that of the inner surface.
That would mean that additional increases in thickness would not decrease the overall resistance
much. This is rather subjective, though.
The assumption that there is an infinite number of insulated concentric rings, however, is not
accurate, since the tube is a solid piece of metal. Therefore, the above estimate doesn't account
for eddy currents and skin effect, which among other things, depend on the speed of the magnet
travelling past the metal. This is pretty much where my ability to help falls flat. |
Thanks WGTR! With an internal dia of 10 and an external dia of 20 that is a 1:1 ratio of radius to wall thickness which was also my guess, interesting
at least that we came to the same conclusion but for me it was more of a gut feeling then actually using logic to work it out...still two heads is
better then one!
Another thing I was thinking of was instead of using a solid bar which is heavy to segment the bar by running deep grooves at regular intervals on a
lathe, so for example 2mm grooves 2mm wide spaced 2mm apart and leaving 1mm wall thickness at the bottom of each groove.
[Edited on 16-12-2013 by D4RR3N]
|
|
|
Master Triangle
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 24-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
For giving it the maximum fall time you should use copper, it gives quite noticeably longer fall time for the same or thinner walls. If you are going
for low cost however I would recommend getting a catalogue from a local aluminium supplier and finding the thickest one that matches your magnet (up
to about a diameter of about twice the magnet). And machining groves in the wall will increase the resistance and reduce the electromagnetic
opposition that it can provide.
Have look at the conductivities of aluminium alloys, as far as I know the more pure the metal the lower the resistance. Consider using a smaller
magnet as that will require a smaller and cheaper tube.
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Try a silver tube for maximum effect  It has the highest conductivity of all
metals, and will sustain the best eddy currents. Another fun thing to try is cooling your tube with liquid nitrogen (or dry ice, easier to come by).
As you cool the metal its resistance goes down, further increasing eddy currents and slowing the magnet even more.
In a completely different application of Lenz's Law, my friend built an electromagnetic coil gun using some scary-looking capacitors and a flat coil
of thick copper wire. Placing an aluminum hard drive platter atop the coil and discharging the capacitors into the coil creates a huge, short duration
electric field. This induces eddy currents in the aluminum disk in opposition, and the corresponding magnetic fields cause the disk to launch into the
air. One time we had access to liquid nitrogen and cooled the disk with it, then tried a launch. It easily flew 100 feet straight into the air,
probably double the height we were able to achieve at room temperature.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1376
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Without wanting to hijack this thread, this made me wander if it might be possible to separate particles of different metals with a rapidly varying
magnetic field.
Consider a stream of vertically falling metal powder with a magnetic field of increasing magnitude (in time), with the flux horizontally and
perpendicular to the stream of metal powder. Would particles of different metals be deflected differently, effectively separating them?
If so, this might be a quite useful method for recycling metal-containing waste.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
The difference in particle size and shape would probably swamp the difference in conductivity among metals.
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Interesting idea, though. If your recycling center had several grinding steps to shred the metals into uniformly-sized small particles, I'd bet there
would be some effect. That would be an awesome experiment if practical - ball mill several different metal powders together (or just buy all the same
mesh size), then subject them to such an electric field as they fall down a long tube and see what happens.
|
|
|
Master Triangle
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 24-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That is definitely an interesting idea but I believe that the induced magnetic field in each particle would attract them together in clumps like iron
filings rather than separate them. I believe that I have heard of an electromagnetic "kicker" being used to separate high-conductivity metals from
low-conductivity ones though, it would be used in metal recycling and I guess would push the items out of falling rubbish?
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
