Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  
Author: Subject: What's the big deal with alpha and beta sources?
hodges
National Hazard
****




Posts: 525
Registered: 17-12-2003
Location: Midwest
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 18-11-2004 at 15:49
What's the big deal with alpha and beta sources?


According to the United Nuclear web site, the only alpha source legal to possess in the US without a license is Polonium 210. Furthermore, I note that if you buy this source you only get 0.1 uCi wheras the other sources have 1 to as much as 10 uCi for a comparable price.

I also read somewhere that tritium is not legal to posess in the US for private individuals. This is a very low energy beta emitter.

OTOH, there are plenty of (presumably legal) gamma emitters to choose from.

So why would this be the case? I always thought alpha was the least dangerous form of radiation and gamma by far the most dangerous.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mr. Wizard
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1042
Registered: 30-3-2003
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-11-2004 at 17:10


I don't know why the alpha sources are hard to get, expensive, or illegal, but they are definitely not less dangerous, just dangerous in a different way. Although the Alpha radiation, a Helium nucleus, is stopped by a few inches of air, a piece if paper or some other minimal shielding, it is still extremely dangerous if it gets inside a living organism, say as a dust on the surface of the lungs or mixed with food and incorporated into your cell structure, or under your skin where it can cause cancer and cause all sorts of problems, just like it's 'long legged' cousins Beta and Gamma. Alpha particles are highly ionizing, and can do terrible damage to living cells. It is also rather hard to detect at a distance by the normal "Geiger Counter" type detectors. The Alpha detectors have a very delicate film on them, and almost have to touch the object to detect the Alpha output. If they touch an Alpha source, they are almost useless until they can be cleaned. Some Alpha emitters also put out other radiation, so they can be picked up by the secondary or from daughter products, by a Geiger type tube. Don't underestimate these sources. Alpha radiation can also stimulate neutrons from other materials, Beryllium for example. With neutrons you really get into the realm of Alchemy ;-) Maybe that's why they are hard to get?



View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnWW
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-11-2004 at 17:37


"Alpha radiation can also stimulate neutrons from other materials, Beryllium for example." In fact, the action of radium-226, an alpha-emitter, on beryllium-9 is the standard method for generating neutrons, e.g. for neutron activation analysis, and for making heavier isotopes of elements.

In general, the heavier the radioisotope, the more energetic (and dangerous) is the radioactive emission. This is why the energy of the betas emitted by tritium is so low.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-11-2004 at 18:54


Tritium can be used in thermonukes, so that's probably why it's banned. Anyway, its a stupid law. Besides, it can be found in glow-in-the-dark gun sights.



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
neutrino
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: oscillating

[*] posted on 18-11-2004 at 20:27


I seriously doubt that that one large-scale use of the stuff would warrant a massive ban on it. I think it’s just due to the fact that it’s a radioactive <i>gas</i>, so if it is released, it could (theoretically) be relatively dangerous.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Oxydro
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 152
Registered: 24-5-2004
Location: NS, Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: distracted

[*] posted on 19-11-2004 at 04:14


Quote:
Originally posted by neutrino
.... I think it’s just due to the fact that it’s a radioactive <i>gas</i>, so if it is released, it could (theoretically) be relatively dangerous.


That may well be the case, but it's kind of ridiculous, don't you think? How long does a gas like tritium hang around for, really? As opposed to something like radon, which is heavy enough to accumulate in basements etc. I suppose if you react tritium with anything you could get some nasty radioactive compounds ( "super-heavy" water, anyone ?:D) but that automatically removes the whole uniqueness of the fact that it's a gas!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
neutrino
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: oscillating

[*] posted on 19-11-2004 at 14:46


I suppose that I'm just a man of too few words... What I was thinking was along these lines: tritium is released into the atmosphere, you inhale some, some decays in your lungs, more sticks around after diffusing into your bloodstream and you get cancer.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

wink.gif posted on 18-12-2004 at 09:06


When tritium is realeased into the atmosphere, it goes up (hydrogen, get it?:P), so much doesn't hang around.:D



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
*****




Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-12-2004 at 13:30


Polonium has to be legal otherwise all tobacco products should be banned. I don't know why, but for some reason tobacco contains a much higher concentration of polonium than anything else.



One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-12-2004 at 16:41


IIRC, tobacco plants also absorb the uranium in the phosphate fertilizers applied to them. Then you have a beta emiter in your lungs...very healthy:P



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
JohnWW
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-12-2004 at 01:53


The same plants that selectively absorb Se, of which there are many, can be expected to also similarly absorb Te and Po.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr. BOOM
Banned





Posts: 14
Registered: 15-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

biggrin.gif posted on 20-12-2004 at 01:28
Go to the junk shop!


try finding some 1970's fire alarms and rip out the ion chambers! You will get an excellent alpha.beta source that will do 40,000 CPM on a gammascout rad meter.

Americum 241 is VERY active material** worse than Radium.

or you could look for photographers Uranyl Nitrate..sometimes sold on ebay or at speciality shops. Its moderately radioactive beta emitter.

Allof these sources are legal and can be bought without a licence.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-12-2004 at 16:28


Dr. BOOM: nice try!
Radium is a high energy gamma emitter and if IRC alpha and beta too, and americium is alpha and *very* low energy gamma emitter, or it wouldn't be used in smoke detectors. However, even modern smoke detectors contain it, but in milligram quantities.




\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
neutrino
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: oscillating

[*] posted on 20-12-2004 at 18:19


He might have been referring to the rate of particles being emitted, and not their energies. Am-214 emits particles ~3 times as fast as the corresponding sample of radium.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Marvin
National Hazard
****




Posts: 995
Registered: 13-10-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-12-2004 at 23:16


Dr BOOM is correct about everything except the beta emission.

A modern ionisation based smoke detector will also be fine. While they are legal to buy, it is illegal to remove the source.

Radium last I looked was alpha only, but it has some short halflife daughters that produce a lot of beta and gamma. I figure the amount of Am in a smoke detector is more like nanogram amounts.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nick F
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 439
Registered: 7-9-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-12-2004 at 04:59


IIRC, I calculated the amount to be about half a microgram (L*T(1/2)=ln2, A=LN...). Or maybe I calculated power output to be about half a microwatt. Hell, I can't remember! There's not much, anyway. A guy on ebay was selling a milligram sample a year or so ago, I think it went for about $200.
Fairly large activities of polonium can still be had as anti-static brushes, I've seen 100uC! So that's a good alpha source. For gamma, try thorium compounds, gas mantles, or old camera lenses. I have a lense about 3/4" accross that's hotter than six mantles! Or extract thorium out of welding rods using electrolysis or H2O2. Then a mm of Al will shield out alpha and beta. A pure beta source is more difficult. Uranium compounds are good beta emitters, but there's gamma in there too. Maybe K40 could be seperated as some sort of crown ether complex with fractional crystalisation..? Would be a nice experiment!




View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-12-2004 at 11:38


Any more details on how to purify thorium? I've got welding rods and gas mantles.



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Dr. BOOM
Banned





Posts: 14
Registered: 15-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

biggrin.gif posted on 21-12-2004 at 15:26


Quote:
Originally posted by Marvin
A modern ionisation based smoke detector will also be fine. While they are legal to buy, it is illegal to remove the source.


I have several older firealarms some with larger than usual amounts of Am 241, and some with Radium. They are all over the "safe" level of activity...say 40,000 CPM---- I have one source that measures 81,500 CPM on alpha ---- its a Radium source.

The UBC physics guys help measure the activity with their Geiger counters--- they got rather interested really fast :)
BAAADDD. Very BAAADDD indeed... i'd be willing to sell it :) .... jokin' of course.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-12-2004 at 15:39


Where did you get these detectors?:o



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Dr. BOOM
Banned





Posts: 14
Registered: 15-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-12-2004 at 02:15


A local junk shop of course.

Hey HNO3, you want one of these sources sent to you? I'll gladly go searching for one...

[Edited on 22-12-2004 by Dr. BOOM]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-12-2004 at 09:52


A radium source would be nice. My lab boss authorised my to go up to $30 fro the source and S&H. :cool:



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
J-scan
Banned





Posts: 3
Registered: 22-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-12-2004 at 10:21
a newby posting here: not a newby to experiments


Hey...that man is telling the truth. Those 70's Firealarms are wickedly radioactive. It can't Am241----its just too darn hot. I have a few older radioactive sources but nothing that comes close to 81,000 CPM ---- several of mind are in the upper 60 K range. Some older ion chamber had double sources and those could hit the 80 k range.

It is ILLEGAL to send those types of sources through the mail system unfortunately




---expand your mind-------
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-12-2004 at 10:32


Bummer. I guess I'll have to make a container out of my 1/2" thick lead plate and ship it to Dr. BOOM with my money order. At which point he'll put the detector in and crimp it shut and ship it back to me.:D Oh, and I never knew it was illegal, either. ;):cool::D:P
Check out his shipping methods. http://www.theodoregray.com/PeriodicTable/Elements/090/index...




\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
J-scan
Banned





Posts: 3
Registered: 22-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-12-2004 at 10:35


activity is beyond what any mail courier system would allow.. sorry



---expand your mind-------
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-12-2004 at 12:16


The obvious solution: I'm shipping some lead to a costumer. With an innocent face, of course.



\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
 Pages:  1  

  Go To Top