Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: vessel shape opinions needed
Funkerman23
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 416
Registered: 4-1-2012
Location: Dixie
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-2-2014 at 23:57
vessel shape opinions needed


First let me ask forgiveness if this is a spoon feed request. My intent is not to be lazy; I just don't know how I would search for the answers to the following questions or where to look.
I have been trying to find a good reaction vessel for some time. But given the cost this looks like I'll be able to buy one good one and that's it( for a few years it seems). With that limitation in mind and knowing that this will be used for a lot of preparatory work: would you. if in the same scenario, buy a spherical shaped or a cylindrical shaped reaction kettle? Again assuming you only can buy one and you will use this later on for many preparations.
Opinions, and advice are very much appreciated and needed here.Comments and feedback are needed and welcomed as well. Thank you for your time and I wish you the best.




" the Modern Chemist is inundated with literature"-Unknown
View user's profile View All Posts By User
confused
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 244
Registered: 17-3-2013
Location: Singapore
Member Is Offline

Mood: tired

[*] posted on 12-2-2014 at 00:17


what exactly will you be using it for?

that would determine the shape/type of the reaction vessel
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2659
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-2-2014 at 07:28


It is hard to clean a real cylinder, so if you can find a cylinder with a nice round bottom, that it the best option, otherwise, I would just go spherical. What size and type are you looking for, if you post what you most desire, someone might turn out to know where to find it, or have one available. I have had weirder things happen.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Muffn Man
Harmless
*




Posts: 45
Registered: 12-11-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

thumbup.gif posted on 12-2-2014 at 13:30
Opinion


If/when you figure out what you want, check out Dr.Bob's "Glassware Inventory.xls" list on page http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=15667&...

Many have ordered from the good Doctor, including myself and all of us have given rave reviews following excellent transactions/service/price/selection/communication.

I am not a puppet animated by Dr.Bob...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DJF90
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-2-2014 at 15:04


I suppose the key question is what size do you have in mind, and is the vessel jacketed (and do you have a heater/cooler system suitable). Both types of vessel have advantages and disadvanges, and share many common features.

"Cylindical" vessels typically come with a conical or round bottom, and may or may not be baffled. They will generally have a BRO (bottom run-off) valve to empty the vessel/perform phase separations/transfer slurries to filter. Get one which is jacketed as heating and cooling will be a real pain in the arse otherwise. You need to use mechanical stirring with a cylindrical vessel, but this is not a bad thing. Cleaning will typically be done by charging sequential portions of solvent and "boiling out" the vessel (to dissolve residues) and emptying, very similar to pilot plant operations.

"Spherical" reaction vessels are typically the "smaller scale" rbf. Heating can be performed with heating mantles, oil baths, air baths etc and cooling can be done with a bucket/bowl of ice/dry ice-acetone. Larger reaction flasks usually (advantageously) come with a flange neck for easy filling, emptying and washing, and a variety of different lids allow for different equipment/ancillary glassware arrangement. Stirring can be magnetic (especially on small scale) but mechanical stirring is also accomodated. I've done reactions using 20L flange pots before. Transfers are done using vacuum lines, and phase separations are perfomed in stationary 10L sep funnels. Mixing of the phases is done in the reaction pot. Filtration of solids is a very manual job requiring the chemist to lift and pour but is good exercise. Approx. 1 kg of material can be processed per batch on this scale (as a rough indicator)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Funkerman23
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 416
Registered: 4-1-2012
Location: Dixie
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-2-2014 at 20:41


Right now I am limited in size. if I want to use my mantles 2 liters is the max I can go without buying a new one and a suitable variac. My biggest concern is if I go with a larger size, it will have to be cylindrical, to be used on a hotplate but if I ever need to put it under a vacuum I dunno how well that will work and for how long. Long winded dreck was edited out, Dr bob makes a good pint though: a big part of buying this thing is to make difficult to clean reactions less of a nuisance.

[Edited on 13-2-2014 by Funkerman23]




" the Modern Chemist is inundated with literature"-Unknown
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top