Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Two "gear pumps" as an internal combustion engine
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 09:15
Two "gear pumps" as an internal combustion engine


There are many new internal combustion engine designs. When power to weight ratio is crucial, the rockets use turbines(to power the main pumps of their liquid fuel engines), in the simple case they are pressure fed with moderately powerful monopropellant.
Cant we put two gear pumps(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gear_pump.png) and get the efficiency of a diesel engine in a smooth working very compact package?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
IrC
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline

Mood: Discovering

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 11:08


Quote: Originally posted by Ral123  
There are many new internal combustion engine designs. When power to weight ratio is crucial, the rockets use turbines(to power the main pumps of their liquid fuel engines), in the simple case they are pressure fed with moderately powerful monopropellant.
Cant we put two gear pumps(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gear_pump.png) and get the efficiency of a diesel engine in a smooth working very compact package?


While most big trucks today use turbines, for decades many had 8:71 blowers. Nothing new. If you are talking fuel pump, that idea was also old in the 70's. Very dangerous, a belt driven gear type fuel pump. Caused many a disaster back in the day. I know as drag racing was a hobby of mine long ago. The car I drove on the street every day did 10.82 seconds at 147.3 MPH in the quarter mile in it's first run at International Speedway back in 1973. They had a racing class where people could drive in off the street and drag race. Even more fun was driving back home from East St Louis to Lake of the Ozarks with both 4" headers left in the trunk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercharger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roots-type_supercharger




"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
*****




Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 11:28


<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wankel_engine" target="_blank">Wankel engine</a> <img src="../scipics/_wiki.png" />



View user's profile View All Posts By User
IrC
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline

Mood: Discovering

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 11:51


Hey I forgot about that one. Brings back memories of big stories decades ago about how we were all going to be running them in ten years, but by the 80's the seal problems were still unsolved for everyday commercial production. IIRC (but I could have just read they wanted to but didn't), I remember limited production of a car that spent it's days in recall shops. Did not read that whole wiki but did they ever solve that problem?




"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 12:27


What makes a centrifugal or inline turboprop more efficient engine then the idea with two gear pumps-one is the compressor and the other at the exhaust with combustion chamber between them?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
froot
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: refluxed

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 12:54


Gear pumps by design are perfectly suited for high pressure applications because back pressure won't reverse the pump if the drive ceases, meaning that the drive won't need to overcome back pressure before it can start feeding more media in the intended direction of flow. So, if you connect 2 of these with a combustion chamber in between all you'll achieve is an elaborate pipe bomb because any pressure generated will not flow through and rotate any of the gear pumps. Gear pumps are also best suited for media with lubricating properties such as oil because of the tight tolerances with which the parts are made. If you run a hydraulic gear pump dry in air it will seize in minutes rendering it unusable.



We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ral123
National Hazard
****




Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-2-2014 at 13:04


Quote: Originally posted by froot  
Gear pumps by design are perfectly suited for high pressure applications because back pressure won't reverse the pump if the drive ceases, meaning that the drive won't need to overcome back pressure before it can start feeding more media in the intended direction of flow. So, if you connect 2 of these with a combustion chamber in between all you'll achieve is an elaborate pipe bomb because any pressure generated will not flow through and rotate any of the gear pumps. Gear pumps are also best suited for media with lubricating properties such as oil because of the tight tolerances with which the parts are made. If you run a hydraulic gear pump dry in air it will seize in minutes rendering it unusable.

Thanks for the answer, it's really logical about the lubrication part, but isn't that how superchargers work? Also I don't see how such pump wont spin under pressure, but yes, maybe it will overheat and wear, because normally friction is not nice in the jet engine speeds and temperatures.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Thread Pruned
20-2-2014 at 13:18
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Thread Split
20-2-2014 at 13:21

  Go To Top