Turner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 197
Registered: 2-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Why are some explosives louder than others?
I have detonated 20g of RDX before as well as 20g ETN. The ETN was much louder. The RDX makes a muffled thud noise, I would even say that this charge
wasn't even as loud as the small aerial burst fireworks, ETN makes a Bang, although RDX provides just as much damage. Is this because ETN creates more
heat upon detonation? According to this, what would be a relatively loud explosive? Maybe one that has aluminum powder in composition?
Never seen ANFO or ammonal explode, but I am sure ANFO wouldn't be nearly as loud as ammonal exploding. What about an over aluminized ammonal
composition?
[Edited on 26-2-2014 by Turner]
|
|
|
numos
Hazard to Others
Posts: 269
Registered: 22-2-2014
Location: Pasadena
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm just taking an educated guess but I think it has something to do with the explosion velocity, the faster the pressure wave travels the louder it's
going to sound.
Edit:
Perhaps also the burn rate? Because RDX has a higher explosion velocity than ETN... Not sure if heat plays a role although heat would contribute to
more expansion of gases.
I know what you mean though - but maybe it's not necessarily louder, just a different sound a sharp bang as opposed to a deep boom. A higher pitch
tends to sound "louder"
[Edited on 2-26-2014 by numos]
|
|
|
DrAldehyde
Hazard to Self
Posts: 82
Registered: 12-1-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes, I hope somebody jumps in with the basics here. I have been wondering the same thing. I haven't come up with a search string that gets the answer
I am looking for. Like the report of a shotgun vs a high power rifle. Same question with explosives. Some give you a thundering rich euphoric booming
sound vs. a sharp ringing painful sound. An explosive sound primer if someone doesn't mind.
|
|
|
goldenoranges
Harmless
Posts: 42
Registered: 25-1-2014
Location: Huge Corrugated Pipe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Giddious
|
|
I think it does have to do with detonation velocity. Some things detonate super fast, make a very loud crack, other things like black powder in a CO2
Canister, haha, are still loud but a bit duller because it takes a bit longer to fully detonate, and the sound waves are still loud but last a bit
longer.
Knowledge is the Ultimate Power.
PGP Key is in Bio
|
|
|
Motherload
Hazard to Others
Posts: 245
Registered: 12-8-2012
Location: Sewer
Member Is Offline
Mood: Shitty
|
|
It doesn't have much to do with VOD as ETN and RDX are close enough.
I would suspect the actual frequency of sound being different. The decibel output is probably very similar but the human ear perceives them
differently.
Kinda like the same lumen output lights ... Green seems brighter than red.
There might be a link between the by products generated upon detonation to the frequency of sound.
Like if more CO is produced as opposed to CO2 .... It sounds not as loud.
[Edited on 26-2-2014 by Motherload]
"Chance favours the prepared mind"
"Fuck It !! We'll do it live !!"
|
|
|
hyfalcon
International Hazard
Posts: 1003
Registered: 29-3-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I know a small amount of flash sounds louder than the same quantity of ANAl when used for reactive targets.
|
|
|
Praxichys
International Hazard
Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Coprecipitated
|
|
This thread has useful information:
Why is FP louder than fast detonation?
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Apropos very little in particular ─ I have a nervous cat who panics over loud noises and one night some time ago, what I assume was a small
battery, exploded with a loud, sharp crack in my open fire and my cat ignored it completely . . .
I assume the sudden noise didn't register because of its very short duration!
As to the noise produced by detonation of HEs, it is the same for explosives of similar force, obviously ─ the perceived differences arise due
to charge-positioning, wind velocity/direction, topology and various other factors . . .
|
|
|
VladimirLem
Hazard to Others
Posts: 204
Registered: 24-5-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Have no fear <Vlad> is here.
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Turner  | I have detonated 20g of RDX before as well as 20g ETN. The ETN was much louder. The RDX makes a muffled thud noise, I would even say that this charge
wasn't even as loud as the small aerial burst fireworks, ETN makes a Bang, although RDX provides just as much damage. Is this because ETN creates more
heat upon detonation? According to this, what would be a relatively loud explosive? Maybe one that has aluminum powder in composition?
Never seen ANFO or ammonal explode, but I am sure ANFO wouldn't be nearly as loud as ammonal exploding. What about an over aluminized ammonal
composition?
[Edited on 26-2-2014 by Turner] |
i dont know, but ETN will detonate high order at even small quantities like 20g....RDX is less sensitive and may be just pratialy/low order
detonated?
Released heat is of course a very important thing at this question....supressors at handguns cools down the expanding gasses, but its not like
hollywood movies it gives still a realitive loud bang...
Anfo: AN, Motoroil (C)
Ammonal: AN, AL, Carbon containing stuff and TNT
yes...i guess, Ammonal will detonate louder^^, without the TNT, i doubt it will be much louder...but yes, ANFO is a "scilent" explosive compared to
stuff likne ANNM, ETN and so on...
too many AL in an explosive will just fuck up the oxygen balance...i doubt that there will be a significant louder bang
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Lots of speculation here, to which I'll add (having no experience in energetics myself, but having a physics background): I tend to agree with the
view that velocity has a lot to do with it. High velocity would produce a stronger pressure wave, which could sound louder than a longer duration
"boom." Apparently to the human ear, the duration of a sound plays a role in "loudness" determination. The wikipedia article on Loudness (sort of
surprising that that is a real thing) has a great section discussing this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness#Explanation
But what would be really valuable is to see some actual data. First, measure the sound output of equal amounts of your substances under identical
conditions (i.e. confinement) and see if one is actually louder (not just perceived). Then we can ask why. As I've seen in someone's signature around
here:
"There is no need to argue if an experiment can be made."
- H. St. C. Deville
|
|
|
NeonPulse
Hazard to Others
Posts: 417
Registered: 29-6-2013
Location: The other end of the internet.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Isolated from Reality! For Real this time....
|
|
im not really sure but it may have something to do with the density of the charge,as well as VOD. A 10g etn loose packed seems louder than 10g of etn
cast. in the past i was able to hear a few NM+amine or nitric combinations and the PLX formulas seemed to have an echoing and fast crack kind of sound
while the nitric sensitized NM was more of a boom. mhn seemed a little quieter than i expected also. ANNM has a more heady sound than ANFO too. this
topic has caught my attention so i think i may do a little research on it ....
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
We have done tests with identical size (volume, not weight) & configuration but different compositions, with groups of people listening, judging
& placeing them in perceived order of "loudness".
The order we shoot them in changes the relative loudness perceived. The distance to those listening and judging changes the relation too- High pitched
brissant explosions that get a low placement close up may get a much higher one from listeners far away.
And very seldom do these subjective orders match those done with a dB meter, unless there is a large discrepancy in size/weight between devices.
So, if in addition to all of these factors, you are judging explosions heard on different days and at different distances? I give up. No meaningful
data to had here.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
Ral123
National Hazard
Posts: 735
Registered: 31-12-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If let's say 15g flash are heard louder then 25g highly pressed RDX at let's say 15m distance in the open. I'm not convinced at 100m people won't find
the RDX louder.
|
|
|
Dany
Hazard to Others
Posts: 482
Registered: 3-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The duration of the shock wave play an important role in how you hear the explosion. When an explosive is detonated, the shock front will propagate in
air at supersonic speed. The amplitude (overpressure) will decrease with distance but the duration of the shock will increase. This why you hear a
sharp sound when you are close to the detonated charge. the sound will become broader and broader (similar to a thunder sound) when you are farther
and farther from the detonated mass of explosive. The comparasion between RDX and aluminized explosive is not correct (even if the charge have the
same mass). RDX is a nearly ideal explosive while aluminized explosive like ammonium perchlorate/Al or ammonium nitrate/Al are highly non-ideal and
this effect is reflected in the blast wave generated from each explosive. RDX has a higher performance (higher detonation velocity and dtonation
pressure) than ammonium perchlorate/Al or ammonium nitrate/Al. However, the later non-ideal explosive can have higher blast pressure due to the
afterburning of aluminium in air (aluminium burning is enhanced by turbulence due to the Rayleigh-Taylor instability generated at the interface of
detonation products/ambient air).
Dany.
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
I think duration is a factor but the reason this question seems difficult is due to more than one variable simultaneously as well as the rate of
change of variables involved. The rate of change over time of both the volume of gas displacement and rate of change in velocity of the gas molecules.
The difference in sound from a safe distance of say dynamite (which hits you in the gut as a large slow pressure wave) and the sharp report of a very
fast (high brisance - high shattering capability) material. While considering the way the mechanism in the ear works which allows the perception of
sound.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
papaya
National Hazard
Posts: 615
Registered: 4-4-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: reactive
|
|
I have a feeling that the shape of the charge as well as the point where it was initiated (where detonator is located) may contribute to the effect,
since the propagation of the wave exiting the charge is not uniform in all directions (correct me if wrong). It would be interesting if you try 2
identical cylindrical charges initiated same way from one end, one placed vertically and the other horizontally on the ground such as the end
opposite to the initiation is directed to the observer.
|
|
|
Turner
Hazard to Others
Posts: 197
Registered: 2-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Papaya, if this is true, then does a charge lose effectiveness if it is initiated on the side (i.e tape a blast cap to the side of a cylinder of TNT,
vs a cap placed in the center in the hole). The propagation throughout the material takes longer if initiated from the side than the center, would the
explosive behave differently and create a slightly different affect? How about exploding bridge wire detonator throughout the mass so all material
detonates virtually at once?
I think this question came up once and the answer is no, the performance in either case is basically the same... HMMMMM
|
|
|
papaya
National Hazard
Posts: 615
Registered: 4-4-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: reactive
|
|
Honestly I don't know, I just imagined that a cylindrical relatively long charge initiated from one end would yield the strongest wave from the
opposite end compared to sides. I want to hear the expert as well.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
