JefferyH
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 7-5-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Do stronger bases create stronger nucleophiles?
Very nooby question... I know....
If there is a compound that can be deprotonated by a base to give a nucleophilic enolate. Does a stronger base create a stronger nucleophile? Versus,
if a weaker base was able to deprotonate the same compound? Or does the strength of the nucleophile depend on the molecule itself and not the base use
to deprotonate it?
|
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think it's a combination of both. Please correct me if I'm wrong
Good eyes
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4278
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
If you're deprotonating HX to give X-, the nucleophilicity of X- will not depend on the strength of the base you're using to deprotonate HX, although
a stronger base may give you a higher concentration of X- at equilibrium.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
JefferyH
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 7-5-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That's what I assumed but I wasn't entirely sure. That helps a lot! Thanks!
|
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by JefferyH  | | If there is a compound that can be deprotonated by a base to give a nucleophilic enolate. Does a stronger base create a stronger nucleophile? Versus,
if a weaker base was able to deprotonate the same compound? Or does the strength of the nucleophile depend on the molecule itself and not the base use
to deprotonate it? |
The type of the base can have a strong influence on the nucleophilicity of anions, particularly of the ambiphilic nucleophiles. This is not due to the
base itself, but due to its counter-ion. This effect can be either irrelevant in highly polar protic solvents (such as water, lower alcohols, etc.),
or it can have an extremely strong effect in non-polar solvents.
See this thread for more info.
Obviously though, this has nothing to do with the strength of the base. The pKa of the base influences the proton transfer equilibrium point (and
trough this it affects the rate of the reaction), but the strength itself it has no effect on the nucleophilicity (counter-ion effects and possible
effects from the coordination with the base protonation product are not necessarily related to the "strength").
…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being
unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their
scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)
Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
|
|
|
madscientist
National Hazard
Posts: 962
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: American Midwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Basicity is thermodynamic, nucleophilicity is kinetic. Strong bases can be poor nucleophiles, and vice versa. For example, Hunig's base isn't much of
a nucleophile, but it's a hell of a lot more basic than CN-, and will deprotonate HCN easily. Steric hinderance and delocalization of charge are the
most common ways to increase the strength of a base while diminishing nucleophilicity. On the other end of the spectrum, things like the alpha effect
become important - hydroxylamine is more nucleophilic than ammonia, and yet, it is less basic.
I weep at the sight of flaming acetic anhydride.
|
|
|
JefferyH
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 7-5-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Here's a question. I was going to make a new thread for this but realized it could be tied into this one.
I was reading over a paper where the authors claimed the [totally deprotonated] potassium tert-butoxide enolate of a dicarbonyl was not reacting with
the electrophile at any appreciable speed (less than 1% after 5 hours). The authors switched to potassium metal to deprotonate the substrate (forming
the dipotassium salt), and it reacted to over 80% in an hour. There were no further comments made on this. The authors do make causual remarks about
the reaction being effected by steric hindrance, but they make no specific reference to the butoxide ions. Out of 30 different substrates tested, only
one of them (which didn't react at all as a butoxide enolate) was tested with potassium. So I am not sure if this specific case is included when they
remark about steric hindrance effecting the reaction, or if there is another mechansm unbeknownst to me.
I realize tert-butoxide is more sterically hindered than a lone potassium atom, and this decreases its nucleophiliticity, but does this also mean that
enolates of tert-butoxide are more sterically hindered and this itself can limit the reaction? As I understand it, the strength of the nucleophile
doesn't always depend on the base that deprotonates it as said above.
Is this an explanation for why this reaction did/did not occur, the base was adding too much steric hindrance for the nucleophile to attack the
electrophile?
[Edited on 15-5-2014 by JefferyH]
|
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You forgot to add the reference.
Surely you don't believe anyone can answer that without knowing what you talk about or before reading the article?
PS: An enolate is an anion, so there is no such thing as a "butoxide enolate". Utmost you can have a potassium enolate (and the tert-butanol
residue from the consumed base).
|
|
|
JefferyH
Hazard to Self
Posts: 97
Registered: 7-5-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sorry I don't have a digital copy. I have in front of me a brief physical copy of a paper we were given.
What I was asking is whether or not the carbons on the tert butyl are capable of blocking the site of deprotonation to an appreciable extent if the
molecule (being deprotonated) is already sterically hindered. The question applies to any molecule. I am asking about the behavior of how these bases
deprotonate.
These molecules on this paper are not named either, there are just pictures of them, at least on these pages I have. Being dicarbonyls, a good
majority of them, it seems the potassium portion would be much more free to move, as opposed to the tert butyl. Do the bases stick around nearby to
these molecules while the molecule is deprotonated? Allowing steric factors to influence the molecules nucleophilicity when trying to attack an
electrophile?
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4278
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
You have a physical copy- does it give the authors? Title? Publication date? Page number?
If the t-butoxide deprotonates the diketone, then the t-butanol formed really has no reason to hang around the enolate formed, so why would it
sterically hinder it?
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
