Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Poll: Should we get a section on how to get cheaper chemicals
yes --- 17 (60.71%)
no --- 11 (39.29%)

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Should we get a section on how to get cheaper chemicals
kclo4
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 913
Registered: 11-12-2004
Location:
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-12-2004 at 22:28
Should we get a section on how to get cheaper chemicals


I think it would be nice because a lot of people seem to have no clue were to get a lot of common chemicals I know it would probably save people a lot of money and time I personally wish I new the naclo3 was used as a pesticide before I started boiling bleach it would be nice for the beginner chemists and I would love to know were to get Mg :)

But that just me

Is it possible to add a new section?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Pyrovus
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 241
Registered: 13-10-2003
Location: Australia, now with 25% faster carrier pigeons
Member Is Offline

Mood: heretical

[*] posted on 28-12-2004 at 22:32


Isn't that what the Reagents and Apparatus Aquisition section's for?



Never accept that which can be changed.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Joeychemist
National Hazard
****




Posts: 273
Registered: 16-9-2004
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: Sedated

thumbup.gif posted on 28-12-2004 at 22:33
Great idea


The explosives and weapons forum has the great OTC survey, I don't see any reason why sciencemadness shouldn't have one.:)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
BromicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2938
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline

Mood: Anxious

[*] posted on 28-12-2004 at 22:47


I am a Fish has his famous Readily Avalible Chemicals website which is fairly comprehensive. That suffices for most of us since we lack sticky threads it is a good repository for this information.



Shamelessly plugging my attempts at writing fiction: http://www.robvincent.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Joeychemist
National Hazard
****




Posts: 273
Registered: 16-9-2004
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: Sedated

[*] posted on 28-12-2004 at 22:51


O yes I forgot about that. That is a very good list indeed, but I'm sure it can be updated;)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
cyclonite4
National Hazard
****




Posts: 480
Registered: 16-11-2004
Location: is unknown
Member Is Offline

Mood: Amphoteric

[*] posted on 29-12-2004 at 03:57


The only problem i can think of with compiling a list of available chemicals and their sources, is that it helps k3wls get all the 'k3mic4ls' they need to make '30m35'.

Otherwise I think they are very helpful :D




\"It is dangerous to be right, when your government is wrong.\" - Voltaire
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
kclo4
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 913
Registered: 11-12-2004
Location:
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 29-12-2004 at 04:08


You can’t get rid of k3wls only they can

The more chemicals obtainable the more likely the more likely thy are to fuck up ;)

we have to tell them to kill them
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
cyclonite4
National Hazard
****




Posts: 480
Registered: 16-11-2004
Location: is unknown
Member Is Offline

Mood: Amphoteric

[*] posted on 29-12-2004 at 04:32


Quote:
Originally posted by kclo4
You can’t get rid of k3wls only they can

The more chemicals obtainable the more likely the more likely thy are to fuck up ;)

we have to tell them to kill them


I guess if you look at it in that light, you could appreciate sites like TOTSE, they practically instruct you on 'how to kill yourself unknowingly' :D




\"It is dangerous to be right, when your government is wrong.\" - Voltaire
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger

  Go To Top