Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Nomenclature - group abbreviations
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline

Mood: Copious

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 14:28
Nomenclature - group abbreviations


Often, things like Ethyl Acetate are abbreviated EtOAc. Does anyone happen to have a list of the common abbreviations? I think they ought to be standardized. Silly, I know, but I at least want to have one standard out there as to make those abbreviations official - ish.
I'd rather not have opinions on this endeavor, but I wouldn't mind if you all posted the ones you use. I use Ac for acetate and Et for ethane, Me for methane, Pro for propane, Bu for butane, and Iso for ProO, but that's about it. What do you all use?
A list, once compiled, will be available at http://ptp.x10.mx/chemabbrv.txt
Thanks!
Nathan




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 14:40


Would it not make sense to have them in capitals, or curly brackets or something ?

AlOH is silly.

[Al]OH is less silly, but looks ionic,
{Al}OH even,
or Al&OH

I like the last one best. Ampersand is probably unused in chemistry so far.

[Edited on 6-7-2014 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline

Mood: Copious

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 14:55


Quote: Originally posted by aga  
Would it not make sense to have them in capitals, or curly brackets or something ?

AlOH is silly.

[Al]OH is less silly, but looks ionic,
{Al}OH even,
or Al&OH

I like the last one best. Ampersand is probably unused in chemistry so far.

[Edited on 6-7-2014 by aga]

I was thinking ' symbol before it or after it, or maybe the ` symbol. & looks too much like programming. Were you saying Al as in aluminum, or some organic thing?




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
arkoma
Redneck Overlord
*******




Posts: 1761
Registered: 3-2-2014
Location: On a Big Blue Marble hurtling through space
Member Is Offline

Mood: украї́нська

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 15:01


I use "DMK" a lot in my own notes--Dimethyl Ketone=acetone



"We believe the knowledge and cultural heritage of mankind should be accessible to all people around the world, regardless of their wealth, social status, nationality, citizenship, etc" z-lib

View user's profile View All Posts By User
ScienceHideout
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 391
Registered: 12-3-2011
Location: In the Source
Member Is Offline

Mood: High Spin

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 19:45


Quote: Originally posted by The Volatile Chemist  
Pro for propane,
Nathan


Interestingly enough, I believe that the IUPAC actually supports such nomenclature. EtOH is a lot easier formula for ethanol than CH3CH2OH. However, I just wanted to correct you on one thing...

Pr is propyl- there is no 'o' after it. Propanol is PrOH, not ProOH. Then the O would be too redundant :)

By the way, there are quite a few. Butyl is Bu, Aryl is Ar, etc.




hey, if you are reading this, I can't U2U, but you are always welcome to send me an email!


View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
*****




Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline

Mood: Incommensurately modulated

[*] posted on 6-7-2014 at 19:55


I object!

PrOH is praseodymium(I) hydroxide, not propan-1-ol!




At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kavu
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 207
Registered: 11-9-2011
Location: Scandinavia
Member Is Offline

Mood: To understand is to synthesize

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 01:50


For isomeric alkyl side chains additional n, i or sec or tert are usually added. So we have n-BuOH, i-PrOH, tert-BuOH and so forth. Lists of these abbreviations are widely avaliable in orgo textbooks. There's no reason to try and reinvent this wheel.

[Edited on 7-7-2014 by kavu]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 02:02


Quote: Originally posted by The Volatile Chemist  
I use Ac for acetate and Et for ethane, Me for methane, Pro for propane, Bu for butane, and Iso for ProO, but that's about it.
They are all wrong. I suggest that you open a book and re-learn the basics.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Praxichys
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Coprecipitated

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 05:48


All of this is pretty straightforward.

EtOH - ethyl alcohol (use this format for alcohols)
AcOH - acetic acid (use this format for carboxylic acids)
EtOAc - ethyl acetate (use this format for esters)
Et2O - diethyl ether (use format for ethers)
Ac2O - acetic anhydride (use for simple carboxylic anhydrides)

And there are the simple alkyls... Me-, Et-, n-Pr-, i-Pr-, n-Bu-, sec-Bu-, t-Bu-, etc. Don't forget Ph-, Bn-, Bz-.

Then the myriad of solvent abbreviations... DCM, TCM, THF, DMSO...

Honestly though, these things become obvious when you get through something like Org 1. Here's a start. http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/local/organic/tutorial/Abbreviations....




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline

Mood: Copious

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 06:45


Quote: Originally posted by Brain&Force  
I object!

PrOH is praseodymium(I) hydroxide, not propan-1-ol!

I know! Ac is technically Actinium, but it's kind of obvious what it represents when it's negatively charged. I saw Pro once used on Wikipedia (I know, GREAT source...), so I decided to use that so no confusion could come.

Quote: Originally posted by forgottenpassword  
Quote: Originally posted by The Volatile Chemist  
I use Ac for acetate and Et for ethane, Me for methane, Pro for propane, Bu for butane, and Iso for ProO, but that's about it.
They are all wrong. I suggest that you open a book and re-learn the basics.

Excuse me??? According to people posting here, only some are "wrong" abbreviations, according to IUPAC, but in reality none can be "wrong", as I said I use them on my own, and asked others what they used.
I don't know why you attacked like that, either. I certainly don't try to come across as haughty on this forum, as I'm sure most people can attest. I know I don't know very much about organics, but that doesn't mean I need to "re-learn the basics". I found that statement so out-of-place that I'm still not sure if you're just trolling me, or weren't paying attention to what I posted.

I see the silliness of making yet another standard as some of you said. I certainly didn't know IUPAC accepted abbreviations. Does anyone know if they actually have a list of the accepted ones? (Thanks for the PDF above, interesting ones in there. Is THAT the standard for IUPAC, or just some common ones)
Thanks for putting up with my slight lack of knowledge in this subject.
Nathan, TVC




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 07:09


In this thread I see Ac being misused a few times (e.g. negatively charged, named acetate). Ac stands for acetyl, being the H3C-C(=O)-group.

Some common compound of this are:
- AcCl (acetyl chloride, CH3COCl)
- AcOH (acetic acid, CH3COOH)
- NaOAc (sodium acetate, CH3COONa)
- AcAc (diacetyl, a light yellow/green diketone smelling like butterscotch, CH3COCOCH3)
- AcOAc (acetic anhydride, CH3CO-O-COCH3)

As you see, Ac does not occur as a negatively charged particle Ac(-), formally it should be assigned oxidation state +1 in many of its compounds, and only the particle OAc(-) has negative charge in the acetate ion.

[Edited on 7-7-14 by woelen]




The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline

Mood: Copious

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 07:48


Quote: Originally posted by woelen  
In this thread I see Ac being misused a few times (e.g. negatively charged, named acetate). Ac stands for acetyl, being the H3C-C(=O)-group.

Some common compound of this are:
- AcCl (acetyl chloride, CH3COCl)
- AcOH (acetic acid, CH3COOH)
- NaOAc (sodium acetate, CH3COONa)
- AcAc (diacetyl, a light yellow/green diketone smelling like butterscotch, CH3COCOCH3)
- AcOAc (acetic anhydride, CH3CO-O-COCH3)

As you see, Ac does not occur as a negatively charged particle Ac(-), formally it should be assigned oxidation state +1 in many of its compounds, and only the particle OAc(-) has negative charge in the acetate ion.

[Edited on 7-7-14 by woelen]

Interesting... I have a few old books, like Chemical Calculations, which use it like acetate. Sorry, i didn't know...




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
forgottenpassword
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 374
Registered: 12-12-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 09:14


Quote: Originally posted by The Volatile Chemist  

Quote: Originally posted by forgottenpassword  
Quote: Originally posted by The Volatile Chemist  
I use Ac for acetate and Et for ethane, Me for methane, Pro for propane, Bu for butane, and Iso for ProO, but that's about it.
They are all wrong. I suggest that you open a book and re-learn the basics.

Excuse me??? According to people posting here, only some are "wrong" abbreviations, according to IUPAC, but in reality none can be "wrong", as I said I use them on my own, and asked others what they used.
I don't know why you attacked like that, either. I certainly don't try to come across as haughty on this forum, as I'm sure most people can attest. I know I don't know very much about organics, but that doesn't mean I need to "re-learn the basics". I found that statement so out-of-place that I'm still not sure if you're just trolling me, or weren't paying attention to what I posted.

You DO need to re-learn the basics.
Ac is acetyl
Me is methyl
Et is ethyl
Pr is propyl
Bu is butyl
"Iso for ProO" is nonsensical.
As I said, they are all wrong.


[Edited on 7-7-2014 by forgottenpassword]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-7-2014 at 10:03


The Volatile Chemist, first of all, these are not true abbreviations. They are the so called "shorthands" (shorthand notations, representations or formulas). Some structural groups are so common or useful that the synthetic chemists adopted some shorthand notations for them. Some of the ones you listed (Ac, Et, Me, Bu) are used and adopted shorthands that already have their assigned meaning (acetyl, ethyl, methyl, n-butyl). Essentially what forgottenpassword said is correct: you did got them wrong, because you reassigned them a different meaning (asserting ones own definition without consent is considered wrong in most cultures, science included). Also "Iso" is too close to the Latin "isomeric" prefix "iso", so you can't use that either. The shorthand notation for propane is PrH, not Pro.

The major problem with these shorthands is in that they are most commonly used in combination with chemical symbols which can be a source of confusion, because some of these shorthands actually are identical to some symbols (as it was already noted in this thread: Ac and Pr). I try to avoid using Ac and Pr in articles (an alternative to Ac is MeCO), but they are not so much a bother when they are used in organic synthesis journals (how much organic chemistry there is with praseodymium and actinium anyway?).

The other problem is in some historical confusion. For example, there is a confusion between benzyl (Bn) and benzoyl (Bz), because the older volumes of Chemical abstracts used Bn for benzoyl (or was it the opposite?).


Edit: The last pages of JOC's guidelines for authors has a list of abbreviations and shorthands. (In relation to AvBaeyer's comment bellow)

[Edited on 9/7/2014 by Nicodem]




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AvBaeyer
National Hazard
****




Posts: 644
Registered: 25-2-2014
Location: CA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-7-2014 at 20:21


I believe that the American Chemical Society has a list of "standard" (for the ACS anyway) abbreviations for a multitude of terms. This is usually published in the first issue of the year for journals such as J Med Chem, J Org Chem, etc., under instructions for authors. Perhaps this list is generally accessible at the ACS website.

AvB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pomzazed
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 15-9-2008
Location: In th' Lab
Member Is Offline

Mood: Acylated

[*] posted on 13-7-2014 at 06:13


These shorthand name are quite widely accepted. They are commonly used "formula" even in the publication entity if the title is related to organic chemistry!
(So don't keep arguing AcOH is actinium(I)hydroxide :D lol)

Bunches of them can be found in either
- Name Reaction Handbook (in appendix);
- Organic Chem Textbooks (they used, but most of them are regularly used as so it doesnt show abbrev table in some books!)

The short chain alkyls all have a symbol for it:
Me; Methyl
Et; Ethyl
Pr; Propyl
Bu; Butyl
which can be tailored to show isomerism like t-Bu (tert-butyl) or s-Bu (sec-butyl) (also notice the italics s and t)

The group itself also have their own representatives:
R: Alkyl group (include alkenyl and alkynyl)
Ar: Aryl group (any aromatics)
X: Halogen
(Thus, ArOH shows phenolic-like moeity and not Argon Monohydroxide:o)

Many common synthesis moeities (especially if they are used alot in synthesis or as solvent) also have their own:
Ph; Phenyl
Bn; Benzyl
Bz; Benzoyl
Ac; Acetyl
Cy; Cyclohexyl
Ts; Tosyl (Toluenesulfonyl)
Bs; Brosyl (Bromophenylsulfonyl)
Tf; Triflyl (Trifluoromethylsulfonyl)
et cetera

They can be attached together with other "moeity", "radical" like:
PhH; Benzene
PhMe; Toluene
AcOH; Acetic Acid
AcOAc; Acetic Anhydride (sometimes Ac2O; and not actinium suboxide!)
EtOAc; Ethyl Acetate
TsOH; Toluenesulfonic Acid
TsCl; Toluenesulfonyl Chloride
EtOEt; Diethyl Ether (Et2O is also very common)
PhO-; Phenoxy anion
AcO-; Acetate anion
et cetera

Even in inorganic chemistry they also have these for ligands!
Cp; Cyclopentadienyl
Cp*; Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl (Ha! Good idea they used! the ligand looks really like a star!:D)
en; ethylenediamine (as ligand, all small lettercase)
bipy; bipyridine (as ligand, also all small lettercase)

So: FeCp2 is well known "formula" of ferrocene for inorganic chemists, and not Perferric Copernicide!


The confusion may also arise if you capture an ancient references, as at that time each publisher just choose their own shorthands, so you will see Ac both as Acetyl, Acetoxy, Acyl, etc.

But nowadays they are quite standard already...:)


[Edited on 13-7-2014 by Pomzazed]




Don't stare at me making fumes... I'm just experimenting with some gas...
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top