Blind Angel
National Hazard
Posts: 845
Registered: 24-11-2002
Location: Québec
Member Is Offline
Mood: Meh!
|
|
Reaction Speed (help for school)
Sorry about bothering you about my school project, but today we had a laboratory (test) on speed reaction so the teacher took all of us in the lab and
told us to do whatever we want as long as we proove how Speed of reaction can be mesured and modified. We have access to almost every hardware, for
chemical product we have:
CaCO3
Zn (powder and scrape)
Mg (Ribbon, powder and scrape)
HNO3 (1mol/l)
HCl (1mol/l)
NaOH (solution: 1mol/l)
CH3COOH (1mol/l)
Personaly i would have tried to do it with HBr and a base (the Bromine coloration would have disapeared gradualy so we would be able to time it), but
we don't have Bromine.
What i have tried:
I put a tube on a erlenmeyer and finished it with a U glass tube. I put the other end in a long glass tube (about half an inch of diameter) filled
with water with the end submerged in a becher also full of water. Since the long glass tube was graduated we decide to time of long it will take to
reach a certain predefined level. But here is the problem: or the glass tube was all filled in one shot or is was filling by big shot wich gave us too
much imprecision. In the erlenmeyer I tried to put:
50ml HCl/1g Mg(scrape)
25ml HCl/1g Mg(scrape)
25ml HCl/1g Mg(scrape)/1g Zn(powder)
10ml HCl/0.5g Mg(scrape)
10ml HCl/0.05Mg(scrape)
None of these tried work, but we have a second hour to work on it Monday. Any idea that could help me? Thanks
P.S Is HNO3 1mol/l can be usefull or it's too weak (for Nitration)?
|
|
|
KABOOOM(pyrojustforfun)
Hazard to Others
Posts: 254
Registered: 12-10-2002
Location: Iran (pseudoislamic dictatorship of)
Member Is Offline
Mood: exuviating!
|
|
I hope it's not late
u can do it without measuring the volume of hydrogen evolved just measure the mass of Mg (g) and the time it takes until it completely disappears (s).
Dn = mass/24.305
then use this formula:
Dn
RMg = - ----
Dt
RH2 = - RMg
RHCl = 2RMg
RMgCl2(aq) = - RMg
|
|
|
ahlok2002
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 10-12-2003
Location: malaysia
Member Is Offline
Mood: peace
|
|
speed of reaction in chemistry term rate of reaction....
normally to do so we need to identified the reaction equation of the particular reaction.
that may involved gas, liquid, or solid form whether the reactants or products.
the to measure the rate of the reaction we can measure in the form like pH , colour, volume, mass, concentration change....
that is many ways and instruments to do so like pH meter, optical density measurment....etc.
|
|
|
thunderfvck
Hazard to Others
Posts: 347
Registered: 30-1-2004
Location: noitacoL
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
25 ml's HCl/0.5g Mg (or something like that)
25 ml's HNO3/0.5 Mg
25 ml's acetic/0.5 Mg
Time all the reactions, stop timer when metal has completely reacted. From this you can say that stronger acids will react at a faster rate.
Then you can use powder instead of ribbon (or ribbon instead of powder) and you can use this to say how surface area affects the rate.
Then you can use the CaCO3, Mg, Zn, use them with some constant volume of HCl (or whatever), and see which one goes fastest. This has to do with the
effect of acid on different reagents.
I'm sure you can write up a nice report with that. And I don't think 1 molar HNO3 would be incredibly useful but if you were to obtain a
large volume you could always distill it to purify.
|
|
|
Hermes_Trismegistus
National Hazard
Posts: 602
Registered: 27-11-2003
Location: Greece, Ancient
Member Is Offline
Mood: conformation:ga
|
|
The highest expression of brilliance is the logical application laziness.
The fastest and easiest way to measure rate of reaction is to arrest that reaction in progress.
For instance you could begin with a known weight of metal strip and calculate its surface area exposed to reactants.
"length x width x height"
Allow to digest in acids for a series of set periods of time and then withdraw from solution, wash with distilled water and then mass remaining metal.
Graph the results.
Dilute the acids to known dilutions and repeat.
graph results.
Tabulate rate of reaction v.s. dilution of acids.
graph results.
Remember Hermes in your Nobel Prize acceptance speech.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics; even if you win: you\'re still retarded.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yep, remember Hermes, he's the one who gave you the expression for the volume rather than the area
Apart from that it's a neat solution.
BTW, if the problem with the original method was the reaction being too fast you can try diluting the acid.
Now, all I need is a time machine so I can post this in time for his lesson.
Nevermind, teachers tend to set the same pieces of work each year.
|
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
more complications
If you've dropped a block of metal into an acid before, you'll notice that the block gets smaller and less block-like over time. That is,
the surface area and the geometry are both changing as the reaction progresses.
You need to keep the geometry/area from changing. If you have metal scraps, you might be able to work like this:
Coat each metal scrap in hot wax.
In a well-defined area, remove the wax by solvent or mechanical means.
Allow acid to act on the scraps for a limited amount of time.
This should give you a reasonably uniform geometry/surface area for all of your samples. The flat surface exposed to the acid should be far greater
than the minor amount of perhaps-irregular material around the edges of the wax-protected area.
Of course this advice may be impractical, since 'wax' is not listed among your available materials, and it's probably too late anyhow.
PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
