Cappy
Hazard to Self
Posts: 92
Registered: 27-3-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
ICE-Advantages of N2O over O2
Although not street legal, N2O is sometimes used to increase rate that fuel can be burned by supplying an additional source of oxygen. Although N2O
contains a higher percentage of oxygen than air(33% vs. 21%), pure oxygen could be used. Oxygen gas contains twice as many oxygen atoms per mole of
gas as N2O. Both gasses can be easily condensed for high density in storage. Both cool the intake charge significantly by evaporating, further
increasing oxygen density. However, N2O is used and not O2.
I'm assuming that N2O has some practical advatage of O2, otherwise smart people would have been using O2 by now. Does N2O require less energy to
free oxygen atoms for combustion? Does the formation of triple-bonded N2 release greater energy? Is N2O cheaper or safer to bottle and use?
[Edited on 4/1/2003 by Cappy]
|
|
|
madscientist
National Hazard
Posts: 962
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: American Midwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
My guess would be that it has to do with the highly exothermic formation of N<sub>2</sub>.
I weep at the sight of flaming acetic anhydride.
|
|
|
a_bab
Hazard to Others
Posts: 458
Registered: 15-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Angry !!!!!111111...2?!
|
|
QUOTE: "Both gasses can be easily condensed for high density in storage"
Well, it's not true. While the N2O can be easily liquified, O2 cannot. This is due to the critical temperature of the oxygen.
|
|
|
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You can't use pure oxygen in an engine.
This would cause to rapid ignition and flame front dispersion which would cause the famous "rattling" or "bumping" of an engine,
because the piston head does not follow quickly enough because of it's inertia.
Secondly, the pure oxygen would severely corrode the piston in a very short time.
The N<sub>2</sub> acts as a reaction mediator because of it's relative inertia.
N<sub>2</sub> formation does not contribute to the reaction enthalpy as it's formation enthalpy is zero. I know that the bondenergy
is huge, but you may not include this when calculating enthalpy.
If you would want to, you would have to calculate with the bond breaking and formation energies of every bond that participates in
the reaction.
[Edited on 1-4-2003 by vulture]
One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
|
|
|
Theoretic
National Hazard
Posts: 776
Registered: 17-6-2003
Location: London, the Land of Sun, Summer and Snow
Member Is Offline
Mood: eating the souls of dust mites
|
|
Quote:
"I'm assuming that N2O has some practical advatage of O2, otherwise smart people would have been using O2 by now. Does N2O require less
energy to free oxygen atoms for combustion? Does the formation of triple-bonded N2 release greater energy? Is N2O cheaper or safer to bottle and
use?"
Correct. All of those contribute.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
