Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Silent discharge in preparative chemistry?
Jimmymajesty
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 145
Registered: 9-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-4-2015 at 14:06
Silent discharge in preparative chemistry?


Hi folks,

I am just wondering what useful chemicals could be made out of OTC chems with this method. As I understand you give energy to the molecule mainly without heating the rectants too much, it is like the socalled "microwave effect" I saw some papers on preparation of amino acids and hydrazine, but what else could be made with it?

It is completely doable with standard glassware so feel free to experiment and do not forget to post the results here!
Thanks!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7028
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 12-4-2015 at 15:26


Please read what you typed and try again.

Your post makes almost no sense at all (maybe to you).




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 2720
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".

[*] posted on 12-4-2015 at 17:42


Please give a link to your source material?

I will put this thread into "beginnings", at least until you provide some background references/documentation-




Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:

1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.

Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
Thread Moved
12-4-2015 at 17:42
Jimmymajesty
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 145
Registered: 9-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-4-2015 at 02:55


Hi,

I do not have references, the question is what woluld be the outcome if you refluxed simple chems like ethyl acetate through silent discharge, would it decompose? Can you induce molecular rearrangements of any sort with it?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
Thought-provoking Teacher
*****




Posts: 10334
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-4-2015 at 05:05


Explain what you understand by 'silent discharge'.

If you don't have any references at all, then where did the idea come from?




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Metacelsus
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2308
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Cambridge, MA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble

[*] posted on 13-4-2015 at 06:45


I think he means dielectric barrier discharge.



As below, so above.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HgDinis25
National Hazard
****




Posts: 439
Registered: 14-3-2014
Location: Portugal
Member Is Offline

Mood: Who drank my mercury?

[*] posted on 13-4-2015 at 11:55


Dielectric Barrier Discharge is just a fancy name for Silent Discharge. There are a few papers out there, concerning the decomposition of certain gases by Silent Discharge, like the two:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja01550a021
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/i260069a019

I didn't understand your system, though. Are you talking about having a continuous discharge in a reflux apparatus, for gas-phase decomposition? That's not easy. If you were able to get it working, though, Ethyl Acetate would probably decompose into dozens of different chemicals.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4229
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-4-2015 at 12:05


There is very little on preparative chemistry using silent discharge reactors. It's nearly only application in academic and industrial setting is for the production of ozone. Otherwise, a similar technology found its use in the plasma reactors used for depositing materials or surface etching.
There was some research into use of (modified) silent discharge reactors for the partial oxidation of alkanes to alcohols mainly, or generation of hydrogen from hydrocarbons. There was also some interest for their use in the decontamination of trace amounts of volatile organic compounds in the exhaust gases. But there is almost nothing more complex or interesting.
The reason is probably in its limitation to vapour phase reactions and due to the limitations imposed by the reactivity and instability of cationic species formed from the compounds being ionized. Any complex substrate, like organic compounds, would tend to undergo complex fragmentation (or complete oxidation in the presence of oxygen).




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
violet sin
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1222
Registered: 2-9-2012
Location: :14,15,9,20,1,3,15,12
Member Is Offline

Mood: doom

[*] posted on 13-4-2015 at 12:37


after reading the opening post I looked into the silent discharge research in hydrazine production. the paper I found was using reduced pressure oxidation of ammonia vapor. it stated that the hydrazine was produced exclusively in the positive column and was related to some of the other actions happening but also independent of some species entirely.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja01639a006#
_________________________________________
and this one has some interesting info as well,

" It has been found that sustained high yields of hydrazine may be obtained by passing a stream of ammonia through an extended glow discharge if the stream of gas is maintained under conditions of highly turbulent flow in its passage through the discharge and is eificiently cooled while it is in the discharge zone. "

http://www.google.com/patents/US2728723
_________________________________________

interested in this one also,

" The term electrolysis is conventionally applied to chemical changes brought about by passing an electric current between conducting electrodes dipping into a liquid phase containing ions, where the changes can be satisfactorily explained by electron transfer between the ions and the electrodes. If, however, the liquid phase is itself made an electrode and an electrical glow-discharge is passed to it from a conductor located in the gas space above the surface, a completely different situation arises in which novel chemical reactions can be brought about in the liquid phase, and this process is referred to as glow-discharge electrolysis (GDE). "

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-3000-4_5
____________________________________________

looks like I might have some research and papers to request when I get time to look around more. I LOVE electrochem
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Jimmymajesty
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 145
Registered: 9-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 15-4-2015 at 08:58


I finally had some time to try it out. I used 95% ethyl alcohol. Aluminum foil was wrapped around a column and a copper wire went all along in a zig-zag way inside the tube. I used a flyback transformer as a power source, switching it on without Et-OH it generated ozone as it should.

I set up the Et-OH for reflux, waited for 10 mins. Then switched on the H.V. source, the blue glow was apparent inside the tube but small to zero gas evolution could be observed (~2ml/min). I smelled inside the condenser but apart from the ozone-ish smell nothing special.

I do not really know how to do a better trial... The electric power trasferred to the Et-OH molecules was too little I think.

IMG_3658.JPG - 530kB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
violet sin
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1222
Registered: 2-9-2012
Location: :14,15,9,20,1,3,15,12
Member Is Offline

Mood: doom

[*] posted on 15-4-2015 at 10:49


Did you see the last link I provided? It said different effects take place when one electrode is below the surface. Could be more reactive and not too different that you would have to scrap the first setup entirely. At least worth a try I would wager
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Jimmymajesty
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 145
Registered: 9-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-4-2015 at 12:12


Yup, I tried it out out today with Et-OH, but nothing really happened apart from after some time the ethanol started to boil. I really do not see how this could be used to make anything at all, at least with my stuff.

I did another experiment today inspired by the patent attached.

I mixed ozone and acetaldehyde gas then bubbled them into 20°C water. The gas flow was around 5ml/sec for each feed.
But again nothing really happened... I even prepared for an explosion but the ozone and the acetaldehyde did not even react. After 30mins I put some KI crystals into the water and it turned yellow, so there were some ozone dissolved but also there was a strong smell of acetaldehyde. Thought they are easily forming acetaldyde monoperacetate so I boiled the resulting liquid but not a single trace of acetic acid, just acetaldehyde, so it appears they not.

Attachment: acetaldehyde monoperacetate GB877662A.pdf (393kB)
This file has been downloaded 328 times
View user's profile View All Posts By User
violet sin
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1222
Registered: 2-9-2012
Location: :14,15,9,20,1,3,15,12
Member Is Offline

Mood: doom

[*] posted on 17-4-2015 at 02:28


well that sucks( scientific term lol) I had hoped to see some results of some kind.

good one with pic's and diagrams
http://iesj.org/html/service/ijpest/vol1_no1_2007/4_Moon.pdf
" The effects of the third electrode on the discharge and ozone generation characteristics of a wire-plate type
nonthermal plasma reactor, with a slit dielectric barrier, have been investigated. When a third electrode is installed just
above the slit of the slit dielectric barrier, where an intense surface corona discharge occurred, it is found that a
significantly-increased ozone can be obtained, especially from a negative corona discharge. "

oxidative coupling of methane with AC and DC coronal discharge
http://coecs.ou.edu/Richard.G.Mallinson/PDFs/96iecr3295Liu.p...

plating in a coronal discharge
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ba-1969-0080.ch016
" It has been demonstrated that boron can be deposited on tungsten in a corona discharge. "

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Jimmymajesty
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 145
Registered: 9-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-4-2015 at 06:58


violet sin, thanks for the papers.

I tried out couple of things in the last days mainly with acetaldehyde.

I mixed ozonized air with acetaldehyde and let the gases into a temp. controlled reactor.
Above 100°C a bleach like smell was indicating that something was happening still I could not really condense anything after the reactor, (after 1 hour 0,1ml of oily liquid that was flammable and strongly smelled of formaldehyde+bleach) this was at 120°C, then I went above the ignition temp. of acetaldehyde (to 220°C) but this time nothing condensed at all.

Also I tried to use ozone as a catalyst in water at 40°C. I let the acetaldehyde into the water together with ozonized air, the acetaldehyde escaped as it entered, the smell again was somewhat formadehyde-ish but I think my nose was tricked by the smell of ozone because its smell is way stronger than that of acetaldehyde.
Then I added 2 ml of saturated copper acetate into the sparger without any detectable effect. The time frame for each experiment was around 1 hr, so they either proceeded very slowly or I was doing something wrong.

It seems the thread does not deseve much attention afterall...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
WGTR
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 867
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline

Mood: Outline

[*] posted on 19-4-2015 at 13:58


I have experienced silent discharges in the lab before. Thankfully, I was positioned in front of the fume hood. I merely opened the sash a little wider, and no one was the wiser.

This was a topic that I found fascinating back when I was trying to synthesize liquid hydrocarbons from common materials. The silent discharge was a general area of research in the late 1800's to early 1900's, but as others have mentioned, the main application today is ozone generation.

The following reference contains several experiments and experimental conditions with the silent discharge. It seems that the procedure works better when the electrodes are as close as possible together, a few mm at most. Enjoy.

https://books.google.com/books?id=1902AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA1542...
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top