SupFanat
Hazard to Self
Posts: 86
Registered: 26-4-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Astatine
Do you know anything about experiments with astatine?
Yes, I know, it's the second least stable element of the first 101 elements (the least stable is francium, the third least stable is radon). So... the
amounts must be really tiny.
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
so tiny in fact that all its chemistry is speculative... if you could somehow gather enough Astatine to be visible it would heat up so much and so
fast it would almost instantly blow itself apart....
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
I am led to believe that chemistry can be done on sub-visible quantities and discoveries made. I understand that work has been done to investigate
the chemical properties of Bohrium and Seaborgium.
However, this kind of research, while interesting, raises big questions about the meaningfulness of the discoveries made. If there is no possibility
of ever accumulating enough of a material for it to ever have any use or detriment then the discoveries are academic rather than pragmatic.
As far as anyone knows, astatine behaves as a halide. The same might not be true of ununseptium sitting below it.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1375
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
One important result of those experiments is that they allow us to test theoretical models of quantum chemistry. So the real result is not any new,
useful compound, but rather new, better theories.
Unusual relativistic effects come into play for electrons orbiting these highly charged nuclei and bonding with unusual orbitals.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1  | I am led to believe that chemistry can be done on sub-visible quantities and discoveries made. I understand that work has been done to investigate
the chemical properties of Bohrium and Seaborgium.
However, this kind of research, while interesting, raises big questions about the meaningfulness of the discoveries made. If there is no possibility
of ever accumulating enough of a material for it to ever have any use or detriment then the discoveries are academic rather than pragmatic.
|
The development of 'ultramicrochemistry' was largely the work of Glenn T. Seaborg's team, in pursuit of the transuranium elements. They developed
methods dealing with liquid quantities in the order of 10<sup>-1</sup> to 10<sup>-5</sup> millilitre. They also developed a
scale (the 'Salvioni scale') with a sensitivity of 0.02 microgram (10<sup>-3</sup> milligram).
| Quote: | | [...] then the discoveries are academic rather than pragmatic. |
Don't be so bloodymindedly utilitarian! 
[Edited on 16-5-2015 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
| Quote: | | Don't be so bloodymindedly utilitarian! |
I wasn't trying to be.
I am normally intrigued by the theoretical side of things and appreciate the exploration of quantum chemical effects even though the content flies
right over my head.
It seemed to me that the OP was after something of practical consequence.
|
|
|
councilxvb32
Unregistered
Posts: N/A
Registered: N/A
Member Is Offline
|
|
first to know it
|
|
|
ave369
Eastern European Lady of Mad Science
Posts: 596
Registered: 8-7-2015
Location: No Location
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Perhaps some futuristic superscience will find a way to prevent radioactive decay, and we well know what astatine looks and smells like... There's a
current theory called the "Weakless Universe". In it, it is proven that a universe with nonexistent weak nuclear force (and thus no beta decay) can
exist and is not internally contradictory. Atoms, elements and chemistry as we know them exist in this universe, but there is way more stable
isotopes, because neutron is stable and putting more of them in any nucleus stabilizes it. So maybe later we shall find a way to simulate a piece of
weakless universe in our own... Perhaps do some reverse polarity mumbo jumbo to the Higgs field that gives the W and Z bosons their mass, and make
them behave like photons... And ta-dam! Francium in ampoules! Hydroastatic acid! Salts of flerovium! Bibibium! Oh my!
[Edited on 30-7-2015 by ave369]
|
|
|
fluorescence
Hazard to Others
Posts: 285
Registered: 11-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: So cold outside
|
|
There is some chemistry on astatine in the Gmelin on Astatine but as all above said it's just calculated. But it's full with it's compounds and
reactivity what you can't really find on the net. But I don't think that we will ever work with that. Why would we ? We either discover new elements,
make a single atom of it to show that it exists and then continue with U an Pu.
|
|
|
careysub
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lowest quantum state
|
|
Read about the state of astatine chemistry circa 1960:
https://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?rc000018.pdf
Yes, work has been done with its chemistry in the lab.
Having a short half-life means you never have much, but is also means what you have is very easy to detect.
|
|
|
kjpmi
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 9-11-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemical-y
|
|
Thanks for the pdf. Great read!
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
