Pages:
1
..
30
31
32
33 
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


If i've seen all THAT before, call me a cobblerwonky and slap my bodkin with a thrice folded cornichon !
Alternatively:
Ah yes, of course.
I must take some time to consider such dazzlingly beautiful representations of awesome Mathematical Purity.
(buys enough time, hopefully, to run off and find the Mafs book, then frantically revise)


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Get over yourself! You know enough to revise this quite quickly!
Chop, chop...


j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 5139
Registered: 4102014
Location: Oz
Member Is Offline
Mood: Metastable, and that's good enough.


I had to look up what a cornichon is and I have no idea why it would be thricefolded.
The mathematics here is rather beautiful and elegant. But the initial concepts of complex numbers involve the intersection of numerous different
fields of mathematics as well as some counterintuitive ideas and some rather unfortunate terminology. Compounding this is the fact that computation
with complex numbers manually quickly becomes its own special headache. (I distinctly remember asking my maths teacher the value of
2^{i} and it taking him a long time to figure it out.)
The combined effect of this is that it easy to feel overwhelmed. But in reality it is not that daunting.


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


Cornichons are just Gherkins.
Overwhelmed, a bit, overimbibed, a lot.
Partake !
On the morrow i'll get some new car insurance.
After that, well, who knows ?


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1  (I distinctly remember asking my maths teacher the value of 2^{i} and it taking him a long time to figure it out.)

Even more "fun" are things like:
$$\sqrt [4]{6}$$
But we're not going there. "Lite" here means addition, substraction, multiplication and division only!
[Edited on 2112016 by blogfast25]


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


The car insurance got complicated, a bit like where i'm heading on this first (presumably easy) question.
So far i got some pythagoras going on to give :
$$ y = \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \frac {\pi}{4} } $$
Is this going in remotely the right direction, or is it an overthunk, drunk and sunk direction ?
[Edited on 2112016 by aga]


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by aga  The car insurance got complicated, a bit like where i'm heading on this first (presumably easy) question.
So far i got some pythagoras going on to give :
$$ y = \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \frac {\pi}{4} } $$
Is this going in remotely the right direction, or is it an overthunk, drunk and sunk direction ?
[Edited on 2112016 by aga] 
No, it is in fact correct but it's not the full solution.


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


Phew ! I was once again worried that i'd gone all around the houses for no reason.
So,
$$ y = \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \Big ( \frac {\pi}{4} \Big ) } $$
$$ x = \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \Big ( 90  \frac {\pi}{4} \Big ) } $$
The y part is the Imaginary bit, so, tentatively ...
$$ \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \Big ( 90  \frac {\pi}{4} \Big ) } + i \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \Big ( \frac {\pi}{4} \Big ) } $$
The LaTeX is coming back, slowly ...


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by aga 
$$ \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \Big ( 90  \frac {\pi}{4} \Big ) } + i \sqrt { \frac {1}{2} } \sin{ \Big ( \frac {\pi}{4} \Big ) } $$
The LaTeX is coming back, slowly ... 
... is basically correct but slightly strangely expressed. But, don't mix (360) degrees wit radians. Instead of:
$$90\frac{\pi}{4}\:\text{write}\frac{\pi}{2}\frac{\pi}{4}=\frac{\pi}{4}$$
But that transformation wasn't even necessary:
$$c=r\cos\varphi+ri\sin\varphi=\sqrt{\frac12}\cos\frac{\pi}{4}+i\sqrt{\frac12}\sin\frac{\pi}{4}$$
And with:
$$\cos\frac{\pi}{4}=\sin\frac{\pi}{4}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$$
$$\implies c=\frac12+\frac12 i$$
Quick backcheck:
$$r^2=x^2+y^2=\Big(\frac12\Big)^2+\Big(\frac12\Big)^2=\frac14+\frac14=\frac12$$
Thanks for playing!
Next installment tomorrow.
[Edited on 2112016 by blogfast25]


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


Mind: As boggled as a thing that can be boggled, but with extra boggleness.
Why was the expression 'strange' and where does 'c' some into it ?
Edit:
The notion of Radians did not enter my head, at all.
I recall that Raidans exist, but am not aware of what they are, apart from being an alternate way of expressing Degrees.
Gradians as well. Same story.
I would Google, but it's bed time, and Google does not always return the Best results.
[Edited on 2112016 by aga]


j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 5139
Registered: 4102014
Location: Oz
Member Is Offline
Mood: Metastable, and that's good enough.


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1  (I distinctly remember asking my maths teacher the value of 2^{i} and it taking him a long time to figure it out.)

Even more "fun" are things like:
$$\sqrt [4]{6}$$
But we're not going there. "Lite" here means addition, substraction, multiplication and division only!
[Edited on 2112016 by blogfast25] 
Division of complex numbers can be its own special kind of torture too. Fourth root of neg 6 is easy by comparison IMO. And yes, fun.


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by aga 
Why was the expression 'strange' and where does 'c' some into it ?
Edit:
The notion of Radians did not enter my head, at all.
I recall that Raidans exist, but am not aware of what they are, apart from being an alternate way of expressing Degrees.
Gradians as well. Same story.

c is just representation of a complex number.
Radians are NOT an "alternate way of expressing Degrees", rather it's the other way around. "Degrees" are a crappy nonmath way of expressing angles:
good for compasses and maps, rubbish for math.
In math a full circle is:
$$2\pi$$
So a quarter circle is a right angle or "90 degrees" or:
$$\frac{\pi}{2}$$
and half of that is "45 degrees" or:
$$\frac{\pi}{4}$$
Even "radians" is a misnomer: in the "2 pi system" angles are dimensionless numbers. They don't need a "name".
You invoked the famous trigonometric identity:
$$\sin\theta=\cos\big(\frac{\pi}{2}\theta\big)$$
That was fine but not really needed.
"Gradiants"? I think you meant gradients, the basis of differential calculus.
Manana!


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


Thanks for the explanations of Rads and Grads.
I really did not know what they meant.
Hasta mañana, Maestro.
(alt+164 for the n + tilde: changes it from 'n' to 'ny', hence 'manyana')


Maroboduus
National Hazard
Posts: 257
Registered: 1492016
Location: 26 Ancho Street
Member Is Offline
Mood: vacant


Gradians are 400ths of a full circle.
They were an option on various calculators in the 1980s.
At the time I heard they were used by some engineers.
Your memory is not faulty here.


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by Maroboduus  Gradians are 400ths of a full circle.
They were an option on various calculators in the 1980s.
At the time I heard they were used by some engineers.
Your memory is not faulty here. 
G*d yeah, I vaguely remember that now (not that I want to!)


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Complex numbers: complex conjugation
With c a complex number, c^{*} is said to be its complex conjugate, if and only if:
$$c=a+bi \implies c^*=abi$$
$$c=abi \implies c^*=a+bi$$
The product of a complex number with its own complex conjugate is the modulus of the complex number (and thus a Real number):
$$c^*\times c=(abi)(a+bi)=a^2+abiabi+(bi)^2=a^2b^2i^2=a^2+b^2\in\mathrm{R}$$
If a number is Real, conjugation has no effect:
$$c\in\:\mathrm{R}\implies c=c^*\implies c^*c=c^2$$
Flash back/flash forward to quantum physics:
Higher up in this thread we saw that the probability distribution P(x) in QP is given by, with psi the wave function:
$$P(x)=\psi^*(x)\psi(x) \in\:\mathrm{R}$$
Probabilities are of course always Real numbers:
$$0\leq P \leq 1$$
If psi is a Real function:
$$\psi\in\mathrm{R}\implies \psi^*=\psi\implies P(x)=\psi(x)^2$$
The term:
$$\psi^*(x)\psi(x)$$
... is often referred to as the Norm.
Wave functions for which:
$$\int_{all\:\mathrm{ space}}\psi^*\psi dV=1$$
... are said to be Normalised.
Next up: complex numbers basic operations > vectors >...
[Edited on 5112016 by blogfast25]


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


To be sure, what does the sigmalike symbol mean ?
$$c\in\:\mathrm{R}$$
I guessed at 'in the realm of' but then it all went odd.


Oscilllator
International Hazard
Posts: 659
Registered: 8102012
Location: The aqueous layer
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by aga  To be sure, what does the sigmalike symbol mean ?
$$c\in\:\mathrm{R}$$
I guessed at 'in the realm of' but then it all went odd. 
It technically means "in the set of" and R means "Real numbers" . Real numbers are just normal numbers that can be positive, negative and have as many
decimal points as you like e.g. 1, 1.3, 3.14159...
So c∈R means c is a sensible, nonimaginary number. There are other letters you can use like N for "natural number", which is all the whole positive
numbers and Z for integer, which can have negative numbers too.


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


If even Numbers have limits, they cannot be a linear sequence, which, in turn, makes even Numbers meaningless
The status of Zero has always bothered me.
Ponderment required.


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by aga  If even Numbers have limits, they cannot be a linear sequence, which, in turn, makes even Numbers meaningless
The status of Zero has always bothered me.
Ponderment required. 
Zero took a long time to get accepted: the other numbers didn't want to know it! But accepting it was a true revolution!
The first part of your ponderment is cryptic. Care to explain?


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


Sorry, i missed the question earlier.
It was some random drunken notion more than likely.
Something about Numbers spanning an infinity, yet allowing an infinity between each number.
0 to 1 (or 1) being an infinity, equal to, er, infinity, making 0 the only True number.
Every other number is infinitely distant from 0, and infinitely distant from the next number, making them all basically the same number.


j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 5139
Registered: 4102014
Location: Oz
Member Is Offline
Mood: Metastable, and that's good enough.


Quote: Originally posted by aga 
Sorry, i missed the question earlier.
It was some random drunken notion more than likely.
Something about Numbers spanning an infinity, yet allowing an infinity between each number.
0 to 1 (or 1) being an infinity, equal to, er, infinity, making 0 the only True number.
Every other number is infinitely distant from 0, and infinitely distant from the next number, making them all basically the same number.

Don't contemplate infinity for too long. Especially when drunk. You know that Cantor went mad don't you? He was trying to resolve the very
questions you have asked and eventually went nuts.
Not only are there an infinite number of numbers between any two given numbers (uncountably infinite actually), there are an infinite number of
infinities; each one infinitely bigger than the one that preceded it.


blogfast25
Thoughtprovoking Teacher
Posts: 10334
Registered: 322008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Complex numbers basic operations:
1. Addition and subtraction:
$$(a+bi)\pm(c+di)=(a\pm c)+(b\pm d)i$$
2. Multiplication:
$$(a+bi)\times(c+di)=ac+adi+bci+bdi^2=ac+(ad+bc)ibd=(acbd)+(ad+bc)i$$
3. Division:
Division is carried out by multiplying denominator and numerator by:
$$\frac{c^*}{c^*}=1$$
$$\implies\frac{a+bi}{c+di}=\frac{a+bi}{c+di}\times\frac{cdi}{cdi}\tag{1}$$
$$=\frac{(a+bi)(cdi)}{c^2+d^2}=\frac{acadi+bcibdi^2}{c^2+d^2}$$
$$=\frac{(ac+bd)+(ad+bc)i}{c^2+d^2}=\frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}+\frac{ad+bc}{c^2+d^2}i$$
4. Exponential complex numbers:
Euler's formula:
$$e^{ai}=\cos a+i\sin a$$
Complex conjugation:
$$(e^{ai})^*=e^{ai}$$
So:
$$e^{ai}=\cos ai\sin a$$
Exercise:
Using the 'trick' of (1), determine:
a)
$$\frac1c=\frac{1}{23i}$$
b)
$$\frac1i$$
Next up: vectors > functions as vectors > ...
[Edited on 7112016 by blogfast25]


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


$$\frac1c=\frac{1}{23i}$$
So
$$c = 23i$$
and
$$(23i)  (c  0i) = 0$$
Let a = 2, b=3, c=c, d=0, then with rule (1)
$$(2c) + (3+0)i = 0 = 2c+3i$$
Which basically winds up back at the start !?!?
Confused.


aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 2532014
Member Is Offline


To be 100% honest, i do not understand the first queston, nor how (1) applies.


Pages:
1
..
30
31
32
33 