Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4    6  ..  33
Author: Subject: Quantum Mechanics/Wave Mechanics in Chemistry Beginners Thread
j_sum1
Administrator
********




Posts: 6328
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline

Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 06:58


I have the cat skin. I still don't know if the cat is alive or dead though. :D

On the topic of thread contributions, I think it is much better in this case to keep the signal to noise ratio high. And with that, I will shut up for a while.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 07:37


Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1  
I have the cat skin. I still don't know if the cat is alive or dead though. :D



As long as you're not looking at her, she's both dead and alive! :P

[Edited on 22-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
annaandherdad
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 387
Registered: 17-9-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 10:22


Quote: Originally posted by Cheddite Cheese  
I have taken courses in linear algebra and vector calculus (but not Q.M.) so I know basically what the equation means mathematically. My question is: what does the constant factor (-Hbar^2/2m) physically mean?

[Edited on 15-7-2015 by Cheddite Cheese]


This constant factor is multiplied times the differential operator d^2/dx^2, that is, the term in the Schro"odinger equation is -(hbar^2/2m) x (d^2 psi/dx^2). This is regarded as (1/2m) times the square of the momentum operator p, where p is the differential operator -i hbar d/dx, that is, the term in the Schro"dinger equation is

-(hbar^2/2m) x (d^2 psi/dx^2) = (hbar/2m) x (-i hbar d/dx)^2 psi
= (p^2/2m) psi

(This is easier to understand if you write it out on the blackboard).

In classical mechanics, things you observe (energy, momentum, angular momentum, position of planet x) are just numbers, which may be functions of time in a particular system. In quantum mechanics, when you observe something (like the position or energy of an electron) you get a number, just like in classical mechanics, but unlike classical mechanics, the number you get isn't necessarily the same if you make the identical measurement on identically prepared systems. That is, there is a statistical distribution of the answers.

To calculate the statistical distribution of answers you need the linear operator associated with the observable. Every observable corresponds to a definite linear operator. The linear operator acts on wave functions psi and maps them into new wave functions. As I mentioned in the last paragraph, the linear operator corresponding to momentum is -i hbar d/dx.

How do we know this is the momentum operator? It was a guess of deBroglie. Einstein had been saying that a photon of energy E and momentum p was associated with a wave of frequency omega and wavenumber k, where E=hbar omega and p =hbar k. (omega and k are measured in radians; omega is radians/sec and k is radians/cm or radians per meter if you prefer). So deBroglie said, maybe this applies to massive particles as well. If so, a massive particle (like an electron) of energy E and momentum p must correspond to a wave of frequency omega=E/hbar and wave number k=p/hbar. That is, the wave must be

psi(x,t) = exp[i(kx -omega t)] = exp[i(px - Et)/hbar]

Now, deBroglie said, if we let the operator -i hbar d/dx act on this wave, we get

(-i hbar d/dx) psi(x,t) = p psi(x,t),

that is, the operator acting on the wave is the momentum times the wave. Historically this was how the momentum got associated with this particular differential operator. By the same logic, the energy is associated with the operatior (i hbar d/dt). (These are really partial derivatives, since psi depends on both x and t.)

To go back, the operator p^2/2m, which appears in one term in the Schro"dinger equation, corresponds to the classical number p^2/2m (where now p is a value, not an operator), which is otherwise mv^2/2 because p=mv, which is otherwise the kinetic energy. So, to answer your question, what this factor means physically, it means that this term in the Schro"dinger equation is the kinetic energy term. In fact, the Schro"dinger equation is an operator encoding of the classical energy relation,

p^2/2m + V(x) = E







Any other SF Bay chemists?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 10:35


Thanks AAHD:

I was trying to avoid Quantum Operators because they're hardly simple, for those with minimum math knowledge.

I might dedicate a small segment to them at the end of Part 1.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 10:37


Quote:
psi(x,t) = exp[i(kx -omega t)] = exp[i(px - Et)/hbar]

Phew. Head. Over. Whoosh !




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 11:44


Quote: Originally posted by aga  
Quote:
psi(x,t) = exp[i(kx -omega t)] = exp[i(px - Et)/hbar]

Phew. Head. Over. Whoosh !


It looks a lot worse without proper scientific notation.

Gimme five.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 11:48


High Five Bro (?)



View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 11:54


psi(x,t) = exp[i(kx -omega t)] = exp[i(px - Et)/hbar]

Ψ(x,t) = e<sup>i(kx – ωt)</sup> = e<sup>i(px – Et)/ћ</sup>

It’s the Time Dependent Schrodinger equation for a free particle:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/scheq.htm...

But in AAHD's formula the factor A (amplitude) is missing...

Neat, huh? [cough!]


[Edited on 22-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 12:00


Oh ! I see now !

[/lie mode off]

Hokay.

No. Just No.

I am very pleased that other people understand this very well, and can have fun and games with it.

Personally, i do not follow the maths at all, and i assumed the idea of this thread was to Teach rather than to be a discussion group for advanced theoretical mathematicians.

Yes, i am a drunken dullard because i do not grasp the idea even though i have been shown pitchforks, and should be left in the gutter where i belong.

If some Good Smaritan could summon some extra goodness, perhaps they could explain in simple terms what the Psi function is attempting to model, and how on earth you get from kx - ... to wx - ...

For starters, Schroedinger's equation for a time dependant particle in a matchbox is attempting to describe what exactly, how, and what does each term actually mean ?

[Edited on 22-7-2015 by aga]

[Edited on 22-7-2015 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 12:12


Or with Euler:

Ψ(x,t) = Ae<sup>i(kx – ωt)</sup> = A cos(kx – ωt) + Ai sin(kx – ωt)

Much better, huh? ;)




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 12:13


Quote: Originally posted by aga  

Personally, i do not follow the maths at all, and i assumed the idea of this thread was to Teach rather than to be a discussion group for advanced theoretical mathematicians.



That's a tad unfair. I'm keeping it as math lite as possible. Hard to do with QP. :o;);):D:):P:o

As I wrote above: I want to avoid the TDSE as much as possible. Forget about this interlude. 1,2,3... click and you're back in the room!


[Edited on 22-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 13:27


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
Ψ(x,t) = Ae<sup>i(kx – ωt)</sup> = A cos(kx – ωt) + Ai sin(kx – ωt)

To re-iodiotate,

Please Explain.

Psi function of x and t =
unexplained A mutiplied by presumably Euler's number
to the power of the square root of -1 multiplied by some random k minus some small buttocks multipled by t.


Obviously the following error or failure to understand is laughable !

fcs = (uint32_t *) &buf[len];
*fcs = swaporder(crc32(len-RTAP_SIZE, &buf[RTAP_SIZE]));

Belly laughs all the way when the Fool did not realise he should do a simple cast of the buf pointer to a const * uchar_8 ! How could he NOT know !?!?! Gfaw Gfaw.

Oh the joy that the partial mastery of a single paradigm must bring.


Now, where were we with a simpler explantion of the actual terms being used in that equation, and how they were arrived at ?

Edit:

said pitchfork(x,y) instead of (x,t)

[Edited on 22-7-2015 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 14:07


OK, G-ddammit, that's it, detention for you: ;)

Copy this text FIVE times, in LONGHAND: :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_particle#Non-Relativistic...

Oral examination on the material tomorrow! :cool:

[Edited on 22-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
annaandherdad
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 387
Registered: 17-9-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 14:23


Quote: Originally posted by aga  

Personally, i do not follow the maths at all, and i assumed the idea of this thread was to Teach rather than to be a discussion group for advanced theoretical mathematicians.


Sorry, aga, I was answering CC's question. I think different people here have different backgrounds. The formula, which bf25 made look much nicer, is the formula for a wave in complex notation. It's pretty standard in the theory of waves. deBroglie used it to connect the properties of a wave (its frequency and wave length) to the properties of the associated particle (its energy and momentum). I'll explain it if you want.

It was deBroglie's dissertation. Later Debye (a noted physicist at the time) commented that if there was a wave there had to be a wave equation. This motivated Schro"dinger to find his equation. It wasn't straightforward, because he tried to find the relativistic version of the wave equation first, and that's much more complicated. He gave up for a while, but later returned to the problem, this time looking for the non-relativistic version, which is the version usually known today as "the" Schro"dinger equation. The wave I wrote down is a solution for the case of a free particle.




Any other SF Bay chemists?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 14:33


Sorry for the outburst.

One was simply trying to make clear how little can be understood when there's a lot of Running before Walking.

Explaining would be very helpful, but please try to use simple terms, such as k is a constant you'll just have to accept, x is horizontal position in space etc.

As a noob, i do not immediately recognise Qdangle as anything at all.

@Blogfast25

Morning Orals have been banned since 2002 following the Jenkins vs Blogfast24 affair if you may recall, Sir25.





View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 15:35


aga:

The physical meaning of kx – ωt you should be able to grasp from the wiki link provided, including k and ω.

This should also help:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave#de_Broglie_relatio...

And maybe this too:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave#Phase_velocity_and_group_...

I do seriously suggest to leave all this aside for now. In chemistry (and that IS Part 2 of this little resume, if you recall) the TDSE is much less important.

In the example of a quantum system featured so far (particle in 1D box) time plays no part: the (time independent) SE explores the 'steady state' possible states of the system: E<sub>1</sub>, E<sub>2</sub>, E<sub>3</sub>, etc (and the associated wave functions Ψ<sub>n</sub>(x)) . We're not considering any CHANGES or how these occur. Change inevitably involves time (t) and the solving of the TDSE. Considering the added complexity of making the system dynamic (changeable in time) it's counter-productive here (but vital for a FULL QP description of a system).

Hope you understand.

[Edited on 23-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 22-7-2015 at 23:52


I think i was missing what the Result means.

Please stamp on any errors here :-

Ψ(x,t) computes a positive real number indicating the probability of a particle existing at position x at time t, given that it's Amplitude and frequency are known.

Ψ(x,t) = Ae<sup>i(kx – ωt)</sup> or much better
Ψ(x,t) = A cos(kx – ωt) + Ai sin(kx – ωt)

where :-

x = horizontal position
t = time
A = amplitude
ω = angular frequency (how fast the particle is spinning) given by 2πf where f = frequency in Hz
k = the 'wave number' = 2π/λ.
λ = c/f where c = the speed of light.

This was helpful :-
http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Schrodinger/Schrodinger.htm...




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 06:16


Ooopsie, not sure where this repetition came from.



[Edited on 23-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 06:17


aga:

One error: λ = c/f

That is true for electromagnetic waves, like light. But 'electron waves' are de Broglie waves. For matter waves (de Broglie waves) in general:

λ = h/p with p = mv

Now go back a bit to this:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/pbox.html...

In the box, the matter waves are 'standing waves'. What are the wavelengths λ?

Well, you can literally see this from the schematic:

for n = 1, λ = L/2
for n = 2, λ = L
for n = 3, λ = 3L/2
for n = 4, λ = 2L
for n, λ = nL/2

That was a good link, aga. I can see from that link I will be able to skip the treatment of the hydrogen atom altogether! :D:D


I know you're finding all of this hard but when I had Erwin Schrodinger and Werner Heisenberg in my class all those years ago, they found it hard too. Not to mention the endless food fights between them! ;)


[Edited on 23-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 08:10


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
λ = h/p with p = mv

Phew !

For absolute clarity :-

h being Plancks' constant right ?
and Ψ(x,t) does calculate a real number indicating the probability of finding the widget at x, t ?

Sorry if this is like wading through treacle for you, just that if i don't actually understand it, i just have to ask questions, or i never will understand it and be utterly lost.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 08:18


Quote: Originally posted by aga  
Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
λ = h/p with p = mv

Phew !

For absolute clarity :-

h being Plancks' constant right ?
and Ψ(x,t) does calculate a real number indicating the probability of finding the widget at x, t ?

Sorry if this is like wading through treacle for you, just that if i don't actually understand it, i just have to ask questions, or i never will understand it and be utterly lost.


h is Planck's constant, indeedy.

The probability of finding a particle at x,t is given by: P(x,t) = Ψ(x,t)Ψ<sup>*</sup>(x,t)

With Ψ<sup>*</sup>(x,t) the Complex Conjugate of Ψ(x,t).

For a free moving particle Ψ(x,t) is a complex function but as we've seen above for any complex number a:

a<sup>*</sup>a is always a Real Number. P(x,t) = Ψ(x,t)Ψ<sup>*</sup>(x,t) always returns a Real Number. Probabilities are of course real numbers (0 <= P <= 1).

Applied to a free moving particle:

Ψ(x,t) = Ae<sup>i(kx – ωt)</sup> = A cos(kx – ωt) + Ai sin(kx – ωt)

Ψ(x,t) Ψ<sup>*</sup>(x,t) = A<sup>2</sup>

Another thing that might help you is this: simple sinusoidal waves:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave#Sinusoidal_waves

In essence a wave is a harmonic oscillation, travelling through space (x) at constant speed.

Take a tuning fork, for instance. Hit the fork and it starts oscillating at the pitch (frequency) of its note. The oscillating fork 'pushes' against the elastic air and a sound wave travels with that pitch, at the speed of sound.


[Edited on 23-7-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 09:18


Ah Right. I missed the i hiding next to the A before the sin, so Ψ(x,t) isn't a real number.

OK. Thanks. By jove i got it !

[Edited on 23-7-2015 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 09:26


You'll be relieved that the next instalment is lighter. [cough! Must take some Benyllin]



View user's profile View All Posts By User
Darkstar
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 279
Registered: 23-11-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: Sleepy

[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 09:49


Quote: Originally posted by aga  
Yes, i am a drunken dullard because i do not grasp the idea even though i have been shown pitchforks, and should be left in the gutter where i belong.


The fact that you're even trying to in the first place already puts you light years ahead of the general population. No one said these concepts were simple or easy to understand. Don't be so hard on yourself.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-7-2015 at 09:58


Certificates of attendance will be handed out at the end of the course. Unless I lose the will to live before it! :)



View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2    4    6  ..  33

  Go To Top