Plan_B
Harmless
Posts: 4
Registered: 8-8-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
CCl4 Alternative ?
Hello.
I'm trying to brominate a cyclopentyl-ketone.
The literature dictates I use Bromine in Carbon tetrachloride.
What is a good alternative for CCl4 I can use ?
Thanks in advanced!
|
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Chloroform or even dichloromethane will likely work. As long as the solvent is inert to the reactants (including bromine), it can be used.
|
|
|
Plan_B
Harmless
Posts: 4
Registered: 8-8-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thank you for your answer!
|
|
|
kecskesajt
Hazard to Others
Posts: 299
Registered: 7-12-2014
Location: Hungary
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Chloroform isn't a great idea.It can be brominated.
|
|
|
Pumukli
National Hazard
Posts: 686
Registered: 2-3-2014
Location: EU
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
CCl4 has a bit higher boiling point than methylene chloride does. It may cause problems if the reaction temperature is expected to be above
say 40 Celsius.
But your question is still valid, it is not always straightforward to find a good alternative to "old-school" chemicals like CCl4.
Actually, sometimes I find an interesting synthesis which requires this compound as a solvent and I immediately try to substitute it (mentally) with
chloroform or methylene-chloride but sometimes I feel that it might just won't work.
Edit:
I see you found the alternative path: started to search for another brominating agent (NBS) and/or another recipe that does not require
CCl4. 
[Edited on 9-8-2015 by Pumukli]
|
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Chloroform is unlikely to be brominated under these conditions. A free radical halogenation with bromine requires very strong ultraviolet irradiation
and the reaction still is quite slow.
The boiling point of chloroform is likely not a major issue because its boiling point is higher than that of bromine. The temperature during the
addition of the bromine solution must be maintained low enough to prevent evaporative losses and boiling of the bromine. An ice bath is often employed
for this purpose. Dichloromethane may or may not be suitable depending on the temperatures expected to be reached during the reaction.
On a side note, the boiling point of carbon tetrachloride is only 15 degrees C higher than that of chloroform.
[Edited on 8-9-2015 by ParadoxChem126]
|
|
|
Praxichys
International Hazard
Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Coprecipitated
|
|
I have used tetrachloroethylene for such reactions with good success. It is relatively inert and is sold cheaply around here as automotive brake
cleaner in an aerosol can with carbon dioxide. It has a BP of 121C which makes it superior to chloroform and dichloromethane for these types of
reactions.
|
|
|
Oscilllator
National Hazard
Posts: 659
Registered: 8-10-2012
Location: The aqueous layer
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I believe this really only happens under the influence of UV light, so this shouldn't be to much of a problem for OP. Chloroform/dichloromethane is
commonly used as a dilutant for bromine so there isn't to much of a risk here.
|
|
|
kecskesajt
Hazard to Others
Posts: 299
Registered: 7-12-2014
Location: Hungary
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Oscilllator  |
I believe this really only happens under the influence of UV light, so this shouldn't be to much of a problem for OP. Chloroform/dichloromethane is
commonly used as a dilutant for bromine so there isn't to much of a risk here. |
UV light isn't avoidable.It will always make radicals.
But at this temperature,It is very slow.
|
|
|
CuReUS
National Hazard
Posts: 928
Registered: 9-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
can't you just use acetic acid ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketone_halogenation
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Tetrachloroethylene as mentionned above by Praxichys.
Also used as alternative to CCl4 in dry cleaning laundries!
But also:
Trichlorethylene.
Tetrachloroethane (1,1,2,2).
Tetrabromoethane (1,1,2,2).
CCl4 is toxic and hepatotoxic but so does on a lower extand CH2Cl2, CHCl3 and other halogenated hydrocarbons.
As long as you do it under a good hood using comon sense...you may work with CCl4.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
byko3y
National Hazard
Posts: 721
Registered: 16-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: dooM
|
|
Man, I was breathing with dichloromethane and chloroform fumes and I'm completely okay. Moreover, some time ago chloroform was used for analgesia. But
tetrachlorocarbon is dangerous, because is metabolized into phosgen. Unstabilized chloroform is also dangerous after long or improper storage.
Also, I don't get it how you are going to halogenate anything in unsaturated hydrocarbon - your solvent will be halogenated first. Correct me if I'm
wrong.
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by byko3y | Man, I was breathing with dichloromethane and chloroform fumes and I'm completely okay. Moreover, some time ago chloroform was used for analgesia. But
tetrachlorocarbon is dangerous, because is metabolized into phosgen. Unstabilized chloroform is also dangerous after long or improper storage.
Also, I don't get it how you are going to halogenate anything in unsaturated hydrocarbon - your solvent will be halogenated first. Correct me if I'm
wrong. |
Did you got a blood analysis to say you are completely OK?
In blood analysis you may get liver indicator of toxicity (hepato enzymes).
When I was working in an organic synthesis lab during summer for 1 month with lab T° around 35°C we were performing silica gel chromatography with
CH2Cl2 and even if working in a hood to fill the solvent, you had to open it somehow...you could see and feel the vapors of CH2Cl2 flowing outside the
hood.
Ambiant T° was very close to boiling point and so vapour pressure was high.
I had a blood analysis prior to the job and a second one afterwards and all hepatotoxicity indicators had increased by a lot. After a while away from
lab (jobless) a third blood analysis revealed all indicators back to normal.
So yes you can live without troubles for a while when working with HVOS (halogenated volatile organic solvents), but you may get troubles on the long
term...like professional painters that display after a few years nerve decay illness.
CHCl3 was used as aenestetic long ago, but was replaced because of its hepatotoxicity... so does chloral hydrate.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
FriedBrain
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 10-8-2015
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Something may be added: A friend of mine, a very good organic chemist told me once, that it can't be always that easy to change the solvent (e.g. in
a bromination), because the intermediates could change and you'll may the yields of the isomers change. But I can just mistaken him, but it sounds
possible.
But what you should take care of, is the reaction time/temperature, because Chloroform has some lower boiling point, I would at least reflux longer
(if necessary). If it's not necessary, I think Dichloromethane should work just fine.
You always have time to do some chemistry, but maybe you just have other priorities?
|
|
|
Sniffity
Hazard to Self
Posts: 70
Registered: 27-12-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Another issue which hasn't been raised yet is the environmental concerns related to the use of carbon tetrachloride. While you can certainly work
safely with CCl4 if you follow proper procedures; the environmental damage caused by CCl4 is still hard to avoid.
If I'm not mistaken, chloroform has much less environmental concerns than CCl4.
|
|
|
FriedBrain
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 10-8-2015
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Sniffity | Another issue which hasn't been raised yet is the environmental concerns related to the use of carbon tetrachloride. While you can certainly work
safely with CCl4 if you follow proper procedures; the environmental damage caused by CCl4 is still hard to avoid.
If I'm not mistaken, chloroform has much less environmental concerns than CCl4.
|
I'm sure he won't do this synthesis in a 100L scale, so the environmental damage is likely none, if he will work with proper precautions and don't
just let it all evaporate. Because it's pretty hard to get and so valuable everyone would work economical, so after the bromation the CCl4 can be
distilled to have some pure one again. No reasonable waste containing chlorinated hydrocarbons should be poured in the sink or environment of course.
You always have time to do some chemistry, but maybe you just have other priorities?
|
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
Can you stop making comments like this without sources or details? You might have derailed a completely valid synthesis.
|
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by byko3y | Man, I was breathing with dichloromethane and chloroform fumes and I'm completely okay. Moreover, some time ago chloroform was used for analgesia. But
tetrachlorocarbon is dangerous, because is metabolized into phosgen. Unstabilized chloroform is also dangerous after long or improper storage.
Also, I don't get it how you are going to halogenate anything in unsaturated hydrocarbon - your solvent will be halogenated first. Correct me if I'm
wrong. |
You are wrong, so I'll correct you. Halogenating aliphatic hydrocarbons, at least when the halogen is chlorine, bromine, or iodine, doesn't just
happen when you combine the two on their own at STP. The procedure for making chloromethanes, for example, requires very high temperatures and
pressure and perhaps a catalyst as well. Dichloromethane and chloroform are generally suitable solvents for bromination, as can be seen here: https://youtu.be/6tEs7P6UUVQ?t=15m30s
|
|
|
Sniffity
Hazard to Self
Posts: 70
Registered: 27-12-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Amos | | Quote: Originally posted by byko3y | Man, I was breathing with dichloromethane and chloroform fumes and I'm completely okay. Moreover, some time ago chloroform was used for analgesia. But
tetrachlorocarbon is dangerous, because is metabolized into phosgen. Unstabilized chloroform is also dangerous after long or improper storage.
Also, I don't get it how you are going to halogenate anything in unsaturated hydrocarbon - your solvent will be halogenated first. Correct me if I'm
wrong. |
You are wrong, so I'll correct you. Halogenating aliphatic hydrocarbons, at least when the halogen is chlorine, bromine, or iodine, doesn't just
happen when you combine the two on their own at STP. The procedure for making chloromethanes, for example, requires very high temperatures and
pressure and perhaps a catalyst as well. Dichloromethane and chloroform are generally suitable solvents for bromination, as can be seen here: https://youtu.be/6tEs7P6UUVQ?t=15m30s |
Shouldn't chains (3+ carbons) of aliphatic hydrocarbons be brominated in the presence of light?
I might be wrong here, but I remember that a way to differentiate between saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons was adding bromine to them and
putting both in a dark place: The unsaturated hydrocarbon reacts with bromine in the absence of light, whilst the saturated one only does so in the
presence of light...
Or am I mistaken?
Edit: Check Organic Chemistry, Wade, Seventh Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 4. They give the example of Propane being halogenated at 25C, in the presence
of light.
Also claim that:
Br2 -> 2 Br Radicals: Activation energy of 192 kJ per mole.
CH4 + Br radical -> CH3 radical + HBr: Activation energy of 75 kJ per mole.
CH3 radical + Br2 -> CH3Br + Br radical: Activation energy of 4 kJ per mole.
Edit2:
I'm NOT suggesting that chloroform will be halogenated under these conditions. I'm only saying aliphatic hydrocarbons can be halogenated at STP.
Edit3:
Also, if I'm not mistaken, the standard, commercial procedures for making chloromethane is not halogenation of methane, but a reaction involving
methanol and HCl, which does require high temperatures and a catalyst.
[Edited on 12-8-2015 by Sniffity]
|
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Sniffity | | Quote: Originally posted by Amos | | Quote: Originally posted by byko3y | Man, I was breathing with dichloromethane and chloroform fumes and I'm completely okay. Moreover, some time ago chloroform was used for analgesia. But
tetrachlorocarbon is dangerous, because is metabolized into phosgen. Unstabilized chloroform is also dangerous after long or improper storage.
Also, I don't get it how you are going to halogenate anything in unsaturated hydrocarbon - your solvent will be halogenated first. Correct me if I'm
wrong. |
You are wrong, so I'll correct you. Halogenation of aliphatic hydrocarbons, at least when the halogen is chlorine, bromine, or iodine, doesn't just
happen when you combine the two on their own at STP. The procedure for making chloromethanes, for example, requires very high temperatures and
pressure and perhaps a catalyst as well. Dichloromethane and chloroform are generally suitable solvents for bromination, as can be seen here: https://youtu.be/6tEs7P6UUVQ?t=15m30s |
Shouldn't chains (3+ carbons) of aliphatic hydrocarbons be brominated in the presence of light?
I might be wrong here, but I remember that a way to differentiate between saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons was adding bromine to them and
putting both in a dark place: The unsaturated hydrocarbon reacts with bromine in the absence of light, whilst the saturated one only does so in the
presence of light...
Or am I mistaken?
Edit: Check Organic Chemistry, Wade, Seventh Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 4. They give the example of Propane being halogenated at 25C, in the presence
of light.
Also claim that:
Br2 -> 2 Br Radicals: Activation energy of 192 kJ per mole.
CH4 + Br radical -> CH3 radical + HBr: Activation energy of 75 kJ per mole.
CH3 radical + Br2 -> CH3Br + Br radical: Activation energy of 4 kJ per mole.
Edit2:
I'm NOT suggesting that chloroform will be halogenated under these conditions. I'm only saying aliphatic hydrocarbons can be halogenated at STP.
Edit3:
Also, if I'm not mistaken, the standard, commercial procedures for making chloromethane is not halogenation of methane, but a reaction involving
methanol and HCl, which does require high temperatures and a catalyst.
[Edited on 12-8-2015 by Sniffity] |
I said chloromethanes, as in all 4 chlorides of methane. And yes, chloromethane itself has a separate route, but I was just saying that to illustrate
how difficult it is to directly halogenate methane.
A halogenation at 25 C of propane likely requires pressure; after all, propane is a gas at standard pressure at that temperature while bromine is not.
And I imagine "light" refers to a UV source. So though to some extent some bromination of straight-chain alkanes may occur given simply light
exposure, it shouldn't be a risk for DCM or chloroform, because these are commonly used as lab solvents for bromine during brominations.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
