| Pages:
1
2 |
antimon
Harmless
Posts: 33
Registered: 24-6-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Homemade Birkeland-Eyde reactor?
Hi, guys. I have some free time now i have an hour busride ahead of me. 
I just have to ask and see if any of you have made a Birkeland-Eyde reactor yourselves?
I am asking because i recently found the thread on the Birkeland-Eyde process here on sciencemadness, and it seems like a very interesting process to
me.
Also it is very hard to come by HNO3 these days, and it would be wonderful if you were just able to make it yourself at home.
I have googled it and i have read a bunch of stuff on it, and there are even a couple of clips on YouTube with people showing off their own homemade
reactors, and that got me thinking about making one myself.
I have been working on a 555-timer ignition coil driver circuit for a while now, to make a Jacobs ladder, and i thought that it would be perfect for
making the arc.
I have read that many people use neon sign transformers, but i was hoping that i wouldnt be forced to buy one of those, and the ignition coil would
be sufficient?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
violet sin
International Hazard
Posts: 1475
Registered: 2-9-2012
Location: Daydreaming of uraninite...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Good
|
|
for the sake of reading with your bit of free time, take a look at oil burner ignition transformers. I like mine. but I haven't tried running it for
hours on end. I have read a few places where you can submerge them in oil to facilitate better cooling. I do know that with 2 platinum tips on the
electrodes, I was able to fill a mason jar with orange haze quickly. noticeably strong rusty color in 30-45 seconds. though I have never revisited
the issue. workspace is in my basement, so no more of that making toxic gas. have fun play safe, and read the existing thread through if you havent
already
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | I like mine. but I haven't tried running it for hours on end. |
It will burn out if left running!
Thermal cut-out required . . .
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
I've posted some of my frustrations here, and other places in that thread.
My employer took an interest in what I was working on, i.e., I'm now getting paid to develop it, so I won't be posting more updates. However, I think
my previous posts will provide some helpful information.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | I'm now getting paid to develop it. |
Now that's interesting ─ tell us more?
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
There was a long ago link to a Russian process designed to use off peak electricity in electric arc generation to make NOX, combine that with
cellulose in unprocessed farm chaff/straw/cellulosic byproducts and have an essentially free solid Nitrogen fertilizer... It's on here somewhere.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
My hobbies and work tend to overlap. The majority of my projects are duplications of earlier research, much of it 100+ years old. When they become
more than that I need to get prior approval before posting them (which I sometimes can). Sometimes things go the other way, and my little projects
turn into actual work. If it wasn't for my employer's generosity, I wouldn't have the resources to contribute much in any case.
Ammonia oxidation is more economical on the industrial scale than the BE process. On the lab scale, however, the economics are reversed. There are
several commercial areas where a reliable supply of on-demand nitric acid might be useful. We're currently aiming towards a small unit that will
operate > 1 year without requiring significant maintenance. Of course, the efficiency will have to rival the original industrial process, and be
fairly safe to operate indoors.
I'm all ears for ideas regarding potentially viable markets. The wider the market, the more likely this will become available, and that would
probably benefit SM members in some way.
Thanks, Bert. I'll see if I can find the patent that you're referring to. It doesn't ring a bell off the top of my head.
|
|
|
Fulmen
International Hazard
Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
WGTR: I have a hard-on right now 
We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
|
|
|
Aurium
Harmless
Posts: 46
Registered: 4-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
Yea WGTR what do work on?
Even an engineer wouldn't have that freedom of interest at his job. 
About the reactor, well there have been many many of these Birkeland–Eyde process reactors based on arcs, maybe we could try something different.
I'm thinking about experiment with lower or higher chamber pressures, see if that improves efficiency,
or doing something totally different which is building a reactor that works based on corona discharge, or (another different thing), a Dielectric
barrier discharge.
I know I know the main theory about these arc reactors is that it's the arc's extreme temperatures doing the chemistry happen, but them again, any one
of the methods I mention also create allot of free nitrogen ions, and at much higher efficiency.
Read on EHD thrusters or lifters.
|
|
|
antimon
Harmless
Posts: 33
Registered: 24-6-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I was thinking about trying to apply pressure to see what happens. That would be interesting. But i guess that must have been done before.
WGTR: I tried to click the link, but i couldnt go any further. Its not a safe website it say. 
Anyway, it is interesting work you do. I wish you best luck with it, and im looking forward to seeing your process.
I was thinking about this ignition coil, and if that would work. If it is too weak or too strong power.
I have read about using the oil ignition coil, but right now i only have the VW Golf ignition coil and i want to check it out to see what its good
for.
I want to do this right, so it will be as efficient as possible, so i was thinking about the driver circuit. Are the 555 circuit good enough to
control the coil, or should i maybe look at another circuit design?
Thanks for all the replies.
|
|
|
antimon
Harmless
Posts: 33
Registered: 24-6-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yesterday i read in some patent that the electric arc that was used in that reactor was flattened out with the help of a electromagnet.
How do you do this?
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
It is a fun job
Arc deflection is related to arc current and magnetic field strength. If it doesn't deflect, then the current isn't high enough for long enough time,
with a strong enough magnetic field.
You can follow the links safely. If you look at the links, they point to the HTTPS version of Sciencemadness. I get this message all the time.
Polverone has explained it here:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=25296
|
|
|
antimon
Harmless
Posts: 33
Registered: 24-6-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
WGTR: im going to check it out. I'll send you a pm if thats ok?
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
Have you reviewed this thread?
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=1518&a...
I commend those trying to develop an efficient NO generator. But I think the real rub is going to be absorbing NO2 in water effectively.
[Edited on 22-10-2015 by Magpie]
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Maybe NaOH could help a bit... making a mix of Na nitrate and nitrite?
NO2 + H2O --> HONO + HONO2
3 NO2 + H2O --> 2 HONO2 + NO
Alternatively NH3 would make only NH4NO3 since NH4NO2 decompose to N2 and H2O.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by WGTR  | My hobbies and work tend to overlap. The majority of my projects are duplications of earlier research, much of it 100+ years old. When they become
more than that I need to get prior approval before posting them (which I sometimes can). Sometimes things go the other way, and my little projects
turn into actual work. If it wasn't for my employer's generosity, I wouldn't have the resources to contribute much in any case.
Ammonia oxidation is more economical on the industrial scale than the BE process. On the lab scale, however, the economics are reversed. There are
several commercial areas where a reliable supply of on-demand nitric acid might be useful. We're currently aiming towards a small unit that will
operate > 1 year without requiring significant maintenance. Of course, the efficiency will have to rival the original industrial process, and be
fairly safe to operate indoors.
I'm all ears for ideas regarding potentially viable markets. The wider the market, the more likely this will become available, and that would
probably benefit SM members in some way.
|
On-site production of fixed nitrogen for agriculture, maybe? I like the <a href="http://www.sundropfarms.com/facilities/">Sundrop
Farms</a> greenhouse concept, and there are likely times when they have surplus PV electricity. If you could combine e.g. limestone with surplus
electricity and water to make a nitrate solution, that would be a good use for otherwise-wasted electricity plus make the facility even more self
sufficient.
There might also be opportunities at a larger scale doing the same with off-grid farms that have solar or wind power. Most of the world's fixed
nitrogen demand goes toward farming, and intermittent renewables that sometimes produce surpluses are becoming more common, so if you can hitch your
reactor to those trends I think you'll have plenty of room for growth.
PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
Sure!
Yes, I've researched that thread thoroughly. I also obtained a copy of Webb's "The Absorption of Nitrous
Gases". It's a useful book and enjoyable to read.
The absorption problem can be a difficult one, but there are viable options for attacking it.
| Quote: Originally posted by PHILOU Zrealone |
Maybe NaOH could help a bit... making a mix of Na nitrate and nitrite?
NO2 + H2O --> HONO + HONO2
3 NO2 + H2O --> 2 HONO2 + NO
Alternatively NH3 would make only NH4NO3 since NH4NO2 decompose to N2 and H2O. |
I've given the idea some
thought. Right now, though, we're trying to fix nitrogen from air, so adding ammonia feels like "cheating" in a way. We'll probably use an alkaline
scrubber to capture what doesn't get properly absorbed, but otherwise we're intending to just make the acid. For hydroponic applications, I think it
would be best to decouple the nitrate additions from any cations such as calcium, ammonium, etc (which can be added separately if needed), so having
the acid itself would be more useful.
| Quote: Originally posted by Polverone | On-site production of fixed nitrogen for agriculture, maybe? I like the <a href="http://www.sundropfarms.com/facilities/">Sundrop
Farms</a> greenhouse concept, and there are likely times when they have surplus PV electricity. If you could combine e.g. limestone with surplus
electricity and water to make a nitrate solution, that would be a good use for otherwise-wasted electricity plus make the facility even more self
sufficient.
There might also be opportunities at a larger scale doing the same with off-grid farms that have solar or wind power. Most of the world's fixed
nitrogen demand goes toward farming, and intermittent renewables that sometimes produce surpluses are becoming more common, so if you can hitch your
reactor to those trends I think you'll have plenty of room for growth. |
We were talking about how useful
something like this might be for a farm out in the middle of nowhere, with limited access to resources. I wasn't aware of an agricultural operation
that was actually operating this way, though. I really appreciate your input; it turned on a few light bulbs for me. I'm willing to bet that they
don't get their nitrates from seawater.
|
|
|
Fulmen
International Hazard
Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
I agree, a straight acid generator will be the most versatile, any neutralization can be done in a separate step allowing virtually any nitrate to be
manufactured with the same setup.
The biggest issue as I see it is absorption and the ability to reuse the NO produced in that step. With straight air you're pretty much doomed to
eject that NO as you have a surplus of N2, a zeolite oxygen generator should allow feeding it with a perfect gas blend allowing greater efficiency.
We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | The absorption problem can be a difficult one, but there are viable options for attacking it. |
An idea mentioned here a few times ─ that of combining the effluent of an ozone generator with that of a BE generator to oxidise half of the formed
NO2 in the stream to form the anhydride would certainly solve the absorption problem!
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Fulmen |
The biggest issue as I see it is absorption and the ability to reuse the NO produced in that step. With straight air you're pretty much doomed to
eject that NO as you have a surplus of N2, a zeolite oxygen generator should allow feeding it with a perfect gas blend allowing greater efficiency.
|
If you could separate the NO from the N2 then you could recycle it. But that likely is a tall order also.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3558
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Since a hot electric arc is used to produce NO
could a high voltage corona discharge be used, either before or after the arc
to generate ozone which would rapidly convert NO to NO2 ?
OR (total speculation here, never tried)
could the equipment be run at low enough pressure to use a plasma discharge which might produce ozone and NO2 simultaneously?
[Edited on 24-10-2015 by Sulaiman]
|
|
|
Fulmen
International Hazard
Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
No, separating out the NO doesn't sound feasible to me either. Could it be utilized for something else fun?
We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | Since a hot electric arc is used to produce NO
could a high voltage corona discharge be used, either before or after the arc
to generate ozone which would rapidly convert NO to NO2 ?
OR (total speculation here, never tried)
could the equipment be run at low enough pressure to use a plasma discharge which might produce ozone and NO2 simultaneously? |
The NO formed is readily oxidised by free oxygen on cooling but ozone will oxidise NO2.
2NO2 + O ─> N2O5
Being the anhydride of HNO3, N2O5 reacts readily with water, forming HNO3 with no off-gassing!
Airfed ozonisers produce NO2 in addition to O3 if the air contains moisture but amounts are largely uncontrollable . . . ?
|
|
|
Fulmen
International Hazard
Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
Ozone seems like a viable idea, either by passing the cooled output from the arc reactor (does have a nice ring to it, eh) through an ozone generator
or possibly by absorbing it into ozonated water?
Hissingnoise: While NO is oxidized by air to NO2 the reaction is slow, especially in low concentrations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Formation_and_reactions
I would expect ozone to primarily increase this reaction, although some anhydride could be formed as well. Either way, yields should improve.
The BE-process is said to produce up to 4% NO, ozone generators should be able to produce ozone in similar concentrations. So it seems like it's
possible to produce enough ozone for this to be possible.
[Edited on 24-10-15 by Fulmen]
We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | | Hissingnoise: While NO is oxidized by air to NO2 the reaction is slow, especially in low concentrations. |
Indeed yes, the process requires a large chamber for oxidation to occur prior to absorption . . .
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
