| Pages:
1
2 |
feacetech
Hazard to Others
Posts: 163
Registered: 12-2-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by chemrox  | | Have you tried evaporating the water to see what mass is left and compared that to the residue from the input water? A good analytical balance would
be key. |
Or you could use conductivity to estimate TDS I have compared the two methods before in cooling water and found them to line up almost exactly
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by chemrox | | Quote: Originally posted by neptunium | How about strong radioactive source exposure? Depending on the source it requires a one time purchase and a lifetime of fun without any chemicals
added to the water...
God knows there is plenty of powerful source going around. For a modest increase on the electric bill, you could use Xrays as well! No need for
source removal at all!!
|
I corrected your spelling for you.. I realize the spell checker here is a little light on vocabulary but
still...
so do you mean transmutation of Pb to Au? I believe the expense would be horrendous and not available using x-ray machines. |
Yes thanks I am not writing from home and this tablet is awkward .
No I meant a strong radioactive source externally mounted in the context of the bio sterilization conversation we were having.not the lead
contamination. In order to bypass the use of harsh chemicals. I know UV usually do the trick I was just pushing the envelope a little with more
ionizing radiation.
Nothing to do with transmutation . getting rid of the lead was not the subject.thanks for clarifying
[Edited on 27-1-2016 by neptunium]
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
