Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Propane/Acetylene torches
Odyssèus
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 50
Registered: 7-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-9-2006 at 12:30
Propane/Acetylene torches


Is there much of a difference between propane and acetylene (Burning in the atmosphere, not oxy-acetylene) torches? I have a propane torch and I'm having trouble melting common metals like copper, aluminum, gold, which have MPs well below the operating temperature of my torch (~1800 C I think). I would like to try an acetylene bottle with my torch but my parents are worried about safety.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chromium
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 284
Registered: 27-6-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: reactive

[*] posted on 3-9-2006 at 12:40


Do not know for sure but i suppose that acetylene does not make much difference. Oxygen is needed for high temperature flame.

I did some tests with burning hydrogen and even it is almost useless without oxygen supply.


[Edited on 3-9-2006 by chromium]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 3-9-2006 at 14:21


Acetylene has a higher flame temp, but it's a lot more expensive.

Use more insulation, I melt copper and aluminum all the time. Heck I did a bunch of silver soldering (on copper) with my propane torch just the other day.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Odyssèus
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 50
Registered: 7-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-9-2006 at 15:18


What type of setup do you use? Ceramic crucible? What volume can you usually melt at one time?

[Edited on 3-9-2006 by Odyssèus]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 3-9-2006 at 16:44


I have a #6 crucible furnace, lightweight insulating refractory, whatever ceramic or metal crucible I'm using. But in general, heating stuff against a firebrick or kaowool I could easily melt copper. In the interests of speed and efficiency, I'd put more bricks around something quite that hot, of course.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Twospoons
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1281
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline

Mood: A trace of hope...

[*] posted on 3-9-2006 at 20:31


The old fashsioned kerosene blow-lamps also put out some serious heat. I can melt copper and silver with mine. And I love the roar it makes when its running!

12AX7's suggestion is best - use more / better insulation. Without that you need a seriously big torch.




Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Odyssèus
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 50
Registered: 7-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-9-2006 at 13:50


Well, thanks for the help. But...

I surrounded my torch head and ceramic crucible with solid red gardening bricks. The crucible had a good red glow over the entire bottom surface of it. When I went to look at my copper though a minute later it was only a little oxidised. I blasted it for atleast 10 minutes but it refused to melt. There wasnt very much contact between the bottom of the crucible and the copper though.

I'm going to try and find some online literature on this... I thought it was pretty straitforward. :P
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 14-9-2006 at 15:17


Ten minutes? It takes a good two hours to soak up a full furnace. (At full throttle an insulating furnace can do copper in under half an hour.)

To melt copper you really need some sort of furnace. At least stack those bricks so there is very little gap for radiation to pass. They may be prone to cracking, spalling or melting, being common brick, and will require a lot more fire than insulating bricks.

Copper melts at a good yellow heat, almost twice what you were at (maybe only 30% more, if you were viewing in sunlight).

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Odyssèus
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 50
Registered: 7-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-9-2006 at 16:00


Oh, wow. I suppose I had a few misconceptions about this. I'm going to see if I can find some insulating bricks and try again.

Thanks for your help.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
BioChemMajor
Harmless
*




Posts: 10
Registered: 13-9-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-9-2006 at 08:08


MAPP gas i believe burns hotter than propane, and will work with most propane torches, and i saw that a local hardware superstore has small oxgen bottles and a oxygen/MAPP torch setup (says it can cut 1/4" steel) while this probably isn't as good a oxy/acetelyne you could get the heat from using oxygen AND fuel, yet not have to have an expensive torch, and big oxy/acetelyne cylinders. (the cylinders were the same size as the propane cylinders used for small torches)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
not_important
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-9-2006 at 08:16


If you can find local pottery makers, they may have some old insulating firebricks from thier kilns that you can get for little cost or free. You can simply stack them to form a small enclosure that will greatly reduce heat loss. I've reached cone 10, 1250 C or so, with a propane tourch in such.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Odyssèus
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 50
Registered: 7-3-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-9-2006 at 10:47


Well, I would use MAPP/acetylene and even oxygen, but for some reason my parents think it would be much more dangerous than propane. The only reason they let me use a propane torch is because a relative gave me the torch tip/head that you screw onto the bottle. They suggested I ask about melting stuff here before they would let me buy something besides propane.

[Edited on 16-9-2006 by Odyssèus]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
froot
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: refluxed

[*] posted on 16-9-2006 at 11:14


Acetylene is being slowly phased out in industry here because of it's hazardous properties. If I remember correctly, 5% acetylene contamination in air in a confined space can explode violently if sparked. I used to mix acetylene with air in plastic bags and set them off, made the most wicked bangs! The stuff is nasty. There have been accidents in the past where oxygen from full bottles would leak back into empty acetylene bottles, turning them into deadly bombs. There was an instance near where I live where an entire house was removed from its foundations from one of these.
Propane on the other hand is alot safer, but burns colder. They are now mixing propane with additives, such as butane in order to achieve a hotter burn.




We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top