Adipocerex
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 22-7-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Wonderful aromatic compound identification
Hey SM!
In an experiment yesterday i made some Sodium Ethoxide (i presume) from adding small chunks of Na to anhydrous ethanol which was dried on calcium
chloride. (A bit of the calcium chloride stayed in solution) The ethanol might contain butanone still as well
CH3CH2OH + Na = CH3CH2NaO + H2
Just for the thrill of it i added about 1 drop of H2SO4 to the aqueous solution and a white precipitate crashed out. I have vacuum dried the chrystals
which crashed out from solution. And both the solution & the chrystals have a wonderful sweet smell of raspberry.
What on earth have i made?  Is cannot be an aromatic Ester?.
CH3CH2NaO + H2SO4 + CH3CH2OH = ?
Ethanol + Calcium Chloride(s) + Na(s) + H2SO4 = ?
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
How much butanone? It's possible you made some aldol condensation products.
|
|
|
Adipocerex
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 22-7-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Percentage wise it there is maybe <2% of the weight of the ethanol solution. The weight of the solution is about 8 grams. So it is really not much
|
|
|
Endo
Hazard to Others
Posts: 124
Registered: 5-1-2006
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cold
|
|
Calcium chloride is considered incompatible for use drying alcohols because it facilitates condensation product formation. It also often has small
amounts of hydroxides present (Ca(OH)2) which can increase the pH of the solution and cause side reactions in addition to drying. So it all depends
on how long your ethanol was drying, how pure your CaCl2 was, and what species formed before you started your experiment.
Details on CaCl2 as a drying agent:
http://www.chem.ucla.edu/~bacher/Specialtopics/Drying%20Agen...
https://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/equipment/d...
|
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
I assume this is a typo, but just to be sure, you didn't really add sulfuric acid to the aqueous solution?
Of note, of course, is that sodium sulfate is white and insoluble in ethanol. I don't know what the raspberry smell would be.
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 819
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
Calcium Sulfate.
|
|
|
froot
Hazard to Others
Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: refluxed
|
|
Side reaction producing acetaldehyde?
We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com |
|
|
Adipocerex
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 22-7-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Have i just accidentally created a new method of producing raspberry aroma?
Side note: I forgot that it was not only H2SO4 but a weak piranha solution.
And it is highly likely Calcium Sulfate the white precipitate and maybe the raspberry smell is some analogue of 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one)) or
ethyl formate?
http://www.compoundchem.com/2014/09/18/raspberries/
|
|
|
Adipocerex
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 22-7-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Nobody? Nobody can tell me which the aromatic compound is? Butanone, Sodium, H2O2, Sodium Ethoxide, Ethanol, H2SO4, CaCl2 forms?
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Maybe CH3-CH2-CO-CH=C(-CH3)-CH2-CH3 or higher condensation products or oxydation products due to H2O2 --> epoxyde or gem-diol.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Adipocerex  | | Nobody? Nobody can tell me which the aromatic compound is? Butanone, Sodium, H2O2, Sodium Ethoxide, Ethanol, H2SO4, CaCl2 forms?
|
No, because frankly that isn't a chemical reaction, that's throwing a bunch of crap in a flask. All that
anyone can do is speculate vaguely. Also, it's very misleading the way that you keep throwing around the word "aromatic." I hope that you aren't
implying that you believe this compound exhibits aromaticity, and are just referring to the way it smells.
Start over, and do it in a more controlled way. Measure the amounts of everything that you use. Know for certain how pure your reagents are. Then
describe exactly what you did, clearly.
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
In fact aromatic compounds (benzen family) are intitially called aromatic because many such compounds where extracted/isolated from natural source
used as seasonings/spices for cooking or for perfumery and in french (famous for cooking, perfumery and chemistry at that time) seasonings are called
"aromates" (giving an aroma to food or displaying a good aroma). The adjective is "aromatic" thus what displays such particularity of giving an aroma
recalling seasonings or natural perfumes.
So thymol from thyme, vanillin from vanilla, carvacrol from oregano, toluen from tolu balm, safrole from sasafras, estragole from basil, anethole from
anis, ....but also terpenic compounds belongs to the aromatic following the french definition and remains in the perfumery, cooking language...aswel
as (al)chemical one for long...but this is of course misleading if one is refering to the conjugated cyclohexatriene structure...
[Edited on 16-8-2016 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Yes, I'm aware of the origins of the term, and it's still fine to use it in a non-scientific setting, but in modern scientific discourse, the use of
the word "aromatic" to describe the odor of a compound should be avoided. Just my two cents on that matter. The main problem the OP has is still the
lack of a definite procedure and any controls, but if he/she were to try again in a more controlled way, we could have something to work with.
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
16-8-2016 at 11:54 |
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
@P-Z
cyclohexatriene – That's not a word you hear every day. 
I agree with zts. Try again while controlling your variables.
It is these kind of serendipitous observations that propel science in new directions. (Yesterday I read about extracting gold using cornstarch - a
process discovered by accident.)
But it is the skill of a scientist to make careful initial observations (well done) ask the right questions (also well done) and perform a
carefully-controlled investigation to determine what the hell is going on.
We can of course speculate on the source of the raspberry smell and may even have a chance of being correct. But from this distance there is no way
of knowing. OTOH, if you were to replicate with known concentrations and then post your procedure -- it is likely that we will get better answers.
If I was to guess, I would say some kind of ester had been formed. But, as with many aromas, it is likely to be a mixture of compounds -- especially
likely in this case where there are a large number of reagents and the smell probably comes from assorted side reactions involving impurities.
Keep us informed.
|
|
|
thanos thanatos
Harmless
Posts: 23
Registered: 8-9-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I also agree with zts16. This is a chemistry forum, so aromatic means something quite specific here that has nothing to do with how a compound smells.
However, PHILOU's post would make you think that saying a molecule is aromatic means it has a phenyl group in it. Aromaticity is a much more general
property. Aromaticity is a property of cyclic organic molecules (either all carbon or heterocyclic) with alternating single and double bonds. These
molecules have resonance structures that distribute the electron density more evenly around the ring, thus stabilizing the molecule. Benzene and
phenyl groups are just the most well known example of aromatic molecules.
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by thanos thanatos | I also agree with zts16. This is a chemistry forum, so aromatic means something quite specific here that has nothing to do with how a compound smells.
However, PHILOU's post would make you think that saying a molecule is aromatic means it has a phenyl group in it. Aromaticity is a much more general
property. Aromaticity is a property of cyclic organic molecules (either all carbon or heterocyclic) with alternating single and double bonds. These
molecules have resonance structures that distribute the electron density more evenly around the ring, thus stabilizing the molecule. Benzene and
phenyl groups are just the most well known example of aromatic molecules. |
The OP wrote "smell" and "aromatic ester" ... by definition noze can hardly be a detector or sp2 aromaticity...it is subjective description used by
perfumers! 
If you read carefully my comment:
"In fact aromatic compounds (benzen family) are intitially called aromatic because many such compounds were extracted/isolated from natural source"
You will notice the history signification of my explanation.
The term aromatic was first introduced in early 1855 by August Wilhelm von Hofmann while the Erich Huckel rules
dates from 1930 (defined pyrole and thiophen as being aromatic) and later on based on Hückel's those from Woodward–Hoffmann's work from 1965...thus
a century later!
 
I know what aromaticity is...I have worked and synthesized PHEHAT ligand (= 1,10-phenanthroline[5,6-b]-1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene) a fully
polycyclic-heteroaromatic-extended system of 7 fuzed benzen rings.
Many of my posts and drawings into this forum illustrate my understanding of it
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
thanos thanatos
Harmless
Posts: 23
Registered: 8-9-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by PHILOU Zrealone | | Quote: Originally posted by thanos thanatos | I also agree with zts16. This is a chemistry forum, so aromatic means something quite specific here that has nothing to do with how a compound smells.
However, PHILOU's post would make you think that saying a molecule is aromatic means it has a phenyl group in it. Aromaticity is a much more general
property. Aromaticity is a property of cyclic organic molecules (either all carbon or heterocyclic) with alternating single and double bonds. These
molecules have resonance structures that distribute the electron density more evenly around the ring, thus stabilizing the molecule. Benzene and
phenyl groups are just the most well known example of aromatic molecules. |
The OP wrote "smell" and "aromatic ester" ... by definition noze can hardly be a detector or sp2 aromaticity...it is subjective description used by
perfumers!
If you read carefully my comment:
"In fact aromatic compounds (benzen family) are intitially called aromatic because many such compounds were extracted/isolated from natural source"
You will notice the history signification of my explanation.
The term aromatic was first introduced in early 1855 by August Wilhelm von Hofmann while the Erich Huckel rules
dates from 1930 (defined pyrole and thiophen as being aromatic) and later on based on Hückel's those from Woodward–Hoffmann's work from 1965...thus
a century later!
I know what aromaticity is...I have worked and synthesized PHEHAT ligand (= 1,10-phenanthroline[5,6-b]-1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene) a fully
polycyclic-heteroaromatic-extended system of 7 fuzed benzen rings.
Many of my posts and drawings into this forum illustrate my understanding of it |
You are quite right on the history of the term aromatic as it applies to chemistry, and I think it's naturally confusing when the term means two very
different things, depending on context. Generally, the context in this forum is chemistry.
I didn't mean to imply that you didn't know what aromaticity was. It's just that your post gave the impression that aromaticity, in the chemical
sense, was "refering to the conjugated cyclohexatriene structure...", which doesn't really capture what aromaticity, in the chemical sense of the
word, really means. After all, benzene is not 1,3,5-cyclohexatriene.
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Benzene is 1,3,5- and 2,4,6-cyclohexatriene at the same time (thus
1,2,3,4,5,6-cyclohexatriene)
Live with that chemistry has its roots into alchemistry...so you will always have some sticky sulfurous ambiguous names because of the perpetuation of
those into less scientific fields (cooking, perfumery, potery, grocery, pharmacy, naturopathy, alchemistry, homeopathy, ...).
I used to like to know where this or that chemical name came from and why...it is very instructive.
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
FYI, modern terminology for this use of "aromatic compound" is "aroma compound." Less confusing.
|
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
Because other people are being unnecessarily mean, I'll try and do the opposite. Lots of discoveries have been made by throwing a bunch of crap
together and then noticing that the crap behaved in interesting, unexpected ways. Plenty of famous chemists have made discoveries this way. It's how
they discovered that vanillin could be synthesized from wood pulp, (vats of lignin dissolved in NaOH would start smelling like vanilla after a few
days) and a former waste product became the source of something that was formerly extremely valuable and expensive. The key now is to try and
replicate it. Figure out what parts react, and in what order. If it has a fruity smell to it, it's probably an ester, so we can narrow it down that
way. The key now, is to do actual science, and learn something new using the scientific method. Good luck!
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
